If we assume that by the 78th World War, mankind has realised that wars can be fought via emojis and aggressive messages not exceeding 140 words on Twitter, which would result in 1. No fatalities 2. No necessity for budget to be spent on the military, leaving more money for the colonisation of the 5 other uncolonised planets 3. Just no violence in general, which would definitely gain the support of many, this is a likely scenario.
The above assumed future scenario (Aggressive usage of Social Media) would ensure that the conditions set out by the question can be easily satisfied.
1. It is the 78th World War
Due to the accessibility of social media in the future, wars can be easily started by anyone in the world, and people will be less careful about it due to the lack of physical mutilation, torture, and generally murder.
2. Social Media will start it
This is an incredibly realistic possibility and there is literally no reason for further elaboration.
Furthermore, due to current evidences about how butthurt people can get on the internet, as well as the predicted popularity of the Emoji Movie (coming to you soon in like less than a week or something), I don't see why this WOULDN'T be a thing.
Jkjhijoehgiojioeahiojeajhpiok npaes eyyhehdhjcjwnfncjjshcjjchdhjfjcicfasiojawfaejjohhjwegjapjgohrwuog
Hilgadohwijodh a lot with the most dense text I can find and after the time it was there was not the same thing I did with my life but it is a great idea for a very good app that I can use for some reason
No no no non non mnono onon nononnnino inoon itoirngfiin%fneinfdrfrnif noi no non mno non nonn non no no no non no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no and 1 more thing no
Hi people cant start a war i mean come on only trump can start a war how many people started a war 0 ya that is right 0.I am not talking about tiny little fights people get in those but trump gets in those tip of war so boom by