Amazon.com Widgets
  • Y.E.S, they are

    If they have no supply from US, Western, Saudi, UAE, Quatar, they will die. Have no ideal and fight for money, they are mercenary of US and Western. Only it could explain, why they shot at their people, bombing Allah's pantheon. Syrian civil war is a part of Arab Spring. Hey 46% say no, how do you feel, if US support an armed group to mutiny your country and they called it is for freedom, democracy ? Do you happy ? Of course you feel happy, because that armed group and Syrian rebels are the same

  • Yes yes yes

    They don't have such thing like liberalism or secularsim as they majority of themy follow wahhabi stream of Islam so can't expect them to change at all
    Secondly crimes committed by then are more heinous but the mainstream media doesn't cover as Western countries have partial and biased opinion against the current syrian government
    Thanks

  • Yes yes yes

    Yes
    As they are not willing to talk or negotiate secondly wahhabi mainstream doesn't believe in secularism or liberalism and majority of them follow Saudi wahhabi stream
    Secondly crimes committed by then are more heinous but the mainstream media doesn't cover as Western countries have partial and biased opinion against the current syrian government
    Thanks

  • Yes yes yes

    Yes
    As they are not willing to talk or negotiate secondly wahhabi mainstream doesn't believe in secularism or liberalism and majority of them follow Saudi wahhabi stream
    Secondly crimes committed by then are more heinous but the mainstream media doesn't cover as Western countries have partial and biased opinion against the current syrian government
    Thanks

  • By definition yes. By mass propaganda no.

    There is no debate about them being terrorists, it's a matter of definition. There is also no debate that these "rebels" have the support of only a minority in Syria, but full support of the west. It's amazing that this subject is even considered to be debatable; one needs to be really well indoctrinated to think otherwise.

  • They are terrorists

    Rebels by definition attack and kill personnel and infrastructure of a sovereign nation. This is basically the exact definition of a terrorist. The only difference between terrorists and rebels are the names themselves. Calling a group one or the other really says more about the people naming them than it does of the groups.

  • Technically, yes they are.

    Based on the social construction of terrorist in the United States of America, the Syrian rebels are terrorists. I think the question comes into should we question the driving force behind actions when defining someone as a terrorist, activist, or some other related title based on the purpose of the actions.

  • They are by definition

    It would be impossible to argue otherwise. Whether you agree with their reasons and beliefs or not, it does not change the fact that they have performed actions which would be categorized as terrorist. It is not necessary to determine if an organizations intentions are good or not to call them terrorist. This can go for first world countries, also.

  • Both Sides Are Terrorists

    One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. That said, the Syrian rebels have the majority of the population embracing their cause, and the Syrian regime is fighting a losing battle with increasing brutality. If it wasn't for Russian support, the rebels would have won the civil war by now.

    Posted by: rpr
  • No, they are not.

    One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, I believe the expression goes. The Syrian rebels are simply fighting for what they believe in, and are doing their absolute best to save themselves from a brutal regime that has ruled over them for so very long. They are not terrorists.

  • Gvnj h h

    Ghggvxdjxs t d e f y. S f g f d d d d d. D d d d f. F g t d s a a s f f f . F d. D d f f f f f. R f f f f d d f d u u.

  • They are not

    The people which are forced to immigrate from their own homeland
    and calling them terrorists? These people have no house , food or stay to where can be safe.
    Russians saying that they are bombing the isis but they are not bombing isis.They are bombing the syrian people.Reason of this fully agreement with Essad to make alliance and a new state for russians himself.I am living in here and i know.And THİNK ABOUT Why immigrants all of going to Europe. Reason of course affect the Europe. That is plan of russians.

  • They are not

    The people which are forced to immigrate from their own homeland
    and calling them terrorists? These people have no house , food or stay to where can be safe.
    Russians saying that they are bombing the isis but they are not bombing isis.They are bombing the syrian people.Reason of this fully agreement with Essad to make alliance and a new state for russians himself.I am living in here and i know.And THİNK ABOUT Why immigrants all of going to Europe. Reason of course affect the Europe. That is plan of russians.

  • They are not

    The people which are forced to immigrate from their own homeland
    and calling them terrorists? These people have no house , food or stay to where can be safe.
    Russians saying that they are bombing the isis but they are not bombing isis.They are bombing the syrian people.Reason of this fully agreement with Essad to make alliance and a new state for russians himself.I am living in here and i know.And THİNK ABOUT Why immigrants all of going to Europe. Reason of course affect the Europe. That is plan of russians.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.