Amazon.com Widgets

Can the negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered be justified?

  • The negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can be justified.

    The negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can be justified. The media outlets make their profit off stories and headlines. If he did not want to be on the news then he should have not done what he did. The media will twist and turn any story that they can.

  • Yes, the negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can be justified.

    Yes, the negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can be justified. Nick clegg only acted on the claims against Portsmouth MP Mike Hancock, after the report was leake donline. It seems to me that he would have never suspended Hnacock if the public did not find out about it.

  • Anything can be justified by the media.

    Whether your name is Nick Clegg or Nic Cage, there is a way that the media is going to cover you. I think that whatever the media chooses as their slant, they are able to justify it as a way to cover them. Nick Clegg is just another victim of media bias.

  • The negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered cannot be justified.

    The media should be objective, even if the political view points of reporters disagrees with the subject matter of their reports. The media should not be negative in their coverage of Nick Clegg, even though a lot of his policies have been unpopular. This take legitimacy away from the media.

  • The negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can not be justified.

    The negative way in which Nick Clegg is being covered can not be justified. His Israel-bashing is sickening and he should expect the consequences for speaking as such. Associating all terrorists from one country to everyone in the country is just wrong. There is no way to justify the remarks that he has made.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.