Amazon.com Widgets
  • First Malia, now Melania, are victims of online policing

    Malia Obama, one of the First Daughters, made headlines when she decided to "twerk" at the music festival Lollapalooza. Not long after that, nude photos of Melania Trump, the wife of the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, were leaked. In both instances social media went crazy with judgemental comments, showing that female politicians still have a long way to go when it comes to combating slut-shaming.

  • Yeah, definitely as always

    Women in general are slut-shamed for no reason while men get off scotch free with no criticism. Female politicians are like celebrities, they're in the spotlight more and so experience it more. Why is sex considered shameful for women but great for men? This is an archaic view that isn't relevant anymore and should be put in the ground.

  • Slut-shaming rarely occurs in US politics

    Politicians place themselves in the spotlight and under public scrutiny when they decide to seek public office. Any of their actions from the past or how them present themselves currently is going to be analyzed by their opposition and used against them if possible. The public is not swayed by mere slut-shaming.

  • This is ridiculous

    Male politicians who sleep around are vilified in the press. Female politicians who sleep around, well, I've never even heard of one in the press.

    More to the point, the idea that "slut-shaming" is a problem that needs addressed is absolutely dogmatic. That it should be acceptable for women to sleep around at will, is an idea which will never catch on, because something far stronger than intellectual experiment begets the natural instincts which dictate the practices of most human social behaviour.

    It starts with the neurological and physical make-up of human beings.

    Men are naturally stronger, more risk-driven, and more aggressive than women are. This is not something that is changeable. It is inherent in our genes. Men's bodies have high levels of testosterone, a chemical which is directly related to aggression. Women have high levels of oestrogen, a chemical which is directly related to placidity.

    Our reproductive mechanisms are also adapted in such a way that a man seeks to implant his genetic code into a woman, while women actively choose whether to "accept" the genes of any potential mate.

    This dictates, by itself, a specific cultural trend for mating. Men actively seek copulation much more indiscriminately than women, because the number of women who will accept the male's approach is considerably less than the number of women said man might attempt to copulate with. It's a numbers game for men, and if you aren't in, you can't win. The selection part, most often, is down to the female party.

    Thus, women tend to actively seek out copulation to a lesser degree, simply because women generally have many more potential suitors from which to choose, compared to men.

    The only exceptions to these norms are men of extremely high mating quality: tall, strong, ridiculously handsome, fit, intelligent, and possessing large material wealth.

    Thus, for most men, dating is a matter of seeking out many potential partners, because men will face many rejections in the process, while for most women dating is a matter of receiving solicitations and choosing whether to accept those solicitations or not.

    Evolutionarily, women have adapted to only accept solicitation from males who meet their reproductive standards. If women were to accept sex from all males who approached them, not only would they be in a near constant state of sexual intercourse, they may conceive a child with genes inferior to those which they instinctively desire.

    Essentially, if all women had been "sluts" from the dawn of humanity, the human species' probably would be in a far worse state of affairs than it is. Selective mating on the part of females is the primary reason why humans are still ahead of the general biological curve on Earth.

    Being a female slut is biologically hazardous. Being a male slut is biological necessary.

  • This is ridiculous

    Male politicians who sleep around are vilified in the press. Female politicians who sleep around, well, I've never even heard of one in the press.

    More to the point, the idea that "slut-shaming" is a problem that needs addressed is absolutely dogmatic. That it should be acceptable for women to sleep around at will, is an idea which will never catch on, because something far stronger than intellectual experiment begets the natural instincts which dictate the practices of most human social behaviour.

    It starts with the neurological and physical make-up of human beings.

    Men are naturally stronger, more risk-driven, and more aggressive than women are. This is not something that is changeable. It is inherent in our genes. Men's bodies have high levels of testosterone, a chemical which is directly related to aggression. Women have high levels of oestrogen, a chemical which is directly related to placidity.

    Our reproductive mechanisms are also adapted in such a way that a man seeks to implant his genetic code into a woman, while women actively choose whether to "accept" the genes of any potential mate.

    This dictates, by itself, a specific cultural trend for mating. Men actively seek copulation much more indiscriminately than women, because the number of women who will accept the male's approach is considerably less than the number of women said man might attempt to copulate with. It's a numbers game for men, and if you aren't in, you can't win. The selection part, most often, is down to the female party.

    Thus, women tend to actively seek out copulation to a lesser degree, simply because women generally have many more potential suitors from which to choose, compared to men.

    The only exceptions to these norms are men of extremely high mating quality: tall, strong, ridiculously handsome, fit, intelligent, and possessing large material wealth.

    Thus, for most men, dating is a matter of seeking out many potential partners, because men will face many rejections in the process, while for most women dating is a matter of receiving solicitations and choosing whether to accept those solicitations or not.

    Evolutionarily, women have adapted to only accept solicitation from males who meet their reproductive standards. If women were to accept sex from all males who approached them, not only would they be in a near constant state of sexual intercourse, they may conceive a child with genes inferior to those which they instinctively desire.

    Essentially, if all women had been "sluts" from the dawn of humanity, the human species' probably would be in a far worse state of affairs than it is. Selective mating on the part of females is the primary reason why humans are still ahead of the general biological curve on Earth.

    Being a female slut is biologically hazardous. Being a male slut is biological necessary.

  • This is ridiculous

    Male politicians who sleep around are vilified in the press. Female politicians who sleep around, well, I've never even heard of one in the press.

    More to the point, the idea that "slut-shaming" is a problem that needs addressed is absolutely dogmatic. That it should be acceptable for women to sleep around at will, is an idea which will never catch on, because something far stronger than intellectual experiment begets the natural instincts which dictate the practices of most human social behaviour.

    It starts with the neurological and physical make-up of human beings.

    Men are naturally stronger, more risk-driven, and more aggressive than women are. This is not something that is changeable. It is inherent in our genes. Men's bodies have high levels of testosterone, a chemical which is directly related to aggression. Women have high levels of oestrogen, a chemical which is directly related to placidity.

    Our reproductive mechanisms are also adapted in such a way that a man seeks to implant his genetic code into a woman, while women actively choose whether to "accept" the genes of any potential mate.

    This dictates, by itself, a specific cultural trend for mating. Men actively seek copulation much more indiscriminately than women, because the number of women who will accept the male's approach is considerably less than the number of women said man might attempt to copulate with. It's a numbers game for men, and if you aren't in, you can't win. The selection part, most often, is down to the female party.

    Thus, women tend to actively seek out copulation to a lesser degree, simply because women generally have many more potential suitors from which to choose, compared to men.

    The only exceptions to these norms are men of extremely high mating quality: tall, strong, ridiculously handsome, fit, intelligent, and possessing large material wealth.

    Thus, for most men, dating is a matter of seeking out many potential partners, because men will face many rejections in the process, while for most women dating is a matter of receiving solicitations and choosing whether to accept those solicitations or not.

    Evolutionarily, women have adapted to only accept solicitation from males who meet their reproductive standards. If women were to accept sex from all males who approached them, not only would they be in a near constant state of sexual intercourse, they may conceive a child with genes inferior to those which they instinctively desire.

    Essentially, if all women had been "sluts" from the dawn of humanity, the human species' probably would be in a far worse state of affairs than it is. Selective mating on the part of females is the primary reason why humans are still ahead of the general biological curve on Earth.

    Being a female slut is biologically hazardous. Being a male slut is biological necessary.

  • No, I do not believe that too many female politicians are slut-shamed

    No, I do not believe that too many female politicians are slut-shamed. I do not believe that it is possible to slut-shame a female politician in this upcoming election when Donald Trump is married to a former model. If no one is saying that she should not hold the position of first lady then no one can say anything about female politicians.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.