I am a young college girl, my vaginal tube is tested by cut penis. Cut penis looks good in shape & size against uncut. It is clean, neat, smell-free and no risk of infections. Condom easily fitted on cut penis. Head of penis activated my G-spot, really very nice and silky penis head.
Safe view and look for life and normal beauty if one desires to copulate. A great and better spectacle for length. Easier to grab and hold on to for the reason of girth and important feelings, this is real and the way it should be when you want to be.
I much prefer cut over uncut. I think because it protects against HIV and this is proven it's better defense against STD and infections. Plus, it looks and feels so much better. I woild give a big vote for YES I prefer it much more than UNCUT and I'm in a country where circumsision is not praticed as much as arab nations or USA.
Women do not like to pull down a man's pants to see a disgusting uncircumcised penis.In more civil writing,being uncircumcised really does not have the benefits that uncircumcised people claim.First of all, many but not all uncircumcised penises produce enough smegma to where hygiene becomes an issue.Women are very offended by this.Secondly,there is no increase in pleasure for the woman simply because there is a disgusting flap of skin.Most importantly it looks quite disgusting and women find that extremely unattractive.One may argue that the rates are falling,however in reality the rates of circumcision in the United States are a satisfying 56-66%(depending on the year).If you are wondering on why to get your son clipped don't listen to all of the foreskin propaganda because really it has more pros than cons.
Uncircumcised penises are just aesthetically unpleasant to the eye. They are dirty. You don't need science to tell you that a bigger surface area (uncircumcised penis) means more bacteria. It's logic. The people on the right probably have never had a girl tell them "I won't sleep with you because I don't want any bacterial infections", or just plain "Ewe".
Circumcised penises, in my opinion, are much better. Over the years, I've found that uncircumcised penises tend to have a stronger smell and more greasy/sweaty feel to them. Despite best efforts to keep clean, any skin that is folded on top of other skin will tend to sweat and smell rather quickly - even after a good shower. So it is definitely a fact that circumcised penises are "easier" to keep clean, and I'm guessing are less prone to infections.
No woman will refuse a man only for the fact that he has been circumcised.
There are clearly women who will refuse a man only for the fact that he is intact.
Circumcision improves options, possibilities, opportunities and the converse is true. The fact is that not circumcising a boy may result in him being rejected for this reason alone.
Now it is no use calling such women names, making judgments or complaining. A woman has the right to decide who she will allow to have sex with her - her own personal veto power. A cut penis will never alone be denied consideration for this factor alone.
They are cleaner - Always cleaner. A cut penis can have no smegma - no foreskin = no smegma.
Now it does not matter if an intact fellow lives in the shower - the fact remains that if you have a foreskin you can have smegma and if you do not have a foreskin you can NEVER have smegma.
At least in America. It's what women expect, what they know and love. An uncircumcised penis is animalistic and foreign. The last thing anybody wants is for somebody to associate a noticeable quirk with their penis.
First of all, it looks better & no odor, plus the scar around is not that noticeable/bad looking. What is noticeable are uncircumcised penises. Why would I want a guy that has an odor down there all the time, unless they go wash up pretty good every-time before any sexual contact. I mean do guys like ugly vaginas that have an odor? I don't think so. So why would we?
A: It all depends on the girl, but a woman who really loves you will never care if you are circumcised or not.
Why did I chose yes instead of no, then? Well, if you are not circumcised and your girlfriend tells you to become circumcised, you can easily tell that she is an idiot and you should break up with her for not accepting you "the way you are"--> ( Which should be the main reason for her to be with you.).
Though, if you already are circumcised, she can't ask you to not be circumcised. It could save your couple, but you must hope it will be the only thing she will silently complain about or else it could just mean the break up...only later and for ( probably ) another stupid reason.
Other than that, don't become circumcised for aesthetics reasons, for her, for [not so] proven medical reasons or for it's HIV proof reasons.
Only do it if you are having an infection or something similar that threatens your life. Don't forget, you don't need sexual relations to live ( At least, she will understand your pain better if you need to be circumcised for these reasons. ).
P.S.: I am disappointed by the people who are saying it is child genetalia mutilation. The question is "Do females prefer males who have circumcised penises?" and not "What is your opinion on circumcision?".
Some women or girls think that during the course of the circumcision process, innocent boys' penises are cut and made small. No, it is not true. I being a Muslim girl, had occasion to witness the circumcision celebration of my brother, aged about 3 years (this is the best circumcision age). When his circumcision process, wherein all female members were present, myself also one of them and my age at that time was about 15 years, I saw the doctor massage some lotion on his unerect penis and when he thinks it is soft, he cut the foreskin of his penis, which were covering their penis pee hole, lots of blood came out and boys cried loudly. The cutter doctor folded the remaining skin towards his backside and gave the shape of a ring. His penis head was clearly visible as silky and looks nice. After one week the boys were perfect when washing his penis. In the bathroom, I saw some erection and looks nice and attractive for me. In circumcision, only foreskin is cut, not the penis, therefore no changes in shape and size.
I used to be neutral on this topic until I met a person who was anti circ. It amazed me how much they twisted their figures and would not listen to any reason whatsoever. You can't have a fair debate if the person you are debating against has wild figures.
The 2009 article about circ. Being at percentages in the 30-35% range is FALSE it appears to be a figure that was released without all data because lone behold TRUE figures came out in 2011 regarding 2010 figures and it showed circumcision is still the norm in the USA at 54% those figures only includes hospital circ. So any Jewish or practicing Muslims who do it more for religious reasons are not included in that 54% figure so I maybe as bold to raise that to the 58%-60% if you include circ. Not performed in a hospital.
The American Pediatrics has come out with a full report support circ. A stance they where neutral on prior. That says alot. It also appears to drive the anti circ protestors insane! However FACT is one of the most respected medical associations in the world says health benefits put weight any kind of risk.
I have been with uncircumcised men perfore and it was uncomfortable. I attempted to perform oral on two very clean Latino men I was dating that had not been circumcised. In all honesty, I couldn't get through either one. I don't care who much you scrub the area between the foreskin and the head of the penis is actually similar to the tissue in the anal region, so remember do you really want to touch your anal region on a hot new York summer day? I didn't think so.
It looks better and the stats have been relatively steady since 2004 hovering at 55% not including circ done by Jews or Muslims.
Other countries that routinely circ. Korea, all the middle east, philippines, many African countries are heavily enforcing it as a means of HIV prevention so it's heavily widespread in Manu areas there, malaysia and indonesia.
Do not let twisted facts from anti circ protestors fool you. They come in herds on the Internet or troll Many boards with their crazy theories
I don't know about you but I take the world of AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS over some crazy guy who wasn't circ at birth and got teased so now spends his time endlessly debunking proven medical benefits anyday. I really think most people need to hear the Dr's here. If you have the breast cancer gene and you might get it and decide to have both your breasts removed (as many do) make you crazy and the doctor a butcher just because you didn't develop the cancer yet? Think about it? There's a high chance that if you have this gene you will develop breast cancer, however, there is a chance you won't. Most doctors agree to go with the procedure because benefits out weight the risks. Does that mean these women are crazy and the doctor butchers? I don't thinks so.
I think everyone should check to see the CDC and AAP stance on the issue not some bitter guy at home on a computer with outrageous facts that are distorted.
Fact -protects against HIV many STDs the spread on HPV (anal warts), UTI's, certain cancers, etc. The list goes on please search.
Most women would rather have sex with someone with a circumcised penis, mostly because they are cleaner, and nothing is able to get trapped underneath the foreskin. The look of the actual penis without the foreskin is much more appealing, and it feels better too. It is more possible for men with foreskin to contract an STD which women obviously do not want.
I don't know how many women actually give it much thought. But, when they do, I think that women prefer a man to be circumcised. The number one reason for the preference is that, in western civilization, it is the norm. Then, there is the issue of cleanliness. Lots of folks associate a circumcised penis with a higher degree of cleanliness. Finally, many people believe that a circumcised penis is more enjoyable.
I am circumcised and like many people I have to say IT is amazing! I do enjoy the sensation more. There was only sexual gain for me. The females from what I can grasp seem to like it much more. To each their own. I was circumcised at age 24 due to some health reasons and I am really happy I did it. My children will be circumcised! I know both feelings and this is better.
I hate to sound shallow, but uncircumcised penises just aren't as appealing. They might be more natural looking, but they just don't look as nice. I've never heard of the problem of orgasms being delayed or reduced sensitivity, this seems to be something that a lot of anti-circumcision people make up.
The uncircumcised penis has a foul smell which I cannot stand. Everyone's different & some may like the smell or be able to see past it. However, I cannot. Circumcised is much cleaner & pleasant. It's such a shame that so many people are opting to keep it natural these days rather than have it cut. It's slowly being faded out & soon I believe it won't be an option to have done which is a shame for those of us who don't like stinky penises!
All of my friends and myself included think an uncircumcised penis is very ugly and does nothing to turn us on sexually. The uncircumcised penis also seems to always have an urine odor, with is a big turnoff. Females definitely prefer circumcised penises.
People at the "no" side are actually bitter towards the "yes" side simply because these guys are regreting for not having their penises circumcised. Mainly with many reasons maybe their parents would rather have their penises cut during 6 yrs and onwards, but the main fact is their just damn scared of being cut. Bunch of cowards! .. And yes it can contract STD's and it has a foul smell. It is big turn off for women too.
Why is a foreskin there if all it does it give both partners more risk of diseases? I think all men should be cut, and just forget about this stupid argument. Circumcision is so much better, it reduces all chances of STDs, and all those conditions. Boys should be circumcised around the age of 10, so they can remember the thrill of getting a better, nicer, more attractive penis.
I've never given much thought to circumcision, it was just something that never really crossed my mind. All the males I have been with have been uncircumcised and I really never expected to come across a circumcised penis. However, I had the most amazing sex with this man and I really couldn't understand why it felt so much better and why I was actually attracted to look and feel of his penis, because let's face it, foreskins aren't exactly like candy to the eye... but anyway, it was the best sexual experience I have ever had, and upon glancing at his penis afterwards I noticed that he was circumcised. I doubt I will be returning to uncircumcised sex ever again!
Intact is much better because it's nature beside circumcision is a mutilation which removes vast majority of nerve ending thus hard to man to reach the orgasm so easily. It also prevents boys from doing the masturbation to some extent that's why in most of America and even in Islamic nations men to tend to marry at early age because masturbation doesn't produce a lot of pleasure so they need something to penetrate. This also increases the premarital and teen pregnancy rate and also the abortion rate so circumcision is indirectly responsible for the increment of the teen pregnancy rate and the abortion. But since abortion is banned in most of countries then it goes to underground so there are a lot of crimes so circumcision is indirectly responsible for many crimes happens in the country.
Another disadvantage of the male genital mutilation type 1 aka circumcision is it prevents the man from doing the gliding mechanism which is all about stimulating the ring of the glans by putting the pressure on it through the foreskin but when there is no foreskin this mechanism is completely abolished thus it drives him away from achieving the pleasure he used to have when he had the foreskin. This doesn't stop in here it expands further by making the glans and the shaft of the penis get keratanized thus dropping his pleasure up to 40%. This is pretty much of a serious situation which is still allowed by money hungry capitalistic corporation who constantly brainwash men to get cut themselves in order to harvest the foreskins for harvesting the fibroblast so they can make fairness creams for women have a lot of wrinkles on their face.
A past boyfriend had been circumcised since birth, the doctors had done this, (was for non-religious reasons) and personally I believe it is more hygienic in some cases as not all men clean their foreskins as thoroughly as maybe they should, as I have heard to wash properly the foreskin must be pulled back and cleaned in the shower/bath, which of course in individuals with circumcised penises this isn't a problem unlike those without. Of course there are so many exceptions of many males in the world who believe in good hygiene and taking care of their body. However I know not being circumcised doesn't lead to any problems as far as I am aware, it is just my personal preference and I also believe (again person opinion) that being circumcised does look more attractive :)
ITs become a common thing in the west to see circumcised penises. So its become a hit and miss thing in a culture so used to it. Some partners discuss it ahead of time, others get surprised. Its a case to case basis, but if you went on chance, it is likely yes, they prefer circumcised to un.
Most women who say it doesn't matter are full of bullocks because in reality they haven't been with an intact male... And when they see one, they will think it is strange. I've only seen one and at the time I didn't know the differences, but I immediately found it strange.
In the United States the vast majority of males are circumcised. Due to this women are naturally going to be inclined towards what looks like what they are used to. For instance, in fashion for the masses, small changes are made so that there isn't too much shock to the average consumer. This applies as well to physical anatomy features.
When I give oral sex to a man that is NOT circumcised, I often feel the taste of pee. Urine sometimes gets trapped in a man's foreskin if they don't retract it when they urine. This never happens to a circumcised man. So I don't have to deal with the urine smell and taste. When giving oral sex to a circumcised man, I only feel the texture, warmth of the penis, and tasty precum (yes, I like the taste of it) without the foreskin getting in the way or the taste of urine.
Several women want the law on male circumcision to ensure that the practice is compulsory.
Susan Akello from Orom sub-county says government should pass a legislation that will compel all men to be circumcised and those who refuse be punished.
Jane Adokorach, a self styled women activist agrees with Akello. Adokorach says women should deny sexual rights to men who are not circumcised. She also proposes a law that will include punitive measures for men who refuse to be circumcised. She says this reduces the rate of infection for men and transfer of the disease to their spouses.
Read more: http://ugandaradionetwork.com/a/story.php?s=33903#ixzz1Y8ThMO1P
The uncircumcised penis just looks gross. The smells are foul. I decided to circumcise myself at the age of 22 and don't regret it one bit. I am now 33 and have been complimented many times how nice it is. I'm not sure about the drying of the head because mine is just fine and I create enough precum that its never been an issue.
I had to be circumcised at the age of 25 due to a recurring problem. (I am allergy prone, and the issue I had was like an allergic rash). I had tried various prescribed creams, soaps and different types of underwear material until my GP suggested circumcision. I was hesitant at first but decided to try it and I am very glad I did in the end as it entirely fixed the problem. I was the butt of a few jokes obviously, and discovered through the course of the whole ideal that most women (at least in Australia) prefer circumcised guys.
My husband is circumcised and we've agreed to have our son circumcised once he's born. Penises with foreskin are harder to clean properly. We've done our research on the matter and we find it best for hygienic reasons. I also agree that penises look much better when circumcised. My husband enjoys sex and doesn't have problems climaxing.
My boyfriend and I have been together for a while now and we have had sex before and after he was circumcised. Needless to say without the banana peel-like appendage hanging off his manhood the pleasure has increased dramatically! I enjoy my man cut and there is no way I would ever go back!
I moved to Europe some years ago from Australia. In my experience, the women I've been with in Sweden and Denmark, and now Germany, have overwhelmingly preferred the circumcised penis. In Sweden, I actually women telling their friends they needed to sleep with me.
Now I live in Germany and while circumcision is not as normal as it is in Australia it's not unheard of. You'll often see a fair percentage of circumcised guys in the saunas here. My impression here is that the women don't really see a need to circumcise their children unless it's for health reasons, but they certainly enjoy finding circumcised men in their love lives. I am 31 years old - perhaps it's just an attitude of people my age here, I don't know.
My husband is cut and I like that better. I have been with 5 men and one was not cut. I didn't really care all that much and him lacking in bed likely had nothing to do with his uncut status. I prefer a cut guy. It is better to look at for my taste.
Have personally been in two marriages where intimacy ceased and was served divorce papers after ten years. Both wives prefered circumcised males and I had not taken hints seriously. As an older male, chronic irritation and inability to maintain adequate personal hygiene while away from the conveniences of home caused me to find a good surgeon and get the procedure done. It was the best thing I have done for myself. Each day I wish to thank the gracious surgeon for her help in improving my quality of life. I wish I had yielded to first wife's request and had it done as a young adult. Life is lonely without my female soul mate.
I was circumcised as an adult, in response to my (then new) wife's strong preference and it has been one of the best things that ever happened to me. Sex is far more enjoyable for both of us - I feel more yet last longer, while my wife much prefers the feel of my circumcised penis inside her and can orgasm far more easily. At normal times, both comfort and hygiene are maximized.
The circumcised penis definitely looks sexier than a bunch of foreskin. Even guys who are very conscientious about hygiene develop a funky odor under the foreskin within a short period of time. Condoms are easier to use if he is circumcised. I love feeling the contour of the head inside my vagina.
Women should stay away from men that are not circumcised. A man that is not circumcised is more focused on his penis and pleasure then that of his partner. The ejaculation comes too fast and there is never foreplay. A man that has not been circumcised is more like "Wham bam" without the thankyou.
Foreskin freaks me out. I don't know what to do with it. It's just sitting there being a big turn off. For me the perfect guy IS cut. There is just something so much more appealing and sexy about a cut guy. My guy had it done for medical reasons and I was lucky to find him, cut guys are almost never heard of from around here.
I don't think it's a culture thing at all. I happened upon men who were uncircumcised and one who wasn't. Quite honesty there's a difference in the feel, smell, and look. The circumcised male had plenty of feeling and sensitivity there, too. So I think it's a load of bullocks that some uncircumcised men say the sensitivity drops. You know what causes that? Using your hand too much, too roughly. It's been proven that if you lay off for two or three weeks your sensitivity comes back, guys.
There are few mystery areas on a circumcised penis, fewer places for an errant pee drop to hide, more likely to be usable clean at a moment's notice, less likely to get or cause an infection in either partner, simple to clean ,sleek to the touch, no feelings of being fully-sheathed, half-sheathed, unsheathed. Ready for action and allows the penis head to have more air and blood circulation, leading to larger size.
I am a young college woman as well and I believe that circumcised is much better than uncircumcised. My ex was uncircumcised and my current boyfriend is circumcised and there is a difference. Circumcised wins in the feel better, smells better, and cleaner departments. As mentioned before circumcised fits much better into a condom and hits the gspot. No matter how clean uncircumcised is it will never smell as good as a circumcised one. Circumcised also looks better too.
Although it is not a dealbreaker in a relationship, I do think it looks nicer as opposed to not circumcised. Sexually it does feel one way and it does not feel as good. There is something cleaner about a circumcised penis. IMO. Would I not be with a guy because he was no cirmcumcised? No. But I would talk with him about sex because maybe there is another way he can do it so it does not feel funny and is pleasurable for me, as well.
It's true circumcised penises do look better than uncircumcised. I've been with both and while the uncircs are easier to please, when flaccid they are less pleasant to look at. They are more likely to transmit STDs and pH related infections like Bacterial Vaginosis and yeast infections. That said, I think it would be better to let the young man decide for himself.
Because uncircumcised penises look like dead fish, they can get fungus and grodiesness up under the foreskin, it looks better circumcised. So many reasons. Also, uncircumcised penises smell worse. They're harder to clean. They don't even look remotely as nice as a nice, clean cut circumcised penis. Besides, if people would just circumcise their sons when they are born, they won't even remember it.
I'm sorry, but uncircumcised penis's smell really bad really quickly. Giving oral sex to a man with an uncircumcised penis is a major turn off to me, because I can't stop thinking of all the bacteria that gets trapped behind the skin so easily! All in all circumcision is the way to go!
It is a known fact that the skin of the penis when it is uncircumcised is known to have a higher chance of contracting an STD. It is a very good idea to get your penis circumcised because it prevents diseases and is more attractive to women than one that isn't. Women adore those a lot more because they don't have to pleasure the skin.
It's true, circumcised penises do look better than uncircumcised. I've been with both, and while the uncircs are easier to please, when flaccid they are less pleasant to look at. They are more likely to transmit STDs and pH related infections like bacterial vaginosis and yeast infections. That said, I think it would be better to let the young man decide for himself.
I feel as though circs are larger than un-circs. They look nicer, smell nicer, and overall seem generally cleaner. If a man is NOT circ, it's a deal breaker for me! He could be the most perfect man inside and out and if he hasn't been cut, I cut the relationship! Hard but true fact! Sorry!
I love to see naked guys with the skin removed to show off the beauty of their penis heads. The idea alone of a piece of skin covering and hiding the wonderful looking glans of the penis is such a turn-off! Further, during sex, I love to feel the outline of his head in my fanny. When I did have sex with uncircumcised guys, I could never tell the difference in feeling between the shaft and head thrusting in me. I also found that guys who hadn't been snipped had the head riding in and out of their foreskins, instead of rubbing my fanny inside me!
I have limited experience with male's, however, I do find men with uncircumcised penis' to be more animalistic looking. I hardly like giving oral as is, and I would NOT want to give any kind of oral pleasure to a man with a uncircumcised penis. I also would not want to deal with the health concerns that might follow with someone who did not stay clean and its effect on me. That being said, this is all just objective opinion or thought. I am sure if I found someone I absolutely loved, it would not matter. However, I have not met a man that wish he was NOT circumcised and if I have children, I will have them circumcised.
My partner and I are still active sexually after 20 years of being together. We both agree that my being circumcised near the start of our relationship is to credit for that. Her bouts of cystitis stopped after my circumcision and our sex is spontaneous due to no odors due to trapped sweat, urine and semen. We have seen relationships fail all around us and are sure its due to women losing interest in their partners smelly penises. Her girlfriends always react with comments of "you are soo lucky" if she mentions I'm circumcised. The UK is a non-circumcising country and it's rare here. It's the best-kept relationship secret and the kindest lifetime gift to a boy. It's also nobody's business so if you believe in it, do it, and keep it in the family. There's too many opinionated people ready to condemn having something done down below which in reality is not a big deal at all.
I personally prefer the look of the circumcised penis. Furthermore I think it is so much cleaner than the uncut one, and medical studies clearly show that this is true and circumcision reduces the risk of STIs and cervical cancer. Finally for me sex with a circumcised penis feels more intense.
I have to admit that in my experience, most females - in this culture anyway - prefer circumcised males, mostly for aesthetic reasons. I don't think this preference is universal though, or that it couldn't change over time if the practice of circumcision were not so prevalent. And I actually don't advocate circumcision for baby boys.
I was UNCIRCUMCISED until age 20. I was born not in the USA but Italy. I hated growing up here in the USA because I felt so weird among my peers growing up. My first sexual experience was awful because the girl I was with told her friends my penis looked very strange and after that no girls would sleep with me.
When I turned 18 I began to research CIRCUMCISION this was 5 years ago I'm 23 now. After much thought and consideration I met with my doctor who referred me to a doctor that routinely performs these type of requests. I am bitter my parents did not do this at birth but where I am from it's not common. I had to pay a chunk of change AND I WAS PUT UNDER so I was by no means awake for it.
It was not so painful. Things felt "funny" and tender for around 3 weeks.
When I was healed I was so happy. My manhood looked like the guys at the gym other guys didn't have a weird look on their faces at the showers at the gym anymore.
AND best of all because I am nicely sized my sex life is amazing now! AMAZING! No more weird questions from girls, I get oral tons now and I feel so much cleaner. The best choice I ever made.
I cannot speak for girls but in my experiences yes it does matter to them.
I'm happy I did it. College life is about these kind of experiences and I'm so content now.
Every uncut man I've been with has had a funky odor, even after washing. It's unusual, but has something to do with "smegma", a substance under the foreskin composed of fermenting urine. I suppose they have received a bad reputation. Most females I know wont touch them for this reason.
I've been married to my husband for 15 years now. We both decided that he should have a circumcision 7 years ago. We reached this decision because his penis always smelled very bad. Even when he washed his penis, it would still have a weird taste. Also, the smell would come back a few minutes after he washed it. The smell was a big turn off for me and I rarely gave him oral sex back then. Ever since he was circumcised, I don't hesitate to give him oral sex. It doesn't smell, nor does it taste weird. I actually enjoy it now. It has been a great decision that has greatly improved our sexual life. I don't think this is for everyone, but I personally prefer my husband to be circumcised.
My boyfriend has a cut penis and I love it. I do not have to worry if he washed the smegma off because he has no foreskin. Smegma build up can definitely give you an infection. Also, it does not have an unpleasant odor, another side effect of uncut penises. The only negative thing of uncut is lubrication, but there is always lube that you can buy at stores.
I think it's healthier for the man, and the girl. My husband is circumcised and we have great sex. I've never seen a uncircumcised penis in real life, but I don't think I'd ever want to lol. But everyone is different and I love my husband just the way he is, and he does too.
A circumcised penis is aesthetically pleasing -- at least to me. Also, it's cleaner. Not all uncut penises are ugly, but sometimes if the foreskin is really long it can be kind of gross. If I loved someone who was uncut, I wouldn't dump him. But I prefer cut, thank you.
In my experience, circumcised guys can get me to an orgasm without any other stimulation than penetration, while the uncut guys couldn't. If I ever have a son, he will definitely be cut. It looks better, it's much cleaner and it feels better! Maybe it is just a trend, but it's one that I totally agree with.
I think that women should prefer the neat and healthy appearance of a circumcised penis. Researches say that circumcised males are less likely to take infections, sexually transmitted diseases and other illness, like balanitis and so on. Then, circumcised penis is easier to touch and it has a longer lasting response to stimulation, increasing pleasure for both!
During sex things get a little dry. The skin continues to act as natural lube and it allows him to penetrate further, and he feels bigger. He will last longer, because from birth the glands have never been exposed. The foreskin is to the penis as the eyelid is to eyes.
I cannot believe that the most technologically advaced people on the planet cutoreskins off of their baby boys. It truly amazing. And the systematic manipulation to keep up the atrocity! I woder how billions of men live happy lives with their God given normal penises. A normal penis is happy and clean!
I am a woman and I prefer a circumcised penis. It's cleaner as more bacteria gets trapped under foreskins of uncircumcised penises. As a female I don't like to have infections down there as I"m very clean and take care of myself, so I like my man to be clean, too. I think circumcised also look a lot more attractive. My man isn't circumcised, but I wish he was!
In my home country,(Philippines) almost all males are circumcised when about 7 to 14 years of age. Its part of the process of becoming a man for them. Nurses in the Philippines are trained to perform this procedure and usually when its time for the boy to have it the nurses do it. Operation Tuli is held at various sites in the spring (April-May) to allow any boy who cannot afford a circumcision to have one at no cost. I started doing the procedure at 18 years old and now I am 46 years old, so I have helped hundreds of boys with this problem. For me its very rewarding to remove this obstacle to their being a man. I believe circumcision to be very important for all boys because of disease control and health of men and women.
Uncircumcised penises are just strange to most women. Even as a male I think they're strange and wouldn't want one. Woman like clean cut and easy access. They don't want to worry about skin flaps or strange appearances.
The foreskin makes a haven for the HPV virus and other pathogens that should not be injected
into their partner simply because he hasn't been circumcised. After becoming aware of the risk and practicing safe sex(condom) in the post condom relationship I demanded that he had been circumcised. Today, both my husband and son are circumcised.
I was circumcised at 19. I'd been sexually active since 15 an had numerious girl friends. For some reason I wanted to be circumcised since the age of 16. I hated my foreskin and felt very uncomfortable when i had sex. Don't get me wrong I was very clean and washed it daily.
I finally got 'cut' when I was in the British Army at 19. It didn't hurt at all but a little uncomfortable with stitches pulling in the old undies now and then!
Why is it the best thing I've done....I now feel more confident, found the ladies were fascinated with it being circumcised. They all commented they like it and have never had any negative comments.
Mostly importantly to me the sensastion during sex is amazing. My cut is high and tight and there is no skin movement whatsoever.
I am now 35 married and have 2 boys. I was my wifes first circumcised partner and she loved our first sexual experience. She actually now describes having sex with a foreskin is like having sex with a condom on! Our first son and quite a few problems with his foreskin. The NHS wouldn't circmcise due to money restraints so we went private. At the same time we had our second son circumised. Both had 'locals' and felt no pain during the operations and it only took minutes.
I am amazed how many wrong and negative comments are given about circumcision. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but don't get blinded by comments made by many aggressive INTACTIVISTS...they have their own agenda and won't and don't listen to people who know alot more than they do! I've experienced both uncircumcised and circumcised and there is only way for me.....and my wife!
I've tried both and noticed some differences but they were very minor. Now I prefer circumcised for its looks. I don't think its circumcision status is very important in a relationship or important at all even. It's just something I personally prefer. It, in general, looks cleaner and just more appealing.
There is no doubt in my mind that a circumcised penis is a much cleaner and more pleasant penis to have. Having experienced both, I can categorically say that the trimmed variety winds hands-down every time. Offered the choice between the two, I would choose the circumcised option every time.
At first I was against circumsion. I had my son and chose not to have it done to him. Later he had to have an emergency one done. He was in a lot of pain and when I took him to the doctor the doctor said it was sealed shut which was causing him the pain. Even though he had been taught to clean it, it wasn't a cleanliness issue. Since then I made sure all my sons were done in infancy. I am now completely for having it done.
I grew up in the UK and, for some reason, circumcision is basically unheard of. I am so disgusted by foreskin that just the thought of it makes me sick to my stomach and I have never met someone who didn't feel the same way. I was so disgusted by uncircumcised men that I seriously thought I was a lesbian. When I wasn't attracted to women, I just figured I was asexual. I moved to America when I was 18 years old and I did what every British girl wants to do when visiting America. Sleeping with a bunch of American boys and it was AMAZING. All of them were circumcised and I literally could not get enough sex. I am now pregnant with my first child and my fiancée and I are DEFIANTLY getting him circumcised as a baby.
I prefer a nice clean cut penis. Feels betters and looks much nicer. I have had many cut and uncut partners, but I now always look for cut men. It can be difficult to find in the UK but there are some around fortunately! I think it should be down to an individuals choice however.
My circumcision was out of an element of choice,having experienced recurrent infections of a form of balanitis for a number of years of which repeated doses of antibiotics did not completeley eradicate the problem. At the time i decided that this was a good preventative measure for the future and continue to remain pleased with the end result scuse the pun. I do believe however that men will continue to have this procedure done for the myriad of members of certain religious groups as well as equal numbers of cultures. I do believe that the element of choice as to whether or not an adult male should decide to have or not to have the operation should prevail. Im glad i chose to have it done and to my mind it is aesthetically pleasing and my partner agrees . Its not a designer penis its still my penis but i am appreciative of the modification
I have been circumcised since I was 8. It was the best decision I've ever made. When my penis is erect I feel a much better edge for sex and it pleases more women than if uncircumcised. I'm proud of my penis, because many, many women will enjoy the pleasant feel, and more extensive sex with my penis, than they have been with an uncircumcised penis. I feel better protected, wiser, and it helped me make better choices in my life, not just my SEX Life. All you women out there that like this decision I love you and I'm cut just like you liked it, that's all I have to say for now.
I love looking at guys' penises when they're naked and if I can't see the exposed head then there is nothing in it for me. All little boys should be circumcised! I also find sex feels better when their skins have been circumcised, I love feeling the outline of the head in me which I cannot if the foreskin is still present. Also, it smells much nicer circumcised which is important for me because I love sucking their penises on an impromptu basis, like in the car....
Circumcised penises are cleaner because nothing can become trapped underneath the foreskin. Sexual intercourse is also more comfortable for both parties involved. It can actually be painful for some men to have sex if they aren't circumcised, and this will create stress for him and also for his partner.
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things?? un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
I am a young college girl, my vaginal tube is tested by cut penis. Cut penis looks good in shape & size against uncut. It is clean, neat, smell-free and no risk of infections. Condom easily fitted on cut penis. Head of penis activated my G-spot, really very nice and silky penis head.
Some years after marriage i elected to have myself circumcised and my wife was very supportive in this choice. She has time and again said that she prefers both the look of an exposed glans and prefers the touch and feel of it. I am very pleased with it and it has added a new dimension of pleasure in intercourse.
I fully support the circumcision of the male foreskin, all the boys in my family have theirs removed. The fully exposed head is so much cleaner, especially for oral sex and the fully denuded head is better for stimulating the vagina, I know I've had both. My boyfriend had his penis circumcised for me just over a year ago and he loves it as much as I do.
No odor, no smegma, no floppy skin during sex- the circumcised penis have such a smooth lovely shaft~ and oral is only for the circumcised, its so clean and smooth, no nasty skin folds or smegma - ewww. I don't see anything wrong in making circumcision mandatory. I mean it has so many potential health benefits, and that too just for such a little bit of pain- I say all the boys should get it done, at least for themselves if not for us girls!
I am circumcised, 20, and now I have no feeling what so ever unless my girlfriend gives me the death grip. Circumcision is a crime and takes away almost all feeling of sensation in the penis. It is natural for guys to have a foreskin, it is equal to cutting off the clit and the labia of a women just for hygiene concern. Women can get over the look and appreciate the way god intended the penis to be.
I thought it was better, I had one other man in my life and he wasn't circumcised. My guy now is circumcised and I find he is always so freakin dry... My V-jay can only lube so much... and I find he doesn't lube and I'm not sure if that is the cause. My pervious guy who wasn't circumcised was always lubed, not sure if that is a factor and I'm embarrassed to ask him about it. Because sex becomes painful after awhile. Am I right?
Males & sadly some females agree that if a males penis is un-circumcised, then it's ugly. First things first, when an un-circumsized penis is erect, it looks just like, or maybe even better than, a circumsized penis. As far as the health stereotypes go, they're all fake. As long as a male showers and scrubs, then it's clean. They say the extra skin carries bacteria. COMPLETELY FALSE.
Aside from women who have been socialized to believe that the foreskin is an unnecessary structure (the height of ignorance, we come with no extra parts) I cannot imagine why any woman would prefer a piece of her partner's penis to be missing. So many key anatomical structures with so many nerves are removed and the man's sexual responsiveness is diminished. It is very sad to me that so many American women in their 50s - 30s will never get to experience sex with an intact man because demographically, the numbers were so low from the 1950s to the 1990s. More and more little boys are being left the way nature intended.
I wasn't cut. I have had a fair number of sexual relationships and the females were quite satisfied. So much so that a few of them later chose not to cut their sons even though their husbands were cut. That makes a pretty strong statement. I'd never cut my sons, of course, as I really enjoy having my foreskin and I don't want to deprive them of the pleasure of having a whole penis.
By cutting part of the penis off (the foreskin) your reduce its size. As well, males with circumcised penises experience a reduction in testosterone development and so do not grow to be as large (height wise and penis wise) It is also proven that size matters. Finally, the foreskin helps to stimulate the woman's G-Spot and bring her pleasure through orgasm.
A circumcised penis is mutilation. I mean, it really just boils down to personal preference really, but forcing a man to do that to himself without his approval is wrong, everyone deserves a choice and say in any matter that involves them and their body. I for one prefer uncircumcised men, I think it's a weird American stereotype.
First up, my personal opinion, I think circumcised penises look like mutilated, skinned mushrooms, and there's that ugly scar on it. They seriously gross me out. Get a restoration! Now for some facts, 85% of men, globally, are intact/uncircumcised, and the whole 'preference' thing is merely what women are accustomed to (and what their country's media has spoon-fed them), which would mean around 85% of women in the world prefer intact. It is a known fact that only a small minority in the world still actively practice circumcision (in America and Muslim/Jewish countries). Even the circumcision rate in America has dropped to 33.5% in 2009. Why? Well, let me tell you what, actual science and real medical institutions mention, and why San Francisco almost passed a bill to ban circumcision outright. Circumcision rates are on a steady decline in America. Why? Because -every- single "benefit" you've ever heard about male genital mutilation (circumcision) has been debunked with modern research. What propaganda in American media spews out is actually the -opposite- to what the actual evidence demonstrates: - The foreskin (which is present on an intact penis) has anti-bacterial properties and prevents infection, effectively -reducing- the chance of STD infection and is much cleaner. "Smegma" (Greek for "soap"), the natural lubricant in an intact male penis, is the reason for this (and what's gotten all the absolutely ridiculous blame for everything that was once thought to be "bad" about it). It's also -much- easier to wash than a female's genitals, and here's a little fact that that propaganda doesn't tell you: there is THREE times more smegma behind the labia and under the clitoral hood of a female's genitals than an intact man's, and it does not get auto-cleaned from a vagina either (it's not present inside it). If you really believe the completely false, debunked claims that intact are "unclean", than keep this in mind: the vagina would be THREE TIMES DIRTIER if that was the case. If you want some proof from the world around you that foreskin substantially reduces the risk of STD transmission, bacterial buildup and infection, take a look at real-world facts and add them together: America is the last Western nation to actively practice circumcision and has the highest number of circumcised males from any country in the Western world. Sum that up with this fact: America has the highest rate of STD transmission from any country in the world.| Not enough proof? Check some credible peer-reviewed sources and educate yourself about a sex organ known as the foreskin. - Babies have a -much- higher chance of dying from circumcision than from the almost non-existent penile cancer. - Visit Circumcision.org (the website of a non-profit organization that presents peer-reviewed, verifiable sources for proof of its claims, instead of ridiculous claims made for the 400-million-dollar business that is circumcision), for an actual scientific research that proves that sex with an intact man is -much- more pleasurable and satisfying for the woman than with a circumcised man. And it should be obvious: without a foreskin, vaginal dryness occurs, which can eventually make sex difficult and unpleasurable for the woman since the man's dry glans tends to scoop out the woman's natural lubricant (this explains why most cut men actually require artificial lubricant). - The foreskin has been found to absorb estrogen from the woman's vagina during intercourse, which has a psychological effect on the male which makes him more intimate towards the female. - Intact men can last MUCH longer during sex. Why? An intact man doesn't need to be "near climax" to feel pleasure, while a circumcised male NEEDS to be on the brink of ejaculation in order to feel any pleasure, which tends to make him want to finish as fast as possible. An uncircumcised male enjoys the entire journey (like the female), and unlike a circumcised male, an intact man can actually -feel-, easily, when he is near climax, allowing him to easily prevent it (and also easily prevent getting a girl pregnant by accident!). Hmm. "The teenage birth rate in the United States is the highest in the developed world, and the teenage abortion rate is also high." (http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/repcard3e.pdf). I wonder why. America also has the highest rate of erectile dysfunction in the developed world, and also the highest use of Viagara. A recent study had shown that intact penises are statistically larger than circumcised penises. This is due to a circumcised male's penis being restricted from most growth during puberty and childhood (there's a good reason the foreskin is initially adhered to the glans [self-cleaning] during childhood then separates: it's a part of the natural growth process). - The foreskin contains 20 000 nerve endings, while the clitoral hood of a female contains only 8000. These nerve endings are entirely devoted to sexual pleasure, but also pain. Female circumcision was banned in 1997 in America because of the negative trauma that girls grew up with from the pain from the procedure. When the brain of a -male- infant was tested before and after circumcision, the brain waves were disturbed, -permanently- after circumcision; believe it or not, this can have a drastic and permanent effect on their mental wellbeing, even if they pretend to be fine (technically they don't know the difference). A word of warning for mothers: if you're going to have this done to them, watch the procedure yourself. One mother, having watched it, was in mental trauma for decades, from witnessing the horrific screams of her child from the procedure. Well over 100 infants die every year in America from circumcision. ...Also, keep in mind that the vast majority of the "Yes" answers seem to be from both circumcised American males and paid advertisers, and from the looks of it, they had been brainwashed by a 400-million-dollar business. Not even the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends circumcision; and every single thing I've read from their responses are laughably false. Check "Intact and Famous" for a massive list of celebrities who are intact (e.g: Colin Farrell, Elvis Presley, James Dean, Dane Cook, Pierce Brosnan, Will Smith...). And there are several circled celebrities who actually hate the fact that they're circumcised: look them up. It is male genital mutilation that severely damages the man, and the woman as well. Want evidence for my claims? Check them for yourself from -credible-, scientific sources, instead of propaganda from paid media advertisements. And another thing, that comment on the "Yes" section that starts off with "Some want it even mandatory!", judging from the link he or she has given to an article, it's from some third-world African country, and the poster refers to it as his or her own country. They practice that like rituals from a ridiculous, biased, and now-disproven "study" from over a century ago, in a developing African country that didn't know how to practice the scientific method properly at the time. Look up details on that and you'll notice that it was the most ridiculously biased "study" you'll ever see.
I prefer intact. In my experience intact lovers have been better. Also, cut means most likely cut as a baby. Think about it! You're cutting off a piece of your child's genitals! That's messed up. It's illegal to cut a girl's genitals, why is it okay to cut a boy's genitals? People try to justify it with all kinds of arguments, but the fact remains you are CUTTING your child!
The ignorance on the left makes me want to slam my head against the wall. So many lies and myths being said by these pro-cutters. Only women who haven't been lucky to be with a WHOLE man will say they prefer cut men. The fact is natural sex (meaning intact sex) is so much better. Less friction, more pleasure for both the man and the woman. Cut sex is not normal. There is too much friction. A cut penis is basically a dildo since there are no movable parts like in a whole penis.
Males who are uncircumcised have better orgasms as I have experienced and it is more comfortable during sex. Also nowadays science says that men who are circumcised barely have any orgasmic feeling and in my experience makes sex for me way more uncomfortable. And uncircumcised penis is also bigger. So this is why I say what I say.
Only American women would prefer a mutilated penis because they've been indoctrinated to believe it looks better. An operation that is potentially life threatening should not be taken just to make someone fit in with other people who have had an operation to fit in. It has no venture. I am unmutilated and have found that any "hygiene problems" are made up.
How can a woman be attracted to a penis that no longer looks like a penis should? I personally find circumcised penises ugly. I cant imagine how it must feel for the guy to have his penis head rubbing against the inside of his clothing; thickening the skin and dulling sensation.
The argument about hygiene is obsolete- so long as a man cleans himself daily them there's no problem, if he doesn't then he'll be unclean whether or not his penis is circumcised.
The penis skin is a form of protection and also is the dominating factor in male sexual pleasure as it roles up and down the penis.
Don't get me wrong, if an adult male makes the decision to have his penis circumcised its his own choice, but we should not be doing it to babies against their will.
Uncut is better because it's natural; the way a penis is meant to be. Men lose a lot of feeling in their penis when they are circumcised and also, they tend to not last as long. My current boyfriend is uncircumcised and is an amazing lover.
Personally I think that circumcised penises look very odd and naked. Not neat but bare and pink/red and kinda scary. >.<
I understand that many people feel that circumcised is "cleaner" but have you not heard of soap and warm water? It's just laziness. Wash yourselves thoroughly and regularly and there is no problem!
I definitely prefer a man that is uncircumcised. I have been with my fair share of men and those who are uncircumcised have been far more sexual and willing to reciprocate (not that you'd think the latter would have much to do with it, but there is a correlation.). I also think touching performing oral on an uncircumcised man is far more natural and just comfortable in general. Men that are circumcised are just plain tight and I feel like there's always friction.
This is very likely going to depend on regional factors. Most women in Europe will likely prefer intact penises because it is what they are accustomed to, for instance. Actually, most women around the world are accustomed to natural, healthy, intact penises. As a circumcised male, I've been with women who have suggested that they don't care, prefer cut penises or prefer intact penises, .
I have an uncircumcised penis and don't know which is better. But as I have an uncircumcised penis I am going with uncircumcised.
I also think that process of circumcision is a painful and unnecessary process for adults. If it is done to a new born baby or child then it would be the worst decision you have done.
Not this woman. Circumcised sex hurts. It's unnatural. There are no moving parts in a cut penis. No gliding action that provides a natural lube and makes sex comfortable. I HATE circumcised sex and I HATE that my husband was cut at birth. Needless to say we don't have sex anymore. Circumcision of minors needs to be made illegal NOW.
I don't support a practice (which is religious in nature) that mutilates a baby's penis, obviously without their consent. Foreskin isn't gross, or creepy, it is natural. I'd be pretty upset if my labia was altered when I was a baby for religious/cosmetic purposes. I have had sexual relationships with both circumcised and uncircumcised penises and really, they are not that different. Only thing different is how to put the condom on.
If you are a Christian and you believe in circumcision this is for you. In the beginning God created man and found that it was good. This passage means something very important to this topic. God found that man was "good" not that he was almost good. When circumcision started it was meant as a sacrifice to God. God would not ask for a sacrifice that did not matter. He asked for something that would have indeed been a sacrifice. In modern times we live in a new covenant, one that does not require circumcision. There are passages in the Bible condemning circumcision. In Christianity women were created for men. God would not have created women not liking something about men.
The reason I believe many women think an uncircumcised penis is gross is because that is what they have been taught a penis should look like. If women actually thought a circumcised penis looked better the majority of the world might be circumcised. It is my contention that circumcision was started to keep men from masturbating. Since they used to think masturbation caused diseases. Circumcision is the inhumane practice of mutilating men against their will.
A good argument to be made here about the attractiveness and hygiene of a circumcised male is to compare the same arguments about circumcised women. I am NOT trying to equate the two practices as the same. Female circumcision is usually much more invasive. The people in cultures that promote female circumcision have the same arguments for supporting female circumcision as our culture does for supporting male circumcision. They say it is cleaner and is more attractive for a woman to be circumcised like some people say the same for male circumcision in America.
It is my belief that men and women both have a right to keep their genitalia at any age. I would like to journey into a hypothetical situation. I will put forth my best effort to explain myself as effectively as possible as to not offend anyone. Let us have a hypothetical situation that men and women can be circumcised legally. But also allow for a difference in what most people consider female circumcision. Instead what I will mean by female circumcision is the removal of the skin covering the clitoris. This is a far less invasive form of circumcision than we are accustomed to addressing with female circumcision. Now with this different and equally damaging form of circumcision for both the sexes consider if it should still be legal to circumcise all children, regardless of sex. It is my firm belief you will see this in a different light. If not read on.
It is my firm belief that people have evolved over many, many, many years. If you do not share this belief perhaps it would be best to read my next post above. Please do not stop reading if you disagree with this statement as circumcision affects everyone not just those who are religious or not. In continuation, if the foreskin was not beneficial to men. I believe they would not have it. Keeping good hygiene is a practice many have adopted to stay healthy. Many years ago many people must have died due to poor hygiene, whether they were even aware of the possibility of good hygiene or not. If having a foreskin was a hygiene problem for those before us who did not likely practice good hygiene then those people would have had less of a chance of living and would have eventually died out. Instead of the group of people who have foreskins dying out they thrived. Nearly every male is born with a foreskin. This is huge evidence that foreskins are beneficial.
God created man with foreskin for a reason. It maintains a healthy moist environment and enhances both male and female pleasure. For all you people out there who think "intact" penises and less hygienic than a cut one your wrong. Secretions from the glands on a mans penis contain antibacterial properties which helps to prevent STD's, also, it acts as an extra lubricant during sex. Cut men often have to use lubrication as sex can become dry and uncomfortable. This is because a cut penis soaks up a large quantity of female secretions. As I said, why cut of something that is suppose to be there? You wouldn't cut off your eye lids because they could "house bacteria" hahaha. I would like to take this moment to thank my parents for not mutilating my penis....Love you mum!!!!
I believe women prefer men to have a natural-looking penis, not only because it is more attractive, but also on a more pragmatic side, the skin protects the tip of the penis, which is a very sensitive area. It also keeps moisture, avoiding tissue damage from rubbing on the clothes, and keeps sexual pleasure without delaying climaxes, as I've heard from circumcised men.
I totally agree, that its inhumane and barbaric to circumstance a newborn baby. I could understand if it has to be done for medical reasons, but there is no need to cut every single baby boy! Whats up with that? Its painful and there are at least 7-10 days recovery time. Many cut men are having lack of sensitivity and need lots of lubrication. A cut penis gets very rough and dry over the years. Oh yes, and you can still contract STD's from a circumcised guy. I've been dating a circumcised Jewish man for several years and contracted HPV. This unnecessary ridiculous practice has to be banned as soon as possible. Newborn circumcision is just a way for the doctors to make more money - so they will tell parents all these wonderful things about circumcision. Personally I like uncut men very much and never had a problem with odor or the way it looks..
I believe women prefer men to have a natural-looking penis, not only because it is more attractive, but also on a more pragmatic side, the skin protects the tip of the penis, which is a very sensitive area. It also keeps moisture, avoiding tissue damage from rubbing on the clothes, and keeps sexual pleasure without delaying climaxes, as I've heard from circumcised men.
I've been with 3 men. The first 2 were circumcised and the 3rd was intact. There is DEFINITELY a difference. My first 2 boyfriends took forever to please and I felt sore after sex. With my intact boyfriend, he was a lot easier to please and I was never sore. I think circumcised penises look mutilated and unhealthy. An intact penis is actually attractive and clean. Now that I know what it's like to be with an intact man, I would never choose to be with a circumcised man again. Ever. They're missing too much. And my sons will definitely NOT be circumcised.
It's just sad that our society thinks it's normal to chop of parts of genitals from infants. It's sick.
I do believe that is a matter of personally preference, but not only do I personally think that uncircumsized penises are MORE attractive, I believe they feel better too. I think circumcised penises look mis-shapen and I find the scars to be unattractive. Uncircumsized penises seem to be more sensitive and responsive, and just feel like a better fit.
Forcing little boys to be held down and have a part of their penis cut off right after birth is horrible! It should be his decision to be cut or not. I also heard that an all natural uncirc penis feels better during sex because it glides in better as nature intended. I would rather do it with an all natural man any day!
It feels better downstairs- almost like a ribbed condom but better. He's clean so there's no issue there. Unless for religious reasons or if the child is living in a dirty environment where they don't have the facilities for daily cleaning I don't see why children should be clipped just because.
Why do they have to mess with it anyway? You wouldn't take the shell off a turtle just so it won't have anywhere to hide its head, so why do it with a penis? There is no need for it, and who was even the first person to think they would do that? It is ridiculous and people should have their own choices of what their body should be like, not made by their parents.
It's a bizarre cultural phenomenon which most of the world (and therefore most women) doesn't share.
If circumcision was beneficial to the human race (from either the male or female point of view), evolution would have fixed the problem centuries ago (What! You don't believe in evolution? There's no hope for you). It's totally unnecessary, and doctors surely have more important things to occupy their working lives.
Most circumcised men, had part of their body cut off without consent during childhood. Foreskin is one of the most sensitive parts of the penis and parents have no right to make that sort of irreversible decision for their baby.
My first was with a circumcised man. The sex was fantastic, and he didn't have a size problem with his penis or height. Although I did get more sore after with him than with my current uncut boyfriend, uncut does smell weird if he doesn't shower daily, but I find sex more pleasurable and I feel more connected with him while we're having sex. I feel he feels more, and we react off of each others pleasure. Personally as a woman, I can say I don't prefer circumcised penises over uncircumcised.
The foreskin provides many important functions and is not just 'a useless piece of skin' like we've been taught to believe. Its basically just a cosmetic surgery forced on an infant to make others happy regardless of the trauma imposed on him. Any woman who would choose not to sleep with a man simply because he has a foreskin is shallow and narrow-minded.
Cutting reduces the natural blanket that protects the penis from rubbing... meaning he has a better experience, and I do too, because there's less hard friction and more stimulation.
The easy and gentle penetration of an intact penis, the caressing and gentle arousal of the moist glans and the mind blowing orgasm which accompanies the maximal penetration of the oh-so-welcome intact penis, can only be imagined by those who have never experienced it. I think I would prefer a plastic dildo to a dry cut cock.
Personally I believe that it is better for a man to have his foreskin intact. As a female I prefer if my men have their foreskin and feel that sex is better with it. I don't know how to handle a penis that is circumcised as it can be dry and my technique needs to be different.
Where do people get off forcing surgery on another on the idea they prefer the looks? Even the argument of cleanliness is stupid, if you don't clean something it gets dirty. Teach your kids to clean themselves! Regardless. Foreskin is not just skin, it is full of nerves! When having sex the skin goes back for sensitivity and looks much the same but has the ability to go in better. Circumcised penises have no movement. Why do doctors/science spend their life trying to understand the intelligence of the human body and then decide they know more about it than the intelligence that created it? Human stupidity.
Guys who usually end up getting circumcised do it for hygienic reasons (mostly because they can't keep it clean). So what are the chances of them staying clean even after that. I prefer guys who can handle an uncircumcised penis. If it counts for anything, I just think it looks better.
I think that it is a myth that females prefer circumcised penises over uncircumcised penises. I think that this is an idea just because it is much more rare to see one that is uncircumcised, so women are not used to it as much. I doubt that a woman would really not date or sleep with someone over this issue, it just might be a new experience!
A guy is born with foreskin because of nature. Creatures in nature adapt to their environment. Therefore saying, if nature wanted guys to have no skin on top of their penis than they wouldn't. So don't screw with something that nature has chosen! Because it has been chose for a reason and just let it go.
Just no. That shouldn't even be happening, like seriously why?, If God, no Offense to Non-believers but if God created us with Foreskin why the heck would you ruin his creation for?, your foreskin is there for a reason and if it wasn't meant to be there then God would have created us without it, I get for some people it's Religious and some people want to get it, but no! Never, I wouldn't give that to a Child either, putting them through that madness, It's so sad , and even if there're good affects, there's also bad too!, So keep It Natural, It's always better Natural..I don't think there is any need to get it, that's just...Appalling.
While circumcision is considered 'normal' in some cultures, and, somewhat strangely, in the US, it is still an oddity - in modern terms, it is a physical enhancement, much like changing your breasts, or other parts of your body. The idea that foreskins are non-aesthetic is ludicrous (they peel back for a start). And even if phallic design is something that is close to our heart, think of Michelangelo's David - not only is he uncircumcised (contrary to his theological point of reference), but he's not the biggest either. But that's not what defines 'beauty' or 'attraction'. Seriously, women who take issue with men having all of their penis still intact is no worse than men who prefer their women to have implants, or other physical augmentations. Natural is best. Just like David.
Circ reduces the mans sensitivity. Even if done for religious, reasons should be banned. Anyone who supports it is a pedophile and pervert. I hate being circumcised, and I will use foregen.Org to gain back what is rightfully mine. Foreskins 4 ever! Stop male genital mutilation and partial Penectomy. Stop it.
I had never been with an uncircumcised man before my current boyfriend. At first I was confused, worried about all the rumors I had heard. After research and talking with my boyfriend I have found that it is truly wrong to make this type of decision for your child. The sex is so much more intense and enjoyable. He is very clean and has no odor at all. When we decide to have children I have no intention of getting circumcisions for my boys.
Vaginas also can have strange odors and produce much more smegma than an uncircumcised penis. Fortunately, my parents realized that vaginas aren't that hard to clean and did not choose to cut off my labia and clitoral hood. (since female circumcision was technically legal when I was born; it was banned in 1996) Why they chose to circumcise my brother, considering that my dad is INTACT, is a mystery to me. I am currently in a relationship with a circumcised man and I love him dearly. However, I HATE that his parents put him through such an unnecessary and painful procedure when he was a helpless infant. If I have a son, he will remain intact. If he wants to have the procedure done when he is an adult, fine. But I'd rather have my son be able to choose to lose a sensitive part of his penis and hate me because he's already having erectile dysfunction when he's 20. (Yes, there is a positive correlation between circumcision and ER; do your research.)
I resent my parents for doing it to me and I am now restoring. Sex feels way better now than it ever did and my wife agree's. I did not circumcise my son because I didn't think it was medically necessary. AAP shows only benefits of circumcision and is bias on intact benefits. They base their studies on Africa in which they do not have high standards of cleanliness. Why not base it on Europe where more than 80 percent of men are intact. Strange how the countries with more circumcised men need Viagra and how the USA has more diseases than any other country. A woman's labia has tiny folds of skin and covers the clitoris just like the foreskin does. Girls will smell too if it's not cleaned every day just like a man with a foreskin. If women feel sore after sex, it's usually because of the missing gliding action of the foreskin. It is actually more pleasurable with the foreskin to glide during sex for both partners and no soreness. The numbers are in 52 percent of the US is circumcising down from 80 percetn a decade ago. Don't let your baby's foreskin be used for a facial cream, it's too beneficial.
I had a boyfriend who was uncircumcised and at first I thought it was weird and gross, but then I researched it and saw that it is better for a man to be natural. Why should a man be deprived of a lot of the pleasure of sex? Not to mention that circumcised men cause sex to be anywhere from slightly displeasing to downright painful for the woman. We both, my ex and I, still talk occasionally, but I worry that he may get circumcised because he worries about the minor health risks.
As a female in the US, I'm protected by law from having my genital cut without my consent if I am an infant. It doesn't seem right that men are given the same protection. The benefits of circumcision are supposed to be for hygiene, penile cancer, HIV, infection, etc. But the reduced risks are not always substantial or conclusive for these problems. You are as likely to die from circumcision as an infant as you are to die from penile cancer as an adult. Also, they can often be prevented by basic hygiene, sex education, and safe sex practices. I would rather have an intact man who makes his own responsible decisions, rather than for his parents to have decided without his consent to amputate a normal, healthy, functional part of his sexual organs based on the fear of a slight chance of those problems. If there is a specific disease or abnormality that is currently affecting a man and circumcision is required after exhausting all other methods, then I would support his decision because it is his decision and a necessary, not elective, procedure. Also, circumcised men have higher rates of problems with erectile dysfunction, adequate lubrication, premature ejaculation, and adhesions. Not fun! Oh, and getting your son circumcised so he will look like you seems insecure and slightly narcissistic. It's his body and you should cut away at it without his consent. Do you really like the fact that your parents decided to cut away some of the most erogenous tissue on your penis without giving you a choice?
I prefer being with intact guys, because they provide much more sensation during sex and they don't have to pound you during the act just for them to reach an orgasm. The foreskin acts like a natural lubricant when performing on sexual acts. The penis gland was designed to be internal organ that is protected from constant friction just like a the clitoris on a woman.
What it feels like to have a male orgasm. Which BTW starts from the point of entry with your foreskin sensation up to the point when you climax. Circumcised men can't enjoy the full length of sex. Circumcision is like taking away a babies sense of sight away from them at birth. Would you want that really for you our your kid if you had a choice. You do have a choice and you should give your child a choice too!
According to Wikipedia, only 30% of males are circumcised. If women had a preference for circumcision, we wouldn't be making very many babies. Everyone differs but the vast majority of women probably don't have much of a preference either way.
If you weren't circumcised as a kid and youre thinking of get circumcised now, DON'T. See, uncut men have a better advantage over circumcised ones. Men who have not been circumcised actually feel more stimulation down there than circumcised men do. The foreskin is filled with nerves which help the penis feel. Men who receive circumcision as adults almost always regret their decision because they've lost large amounts of feeling down there. To put it in a short version, uncircumcised men FEEL more sensations than circumcised men.
Nobody is talking about a medical treatment, we're talking about genital mutilation! If it's medically needed (very few males are circumcised for medical reasons as a last resort, like under 1%), then fine, but there's no just cause to mutilate a child for your own preference! And as far as "benefits" go, most public healthcare professionals agree that the risks associated with routine circumcision, such as infection and excessive bleeding, outweigh any *potential* benefits.
Preferring circumcised penises is no different to preferring circumcised vaginas (FGM)! Think about it, would you support FGM if women gained all the the "benefits" men got from circumcision?
The hygiene argument doesn't wash (pun intended) now that we can shower every day. There is probably more pleasure for the male, and definitely more comfort for the female when the foreskin is intact. Circumcision is just another excuse for physicians to present us with a bill. Any sons of mine will be uncircumcised.
Circumcised penises just don't cut it for me. They are weird looking, very dry, and also intimidating. The only positive to a circumcised penis is that the man lasts longer during sex due to his loss of sensation from the foreskin. Despite being quick in the sack, uncircumcised penises make for great loving.
The second-class citizenship of American boys is a disgrace. Parents would never let a doctor rip apart the genitals of their precious daughters. Boys are treated like inferior citizens, without the same right to bodily integrity that girls enjoy under the law. The male penis has been trivialized into a disgusting dirty object of scorn by the circumcision industry, which has no intention of ever stopping their cruel practice. They hide behind a smokescreen of preposterous health claims that men in the rest of the world disprove by merely living with their intact genitals, just as normal men & women have lived throughout human history. The reality is that the pro-circ medical lobby has a vision of America as a place where generation after generation of men will live and die with wounded genitals. The malevolent genius of forced infant circumcision is that its victims become its chief proponents in a terrible impulse to deny their own loss. As a circumcised man, I stand up with the truth, "This is wrong. It stops with me." Others who accept their circumcision without objection, or embrace it, live under the tyranny of the circumciser, who owns them. Every absurd hypothesis put forth by the circumciser to justify himself has also been used to justify female circumcision. It's a sick world out there, and American doctors bear the bloodstained mark of their own shame.
The cleaning issue is ridiculous, uncircumcised or not, if the guy is clean his penis will be clean also! The feeling is the other big issue, uncircumcised is better for the joy they offer on sucking or on action. Most of the circumcised penises are led there from their religion background and porn industry fashion.
I just can't seem to find any logical reason why anyone would want to do this their son. There are multiple facts as to why it shouldn't be done. Do your research. Your emotions and the opinions of others shouldn't weigh in. Your decision should be made solely on facts and logical thought process.
They all look the same hard. Also I heard circumcision leads to ED later in life. I've been with both cut and uncut and neither really seemed different. Besides, you're with the man not the penis and to be honest some of my best lovers were still in the original packaging.
It takes a few seconds every day to clean it, so that's the hygiene argument out of the way, and I genuinely don't see how an circumcised penis is nicer looking than one with a foreskin. Then again, I consider it odd that people shave their body/pubic hair off or wear make up.
It's actually a weird practice. Most people claim it has a lot of benefits, but what they are doing is defending their faith and using health benefits as an excuse. All Middle Eastern-originated religions practice this because they wanted to prevent sand getting into their penis beside water was lack so it was hard to clean under the foreskin. That's how the circumcision practice came to the world. Nowadays it's totally useless. So DO NOT CUT it because it's some sort of a Genital Mutilation. Will you cut your daughter's clitoris? Think about it. Humans have it for a purpose, nature will decide what to do with it. So nature decide if the foreskin is useless. It will fade away in the future gradually. Humans DO HAVE A RIGHT TO change nature as they want. If humans keep dong that it will bring oblivion to mankind.
What the majority of women prefer always coincides with the percentage of men that are circumcised in that area. If most men there are circumcised, then most of the women there think circumcised is better. If the majority is uncircumcised, then most of the women will think uncircumcised is better. If it's around 50/50 in an area, then they usually have no preference.
That's about all there is to it on people's preference. Most people just use "facts" (quotation because much of the information is controversial, sketchy or weak) to try to justify their stance, rather than to choose it. Of course most people initially decide on what they hear, which is most support of what' more prevalent.
In the end, they prefer what they are used to. That's society for you, just bandwagoning along with what's already there. Since the majority of the world is uncircumcised, I chose "No", but if varies in each country. In the United States women prefer it circumcised in the northeast and central. In the west, it is much less common. It is also preferred in predominantly very Islamic nations and Israel. It may be preferred in some American spheres of influence. In Europe and the rest of the world, uncircumcised is strongly preferred.
The foreskin is designed to enhance sexual pleasure on both sides. It has been tested and verified that the most pleasurably sensitive part of the penis is the foreskin. The foreskin aids in lubrication and reduces friction upon initial entry. The foreskin also allows for an added 1-2 inches of length to the penis. Because the glans penis is constantly protected, the head is softer and much more sensitive. Plus intact men are sexy and really fun for oral!
How clean a penis is depends on the man, not his foreskin. As long as he practice's cleaning it daily, a women should not notice any difference is cleanliness. FACT
This is only my opinion, I don't pretend to offend or hurt anyone's feelings.
Being a female I personally don't like circumcised penises. I think they are disgusting and I hate how they look. It is so disgusting to me, that I would never date a man if I know he is circumcised. (Although is not something you usually know before dating someone).
I like how uncircumcised penises look, and I think it is more natural because it is how people are born. Also, I think that having a foreskin is better for men when having sexual relations, because they have lots of nerve endings in that particular zone; circumcised men can't experience the same pleasure.
Fore skin, It's a sleeve that glides, keeping it from abrasion on the sides of the vagina! Circumcised men get about 7-16% sexual pleasure, instead of 100%! And women get about 30% when having sex with a circumcised man! The foreskin is the most nerve filled tissue as well. And the membrane of the head will thicken and lose it's sensitivity, And the women will have an abrasive hard object, instead of sliding sheets of skin.
In my country, the circumcised penis is considered unnatural and weird.
Honestly, I've been with only one uncircumcised man [my husband] and he is the best lover in the world! I think his manhood is simply beautiful, and it makes no difference in the terms of cleanliness compared to a circumcised penis. Both will have natural scents or odors, well groomed or not. Why put your baby or teen son through unnecessary pain? Females need to grow up and not be judgmental. I'm totally against fgm, isn't circumcision mgm? Also, the Bible says it makes no difference (in what makes the man a better person [or lover in my eyes]) so there you have it. Keep it natural. Besides, the skin pulls back when he's erect so it looks just like a bare penis!
You won't get any kind of consensus with a question like this. You'll find that some women prefer cut, some uncut, and quite a few who really don't care either way. There is always the issue of being most comfortable with what we are used to and that certainly plays a huge part. There is also social stigma. Look up Rachel "rabbit" White's story about her experience with uncircumcised males. Basically she used to be one of those girls who thought uncut was gross, but once she actually tried it, she loved it.
Some women prefer uncircumcised men because they feel better; sex is more gentle and smooth, etc...more pleasurable for the man because of his greater sensitivity.
Check out sexasnatureintendedit.com
Some women prefer circumcised men for exactly the opposite reason. They actually enjoy the frantic thrusts and increased friction that really turns some women off.
And of course, some love both, "aesthetics" be damned.
I am one of those people who hopes to see a day when routine, as well as religious (superstitious) circumcision of male AND female infants/children is eradicated. But even then, there will still be plenty of adults who choose to have their genitalia surgically modified in whatever way they please for whatever reason they please. Human sexuality is incredibly eclectic. Women as a whole prefer no one thing, just as men as a whole prefer no one thing.
My problem isn't circumcised penises so much as whether or not the owner had any say in the matter.
It is genital mutilation of an important sex organ that the body was BORN WITH. We don't just decide to cut off arms or legs. It is easily cleaned (LIKE ANY OTHER PART OF THE BODY) and despite what anyone says, the foreskin allows the penis to remain more sensitive to touch AND it is easier to masturbate -- no need for lube or lotion. Everyone that says yes to this question was just brainwashed yet again by American medical "research" that is run by lobbies and myths.
Not only does it make no difference to the look of an erect penis, but the foreskin also provides added stimulation and lubrication during sex. I've been with both and FAR prefer a penis being uncut. The rolling action of the foreskin during sex is a sensation that will outweigh the violent pounding that is needed by uncut men any day of the week in my opinion. If a man keeps himself clean (and this goes for cut men as well, because balls smell gross when dirty too) there is no reason any woman should care whether he has a foreskin. It's a natural part of the male anatomy and I know that it's something I had been missing.
I grew up in Hungary and this thing is very rare in here. I had to do it because of medical issues when I was 24. The operation was very painful. I have had an asymetric scar line (unskilled surgeon), and most of the girls have never seen this type. I feel shame in front of them, because it's ugly, and uncommon. And of course I lost about 40% of sensitivity because I lost a lot of my precious tissues and my clothes have damaged the rest of it.
I'm completely against unnecessary circumcisions. I believe that the women in the US are brainwashed into thinking that they prefer circumcised penises. So technically women in the US haven't even formed there own real opinions on the subject. Women in other countries don't usually have an opinion on male circumcision either, because only males in the US are circumcised (for the most part). If given factual information and the opportunity, most women prefer an intact (uncircumcised) male. If not, then you can be sure that she has been successfully brainwashed into thinking that an unnatural penis is "better, cleaner, more attractive and more normal" than a natural one. Supporting circumcision is a new way of thinking, considering how long uncircumcised humans have been on this Earth. Which shows how quickly and easily swayed a human can be, with certain types of influences affecting their opinions.
They are easier to please as opposed to uncut. I never experience anything unclean about it. I was actually afraid to look at it for the first time, but when I did see an uncircumcised penis for the first time, instead of laughing, I actually got a tingly feeling and was completely turned on. It makes sense though: that's the way the penis was intended to look and what our brains are probably instinctively attracted to. I'm actually disappointed now if a guy is circumcised.
My boyfriend is not circumcised and we have a great sex life. As long as he has good personal hygiene cleanliness and odor is not a problem. I don't understand why guys feel they should get circumcised because women complain it's better looking, it's as if all women should get breast surgery because men like bigger boobs. I have no problem with an uncircumcised penis as long as he has good personal hygiene!
Would you still support the genital mutilation of young girls? Cutting of the major or minor labia? People who cut their boys are sick and disgusting people! It should be the man's decision when he is an adult. With all this going on about "a woman's body, a woman's choice", well "It's a man's body, it should be a man's choice!"
In the process of circumcision, nerve endings that make sex more pleasurable for the man are cut off in the process of circumcision. A boy who was circumcised after birth will grow up, never feeling as much pleasure as he could have, which is awful! Quite honestly, I don't want to have sex with a man that cannot have as great of orgasms. I feel like his inability to be fully satisfied will reflect on his performance in bed.
Although many men now have circumcised penises opposed to uncircumcised it still doesn't mean that women prefer one over the other. For most sex comes after love and if a woman loves a man whether or not he is circumcised is not an issue to her nor something she really cares either way about.
The foreskin is not there just to simply exist, it's there to protect the penis against many things, and if you do cut it, it looks mutilated! It was not made to be cut off! It has it's purpose, and it is done away with then it defeats it's whole purpose of being there!
With an uncircumcised guy, you're less likely to need lube, less likely to experience pain, and more likely to have an orgasm via intercourse. Plus, I hate the look of scars and keratinized skin. And it's another part of a penis to play with... YAY! There used to be cleanliness and STD concerns, but not anymore, now that we have running water. It's really freaking easy to keep an uncircumcised penis clean by simply retracting the foreskin and washing it while bathing.
With all that said... It should be up to the man and his long-term partner(s) whether or not he should be circumcised. Some women do prefer it, and that's okay. I just don't like the fact that it's done to babies. 118 baby boys die every year in the US alone directly as a result of routine circumcision. Not okay! Let the kid make up his own mind when he's older and can undergo the procedure with much less risk!
our eye lid are our cover for eye. But every morning we wash them with water and no problem. Our teeth are washed by us everyday. Do we we cut the enamel of teeth because contain so called dirt ??This is nothing but a bluff that the lame excuse of cleaning.