Amazon.com Widgets

Can the U.S. prevent Syria from using chemical weapons?

  • If We See Injustice, We Must Act

    America prides itself that it is the arbiter or liberty and freedom, and seeks to advocate and protect those of not only its citizens at home, but people of the world. We can't sit back and watch as a government used chemical weapons against its own populace, it would be severely immoral to do so.

  • Yes, The U.S. can and will prevent Syria from using chemical weapons.

    I am very confident that President Obama will intervene if necessary in regards to chemical warfare. The President has not given us a single reason to doubt how other countries view us from a power perspective. Whether that be for better or worse, Obama has reestablished the United States as a respectable and fearful nation, meaning that we are fair but stiff. We have given all of the appropriate warnings, and are now prepared to act if necessary. If force must be used, there will be no argument as to whether or not why are right for doing so. The world will not hate us like they did when Bush attacked whatever land he wanted the resources from.

  • Yes, The U.S. can and will prevent Syria from using chemical weapons.

    I am very confident that President Obama will intervene if necessary in regards to chemical warfare. The President has not given us a single reason to doubt how other countries view us from a power perspective. Whether that be for better or worse, Obama has reestablished the United States as a respectable and fearful nation, meaning that we are fair but stiff. We have given all of the appropriate warnings, and are now prepared to act if necessary. If force must be used, there will be no argument as to whether or not why are right for doing so. The world will not hate us like they did when Bush attacked whatever land he wanted the resources from.

  • Maybe Not Alone

    Yes, the U.S. can prevent Syria from using chemical weapons, but not without a strong military presence. The kicker here is Syria realizes there is nothing we can do to stop her without a show of force and the last thing the United States wants is a new war front. Perhaps if all free countries posed a united front to Syria and explained the ramifications of using chemical weapons, they might possibly back down.

  • It has no right

    The same U.S supported apartheid in south africa , supported saddam when he used chemical weapons, osama when he was supporting terrorist in kashmir against India and clinton even callled them jihadi freedom fighters. But when it turns against U.S it becomes world police kills saddam and osama and now is after ASSad. Why would Assad use chemical weapons when without it he had an upper hand but after using them he would become target of International community. I don't think he is so foolish. Western Media is very good at propaganda which suits it. First U.S bombs Nagasaki and when other countries too get nuclear weapons it condemns on pretext of world safety, Used drones everywhere and now when others are developing them I read reports in American media of having ban on use of drones on other territory. IT is serbia own issue let them handle it . Replacing ASSad secular regime with Islamist will only create more problem than solve it like in LIbya . First gaddafi was friend of Ameriica. Same is with Pakistan centre of world terrorism but friend of America because it needs it to face taliban and had used it earlier to check India. Hypocritical world policing

  • It has no right

    The same U.S supported apartheid in south africa , supported saddam when he used chemical weapons, osama when he was supporting terrorist in kashmir against India and clinton even callled them jihadi freedom fighters. But when it turns against U.S it becomes world police kills saddam and osama and now is after ASSad. Why would Assad use chemical weapons when without it he had an upper hand but after using them he would become target of International community. I don't think he is so foolish. Western Media is very good at propaganda which suits it. First U.S bombs Nagasaki and when other countries too get nuclear weapons it condemns on pretext of world safety, Used drones everywhere and now when others are developing them I read reports in American media of having ban on use of drones on other territory. IT is serbia own issue let them handle it . Replacing ASSad secular regime with Islamist will only create more problem than solve it like in LIbya . First gaddafi was friend of Ameriica. Same is with Pakistan centre of world terrorism but friend of America because it needs it to face taliban and had used it earlier to check India. Hypocritical world policing

  • No, the U.S. can do nothing to prevent Syria from using chemical weapons.

    The United States would not be able to act quick enough to stop a chemical weapons attack in Syria. I believe we, as well as the United Nations would retaliate, but it would be too late to help the thousands of people in Syria. I pray this atrocious act never comes to fruition.

  • Can the US, no.

    It is not the United States' place to play global police and tell other countries what they can and cannot have. The United Nations may step in and enforce their decision but the U.S. instigates too many countries with their vocal views. The cockiness comes off as aggressive and only makes the nation weary of what exactly the next step is.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.