• No responses have been submitted.
  • EXAMPLE ANSWER (Mr Stewart)

    ARGUMENT: Sweatshops are not necessary. It is more important for people in poor countries to have human rights than for people in rich countries to have cheap clothes.

    EXAMPLE: For example, sweatshop workers do not get paid enough money to live on and miss out on many human rights, including the "right to a fair wage".

    CONCLUSION: Sweatshops do more harm than good. Sweatshop bosses are too greedy. There are better factories to work in.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.