Amazon.com Widgets

Commonwealth of Nations: Should the Commonwealth be abolished?

  • No responses have been submitted.
  • No, the games benefit everyone

    The Commonwealth games are beneficial for all participating countries. All the countries involved share history together, and it is a great way for the countries of the Commonwealth to communicate, as the games have the unique advantage of all countries being able to converse in one language. It unites us, and is great for tourism for the host country.

  • No, communicatons are good.

    No, the Commonwealth of Nations should not be abolished, because anytime the people from different nations can come together to work together and communicate, it is a positive thing. It is important that governments gets together to discuss ways they can work together, and ways they can iron out differences. The Commonwealth of Nations is a positive group of 53 nations that meets to work together.

  • No, the commonwealth is good for everyone

    The Commonwealth of Nations was formerly known as the British Commonwealth. This a group of nations that work together and that have a common heritage. The commonwealth should not be abolished as it simply a group of nations working together for the common good of the citizens. The cCommon wealth is a good thing for everyone.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.