• Especially on our healthcare system

    It's difficult to understand how it can be justified spending thousands of dollars on keeping people alive who don't have a chance to get better. They cost our healthcare system far more than any other age group put together. And many people who ever really worked will get more of a pension than I ever will.

  • Elderly ain't nothing but trouble...

    The elderly are a burden on society. Financially they are a huge drain making up half the benefit bill on their own, even though they would prefer you to blame the single mums and immigrants.
    They wander around clogging up the pavements whilst striking up mindless conversation with cash machines and trying to argue with self service checkouts.
    I propose that there should be an OAP curfew imposed, allowing them loose on the streets between the hours of 12 and 2pm on a Wednesday. Also that they should have their own checkouts and cash machines (with extra large buttons) so that the rest of us can get on with working hard in order to pax tax so that they may claim a pension and cold weather payments. This is all....

  • Yes the elderly and chronically very ill ARE a burden to society

    Im not talking about older people that are still active and contributing in some way like taking care of grandchildren and giving of useful information that people actually want. I'm talking about elderly people (or even those in their 50s and 60's who act like it) that babble on and on making stories bigger and bigger when no one wants to listen, telling them again and again. They cant listen because they cant hear what your saying, they need a round the clock sitter so they don't hurt themselves by falling OUT of their costly government paid scooter, need someone to feed, change and bathe them, demanding that it be done in style without so much as a thank you many times. Elderly who needed that much care used to die of disease before they became useless, but with the advent of modern medicine, they stay alive on respirators and tubefeeding. When young people want to know what happenedin1920 they need not listen to an elderly persons tainted veiw but instead can get it from online sources or google. So really, what good are those kind of elderly?

  • What do they do?

    Very little add anything to society and most drain it and take it's resources. Some do not even know their children's names there should be a mandatory test for people past a certain age to see if they are still capable of basic tasks such as memory tests and mobility if they fail then they should be euthanized.

  • Social security and health care

    Old people do nothing and expect everything in return. They complain about minor things and cause serious problems to the younger generation. The cost of maintaining them should not be the problem of the younger generation. Older people should maintain themselves or have their children maintain their needs, not other people or society.

  • The elderly need to go.

    The elderly put an economic drain on society. Medical costs and a growing number of pensioners are creating an unsustainable system. Yet, when they don't retire and become pensioners they are useless in the workforce. They don't understand technology and the millions of baby boomers who are hanging around the workforce fill multiple positions that could be replaced with a single educated youth who actually understands how to use time saving technologies. The government and all it's civil services are riddled with them, I know in my department they could cut the number of employees in half just by getting rid of the useless old people.

  • Greatest Generation? Only if mean the generation that cost the greatest amount!

    The elderly sure have worked hard in their lifetimes. They did not have the comforts such as air conditioning, smart phones, or computers that we have today. However, the costs that they have now created for themselves and expect the younger generations to pay for it is inexcusable. They rely almost 100% on social security and medicare. They paid into it yes, but how much do you think they paid? In the 70's..The median pay for a high school teacher was 8 grand. SS contribution was 4%. A whopping 320 dollars was paid that year by people that receive 1220 a month!
    The average cost for a old person that lives to be 80 with medical expenses is $450,000. It costs less to raise a child to 18 that it costs to keep an old person alive from 65 to 80. Do I want to live to be 80? Of course! But I will fully pay for my old age myself through hard work, saving, and investing...The American dream. Not whining and wanting more "entitlements". Not wanting a senior citizen discount. Not expecting people to wait on me and treat me different. When the "greatest generation" is gone...So will massive amounts of debt.

  • Yes they are

    They cost money, most of them don't have a big income thus not paying a lot of taxes, they withraw money from public pension plans (in country that posess public pension plans), etc.

    Also, their "knowledge" is next to useless since most of them don't share their useful knowledge to younger generations.

  • It is not just the elderly

    Elderly people done get more from social security than they pay in, but that is just part of the problem. There is also the problem with people on disability. How is this counrty going to pay for the elderly on social security and the people on disability. If everyone stops working just because they do not fell well there is no money being payed in to it. The system needs fixed.

  • Yes they are..

    The elderly are pretty reliant on Social Security, Medicare, and income based housing. Meanwhile it is the younger generations paying for it. "They paid into it''? No, its not a savings account. They paid for their grandparents generation, and paid much less than they are now receiving. The younger generation is paying for the elderly's cost of living now. So in short, that young family is losing money that would be food for their toddler in order to keep some one who is 90 in comfort. I'm not saying to euthanize the elderly or throw them out onto the streets. However the family who either are, or will grow up to be productive members of society shouldnt lose out, in order to pay for those whose time is done and being artificially extended at cost to taxpayers.

  • Absolutely not, the Elderly belongs in society.

    The elderly have been through it all, seen it all and meant so much to our young lives. Speaking as a young 26 year old, I've only survived big problems in my life as well as gave me a lot of great advice to use in everyday life. I hope that I'm that honorable and wise when I'm older.

  • No, the elderly have contributed much to society.

    Members of the elderly community already contributed much to society during their prior working years. They contributed to taxes and put in money towards social security to stimulate the economy.
    At some point everyone grows older and it is the current generation's responsibility to contribute towards the care of the previous one. The elderly still make contributions to society even though they aren't as noticeable as the achievements of younger citizens.

  • No, the elderly are not a burden on society.

    If anything, the elderly are a great wealth to us. They possess a great deal of old world knowledge, and a level of expertise unknown to the younger generation. They posses the knowledge from real-life experiences, situations and customs that can help lay the path in an effort to maintain honorable values within our current culture. On another note, the elderly population once took care of us, and did not consider it a burden.

  • No, they are not a burden on society.

    Firstly, all these prejudice and generalisations about how the elderly are slow, weak and useless in our society are rather false. Unknown to the folks who voted yes, the elderly still contribute towards our societies as well, even if they may not be contributing directly in the workforce. For the most part, the elderly possess a wide skillset, given that they themselves were part of the workforce, and are the very ones that helped to cultivate the younger, working generation into what they are now. Not only that, some of the elderly are continually cultivating the newest generation as well, as they are the caretakers of the working generation's children when the parents are out working as well.

    Lastly, for the folks who voted yes, you guys are getting older too. How are you going to feel when the younger generation calls you a burden?

  • I object to this prejudice

    Everyone will grow old eventually, and we would expect the younger generation to care for us, just like the elderlys around us. They too, were once young, and had contributed to the society during their youth. So what if health care is spent on them? They are important to someone else, are your grandparents not family to you? The elderly generation took care of us and did not consider it a burden (majority) so why should we do it to them?

  • I object to this prejudice

    Everyone will grow old eventually, and we would expect the younger generation to care for us, just like the elderlys around us. They too, were once young, and had contributed to the society during their youth. So what if health care is spent on them? They are important to someone else, are your grandparents not family to you? The elderly generation took care of us and did not consider it a burden (majority) so why should we do it to them?

  • Definitely, the elderly are not useless to society

    I hope all those who think that we ( and I am over 60) are useless will consider the cost morally that a society will ultimately pay for dismissing any group based on age, a characteristic that all of us will face. It is the last bias and it will creep up on you like the doubled chins and the wrinkled skin. The alternative to age is not pleasant either. So consider well your negative arguments. And, while I am ranting here, I am a retired college professor ( Latin -- another useless subject gone unappreciated. But please folks, though I am not the greatest at spelling, especially on line, I have seen so many grammatical and spelling errors I feel that on-line communication has either suffered because of it or is the cause of it.
    An aged Prof

  • No they are not!

    Beyond any doubt, everyone will grow old.We will eventually become physically weaker hence the things we can do become limited.At a certain point in our life, elderly come to a state where they are not able to contribute to the society, provide and support themselves, they need to rely on the others such as our family for help and care.

  • No, never and neither

    Actually speaking they are the knowledge providers to our children or to the young generation also they are asset to the nation they hold so many keys to success .Some says that their health problems cost us a lot tension but we ought to take care care of them when we become a septugerian then we need help from our kids they just can't ignore it and like wise it goes on expanding.The good thing about being old is not being young they are the true beauty and "a thing of beauty is a joy forever".

  • No they aren't.

    At the end of the day these elderly people will have been the ones who raised you or your parents or your friends parents so why should they be classed as a burden when they never classed you as one. I think they should be treated with some more respect.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.