Amazon.com Widgets

Are there any secular reasons to support traditional gender roles?

Asked by: jjohnmusic11
  • There is always a reason.

    As one argument has already pointed out a argument for traditional gender roles would be reproductive capacites. Now wether or not I agree with the arguement is irrelevant because clearly the arguement exist thus answering the question wether or not there is a secular argument supporting the position. Personally I disagree with that stance but none the less the answer to the proposed question is yes.

  • Coarse there is.

    According to the theory of evolution women stayed inside and nurtured the child(ren). They then began to adapt to it as men began to obtain a high level of physique. It only makes sense that as a species we should play to this to better help our species thrive.

    Also, even without evolution the fact that women are naturally ideal (religious, atheist, and otherwise) for the sole purpose of nurturing the children and the husband, and the husband for working hard and providing for the family.

    As for why their should only be one spouse is because humans are naturally monogamous creatures. And even if this were untrue, it is much more efficient to have one provider per family and one caretaker per family. If the species had multiple providers per caretaker then the species would slowly decline due to a reproductive capability shortage. If their were multiple caretakers it would fail due to a youth population which is too large for the males to provide for.

    The reason should not switch partners is because of an emotional attachment to the partner we had. This attachment is necessary however, as without it the provider would have no reason to care for anyone other than himself and likewise with the female.

    The reason homosexuality is secularly incorrect is because of the inability to reproduce.

  • Yes, yes, yes and yes

    Why not? The fact that 95% of the world are non LGBT means we should be catering to the majority, not turning the world upside down because a vocal minority wants to destroy their way of life to make themselves feel better. This is just the way the world works.

  • Course there is

    Women are inferior aint no doubt about it. They belong in the kitchen cooking and cleaning, not working and voting that's a man's job. Can't ever trust the opinion of somebody who's had a dick in their mouth, and that includes them homosexuals too. Women should cook clean and create more men, as long as they aren't gay.

  • I'm glad my fellow Atheists saw Social Justice as a cult?

    Like others have pointed out evolution told us Women have been best for nurturing and Men have been best for hunting, gathering, and building the greatest and most civilized civilization on the face on the Earth.

    Traditional gender roles create beautiful strong and independent loving Women and handsome strong independent Men.

  • I'm glad my fellow Atheists saw Social Justice as a cult?

    Like others have pointed out evolution told us Women have been best for nurturing and Men have been best for hunting, gathering, and building the greatest and most civilized civilization on the face on the Earth.

    Traditional gender roles create beautiful strong and independent loving Women and handsome strong independent Men.

  • We should support what others want to do, and besides, it's their choice.

    Just put yourself in their shoes, ( Example) You don't want to be yourself and you hate the way you are, not how you look the gender you wanted to be. What else would you do? That is when most people look and choose to be transgender. Then they are happy and it does not matter what people think. But then they realize that everything has to change, their name, how they travel, license, and even some friends. It's hard and all they should be getting is support not hate.

  • We should support what others want to do, and besides, it's their choice.

    Just put yourself in their shoes, ( Example) You don't want to be yourself and you hate the way you are, not how you look the gender you wanted to be. What else would you do? That is when most people look and choose to be transgender. Then they are happy and it does not matter what people think. But then they realize that everything has to change, their name, how they travel, license, and even some friends. It's hard and all they should be getting is support not hate.

  • We should support what others want to do, and besides, it's their choice.

    Just put yourself in their shoes, ( Example) You don't want to be yourself and you hate the way you are, not how you look the gender you wanted to be. What else would you do? That is when most people look and choose to be transgender. Then they are happy and it does not matter what people think. But then they realize that everything has to change, their name, how they travel, license, and even some friends. It's hard and all they should be getting is support not hate.

  • We should support what others want to do, and besides, it's their choice.

    Just put yourself in their shoes, ( Example) You don't want to be yourself and you hate the way you are, not how you look the gender you wanted to be. What else would you do? That is when most people look and choose to be transgender. Then they are happy and it does not matter what people think. But then they realize that everything has to change, their name, how they travel, license, and even some friends. It's hard and all they should be getting is support not hate.

  • Duh duh duh

    According to the theory of evolution women stayed inside and nurtured the child(ren). They then began to adapt to it as men began to obtain a high level of physique. It only makes sense that as a species we should play to this to better help our species thrive.

    Also, even without evolution the fact that women are naturally ideal (religious, atheist, and otherwise) for the sole purpose of nurturing the children and the husband, and the husband for working hard and providing for the family.

    As for why their should only be one spouse is because humans are naturally monogamous creatures. And even if this were untrue, it is much more efficient to have one provider per family and one caretaker per family. If the species had multiple providers per caretaker then the species would slowly decline due to a reproductive capability shortage. If their were multiple caretakers it would fail due to a youth population which is too large for the males to provide for.

    The reason should not switch partners is because of an emotional attachment to the partner we had. This attachment is necessary however, as without it the provider would have no reason to care for anyone other than himself and likewise with the female.

    The reason homosexuality is secularly incorrect is because of the inability to reproduce.

  • There's no longer any reason for them.

    In the past, gender roles have been restrictive because of physical capabilities and needs of humans. But, now, there's no reason for traditional gender roles because women are perfectly capable of any number of jobs formerly done primarily by men, and are oftentimes MORE capable than men at different kinds of work. There's no reason for a workforce of men, and women being caretakers. Men can serve as caretakers for children just as well as women. In the modern world, traditional gender roles are outdated and irrelevant.

    For all these reasons, it's pretty clear that women and men should be considered equal in society and that in the modern world, there are no secular reasons to support such outdated archetypes.

  • I am a radical feminist and I think all men are bad

    Feminists are the master gender and I think that all men should be misogynistic white males should be hunted down and destroyed but not the black guys there cool and women who turn against us Should be hunted down and destroyed. And feminists are master race biches
    Feminism totally rules

  • Duh duh duh

    According to the theory of evolution women stayed inside and nurtured the child(ren). They then began to adapt to it as men began to obtain a high level of physique. It only makes sense that as a species we should play to this to better help our species thrive.

    Also, even without evolution the fact that women are naturally ideal (religious, atheist, and otherwise) for the sole purpose of nurturing the children and the husband, and the husband for working hard and providing for the family.

    As for why their should only be one spouse is because humans are naturally monogamous creatures. And even if this were untrue, it is much more efficient to have one provider per family and one caretaker per family. If the species had multiple providers per caretaker then the species would slowly decline due to a reproductive capability shortage. If their were multiple caretakers it would fail due to a youth population which is too large for the males to provide for.

    The reason should not switch partners is because of an emotional attachment to the partner we had. This attachment is necessary however, as without it the provider would have no reason to care for anyone other than himself and likewise with the female.

    The reason homosexuality is secularly incorrect is because of the inability to reproduce.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.