Far worse people have been invited, e.g. the tyrants who rule China.
Intemperate liberals are calling Trump a Nazi, a fascist, a racist, a misogynist.
He is none of these things - indeed, many liberals are, in their shrill hysteria, turning into fascists themselves.
It's time they calmed down, and pronto.
Eceryone who calls Trump a facist, a nazi, or hitler, obviously have no idea what any of those words are. If Trump really were a fascist, then how come all thes protest against him haven't ended in bloody conflicts? It seems every argument against trump is always, "just because" I see no evidence that proves Trump is a fascist and I find it hypocritical that the ones calling Trump a fascist are the actual fascists.
As a visiting dignitary Trump should be welcomed but not to a parliamentary address. He has not made his intentions clear as to the "special relationship" we enjoyed under Mr. Obama. Until trade, defence and climate policies are agreed we can not hand out unearned, gratuitous honours to Mr. Trump.
Trump may be a bit of an a** but as of yet he hasn't don anything illegal, the things people are getting up in arms about are precisely the same things he said and was elected to do. If we let the house of Saud have tea with the Queen, why would we ban a democratically elected leader who hasn't killed anyone from entering the country.
Fascism is the merging of private business and government. Donald Trump has never called for that or implied thats what he wants. This is just a label that this mp has put on him to dismiss or shut him up. This is quite pathetic. I mean I don't agree with him either, but calling him names is pathetic, whoever said that needs to grow up and stop acting childish. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean you should call them names.
I don't believe Trump is a Fascist. I disagree with him a lot, yes. But even if Trump was a Fascist, the last thing you want to do is radicalize a fascist. You always want a dialogue. An expression of ideas is needed, because the only way you're going to deal with someone you don't agree with, is by talking to them.
It's hypocritical to state "NO" here, because if someone with a different opinion than you is not allowed to speak, then I guess debate.Org doesn't have a right to exist then.
Even if she doesn't want him to come, she already invited him and you can not really retract an invitation like that. Not letting him come would merely show weakness; she doesn't agree with him and would rather just ban him. She shouldn't back down due to pressure of random people.
It would be an unforgivable affront to the president and to the American people for any world leader, especially the British prime minister, to refuse to allow our president into their country. There would be no Great Britain or France or half the countries in the world if it were not for the United States and for a British MP to stoop to name calling is childish and reflects on that individual. Few of us support Trump's latest actions, but he is our president and commands the respect of foreign governments as the leader of the United States, regardless of his popularity here or abroad.
I don't see how May can suddenly take back an invitation. She shouldn't have invited him in the first place. Let's just hope that the people of the UK come out to protest, peacefully, when Trump visits. I also hope that one of the Royals says something that makes him choke on his food or drink.
Since when does fascism permit an individual from visiting another country? Not to mention that this is merely the Prime Minister's opinion of one man, who also happens to be the president of the United States. To ban Trump from visiting England (once again visiting, not moving) would be to close the doors of communication and to foster bad relations with the leader of the free world, something that no major country can afford to do for long.
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONNONONONONONONo onONONON OnO nON oN oNoN oN oNoN ONono noN onON oN oN oN oN oNoN on oNoNo No NOnON onoN oN oNon on oNON onoNoNOn oN oN oNon nONo nO nONO no NoNoN nN oN oN ono no no No nonono n ono no non n o no n no non o no n on no no onon on onn no
As has been recorded the UK had tried last year to prevent Donald by petition and the only reason it was dropped was because Donald was selected for the Republican Party nominee at the convention. The petition was dropped so as not to influence the American Election was a kind act of diplomacy on England's part...But Donald was in the past part of the scheme to separate Scotland from England. Donald and the Nigel guy in the Uk government were the cause of the scandal, and the UK people fought all around the world to prevent the break up...If you had been playing close attention you would have seen that many small entities of the British Government nearly collapsed... The problem is now that Donald has won the office and has reneged on how he has handled the process and has even threatened to make things tougher on the UK if need be, Donald has taking revenge on the BBC and the press from past arguments that he has lost before the people of Scotland and the UK..Donald does not like being laughed at even hates the press there as much as here...It is a fact, yet he has Bannon a news guy from the Far right Alt side as a close associate, now when you think of a twisted mind think of what Donald's and Bannons children will look like except that the 2 of them are married to each other...Yeah for the people of the Uk stating what Donald is and what he will never be, well liked and even worse scorned through-out England's history....