No woman will refuse a man only for the fact that he has been circumcised.
There are clearly women who will refuse a man only for the fact that he is intact.
Circumcision improves options, possibilities, opportunities and the converse is true. The fact is that not circumcising a boy may result in him being rejected for this reason alone.
Now it is no use calling such women names, making judgments or complaining. A woman has the right to decide who she will allow to have sex with her - her own personal veto power. A cut penis will never alone be denied consideration for this factor alone.
They are cleaner - Always cleaner. A cut penis can have no smegma - no foreskin = no smegma.
Now it does not matter if an intact fellow lives in the shower - the fact remains that if you have a foreskin you can have smegma and if you do not have a foreskin you can NEVER have smegma.
I am a young college girl, my vaginal tube is tested by cut penis. Cut penis looks good in shape & size against uncut. It is clean, neat, smell-free and no risk of infections. Condom easily fitted on cut penis. Head of penis activated my G-spot, really very nice and silky penis head.
Women do not like to pull down a man's pants to see a disgusting uncircumcised penis.In more civil writing,being uncircumcised really does not have the benefits that uncircumcised people claim.First of all, many but not all uncircumcised penises produce enough smegma to where hygiene becomes an issue.Women are very offended by this.Secondly,there is no increase in pleasure for the woman simply because there is a disgusting flap of skin.Most importantly it looks quite disgusting and women find that extremely unattractive.One may argue that the rates are falling,however in reality the rates of circumcision in the United States are a satisfying 56-66%(depending on the year).If you are wondering on why to get your son clipped don't listen to all of the foreskin propaganda because really it has more pros than cons.
I don't know how many women actually give it much thought. But, when they do, I think that women prefer a man to be circumcised. The number one reason for the preference is that, in western civilization, it is the norm. Then, there is the issue of cleanliness. Lots of folks associate a circumcised penis with a higher degree of cleanliness. Finally, many people believe that a circumcised penis is more enjoyable.
Circumcised penises, in my opinion, are much better. Over the years, I've found that uncircumcised penises tend to have a stronger smell and more greasy/sweaty feel to them. Despite best efforts to keep clean, any skin that is folded on top of other skin will tend to sweat and smell rather quickly - even after a good shower. So it is definitely a fact that circumcised penises are "easier" to keep clean, and I'm guessing are less prone to infections.
The uncircumcised penis has a foul smell which I cannot stand. Everyone's different & some may like the smell or be able to see past it. However, I cannot. Circumcised is much cleaner & pleasant. It's such a shame that so many people are opting to keep it natural these days rather than have it cut. It's slowly being faded out & soon I believe it won't be an option to have done which is a shame for those of us who don't like stinky penises!
Uncircumcised penises are just aesthetically unpleasant to the eye. They are dirty. You don't need science to tell you that a bigger surface area (uncircumcised penis) means more bacteria. It's logic. The people on the right probably have never had a girl tell them "I won't sleep with you because I don't want any bacterial infections", or just plain "Ewe".
I much prefer cut over uncut. I think because it protects against HIV and this is proven it's better defense against STD and infections. Plus, it looks and feels so much better. I woild give a big vote for YES I prefer it much more than UNCUT and I'm in a country where circumsision is not praticed as much as arab nations or USA.
Most women would rather have sex with someone with a circumcised penis, mostly because they are cleaner, and nothing is able to get trapped underneath the foreskin. The look of the actual penis without the foreskin is much more appealing, and it feels better too. It is more possible for men with foreskin to contract an STD which women obviously do not want.
Safe view and look for life and normal beauty if one desires to copulate. A great and better spectacle for length. Easier to grab and hold on to for the reason of girth and important feelings, this is real and the way it should be when you want to be.
First of all, it looks better & no odor, plus the scar around is not that noticeable/bad looking. What is noticeable are uncircumcised penises. Why would I want a guy that has an odor down there all the time, unless they go wash up pretty good every-time before any sexual contact. I mean do guys like ugly vaginas that have an odor? I don't think so. So why would we?
It's true circumcised penises do look better than uncircumcised. I've been with both and while the uncircs are easier to please, when flaccid they are less pleasant to look at. They are more likely to transmit STDs and pH related infections like Bacterial Vaginosis and yeast infections. That said, I think it would be better to let the young man decide for himself.
Why is a foreskin there if all it does it give both partners more risk of diseases? I think all men should be cut, and just forget about this stupid argument. Circumcision is so much better, it reduces all chances of STDs, and all those conditions. Boys should be circumcised around the age of 10, so they can remember the thrill of getting a better, nicer, more attractive penis.
Every uncut man I've been with has had a funky odor, even after washing. It's unusual, but has something to do with "smegma", a substance under the foreskin composed of fermenting urine. I suppose they have received a bad reputation. Most females I know wont touch them for this reason.
I used to be neutral on this topic until I met a person who was anti circ. It amazed me how much they twisted their figures and would not listen to any reason whatsoever. You can't have a fair debate if the person you are debating against has wild figures.
The 2009 article about circ. Being at percentages in the 30-35% range is FALSE it appears to be a figure that was released without all data because lone behold TRUE figures came out in 2011 regarding 2010 figures and it showed circumcision is still the norm in the USA at 54% those figures only includes hospital circ. So any Jewish or practicing Muslims who do it more for religious reasons are not included in that 54% figure so I maybe as bold to raise that to the 58%-60% if you include circ. Not performed in a hospital.
The American Pediatrics has come out with a full report support circ. A stance they where neutral on prior. That says alot. It also appears to drive the anti circ protestors insane! However FACT is one of the most respected medical associations in the world says health benefits put weight any kind of risk.
I have been with uncircumcised men perfore and it was uncomfortable. I attempted to perform oral on two very clean Latino men I was dating that had not been circumcised. In all honesty, I couldn't get through either one. I don't care who much you scrub the area between the foreskin and the head of the penis is actually similar to the tissue in the anal region, so remember do you really want to touch your anal region on a hot new York summer day? I didn't think so.
It looks better and the stats have been relatively steady since 2004 hovering at 55% not including circ done by Jews or Muslims.
Other countries that routinely circ. Korea, all the middle east, philippines, many African countries are heavily enforcing it as a means of HIV prevention so it's heavily widespread in Manu areas there, malaysia and indonesia.
Do not let twisted facts from anti circ protestors fool you. They come in herds on the Internet or troll Many boards with their crazy theories
I don't know about you but I take the world of AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS over some crazy guy who wasn't circ at birth and got teased so now spends his time endlessly debunking proven medical benefits anyday. I really think most people need to hear the Dr's here. If you have the breast cancer gene and you might get it and decide to have both your breasts removed (as many do) make you crazy and the doctor a butcher just because you didn't develop the cancer yet? Think about it? There's a high chance that if you have this gene you will develop breast cancer, however, there is a chance you won't. Most doctors agree to go with the procedure because benefits out weight the risks. Does that mean these women are crazy and the doctor butchers? I don't thinks so.
I think everyone should check to see the CDC and AAP stance on the issue not some bitter guy at home on a computer with outrageous facts that are distorted.
Fact -protects against HIV many STDs the spread on HPV (anal warts), UTI's, certain cancers, etc. The list goes on please search.
I've never given much thought to circumcision, it was just something that never really crossed my mind. All the males I have been with have been uncircumcised and I really never expected to come across a circumcised penis. However, I had the most amazing sex with this man and I really couldn't understand why it felt so much better and why I was actually attracted to look and feel of his penis, because let's face it, foreskins aren't exactly like candy to the eye... but anyway, it was the best sexual experience I have ever had, and upon glancing at his penis afterwards I noticed that he was circumcised. I doubt I will be returning to uncircumcised sex ever again!
I am circumcised and like many people I have to say IT is amazing! I do enjoy the sensation more. There was only sexual gain for me. The females from what I can grasp seem to like it much more. To each their own. I was circumcised at age 24 due to some health reasons and I am really happy I did it. My children will be circumcised! I know both feelings and this is better.
A circumcised peen looks so manly, sexy and ready for action. A cut willy is much more attractive to this woman. A shudder everytime I see the folds and flaps of one of my friends uncut unit. Besides that the cheeses that are created underneath his flap are pungent and shocking. Give me a dried, flared mushroom head anyday!
Most women do not care if your are cut or uncut. They may have a preference, but I think they would not care if you were cut or uncut. I would say cut is better because it is easier to keep clean, looks nicer, and helps protect against STDs. I am circumcised, but because I think my mother and father got me circumcised when I was really young.
For all the people who are saying that we are not born with extra parts and that every part of the body (including the foreskin) serves a purpose, I have one question for you. What is the purpose of the appendix? The appendix, in my opinion, is just as useful as the foreskin and I am thankful that my parents had the fortitude to circumcise me while I was a baby! How dare you say that they "mutilated" me?
Playing with an uncut penis is like playing with a puppy. You have to be gentle. Whereas, with a cut guy we can have rough sex, I don't have to worry about being gentle with him. I have had a mixture of both types. I base my stance on my experience with men. Also, there's often a foul odour from an uncut guy's penis, even only after showering hours earlier, that's not the case with circumcised males.
Ii also find the circumcised penis more pleasant to look at.
For me it is aesthetic ... A foreskin is fine if you are running naked through the forest and need protection but we have evolved now where cosmetic appearance is everything. Most young women appear, for example, to shave their pubic areas and interest in vaginoplasty surgery to 'tidy-up' loose skin (similar to circumcision) is increasing.
Nature therefore doesn't always get it right cosmetically!
I was circumcised as a child (for medical reasons) and the circumcision looks really neat. I certainly do not think I am mutilated - it is offensive to say so. And I do not have a 'dried' glans - it is actually very smooth to touch and highly sensitive. I also think it is true that the glans flares and becomes larger as not constricted by a foreskin.
In the UK it is less common but all girlfriends have been extremely complimentary at this welcome variation to the standard model!
I work at a clothing optional resort so I see hundreds of naked guys every day. Most guys are nicely circed but a few are not and it looks completely gross. The glans is my favourite part of the penis so I love to see it naked and fully exposed. I think the circumcised penis is beautiful and more hygenic too so I only date circed men. I wish all men were circumcised! Sarah x
It is a well known fact that men who are uncircumcised will generally hate to use a condom. This means that these men will be less likely to use one and in turn have unprotected sex and get / give more STDs. This fact alone should be enough in a world where incurable STDs such as AIDS and Herpes are increasingly common.
It is cleaner, looks sexier and is better for sex with the penile skin tight. My boyfriend was circumcised for me 18 months ago and it is perfect. He loves it too. We've agreed any sons will be circumcised. I think circumcision should be radical with the whole surplus skin removed to leave it taut on erection.
But you see too many circumcisions with very uneven scar lines ... Mine was done very neatly with a very faint scar placed immediately behind the glans. But I would be unhappy if I had a very prominent uneven scar placed half-way down the shaft.
So yes in principle if done well.
Circumcision is the best way to maintain a healthy sex life. There is a strong link between male partners uncircumcised penis and ovarian cancer in their partners female. In a way it will be better to have male sons circumcised when they are young in order for them to enjoy their sex lives with their partner as most of women prefers a neat and clean penis. The feeling is also better when touched.
Circumcision is an improvement. Not only does it look better, especially in clothing, like in a tight pair of Levis, but when naked it isn't all baboony and weird. Also, for some reason I will never understand, circumcised men seem to like to perform oral sex more on women. Someone needs to do that study. It makes no sense, but it's the experience of lots of women!, including me.
To me It looks better circumcised. Besides, not having skin there helps so there is not a bad odor either. It is nice to never worry about finding nasty smegma. I like to compare it with putting earrings on a girl earlobes. Earrings are note necessary, but they make you look very cute
Being a surgeon involved in management of diseases around male sexual organs, I know that many diseases are associated with intact prepuce pre-cancerous and cancerous diseases which are hardly seen in circumcised men. More so, circumcised men generally have cleaner and healthier looking penis without the usual foul smelling secretions or concretions in the preputial space of the uncircumcised. Last is the scientific evidence of reduced disease transmission in circumcised men. Sexual gratification to me has to do more with the mind and mastering of the art of performance.
I hate to sound shallow, but uncircumcised penises just aren't as appealing. They might be more natural looking, but they just don't look as nice. I've never heard of the problem of orgasms being delayed or reduced sensitivity, this seems to be something that a lot of anti-circumcision people make up.
Several women want the law on male circumcision to ensure that the practice is compulsory.
Susan Akello from Orom sub-county says government should pass a legislation that will compel all men to be circumcised and those who refuse be punished.
Jane Adokorach, a self styled women activist agrees with Akello. Adokorach says women should deny sexual rights to men who are not circumcised. She also proposes a law that will include punitive measures for men who refuse to be circumcised. She says this reduces the rate of infection for men and transfer of the disease to their spouses.
Read more: http://ugandaradionetwork.com/a/story.php?s=33903#ixzz1Y8ThMO1P
All of my friends and myself included think an uncircumcised penis is very ugly and does nothing to turn us on sexually. The uncircumcised penis also seems to always have an urine odor, with is a big turnoff. Females definitely prefer circumcised penises.
At least in America. It's what women expect, what they know and love. An uncircumcised penis is animalistic and foreign. The last thing anybody wants is for somebody to associate a noticeable quirk with their penis.
People at the "no" side are actually bitter towards the "yes" side simply because these guys are regreting for not having their penises circumcised. Mainly with many reasons maybe their parents would rather have their penises cut during 6 yrs and onwards, but the main fact is their just damn scared of being cut. Bunch of cowards! .. And yes it can contract STD's and it has a foul smell. It is big turn off for women too.
A: It all depends on the girl, but a woman who really loves you will never care if you are circumcised or not.
Why did I chose yes instead of no, then? Well, if you are not circumcised and your girlfriend tells you to become circumcised, you can easily tell that she is an idiot and you should break up with her for not accepting you "the way you are"--> ( Which should be the main reason for her to be with you.).
Though, if you already are circumcised, she can't ask you to not be circumcised. It could save your couple, but you must hope it will be the only thing she will silently complain about or else it could just mean the break up...only later and for ( probably ) another stupid reason.
Other than that, don't become circumcised for aesthetics reasons, for her, for [not so] proven medical reasons or for it's HIV proof reasons.
Only do it if you are having an infection or something similar that threatens your life. Don't forget, you don't need sexual relations to live ( At least, she will understand your pain better if you need to be circumcised for these reasons. ).
P.S.: I am disappointed by the people who are saying it is child genetalia mutilation. The question is "Do females prefer males who have circumcised penises?" and not "What is your opinion on circumcision?".
Some women or girls think that during the course of the circumcision process, innocent boys' penises are cut and made small. No, it is not true. I being a Muslim girl, had occasion to witness the circumcision celebration of my brother, aged about 3 years (this is the best circumcision age). When his circumcision process, wherein all female members were present, myself also one of them and my age at that time was about 15 years, I saw the doctor massage some lotion on his unerect penis and when he thinks it is soft, he cut the foreskin of his penis, which were covering their penis pee hole, lots of blood came out and boys cried loudly. The cutter doctor folded the remaining skin towards his backside and gave the shape of a ring. His penis head was clearly visible as silky and looks nice. After one week the boys were perfect when washing his penis. In the bathroom, I saw some erection and looks nice and attractive for me. In circumcision, only foreskin is cut, not the penis, therefore no changes in shape and size.
I have been circumcised since I was 8. It was the best decision I've ever made. When my penis is erect I feel a much better edge for sex and it pleases more women than if uncircumcised. I'm proud of my penis, because many, many women will enjoy the pleasant feel, and more extensive sex with my penis, than they have been with an uncircumcised penis. I feel better protected, wiser, and it helped me make better choices in my life, not just my SEX Life. All you women out there that like this decision I love you and I'm cut just like you liked it, that's all I have to say for now.
I grew up in the UK and, for some reason, circumcision is basically unheard of. I am so disgusted by foreskin that just the thought of it makes me sick to my stomach and I have never met someone who didn't feel the same way. I was so disgusted by uncircumcised men that I seriously thought I was a lesbian. When I wasn't attracted to women, I just figured I was asexual. I moved to America when I was 18 years old and I did what every British girl wants to do when visiting America. Sleeping with a bunch of American boys and it was AMAZING. All of them were circumcised and I literally could not get enough sex. I am now pregnant with my first child and my fiancée and I are DEFIANTLY getting him circumcised as a baby.
I am a young college girl, my vaginal tube is tested by cut penis. Cut penis looks good in shape & size against uncut. It is clean, neat, smell-free and no risk of infections. Condom easily fitted on cut penis. Head of penis activated my G-spot, really very nice and silky penis head.
It's true, circumcised penises do look better than uncircumcised. I've been with both, and while the uncircs are easier to please, when flaccid they are less pleasant to look at. They are more likely to transmit STDs and pH related infections like bacterial vaginosis and yeast infections. That said, I think it would be better to let the young man decide for himself.
I think it's healthier for the man, and the girl. My husband is circumcised and we have great sex. I've never seen a uncircumcised penis in real life, but I don't think I'd ever want to lol. But everyone is different and I love my husband just the way he is, and he does too.
I fully support the circumcision of the male foreskin, all the boys in my family have theirs removed. The fully exposed head is so much cleaner, especially for oral sex and the fully denuded head is better for stimulating the vagina, I know I've had both. My boyfriend had his penis circumcised for me just over a year ago and he loves it as much as I do.
I feel as though circs are larger than un-circs. They look nicer, smell nicer, and overall seem generally cleaner. If a man is NOT circ, it's a deal breaker for me! He could be the most perfect man inside and out and if he hasn't been cut, I cut the relationship! Hard but true fact! Sorry!
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things?? un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
un-circumcised penis's look like eels or a elephant nose... who would want to have sex with those things??
I love to see naked guys with the skin removed to show off the beauty of their penis heads. The idea alone of a piece of skin covering and hiding the wonderful looking glans of the penis is such a turn-off! Further, during sex, I love to feel the outline of his head in my fanny. When I did have sex with uncircumcised guys, I could never tell the difference in feeling between the shaft and head thrusting in me. I also found that guys who hadn't been snipped had the head riding in and out of their foreskins, instead of rubbing my fanny inside me!
Most women who say it doesn't matter are full of bullocks because in reality they haven't been with an intact male... And when they see one, they will think it is strange. I've only seen one and at the time I didn't know the differences, but I immediately found it strange.
I am a woman and I prefer a circumcised penis. It's cleaner as more bacteria gets trapped under foreskins of uncircumcised penises. As a female I don't like to have infections down there as I"m very clean and take care of myself, so I like my man to be clean, too. I think circumcised also look a lot more attractive. My man isn't circumcised, but I wish he was!
I was circumcised as an adult, in response to my (then new) wife's strong preference and it has been one of the best things that ever happened to me. Sex is far more enjoyable for both of us - I feel more yet last longer, while my wife much prefers the feel of my circumcised penis inside her and can orgasm far more easily. At normal times, both comfort and hygiene are maximized.
Foreskin freaks me out. I don't know what to do with it. It's just sitting there being a big turn off. For me the perfect guy IS cut. There is just something so much more appealing and sexy about a cut guy. My guy had it done for medical reasons and I was lucky to find him, cut guys are almost never heard of from around here.
I was circumcised at 19. I'd been sexually active since 15 an had numerious girl friends. For some reason I wanted to be circumcised since the age of 16. I hated my foreskin and felt very uncomfortable when i had sex. Don't get me wrong I was very clean and washed it daily.
I finally got 'cut' when I was in the British Army at 19. It didn't hurt at all but a little uncomfortable with stitches pulling in the old undies now and then!
Why is it the best thing I've done....I now feel more confident, found the ladies were fascinated with it being circumcised. They all commented they like it and have never had any negative comments.
Mostly importantly to me the sensastion during sex is amazing. My cut is high and tight and there is no skin movement whatsoever.
I am now 35 married and have 2 boys. I was my wifes first circumcised partner and she loved our first sexual experience. She actually now describes having sex with a foreskin is like having sex with a condom on! Our first son and quite a few problems with his foreskin. The NHS wouldn't circmcise due to money restraints so we went private. At the same time we had our second son circumised. Both had 'locals' and felt no pain during the operations and it only took minutes.
I am amazed how many wrong and negative comments are given about circumcision. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but don't get blinded by comments made by many aggressive INTACTIVISTS...they have their own agenda and won't and don't listen to people who know alot more than they do! I've experienced both uncircumcised and circumcised and there is only way for me.....and my wife!
I have limited experience with male's, however, I do find men with uncircumcised penis' to be more animalistic looking. I hardly like giving oral as is, and I would NOT want to give any kind of oral pleasure to a man with a uncircumcised penis. I also would not want to deal with the health concerns that might follow with someone who did not stay clean and its effect on me. That being said, this is all just objective opinion or thought. I am sure if I found someone I absolutely loved, it would not matter. However, I have not met a man that wish he was NOT circumcised and if I have children, I will have them circumcised.
There are few mystery areas on a circumcised penis, fewer places for an errant pee drop to hide, more likely to be usable clean at a moment's notice, less likely to get or cause an infection in either partner, simple to clean ,sleek to the touch, no feelings of being fully-sheathed, half-sheathed, unsheathed. Ready for action and allows the penis head to have more air and blood circulation, leading to larger size.
During sex things get a little dry. The skin continues to act as natural lube and it allows him to penetrate further, and he feels bigger. He will last longer, because from birth the glands have never been exposed. The foreskin is to the penis as the eyelid is to eyes.
Because uncircumcised penises look like dead fish, they can get fungus and grodiesness up under the foreskin, it looks better circumcised. So many reasons. Also, uncircumcised penises smell worse. They're harder to clean. They don't even look remotely as nice as a nice, clean cut circumcised penis. Besides, if people would just circumcise their sons when they are born, they won't even remember it.
I love looking at guys' penises when they're naked and if I can't see the exposed head then there is nothing in it for me. All little boys should be circumcised! I also find sex feels better when their skins have been circumcised, I love feeling the outline of the head in me which I cannot if the foreskin is still present. Also, it smells much nicer circumcised which is important for me because I love sucking their penises on an impromptu basis, like in the car....
I personally prefer the look of the circumcised penis. Furthermore I think it is so much cleaner than the uncut one, and medical studies clearly show that this is true and circumcision reduces the risk of STIs and cervical cancer. Finally for me sex with a circumcised penis feels more intense.
In my home country,(Philippines) almost all males are circumcised when about 7 to 14 years of age. Its part of the process of becoming a man for them. Nurses in the Philippines are trained to perform this procedure and usually when its time for the boy to have it the nurses do it. Operation Tuli is held at various sites in the spring (April-May) to allow any boy who cannot afford a circumcision to have one at no cost. I started doing the procedure at 18 years old and now I am 46 years old, so I have helped hundreds of boys with this problem. For me its very rewarding to remove this obstacle to their being a man. I believe circumcision to be very important for all boys because of disease control and health of men and women.
The foreskin makes a haven for the HPV virus and other pathogens that should not be injected
into their partner simply because he hasn't been circumcised. After becoming aware of the risk and practicing safe sex(condom) in the post condom relationship I demanded that he had been circumcised. Today, both my husband and son are circumcised.
When I give oral sex to a man that is NOT circumcised, I often feel the taste of pee. Urine sometimes gets trapped in a man's foreskin if they don't retract it when they urine. This never happens to a circumcised man. So I don't have to deal with the urine smell and taste. When giving oral sex to a circumcised man, I only feel the texture, warmth of the penis, and tasty precum (yes, I like the taste of it) without the foreskin getting in the way or the taste of urine.
I've tried both and noticed some differences but they were very minor. Now I prefer circumcised for its looks. I don't think its circumcision status is very important in a relationship or important at all even. It's just something I personally prefer. It, in general, looks cleaner and just more appealing.
I moved to Europe some years ago from Australia. In my experience, the women I've been with in Sweden and Denmark, and now Germany, have overwhelmingly preferred the circumcised penis. In Sweden, I actually women telling their friends they needed to sleep with me.
Now I live in Germany and while circumcision is not as normal as it is in Australia it's not unheard of. You'll often see a fair percentage of circumcised guys in the saunas here. My impression here is that the women don't really see a need to circumcise their children unless it's for health reasons, but they certainly enjoy finding circumcised men in their love lives. I am 31 years old - perhaps it's just an attitude of people my age here, I don't know.
My boyfriend and I have been together for a while now and we have had sex before and after he was circumcised. Needless to say without the banana peel-like appendage hanging off his manhood the pleasure has increased dramatically! I enjoy my man cut and there is no way I would ever go back!
There is no doubt in my mind that a circumcised penis is a much cleaner and more pleasant penis to have. Having experienced both, I can categorically say that the trimmed variety winds hands-down every time. Offered the choice between the two, I would choose the circumcised option every time.
In my experience, circumcised guys can get me to an orgasm without any other stimulation than penetration, while the uncut guys couldn't. If I ever have a son, he will definitely be cut. It looks better, it's much cleaner and it feels better! Maybe it is just a trend, but it's one that I totally agree with.
I don't think it's a culture thing at all. I happened upon men who were uncircumcised and one who wasn't. Quite honesty there's a difference in the feel, smell, and look. The circumcised male had plenty of feeling and sensitivity there, too. So I think it's a load of bullocks that some uncircumcised men say the sensitivity drops. You know what causes that? Using your hand too much, too roughly. It's been proven that if you lay off for two or three weeks your sensitivity comes back, guys.
It is a known fact that the skin of the penis when it is uncircumcised is known to have a higher chance of contracting an STD. It is a very good idea to get your penis circumcised because it prevents diseases and is more attractive to women than one that isn't. Women adore those a lot more because they don't have to pleasure the skin.
ITs become a common thing in the west to see circumcised penises. So its become a hit and miss thing in a culture so used to it. Some partners discuss it ahead of time, others get surprised. Its a case to case basis, but if you went on chance, it is likely yes, they prefer circumcised to un.
No odor, no smegma, no floppy skin during sex- the circumcised penis have such a smooth lovely shaft~ and oral is only for the circumcised, its so clean and smooth, no nasty skin folds or smegma - ewww. I don't see anything wrong in making circumcision mandatory. I mean it has so many potential health benefits, and that too just for such a little bit of pain- I say all the boys should get it done, at least for themselves if not for us girls!
Circumcised penises are cleaner because nothing can become trapped underneath the foreskin. Sexual intercourse is also more comfortable for both parties involved. It can actually be painful for some men to have sex if they aren't circumcised, and this will create stress for him and also for his partner.
In the United States the vast majority of males are circumcised. Due to this women are naturally going to be inclined towards what looks like what they are used to. For instance, in fashion for the masses, small changes are made so that there isn't too much shock to the average consumer. This applies as well to physical anatomy features.
I have to admit that in my experience, most females - in this culture anyway - prefer circumcised males, mostly for aesthetic reasons. I don't think this preference is universal though, or that it couldn't change over time if the practice of circumcision were not so prevalent. And I actually don't advocate circumcision for baby boys.
Uncircumcised penises are just strange to most women. Even as a male I think they're strange and wouldn't want one. Woman like clean cut and easy access. They don't want to worry about skin flaps or strange appearances.
My circumcision was out of an element of choice,having experienced recurrent infections of a form of balanitis for a number of years of which repeated doses of antibiotics did not completeley eradicate the problem. At the time i decided that this was a good preventative measure for the future and continue to remain pleased with the end result scuse the pun. I do believe however that men will continue to have this procedure done for the myriad of members of certain religious groups as well as equal numbers of cultures. I do believe that the element of choice as to whether or not an adult male should decide to have or not to have the operation should prevail. Im glad i chose to have it done and to my mind it is aesthetically pleasing and my partner agrees . Its not a designer penis its still my penis but i am appreciative of the modification
Women should stay away from men that are not circumcised. A man that is not circumcised is more focused on his penis and pleasure then that of his partner. The ejaculation comes too fast and there is never foreplay. A man that has not been circumcised is more like "Wham bam" without the thankyou.
Some years after marriage i elected to have myself circumcised and my wife was very supportive in this choice. She has time and again said that she prefers both the look of an exposed glans and prefers the touch and feel of it. I am very pleased with it and it has added a new dimension of pleasure in intercourse.
At first I was against circumsion. I had my son and chose not to have it done to him. Later he had to have an emergency one done. He was in a lot of pain and when I took him to the doctor the doctor said it was sealed shut which was causing him the pain. Even though he had been taught to clean it, it wasn't a cleanliness issue. Since then I made sure all my sons were done in infancy. I am now completely for having it done.
Have personally been in two marriages where intimacy ceased and was served divorce papers after ten years. Both wives prefered circumcised males and I had not taken hints seriously. As an older male, chronic irritation and inability to maintain adequate personal hygiene while away from the conveniences of home caused me to find a good surgeon and get the procedure done. It was the best thing I have done for myself. Each day I wish to thank the gracious surgeon for her help in improving my quality of life. I wish I had yielded to first wife's request and had it done as a young adult. Life is lonely without my female soul mate.
I had to be circumcised at the age of 25 due to a recurring problem. (I am allergy prone, and the issue I had was like an allergic rash). I had tried various prescribed creams, soaps and different types of underwear material until my GP suggested circumcision. I was hesitant at first but decided to try it and I am very glad I did in the end as it entirely fixed the problem. I was the butt of a few jokes obviously, and discovered through the course of the whole ideal that most women (at least in Australia) prefer circumcised guys.
My partner and I are still active sexually after 20 years of being together. We both agree that my being circumcised near the start of our relationship is to credit for that. Her bouts of cystitis stopped after my circumcision and our sex is spontaneous due to no odors due to trapped sweat, urine and semen. We have seen relationships fail all around us and are sure its due to women losing interest in their partners smelly penises. Her girlfriends always react with comments of "you are soo lucky" if she mentions I'm circumcised. The UK is a non-circumcising country and it's rare here. It's the best-kept relationship secret and the kindest lifetime gift to a boy. It's also nobody's business so if you believe in it, do it, and keep it in the family. There's too many opinionated people ready to condemn having something done down below which in reality is not a big deal at all.
Although it is not a dealbreaker in a relationship, I do think it looks nicer as opposed to not circumcised. Sexually it does feel one way and it does not feel as good. There is something cleaner about a circumcised penis. IMO. Would I not be with a guy because he was no cirmcumcised? No. But I would talk with him about sex because maybe there is another way he can do it so it does not feel funny and is pleasurable for me, as well.
I cannot believe that the most technologically advaced people on the planet cutoreskins off of their baby boys. It truly amazing. And the systematic manipulation to keep up the atrocity! I woder how billions of men live happy lives with their God given normal penises. A normal penis is happy and clean!
I was UNCIRCUMCISED until age 20. I was born not in the USA but Italy. I hated growing up here in the USA because I felt so weird among my peers growing up. My first sexual experience was awful because the girl I was with told her friends my penis looked very strange and after that no girls would sleep with me.
When I turned 18 I began to research CIRCUMCISION this was 5 years ago I'm 23 now. After much thought and consideration I met with my doctor who referred me to a doctor that routinely performs these type of requests. I am bitter my parents did not do this at birth but where I am from it's not common. I had to pay a chunk of change AND I WAS PUT UNDER so I was by no means awake for it.
It was not so painful. Things felt "funny" and tender for around 3 weeks.
When I was healed I was so happy. My manhood looked like the guys at the gym other guys didn't have a weird look on their faces at the showers at the gym anymore.
AND best of all because I am nicely sized my sex life is amazing now! AMAZING! No more weird questions from girls, I get oral tons now and I feel so much cleaner. The best choice I ever made.
I cannot speak for girls but in my experiences yes it does matter to them.
I'm happy I did it. College life is about these kind of experiences and I'm so content now.
My husband is cut and I like that better. I have been with 5 men and one was not cut. I didn't really care all that much and him lacking in bed likely had nothing to do with his uncut status. I prefer a cut guy. It is better to look at for my taste.
My husband is circumcised and we've agreed to have our son circumcised once he's born. Penises with foreskin are harder to clean properly. We've done our research on the matter and we find it best for hygienic reasons. I also agree that penises look much better when circumcised. My husband enjoys sex and doesn't have problems climaxing.
I'm sorry, but uncircumcised penis's smell really bad really quickly. Giving oral sex to a man with an uncircumcised penis is a major turn off to me, because I can't stop thinking of all the bacteria that gets trapped behind the skin so easily! All in all circumcision is the way to go!
All hygiene, smell, and texture aside, who can argue with the aesthetic results. Foreskins are nasty any way you look at them. They're loose crinkled disgusting messes, that inevitably get full of foul smelling bacteria and even worse, knob cheese. My bf is circumcised and I love his penis. The only smell I've got from down there is soap and occasionally ball sweat. He also happens to be a better lay than either of the uncut men I've been with. I'd say its a win-win-win for cut boys.
I have been with my boyfriend for a year now and his sexy penis is just what I like. I never notice any smell or uncleanliness in that area of him and I believe it's because he was circumcised when he was younger. Overall, it looks better, has no smell, and is a total turn-on to me.
Cleanliness and appearance. I can't stand the sight of a uncut penis. Yeah its shallow and shouldn't matter, but guys say that all the time about appearances on women when it's not true so I call it even. Most importantly though, is the cleanliness. Uncut guys don't always clean their penis, which is by far one of the most disgusting things I have ever witnessed and smelled. No thank you.
I was circumcised as a baby, and I can't say I see anything wrong with it. I've never had any trouble with hygiene, and my girlfriend says she actually prefers circumcised. I don't really have any comparison for how sensitive I am, but I do think it helps me last longer in bed, and it still feels great. I agree with the health benefits, and I'm glad I had it done when I was to young to remember it instead of waiting for it to cause some problem.
Frankly, when you get right down to it, it doesn't make any real difference. You can live a healthy productive life now matter what your penis looks like, and I, for one, am comfortable with my body.
My boyfriend is circumcised and hes 23, he has one of the sexiest penises ive ever been with in my life. He got cut when he was 13 and he has an overly big penis head and it turns me on so much. I noticed if the male has had a tight circ that there penis heads get enourmous in size.
Now, I'm not like other girls. I'm a virgin and I don't plan to have sex until marriage. But from what I've heard it is much, much easier to get infections from uncircumcised penises, so yes, circumcision is preferred. It also looks much less gross. Most men who have foreskins don't even bother to pull it back when showering, which is very very important, as it can otherwise cause infections.
Im a woman who used to work in the nursing field, and I always came across uncut males who suffered from phimosis (foreskin attached to the head or created a tight band around the head), chronic UTI's, and I hate to say it, hygienic issues (smell) and obvious STD's e.G. Herpes and genital warts. I saw less issues with circumcised males compared to uncircumcised males. I also think its more aesthetically pleasing to look at, and less gross when performing oral sex. I cant imagine asking my man to go take a quick bath before we get down and busy because his foreskin is creating a white film and a nasty smell. Talk about an overall mood killer!
A circumcised penis is cleaner, more aesthetically pleasing and way more hygienic. My husband is circumcised and I have never had a yeast infection unlike many of my friends with uncircumcised partners who are always complaining about infections. Any woman who experiences a circumcised penis will prefer it for sure!
Circumcised men last more in bed, from my experience. Their penises also smell less and are more fun to perform oral on. It is harder to pleasure men with my hand if they are cut and uncut men lubricate better, but overall I prefer circumcised men. It's not a huge deal though and I understand why a lot of men would rather not get circumcised. Getting surgery on your penis because of what women think shouldn't happen because it's not that big of a deal.
The circumcised penis is less prone to disease, looks better, and is just as- if not more pleasurable to women as an uncircumcised penis. My girlfriend says it is very pleasurable to have a circumcised penis because it hits the G-spot better. Also if the operation is done correctly, the male is less prone to getting infections and disease. And lastly many cultures and religions believe it to be better.
Although circumcision may be genital mutilation I find circumcised penises more attractive. I do however believe circumcision should be a choice men make on their own. If females have a right to unmutilated genitals so should males. It should not be justified by religious or cosmetic beliefs but by a male when he is of age.
I have nothing against men who are uncircumcised I just prefer circumcised ones. I found the sensation of sex with foreskin odd although I know many prefer it. It is just not my thing I suppose. Also I prefer doing oral on a circumcised penis, feels better for me .
Uncircumcision is related to increased disease. Circumcised penises tend to be cleaner and have less of a smell than their uncircumcised counterparts. I have never felt that a circumcised penis was rougher or less attractive than an uncircumcised penis and can honestly say that I would probably have a little trouble with an uncircumcised penis in both looks and texture. I find it interesting that comments say it is difficult to find a circumcised man, as I find it very rare to find an uncircumcised man.
I had to be circumcised when I was 20 years old (medical reasons) and I think it not only looks better, but I last longer in bed and it's easier to clean. Well, most of my girlfriends preferred the look of my penis compared to uncircumcised ones, maybe because it's not as common in Germany as it is in the USA.
To me, they are just nice to look at. Whenever I see an uncircumcised one, it just looks strange. That is probably because I'm used to the other one and don't see it as normal. Even though it is. I am female and just stating my opinion. Its hard to guess on behalf of all women though.
I have always found circumcised penises to be incredibly beautiful. The sight of the bare, exposed penis head is both beautiful and sexual, and I honestly believe that all males should be circumcised for this reason. I have seen a few uncircumcised guys and really it is quite unappealing to look at. My husband is circumcised and I wouldn't have it any other way. If I ever have any sons they will be circumcised at birth.
Circumcised penises are so much better than those which are not!! When I first had sex, I was MORTIFIED at the look of my guys junk. It was all gross and smelt REALLY BADLY!! As you can probably guess, he was uncut. After that, we broke up and. I met a new guy who was cut, and I'll NEVER go back!! The shape is PERFECT and it make me orgasm so hard!! I can not express how much better a circumcised penis was for me!!
Supporting Argument?! Uncircumcised penis taste horrible.
A foul disgusting taste that I cannot even describe. I've never tasted a circimsised penis with that taste. It's the most terrible thing to have in your mouth. If it was just one that tasted this way I would consider it a personal problem but no its not it's ever uncircumcised penis tastes like awfulness.
There is always a slight smell of an uncut penis and it also always has that slight slimy goo = smegma. I just could never give oral sex to someone who was not circumcised. Even my ex at the age of 3o was so uncomfortable with not being circumcised that he had it done at that age. I met a great guy, but when I found out that he wasn't circumcised, it ended right there. Just cannot do it. He was so gob smacked as he said......At least I had the guts to ask him before I slept with hi ......Shew!! Lol
It feels better sexually. I don't like feeling a man going in and out of his skin rather than my walls. Uncircumcised penis hide things and I like to see everything that's going into my mouth or hello kitty. The smell of uncircumcised men is just awful, totally dreadful, even if washed I can still smell the faint scent of rotten fish, and on hot days all it takes is for a uncircumcised man to take a walk around the block and Presto! Baked salmon. It looks very unappealing. I see no reason why a man should not be circumcised.
I personally think that uncut penises are unattractive. They look like an ant eater. I would never break up with someone because of it but its just a preference. Just how guys like either small/big breasts. If I have a son I will get him cut. The thought of the health risks that go along with being uncut makes me sick. It is unhealthy to have "cheese". Foreskin was needed before, as well as pubic hair but it is no longer needed since people now bathe regularly and wear clothes to protect their genitalia.
I have always looked to see if a guy is circumcised. I often look at an attractive guy and wonder if his mum had his skin circumcised. I love the look of a circumcised penis. I love the feel of the exposed head in me and I love sucking a circumcised penis!
A circumcised penis CAN NOT accumulate smegma under it. No self respecting woman wants a dirty penis any where near her. While an intact man can clean himself just before sex - this is hardly a turn on or spontaneous that he has to clean his junk before he is suitable to service her needs.
Looks better, smells better, easier to clean, healthier (for both partners). Uncircumcised men often have problems with pre ejaculation, they can't last 2 minutes. Cicumcised guys can go a long time, and have bigger orgasms because of delayed gratification. They tend to be more confident in bed and more experimental because they aren't worried about blowing their load right away.
I know a lot of guys who don't bother to clean under their foreskin, which is totally gross, so circumcision takes away that element.
That being said, I don't prefer the appearance of one over the other, so I'm totally neutral on the aesthetics. I've also been with a guy who had it cut to just below the head, so I guess that combined both pros of hygiene and stimulation.
I have been with cut and uncut. Uncut stinks and I could never go down. Even the underwear stinks. After being with uncut once, I decided to only stick to cut. I'm so lucky to be married to a cut. He last forever and I get several orgasms. My uncut ex only last 1 to 2 mins and I never had an orgasm with him.
Uncircumcised looks like it has a little wrinkley dunce cap. I think most of my friends would agree. It must be largely popular because it's what we see in "adult" film and many men today are "cut", so it's beginning to be the norm. I could see it becoming a regular part of the birthing process: baby is born then washed, given an exam, and circumcised!
They just do. I dont know why, but they do. Also, something about an uncut penis just bothers me. They smell worse and look worse when i give my bf a bj. Now my bf is circumcised, and it's a lot better. Plus, when he's not erect, his penis doesnt look weird like uncut guys
Every guy I've been with that's uncircumcised has been a premature ejaculator. They also make for a terribly boring and routine sex life as they can only last in bed for about 2-5 minutes. I much prefer a man with a circumcised penis that can actually satisfy me before I hear the "whoops I'm sorry" which is almost inevitable with every uncircumcised man.
I found circumcised men penis looks much better better over the hairy overskined doggie like penis. Same way we, women, invest plenty of pain and time to better appear to men (to ourselves as well), via manicure, pedicure, even by plastic surgery... Men shall also do. The health is not to be discussed at all. May studies proved that, not only for the third world. Bottom line, is love them circumcised... More enjoyable for me... Hope for them
Technique is the most important. After all you're dating the guy, not the penis. However in terms of the ideal aesthetic, circumcised generally looks better and is cleaner. There are no differences in terms of sensation, but I've generally enjoyed sex with circumcised men more just because I place a high emphasis on hygiene. That is not say that the uncircumcised men were unkempt (they washed frequently), but the foreskin traps odors that makes the idea of bjs repulsive (when I enjoy giving them very much).
Only thing is it has a different is the look. Everything else is pretty much the same. I feel that circumcision is mutilation and see no reason for it. Not like it is turning into an alien penis or something. I feel it is an unnecessary and "Ye Old" tradition that should die. It doesn't matter period.
I have had long term relationships with an uncircumcised and circumcised man (at different times). There was no difference in the way sex felt. There did not seem to be any difference in sensitivity between the two guys. I personally preferred the way the circumcised men look. I still think uncircumcised looks weird.
A circumcised penis is much cleaner and better looking. I've had a date with an uncut man and it was disgusting. He had cheese and I gagged at the smell and he insisted I take him in my mouth. If I had a son, I would be sure to have him cut.
Not only does a circumcised penis look more aesthetically appealing and masculine, it is also significantly cleaner. Women are more willing to give and enjoy oral sex with a circumcised man. It is also often said by women and men, that circumcised men can last longer and experience stronger orgasms from a greater sexual buildup. Common men, get circumcised. You and your partner will not regret it!
First I lke the look and think it is sexey when the head is visible and not covered with skin and it is so much more pleasant to do oral sex if he has been circumcised. Both my husband and son have circumcised penises. I think sex is better with circumcised men.
If you go to the NHS website there are many benefits like your less likely to get HIV and a nasty infection all the time. Next in my opinion and probably many others they look better and the scar is not as bad as you think. What exactly is the use of this foreskin anyway? All those bacteria and what not under the foreskin Eww. A circumcised penis is much more hygienic. All that talk about no sensitivity that happens to less than 50% of the people who are cicumcised and its not like they've lost ALL their sensitivity. On the whole there are more Pros than Cons
Yes to me. I actually never thought about that cos all the guys I dated before had circumcision. I kind of took it for granted until recently i met a guy whose penis is in nature status. I have to say, it really turned me off. Circumcised penis looks so cute even not standing up.
O have to admit at first i hated my parents for striping me of my right to make my opinion and making me a "freak". But after a while i found out that i liked my penis the way it is, groomed and taken care of.........I find it nice how i was circumcised at a young age, so i would not have to go through the pain as an adult....So i thank my parents for all they have done for me
It's just simpler to deal with, looks better. Not so awkward to deal with. Feels nice not to go through with pulling skin up etc. Obviously there aren't any supposed health benefits, but it's more aesthetically pleasing. I've heard of cases where the skin tears, not something I would want to happen.
Just more attractive and appealing to be circumcised. Uncircumcised men look like old men, wrinkled and loose skin. I think men who refuse to be circumcised are generally "all about me" kind of men. I have only had one partner that was not circumcised and it repluses me to look at him naked.
I like to be safe at all times. Extra cautious. I won't mind uncircumcised. But if given a choice between the two, I will pick circumcised. Foreskin has more potential of carrying bacteria or viruses. Yes it is natural, but we live in modern world, where viruses such HIV exist.
Sex wise, tried both, nothing different in the physiological feelings for me. It is all about the man techniques. And by me staying lubricated, that will depend on me mostly!
Circumcised is cleaner, enhances sexual pleasure for both partners and is aesthetically far more attractive. My opinion is based on having had it done at age 36 - not because of physical or medical problems but due to a conviction that the benefits referred to above are valid. The results were entirely to my and my wifes satisfaction and I would never wish to return to my original state.
Just looks better, put it this way...Do cartoons (Looney Toons/Arthur) turn you on as much as porn? It's the same thing, fake and made to look better than it is but it's all in the visual. It' shouldnt be a deciding factor in a relationship but if you're looking for a one night stand then you'll be luckier circumcised.
Circumcised is cleaner, better for sex and infinitely better looking. I base that opinion on having had married experience both before and after the surgery. I chose to have it done not because of any physical or medical issues but because I had long felt the advantages stated above were valid. I am more than happy with the result and would never want to revert to the original state. My wife is of the same opinion.
I love giving head but would never go down on an uncircumcised penis. They are just gross.
Even after showering, there's still the residual smell of smegma.
Science has shown that foreskin traps bacteria and viruses.
Who needs that in her vagina?
Circumcised penises are more appealing to look at.
Uncird'd looks like an anteater.
I was circumcised at 22 as I tore my foreskin during sex for the second time and the doctor thought it would prevent further injury. I'd always liked the look of a circumcised penis but didn't think you could have it done as an adult. I did some research and decided I would take the big step.
I had 4 sexual partners with my foreskin and only one of the girls didn't like the look at all and wouldn't give oral sex.
Being from Australia where circumcised men of my age are only around 30% (my estimation of friends I went to school and play football with), I wasnt sure how girls would react. Of the girls I have slept with in the last 5 years, 6 have said they love that I'm circumcised and don't like foreskins. One said she didn't really like it because she wasn't sure if handjobs hurt me. The majority 9 girls haven't given any indication and 2 said they don't know the difference. I personally am much happier being circumcised and think it is still very popular with women.
Apart from all of the obvious reasons, it seems like all the people saying no are men. A cut penis does look much neater and smooth skin is much more enjoyable to play with. There really is no need for extra skin, and I personally am glad my bf is cut.
Cut guys seem to have bigger heads which means I feel more during intercourse. Also, I never give oral to uncut guys.
Even if uncut guys have showered, it doesn't take long for the smell to build up from sweat and urine getting trapped. It's really gross and I'm glad my current bf is getting cut.
I am also a partner to his penis and if he wants me to be enthusiastic towards his penis, it must look nice! I also much prefer sucking a circumcised penis! I find a circumcised penis feels better inside me because I can feel the outline of the permanently exposed head during both the in-thrust as well as the out-pull. I or he do not need to continually hold the foreskin back during thrusting to prevent it covering his head.
I was circumcised as I had phimosis (spelling ?) at a young age. I was the only person in my family that was circumcised and thought that I was weird for having a cut penis. Over the years I never gave anyone the opportunity to see my penis, never went to public showers, or used urinals, this also made me quite nervous about having a relationship, because, as many of you know the penis is involved in sexual intercourse.
It wasn't until after I had sex with my partner that I relaxed and found that I was happy with being circumcised. We had a chat after and she expected me to be circumcised and was glad I was. She enjoyed it a lot more, she thought the look of a uncut penis was disgusting, this really boosted my confidence.
My boyfriend recently had circumcision because he was unfortunate enough to have phimosis. He is okay with it but please for the sake of all the unlucky folks out there do not discourage men who already have their penises circumcised, it was not their choice. Plus he says that apart from the dryness, nothing bothers him and he would've rather have it when he was young and unaware so he didnt have to experience all the clinic experience and everything, I am pleased and so is he. I don't know about other men but after reading these posts I had to point this out. Thank you.
Its not always about the sex. From medical aspect, those skin is a habit for bacteries and filth. So, it is suggested to cut it in purpose to get a cleaner penis. I believe most women like cleaner things, moreover its about organs that are used in sensitive area whos more susceptible to diseases.
A circ'ed man's penis is cleaner, always better looking, and is just plain better for sex since his tip is bigger and he lasts longer I've dated a couple of uncirc'ed guys, and while I wouldn't run away from one, I definitely prefer to find no foreskin.
I would definitely circ my baby if I ever have a son. It's best to just get it over with.
It's common for the partner(s) of uncircumcised men to notice a distinct odor or taste when coming in close contact with the penis and foreskin. A distinct smell around the genitals is normal for men (and women), however if the odor seems overly strong, it may be time to gently suggest taking a shower together to wash up. It's also possible for uncircumcised men to have an infection under their foreskin; if there are any signs of irritation, redness, offensive odor, or other abnormal symptoms, your partner may need to see a health care provider.
I just don't think an uncircumcised penis is appealing. A circumcised one looks better, feels better and is more clean and healthy. I've also had a partner who wasn't circumcised and I didn't enjoy oral activities. SO it does kill the vibe of excitement for me I'm afraid.
It's not even about looks, circumcised obviously looks better, but more importantly it's more hygienic and it's proven that an uncircumcised man is more likely to catch an infection than a circumcised man. I personally wouldn't want an uncircumcised penis near my genitals or any other areas for that reason.
I am uncut and LOVE it but women see it as different and not normal. This sucks because it makes the male feel that mutilation is the only way to have sex. DON'T GET CUT YOU WILL REGRET IT. And girls don't judge a man for being uncut believe it or not but we are self conscious about this.
Men are meant to be circumcised. The difference between circumcised and uncircumcised is a real deal breaker for me and most women. A neatly circumcised penis is the most beautiful thing in the world and by keeping that nasty wrinkled bit of foreskin you are hiding the sexiest part of a mans body! When I come home from work I want to see my boyfriend in all his glory and that means fully naked with NO nasty foreskin! A circumcised penis has a permanently exposed head so there is no hiding! The penis is fully naked and exposed at all times, as it should be. It really is the sexy way to be. What kind of loser wants to hide his penis? Real men are circumcised!
If the guy is cut, I can count on that guy being clean. All these uncircumcised guys are saying its the same, and cleaning is not an issue. But it's not.
What about having sex spontaneously with your guy when he comes home or on Sunday morning as you're both waking up? Uncut guys can't prepare for that. In the heat of the moment, you have to say, "Go wash yourself." They might think that we don't notice but we do.
There are a lot of angry uncut men on here. Good for you that you have an uncut willy. Be proud. Just don't expect us girls to put our mouths on one and not notice or gag.
Male circumcision protects women from cervical cancer and men from penile cancer. Therefore all men should be circumcised right before marriage. I am against infant circumcision because it is generally traumatic. Most men who decide to get a circumcision in adulthood don't regret their decision. Hey guys, don't be afraid of the cut.
My wife is from Germany where most men are uncircumcised. I am a American and, like most of us here, I am circumcised. She much prefers the cleanliness of a circumcised man. She says no matter how diligently an uncircumcised man washes under his foreskin, he just isn't clean "down there." Her first husband (from Brazil) had to get circumcised as an adult because of infections. For health reasons and aesthetic reasons, she fully supported having our son circumcised as a baby.
I am a Canadian male who is cut and prefer it that way. I am used to the look and feel and I'm sure uncut would look weird to me as it would look weird for the opposite. I am not impressed with the woman's cogent that she doesn't have sex with her husband anymore because he doesn't have foreskin. That is just a cruel excuse for her own issues. It is a cultural thing as there are different areas in Canada that circumcision is the norm and other areas where it is rare. I was asked when my son was born whether I wanted him circumcised and I said yes. He is 22 now and is glad he is. Like I said it is a cultural thing and people don't like to be seen as different especially something like that. I'm sure the answers from woman reflect the same although they are the ones how have experienced both sides and can make their decision based on actual preference. We as men can't because we live our lives with what we have and we all want to be the normal ones.
When I was still inexperienced, I actually much preferred the uncut member. But as time progressed, I became rougher in my tastes, and I'm not looking for careful, tender sex as much as I was. I much prefer the harder action of the tightly cut penis nowadays. I will still have fun with an uncut man, but none of my top ten lovers have any vestige of a foreskin.
All males should be circumcised because women prefer them that way. A circumcised penis looks better and doesn't smell at all. A circumcised man is also a healthier man and far less likely to catch any diseases. I always ensure my boyfriends are nicely circumcised and strongly encourage all other women to do the same. All my sons will be circumcised for their own good and the good of their future wives.
I have experienced penises cut and uncut and I would not have sex again with an uncircumcised man. It's too risky (not just HIV, a whole slew of diseases. Also I much prefer circumcised penises - they look so much nicer, they look clean, smell clean and taste clean - no cheesy penises for me, ever again!
My boyfriend has a cut penis and I love it. I do not have to worry if he washed the smegma off because he has no foreskin. Smegma build up can definitely give you an infection. Also, it does not have an unpleasant odor, another side effect of uncut penises. The only negative thing of uncut is lubrication, but there is always lube that you can buy at stores.
I prefer a nice clean cut penis. Feels betters and looks much nicer. I have had many cut and uncut partners, but I now always look for cut men. It can be difficult to find in the UK but there are some around fortunately! I think it should be down to an individuals choice however.
A past boyfriend had been circumcised since birth, the doctors had done this, (was for non-religious reasons) and personally I believe it is more hygienic in some cases as not all men clean their foreskins as thoroughly as maybe they should, as I have heard to wash properly the foreskin must be pulled back and cleaned in the shower/bath, which of course in individuals with circumcised penises this isn't a problem unlike those without. Of course there are so many exceptions of many males in the world who believe in good hygiene and taking care of their body. However I know not being circumcised doesn't lead to any problems as far as I am aware, it is just my personal preference and I also believe (again person opinion) that being circumcised does look more attractive :)
A circumcised penis is aesthetically pleasing -- at least to me. Also, it's cleaner. Not all uncut penises are ugly, but sometimes if the foreskin is really long it can be kind of gross. If I loved someone who was uncut, I wouldn't dump him. But I prefer cut, thank you.
I am a young college woman as well and I believe that circumcised is much better than uncircumcised. My ex was uncircumcised and my current boyfriend is circumcised and there is a difference. Circumcised wins in the feel better, smells better, and cleaner departments. As mentioned before circumcised fits much better into a condom and hits the gspot. No matter how clean uncircumcised is it will never smell as good as a circumcised one. Circumcised also looks better too.
I've been married to my husband for 15 years now. We both decided that he should have a circumcision 7 years ago. We reached this decision because his penis always smelled very bad. Even when he washed his penis, it would still have a weird taste. Also, the smell would come back a few minutes after he washed it. The smell was a big turn off for me and I rarely gave him oral sex back then. Ever since he was circumcised, I don't hesitate to give him oral sex. It doesn't smell, nor does it taste weird. I actually enjoy it now. It has been a great decision that has greatly improved our sexual life. I don't think this is for everyone, but I personally prefer my husband to be circumcised.
The circumcised penis definitely looks sexier than a bunch of foreskin. Even guys who are very conscientious about hygiene develop a funky odor under the foreskin within a short period of time. Condoms are easier to use if he is circumcised. I love feeling the contour of the head inside my vagina.
The uncircumcised penis just looks gross. The smells are foul. I decided to circumcise myself at the age of 22 and don't regret it one bit. I am now 33 and have been complimented many times how nice it is. I'm not sure about the drying of the head because mine is just fine and I create enough precum that its never been an issue.
Intact is much better because it's nature beside circumcision is a mutilation which removes vast majority of nerve ending thus hard to man to reach the orgasm so easily. It also prevents boys from doing the masturbation to some extent that's why in most of America and even in Islamic nations men to tend to marry at early age because masturbation doesn't produce a lot of pleasure so they need something to penetrate. This also increases the premarital and teen pregnancy rate and also the abortion rate so circumcision is indirectly responsible for the increment of the teen pregnancy rate and the abortion. But since abortion is banned in most of countries then it goes to underground so there are a lot of crimes so circumcision is indirectly responsible for many crimes happens in the country.
Another disadvantage of the male genital mutilation type 1 aka circumcision is it prevents the man from doing the gliding mechanism which is all about stimulating the ring of the glans by putting the pressure on it through the foreskin but when there is no foreskin this mechanism is completely abolished thus it drives him away from achieving the pleasure he used to have when he had the foreskin. This doesn't stop in here it expands further by making the glans and the shaft of the penis get keratanized thus dropping his pleasure up to 40%. This is pretty much of a serious situation which is still allowed by money hungry capitalistic corporation who constantly brainwash men to get cut themselves in order to harvest the foreskins for harvesting the fibroblast so they can make fairness creams for women have a lot of wrinkles on their face.
I think that women should prefer the neat and healthy appearance of a circumcised penis. Researches say that circumcised males are less likely to take infections, sexually transmitted diseases and other illness, like balanitis and so on. Then, circumcised penis is easier to touch and it has a longer lasting response to stimulation, increasing pleasure for both!
I thought it was better, I had one other man in my life and he wasn't circumcised. My guy now is circumcised and I find he is always so freakin dry... My V-jay can only lube so much... and I find he doesn't lube and I'm not sure if that is the cause. My pervious guy who wasn't circumcised was always lubed, not sure if that is a factor and I'm embarrassed to ask him about it. Because sex becomes painful after awhile. Am I right?
I am circumcised, 20, and now I have no feeling what so ever unless my girlfriend gives me the death grip. Circumcision is a crime and takes away almost all feeling of sensation in the penis. It is natural for guys to have a foreskin, it is equal to cutting off the clit and the labia of a women just for hygiene concern. Women can get over the look and appreciate the way god intended the penis to be.
First up, my personal opinion, I think circumcised penises look like mutilated, skinned mushrooms, and there's that ugly scar on it. They seriously gross me out. Get a restoration! Now for some facts, 85% of men, globally, are intact/uncircumcised, and the whole 'preference' thing is merely what women are accustomed to (and what their country's media has spoon-fed them), which would mean around 85% of women in the world prefer intact. It is a known fact that only a small minority in the world still actively practice circumcision (in America and Muslim/Jewish countries). Even the circumcision rate in America has dropped to 33.5% in 2009. Why? Well, let me tell you what, actual science and real medical institutions mention, and why San Francisco almost passed a bill to ban circumcision outright. Circumcision rates are on a steady decline in America. Why? Because -every- single "benefit" you've ever heard about male genital mutilation (circumcision) has been debunked with modern research. What propaganda in American media spews out is actually the -opposite- to what the actual evidence demonstrates: - The foreskin (which is present on an intact penis) has anti-bacterial properties and prevents infection, effectively -reducing- the chance of STD infection and is much cleaner. "Smegma" (Greek for "soap"), the natural lubricant in an intact male penis, is the reason for this (and what's gotten all the absolutely ridiculous blame for everything that was once thought to be "bad" about it). It's also -much- easier to wash than a female's genitals, and here's a little fact that that propaganda doesn't tell you: there is THREE times more smegma behind the labia and under the clitoral hood of a female's genitals than an intact man's, and it does not get auto-cleaned from a vagina either (it's not present inside it). If you really believe the completely false, debunked claims that intact are "unclean", than keep this in mind: the vagina would be THREE TIMES DIRTIER if that was the case. If you want some proof from the world around you that foreskin substantially reduces the risk of STD transmission, bacterial buildup and infection, take a look at real-world facts and add them together: America is the last Western nation to actively practice circumcision and has the highest number of circumcised males from any country in the Western world. Sum that up with this fact: America has the highest rate of STD transmission from any country in the world.| Not enough proof? Check some credible peer-reviewed sources and educate yourself about a sex organ known as the foreskin. - Babies have a -much- higher chance of dying from circumcision than from the almost non-existent penile cancer. - Visit Circumcision.org (the website of a non-profit organization that presents peer-reviewed, verifiable sources for proof of its claims, instead of ridiculous claims made for the 400-million-dollar business that is circumcision), for an actual scientific research that proves that sex with an intact man is -much- more pleasurable and satisfying for the woman than with a circumcised man. And it should be obvious: without a foreskin, vaginal dryness occurs, which can eventually make sex difficult and unpleasurable for the woman since the man's dry glans tends to scoop out the woman's natural lubricant (this explains why most cut men actually require artificial lubricant). - The foreskin has been found to absorb estrogen from the woman's vagina during intercourse, which has a psychological effect on the male which makes him more intimate towards the female. - Intact men can last MUCH longer during sex. Why? An intact man doesn't need to be "near climax" to feel pleasure, while a circumcised male NEEDS to be on the brink of ejaculation in order to feel any pleasure, which tends to make him want to finish as fast as possible. An uncircumcised male enjoys the entire journey (like the female), and unlike a circumcised male, an intact man can actually -feel-, easily, when he is near climax, allowing him to easily prevent it (and also easily prevent getting a girl pregnant by accident!). Hmm. "The teenage birth rate in the United States is the highest in the developed world, and the teenage abortion rate is also high." (http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/repcard3e.pdf). I wonder why. America also has the highest rate of erectile dysfunction in the developed world, and also the highest use of Viagara. A recent study had shown that intact penises are statistically larger than circumcised penises. This is due to a circumcised male's penis being restricted from most growth during puberty and childhood (there's a good reason the foreskin is initially adhered to the glans [self-cleaning] during childhood then separates: it's a part of the natural growth process). - The foreskin contains 20 000 nerve endings, while the clitoral hood of a female contains only 8000. These nerve endings are entirely devoted to sexual pleasure, but also pain. Female circumcision was banned in 1997 in America because of the negative trauma that girls grew up with from the pain from the procedure. When the brain of a -male- infant was tested before and after circumcision, the brain waves were disturbed, -permanently- after circumcision; believe it or not, this can have a drastic and permanent effect on their mental wellbeing, even if they pretend to be fine (technically they don't know the difference). A word of warning for mothers: if you're going to have this done to them, watch the procedure yourself. One mother, having watched it, was in mental trauma for decades, from witnessing the horrific screams of her child from the procedure. Well over 100 infants die every year in America from circumcision. ...Also, keep in mind that the vast majority of the "Yes" answers seem to be from both circumcised American males and paid advertisers, and from the looks of it, they had been brainwashed by a 400-million-dollar business. Not even the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends circumcision; and every single thing I've read from their responses are laughably false. Check "Intact and Famous" for a massive list of celebrities who are intact (e.g: Colin Farrell, Elvis Presley, James Dean, Dane Cook, Pierce Brosnan, Will Smith...). And there are several circled celebrities who actually hate the fact that they're circumcised: look them up. It is male genital mutilation that severely damages the man, and the woman as well. Want evidence for my claims? Check them for yourself from -credible-, scientific sources, instead of propaganda from paid media advertisements. And another thing, that comment on the "Yes" section that starts off with "Some want it even mandatory!", judging from the link he or she has given to an article, it's from some third-world African country, and the poster refers to it as his or her own country. They practice that like rituals from a ridiculous, biased, and now-disproven "study" from over a century ago, in a developing African country that didn't know how to practice the scientific method properly at the time. Look up details on that and you'll notice that it was the most ridiculously biased "study" you'll ever see.
I wasn't cut. I have had a fair number of sexual relationships and the females were quite satisfied. So much so that a few of them later chose not to cut their sons even though their husbands were cut. That makes a pretty strong statement. I'd never cut my sons, of course, as I really enjoy having my foreskin and I don't want to deprive them of the pleasure of having a whole penis.
Males who are uncircumcised have better orgasms as I have experienced and it is more comfortable during sex. Also nowadays science says that men who are circumcised barely have any orgasmic feeling and in my experience makes sex for me way more uncomfortable. And uncircumcised penis is also bigger. So this is why I say what I say.
The ignorance on the left makes me want to slam my head against the wall. So many lies and myths being said by these pro-cutters. Only women who haven't been lucky to be with a WHOLE man will say they prefer cut men. The fact is natural sex (meaning intact sex) is so much better. Less friction, more pleasure for both the man and the woman. Cut sex is not normal. There is too much friction. A cut penis is basically a dildo since there are no movable parts like in a whole penis.
By cutting part of the penis off (the foreskin) your reduce its size. As well, males with circumcised penises experience a reduction in testosterone development and so do not grow to be as large (height wise and penis wise) It is also proven that size matters. Finally, the foreskin helps to stimulate the woman's G-Spot and bring her pleasure through orgasm.
I prefer intact. In my experience intact lovers have been better. Also, cut means most likely cut as a baby. Think about it! You're cutting off a piece of your child's genitals! That's messed up. It's illegal to cut a girl's genitals, why is it okay to cut a boy's genitals? People try to justify it with all kinds of arguments, but the fact remains you are CUTTING your child!
Only American women would prefer a mutilated penis because they've been indoctrinated to believe it looks better. An operation that is potentially life threatening should not be taken just to make someone fit in with other people who have had an operation to fit in. It has no venture. I am unmutilated and have found that any "hygiene problems" are made up.
Aside from women who have been socialized to believe that the foreskin is an unnecessary structure (the height of ignorance, we come with no extra parts) I cannot imagine why any woman would prefer a piece of her partner's penis to be missing. So many key anatomical structures with so many nerves are removed and the man's sexual responsiveness is diminished. It is very sad to me that so many American women in their 50s - 30s will never get to experience sex with an intact man because demographically, the numbers were so low from the 1950s to the 1990s. More and more little boys are being left the way nature intended.
Foreskin is not just a useless skin it got nerves and veins and even smooth muscle,tough i am my self circumcised i would not do that and wont let anyone to do that to my son if i going to have any.I wish if there was a way to regenerate foreskin.
Circumcised penises are mutilated and deformed. They are not natural. They are smaller, scarred, callous, skinned etc. They draw out girls natural moisture and hurt us during sex. Intact men are bigger and healthier looking. The foreskin glides up and down inside us hitting our g-spot. The hygiene argument is so pathetic. Us girls have to wear pantyliners everyday because we are covered in discharge and we have periods! If one gender needed to be circumcised for hygiene it would be girls not boys! Over 80% of the world is intact so only uneducated ill-informed people practise this dated barbaric act.
Pain and unnatural surgeries are someone's idea of how it should be. Just be who you are. To change oneself can be good - by being healthy, not by going under the knife! Think for yourself, that's sexy! Circumcision is just a sick unnatural tradition, we make the traditions, so let's change them! /Sara
Males & sadly some females agree that if a males penis is un-circumcised, then it's ugly. First things first, when an un-circumsized penis is erect, it looks just like, or maybe even better than, a circumsized penis. As far as the health stereotypes go, they're all fake. As long as a male showers and scrubs, then it's clean. They say the extra skin carries bacteria. COMPLETELY FALSE.
A circumcised penis is mutilation. I mean, it really just boils down to personal preference really, but forcing a man to do that to himself without his approval is wrong, everyone deserves a choice and say in any matter that involves them and their body. I for one prefer uncircumcised men, I think it's a weird American stereotype.
I have an uncircumcised penis and don't know which is better. But as I have an uncircumcised penis I am going with uncircumcised.
I also think that process of circumcision is a painful and unnecessary process for adults. If it is done to a new born baby or child then it would be the worst decision you have done.
Only daft idiots would think a penis missing part of itself is actually better. I had sex with a circumcised man, and it was the worst sex of my life. It hurt, his penis was rough, and circumcision scars are extremely ugly.
My husband is uncircumcised and I love his penis exactly the way it is. It feels 100x better than the circumcised penis, and he is so much more sensitive to the touch. I love it.
Helmet heads are gross, rough, and unnatural. If given factual information and the opportunity, most women prefer an intact (uncircumcised) male. If not, then you can be sure that she has been successfully brainwashed into thinking that an unnatural penis is "better, cleaner, more attractive and more normal" than a natural one. Supporting circumcision is a new way of thinking, considering how long uncircumcised humans have been on this Earth. Which shows how quickly and easily swayed a human can be, with certain types of influences affecting their opinions.
Basically its up to the guy if ur talking bout hygiene.....N sex is better with the skin on....Its smoother n gives that mind blowing orgasms. Not that cut skin is bad but why defile what you are born with. Besides the foreskin has numerous receptacles which give more pleasure to guys too.
Uncut is really beautiful. The natural way....
The head needs protection to preserve its original colour and texture...
Also it enhances the pleasure ...For both....
Cut may lose sensitivity...Also it is not natural.
The theory of healthiness and cleanliness is all wrong...So uncut is the natural way of living and enjoying...Let us not get confused by the foxes who have lost their tails.
Don't Be Stupid God created man with foreskin for a reason. It maintains a healthy moist environment and enhances both male and female pleasure. For all you people out there who think "intact" penises and less hygienic than a cut one your wrong. Secretions from the glands on a mans penis contain antibacterial properties which helps to prevent STD's, also, it acts as an extra lubricant during sex. Cut men often have to use lubrication as sex can become dry and uncomfortable. This is because a cut penis soaks up a large quantity of female secretions. As I said, why cut of something that is suppose to be there? You wouldn't cut off your eye lids because they could "house bacteria" hahaha. I would like to take this moment to thank my parents for not mutilating my penis....Love you mum!!!!
Its hard to find a guy that has not been cut, its better this way and over the time the ability of getting orgasm fades away. Normally every white male is circumcised and that sucks, Hispanic and Latino boys are more likely to not been cut, so you wanna have that awesome orgasm, better find that Caribbean boy
There is arguments both ways. Some women like the feel or a circumcised penis and others prefer an uncircumcised penis. There is no evidence however that circumcised penises are "cleaner" or less prone to STD's; if anyone claims this they are buying into wives tales. Anyone can get STD's if they don't use a condom correctly regardless of the state of their foreskin. I would prefer it if babies were not circumcised at birth and the decision to get "the cut" could be made by them later in life (it is possible to get circumcised as an adult) when they can fully understand the consequences.
An uncircumcised penis is normal. It's beautiful, sensitive, and keeps itself lubricated. It's more pleasurable and interesting to give oral to... And in my experience, an uncut penis doesn't require "roughness"... I don't have to work as hard during a blow job or take any kind of rough/dry pounding during intercourse because uncut is just more sensitive. It makes sex more enjoyable, and makes me willing and able to go longer because nothing hurts and everything stays wet.
We need to stop supporting a barbaric blood ritual. American doctors are liars and are looking for any reason to hold on to the most common surgical procedure they perform. Women should have no say in how a man's body should be altered just as a man should never say to have a labia reduction or breasts implants. This question has no value to the core issue of body integrity and doctors with no ethics. Parents and lovers do not decide. My body my rights. Just like you women say when it comes to abortion.
For me, I prefer masturbation, oral and penetration more with an uncut man. I don't know why, there's just more to play with and it feels better. I can't speak for other people, but my uncut lovers (on average) lasted longer as well. I like the look of both and both can look really good or really bad depending on the person, but some of the bad circumcisions I have seen just made me feel sorry for the guy. That was one of my deciding reasons, for not having my son circumcised. To me circumcision is like plastic surgery and look at how many people come out of plastic surgery looking worse than before they went in? I was not going to take that chance with my baby who was born perfect and healthy. All the doctors and nurses I spoke to during my pregnancy, claimed (and I verified later) there is no medical society in the world that recommends routine circumcision which makes me question the medical benefits. Lastly, I just think its a bit hypocritical for us as women to say Ban Female Circumcision, because its painful, unnecessary and violates our rights regarding our bodies, but we don't feel the same way about men and their bodies. I guess there are more reasons, but those are the ones that popped into my head first.
When I was married, we had a son in 13 months. My late ex-wife wanted to have him circumcised. I refused. Before the next one came along, she decided I had the best penis in her wide experience. There was nothing about having the second one cut; in fact, she advised her hospital roommate not to have her new second son cut, even though the first one was. About 12 years later, I finally gave in to the realization I had in the first year of marriage: That I am much more attracted to males. I found that I could match my partners orgasm for orgasm, but only one of the multi-orgasmic was circumcised, and he was a country boy just moved to the city. I never experienced noticeable odor from under a foreskin. The only one was in the creases where the legs are separated by the scrotum, and that was from infrequent washing and/or accumulated drops of urine in jockey shorts. Sex with circumcised men became uninteresting to me, and I now avoid it. Before I gave up on bars, I got very good at picking uncut men by foreign accents!
Circumcision is mutilation. 85% of the world has a foreskin and I think circumcised penises are mutilated and pity the victims much like female circumcision. Circumcised penises are scarred, keratinized, uneven, discoloured and commonly have skin tags, skin bridges, hairy shaft ALL of which is grotesque and unnatural. HIS body HIS choice 99% of men left intact STAY intact. American women are ignorant and don't know any better. Cut penises cause painful intercourse while foreskin causes pleasurable intercourse and lube isn't needed for masturbation. The foreskin has the 5 most sensitive points on the penis.
The man is hurting the entire time during Intercourse compared to a uncut man who has all his sensitivity so it feels great and no pain! Plus there is completely no reason to do it what so ever and if you think that it prevents STD's or AIDS your wrong! It opens up your penis so bacteria can easily enter your penis causing a infection compared to having your foreskin to where nothing can enter your body down there.
Thus, polls like this are extremely pointless, stupid and divisive that serve absolutely no purpose. A persons decision to circumcise is a personal one that does not just affect them emotionally, but it will also affect their baby...And their partner.
I am uncut. My wife wants us to get our unborn son cut. I am absolutely against it because I am intact, yet she insists she loves me the way I am. But I refuse to do anything to my son that I would not do to myself....So I gave her the ultimatum. If she wants him cut, I am getting cut.
Uncut looks like cut when erect but provides more girth when pulled back. There is more to play with. More variety and profession in look when aroused. The hygiene comments are really misguided as a regularly cleaned penis is hygienic whether cut or uncut so this should not make any difference in this regard. The difference in look comes down to the unerect situation. When erect the skin traps the blood more and engorges the head of the penis to swell even bigger, which I have been told looks gorgeous or attractive or very big on many occassions.
Having an uncut penis is like freedom. It also comes with great benefits within sexual intercourse. In my and many others eye, having an uncut penis is like a gift from god. Something that should be well kept and saved for someone like me! After all the discussion it's all in all just about personal preference. It's what you yourself prefer.
I am a 29 year old female that was born and raised in the US, and I saw only uncircumcised penises until I met my current boyfriend. He is French and he is uncircumcised.
From a personal standpoint, I love his penis! I don't find it disgusting at all. I find it incredibly sexy to look at (erect and flaccid) and it feels amazing inside me! The sex with him is better than with any circumcised penis. I guess it helps too that his penis is very big. But that is why his foreskin is helpful; his penis glides so smoothly inside me. Even when it's fully erect, it has a smoothness to it (when he is thrusting) that circumcised penises don't have. It is always clean. It's never appeared or smelled dirty in any way. When he is fully erect, the foreskin completely retracts and his penis looks similar to an uncircumcised penis, only better because it doesn't have some frankenstein-looking areas of skin that look like different colored patches sewn together, like some circumcised penises I have seen.
From a scientific standpoint, I don't know if the people who are for circumcision have heard of the concept of evolution, but if foreskins were that unhygienic and detrimental to men's health, natural selection would've done away with them long ago. Every single male would not be born with a foreskin if it didn't serve a purpose.
I hope men don't start saying girl's natural external genitalia look disgusting and dirty, and have their female children's genitalia surgically altered to look more aesthetically pleasing. Then you women who talk about how "disgusting" uncircumcised penises look will know how it feels to be criticized for having genitalia that is in it's natural physical state.
Uncircumcised one really will give you good intercourse excitement. Because the head penis is not dry and its soft will give you good excitement. Only thing have to keep the penis clean. That is god gift why we have to cut the skin. If woman want cut skin let them use some rubber penis stick. I don't agree to cut the skin.
I shower every day. And if my girlfriend and I are going to have sex, I shower before we do. Why? Because I like to feel clean and fresh before we get intimate. She smells fantastic so I want to smell fantastic too. The women here who complain about their men smelling bad -- I'm sorry girls, but your men just smell. And if they smell that bad with a foreskin, they're going to smell that bad without one. I mean, did you ever think the smell might be emanating from their sweaty balls or their stinky, unwashed ass? And just a thought here, but maybe you should wash their penis for them. Make it part of the fun! Slide that foreskin all the way back and give your guy's member a nice warm washing. You really should consider doing this -- because he obviously doesn't know how to do it himself.
I am voting no, because I am circumcised and lost all sensation in my penis over the last 10 years. It is true that the penis is much cleaner, but I have lost all the feeling and believe me, you do not want the same thing to happen to you.
The foreskin, believe it or not, is supposed to be there. On that point alone, it should feel more natural both for men to have one and for women to.. Err.. 'have' one. Technically, as the human brain is very 'plastic' during childhood, it will adapt, for the most part, to the loss of sensory stimulation provided by the removed foreskin if they're circumcised as a baby. Adult brains do not have this plasticity, and adults who are circumcised will lose a majority of sensory ability in their penis, both due to the missing tissue and a general 'hardening' of the glans. Technically, it's much more healthy to have an uncircumcised penis, assuming that you wash properly and don't go showing it off to religious fundamentalists. Anyway, the foreskin is designed to move down over the head of the glans while erect, which creates roughly the same appearance as a circumcised penis.
1. When you cut the skin of your son's penis, your son is losing a lot of the nerves in his penis. You can't feel something if its not there, right? No skin = no feeling, right? So, sex will be less enjoyable. As a woman, if the guy is loving the sex, I am loving it.
2. I personally like the look better.
3. This isn't a matter of "preference" but people say "uncut penises smell bad". Well, something can't smell bad if you clean it. Cut penises will smell bad if you don't clean around it. Teach your child how to clean their genitals and there won't be a problem.
I find circumcised guys tend to have barely any feeling in the head of their penis. Also as far as the infection argument goes - if you take care of your junk you won't get an infection, practice safe sex and bathe yourself regularly and everything will be fine. I prefer the look of un-cut too, it seems more natural and relaxed when soft, and when hard the foreskin pulls back just enough to see the head and its more of a sexual look.
Uncircumcised penises are more natural and the way God intended them. Sex is better for both men and women. Circumcision is a crime forced on babies with no reliable data to support that there is any reason for it. As long as a man keeps it clean there are no issues.
Preference is extremely dependent on the culture of the woman. In areas where it is more common, it is more likely to be preferred. Where it is less common, uncut is preferred. Where it's about equal, there is usually a preference for cut when it comes to aesthetics, but a preference for uncut when it comes to sex.
From the sensations in foreskin so why deny him that. As early as the 18th century, famed British anatomist John Hunter wrote about the acute sensitivity found in the foreskin. In 1991, anatomist John Taylor coined the term the "ridged band" to describe the wrinkly skin at the edge of the foreskin. Taylor's studies conclude that the ridged band is "richly innervated" and "intensely vascular."
I have been with about 10 circumcised men and 1 uncircumcised, but the uncircumcised feels so much better for both of us. It is more fun to play with, and I can feel it when he's down there, it's very easy for him to give me an orgasm-even though he isn't as big as I am usually used to. He keeps it very clean, I have never noticed a smell or gotten an infection from him- and yet I have gotten infections from circumcised men, so to say that uncut is dirty is just silly-dirty is dirty and clean in clean. I can tell by his breathing and body language that he us more sensitive too, making sex more fun and exciting
I am a woman from America where circumcision is prevalent. So, there you go, not ALL women prefer cut & scarred penises - I think only the uneducated ones do. Do they know that an intact penis has 20,000 nerve endings & that a cut penis only has 4,000? Do they know that the foreskin is supposed to keep the head of the penis wet & the skin is like that of the inside of the vagina or the skin inside your mouth & the cut penis is dry & calloused? Do they even know that one of the many functions of a man's foreskin is to stimulate certain parts of her vagina giving her multiple orgasms? Do these women even know that WOMEN ALSO HAVE A FORESKIN - it's called the clitoral hood.....And baby girls are protected from circumcision, WHY NOT BOYS TOO?! Because doctors make too much money off of it, thats why. Incredibly sad.
A guy I was with had a botched circumcision and lost his entire glans because the surgeon messed up. After seeing what that looked like and how the poor guy could never experience an orgasm, I don't understand how any woman can prefer a circumcised penis. Every time I've had sex with a circumcised man, it's been rough and uncomfortable, and in order to experience an orgasm, I need tons of lube. This isn't the case with intact penises; it feels like the penis is gliding in me, sex feels so smooth and so comfortable. I've never noticed an offensive odor from an uncut penis, and frankly, men have to put up with the taste of vagina, so I don't see why it's so much of a deal for women to deal with a foreskin. I've never noticed hygiene issues with foreskins, so I don't think that is a Val,I'd argument either if the guy showers and keeps himself clean.
Most women are in love with the guy for who he is, not whether he has a foreskin or not. The fact of the matter remains that uncircumcised penis's have more feeling for the man himself, and the extra skin creates less tension on friction during intercourse. It's so immature and ridiculous if a women judges you based on circumcised or uncircumcised penis, especially when religion also becomes a factor. Now, if this is a factor then you should probably reconsider your partner and her beliefs. As long as you practice safe sex, and hygeines, I don't see the main issue. While uncut may have a particular "look," the "feel" will always be superior with uncircumcised penis's. Once again, there are both pros and cons to cut and uncut penis's, but I strongly believe that uncut penis will always be thicker and larger than cut penis's, and cleaner/keeps the head from reduced sensitivity (every men wants to feel more out of sex).
Frankly, I don't see any advantage to a woman that comes as a result of the circumcision of her partner. I don't mean to seem graphic, but an uncut penis can act in every way that a circumcised penis can, and more. For example, the foreskin contains many sensitive nerves that can enhance the sensation of the man, leading to a more rewarding experience for the both of you.
There is also the argument of natural evolution. The foreskin acts as a sheath to sort of protect the sensitive penis head from the friction of clothing or whatever sort of harm it comes to. And there's just something slightly more rewarding about a natural and "whole man". It's more appealing. And the thought of mutilation is generally a sort of turn-off.
As a woman, I find uncircumcised penises lead to a better sexual experience on both ends.
Besides, it's a terrible thing to do, really. And honestly, I think it's disgusting when women claim that a man's foreskin is "Gross" or "Dirty". Think about yourselves for just a second ladies. Our apparent 'situation' is mostly foreskin, and we're not ashamed.
In short, it looks and feels better.
My girlfriend and I have been together for a few months. I'm uncut. She loves the fact I feel everything just as much as she does. It feels great for both of us. Our nerves hit and it sends tingles of lightning pleasure down our spines. I take care of mine, I keep it clean and wash it as I should. I've never had any problems.
Uncircumcised penis feel better and the man is less likely to develop erectile dysfunction. The only reason why in America we have practiced circumcision is because the church would say it's wrong for boys to masturbate. Cutting the foreskin was to make it harder them to masturbate. The doctors would also lie about cutting would reduce the risk of infections. Have you ever seen or heard of animal have penis infection? And why should boys have there genital mutilated? How would we women like it if our clitoral hoods were cut off?
First off, with health stereotypes, most of them are fake and all the reasons doctors once said when the procedure was first done has been proven to no longer be true. When a penis is erect both look pretty much the same, an uncut penis maybe looks even better because it doesn't have scarring. Me personally, I don't care enough to prefer one or the other. I think a cut penis looks a little better but doesn't make much of a difference to me as long as it is clean. I do have to say an uncut penis feels better during sex though as it can be uncomfortable and hurt without the natural foreskin http://www.Healthcentral.Com/drdean/408/60750.Html.
It feels good to be natural once in a while, taking the foreskin away takes away a part of someone they can never have back. Its like enlarging your breasts, it never feels the same way again. As for the hygiene part, an agreement can be set so that before any indulgences the penis is clean.
Only old Jews cut a man's penis and its a brutal thing to do. Now, from personal experience a cut penis is usually dryer in me than an uncut one. Also an uncut penis feels so much more manlier to me. Don't know what else can be said to be honest
Circumcision turns a sensitive organ with richly varied topology and sensitivity into a smooth cylinder that loses dimensionality. In other words, it becomes a tool that can only be stimulated in very direct, more aggressive ways. When you remove the foreskin you take away protection as well as sensation, and turn an external organ into an exposed rod. Moreover, it takes the distinction between the penis's functions of excretion and reproduction, making it into a full-time sexual weapon rather than something that only comes out to play at certain times.
From my experiences, if you clean and scrub well, an uncircumcised penis stays clean. There are also ways to eliminate smell, although, probably is more of a personal matter and not because your penis is circumcised or not. Naturally, males were born intact. If natural selection preferred uncircumcised, we would be born without foreskin. In reality, though, a girl wont really care. Most American children, though, are under the impression that an intact penis is a bad penis. America has extremely high STD rates that correspond to America's high circumcision rates. In fact, for the most part, America is the only country that still circumcises. To me, the cost outweigh the benefits. Not hating on the USA though, I live in Virginia and it's my favorite place in the world. Just stating facts.
The only fact to say here is that to cut a part of a males private parts off is not natural- therefore it really isn't the way it's supposed to be, is it? Shaving, tattooing, piercing are all ways to stylize your own area but to mutilate a part of your body by cutting a part off isn't natural and is almost similar to female genital mutilation in my opinion. I'd like to ask the question for females who haven't experienced being with a male who is uncircumcised: have you really felt a full "natural" penis? Trust me, it feels good.
Circumcision is a needless, dangerous operation. Please do not get this done to your infant son. I was circumcised as an infant and, due to a mistake made during the operation, cannot enjoy a normal sex life. A large part of my glans penis was accidentally removed by the doctor performing the operation. As a result, I have a disfigured, partial penis. Unfortunately, this is actually not that uncommon. Mistakes routinely occur. If you're a mom - please don't.
I find it amazing that women think they can tell men to get circumcised for reasons of bacteria. Perhaps they should take a look at their own downstairs. There are far more germs hanging around outside the vagina than under the foreskin.
The Jews really got you good with this one. It's child abuse plain and simple. Think of any other procedure/surgery that is 100% unneeded and comes from religions not science. Then imagine it is given to little girls only a few months old without their permission.
I call sexism on this whole debate.
It is the natural way, if you are circumcised your body was altered, and through evolution it's become a part of sex. It feels better. There is more friction between the penis and the vagina. It looks better, if you're circumcised it looks unprotected, the foreskin is there for a reason.
I don't personally know how much foreskin is important pleasure wise; more simply, EVEN IF it were of no use (as many other parts of our body which were just 'forgotten' by evolution, such as appendix, ear lobs and some of our teeth) I wouldn't take it away unless it were causing damage. We don't cut our appendix if it's not infected, do we? So I personally believe man should have the right to have a 'whole' body, with no unmotivated 'mutilation'. And girls who don't understand this are narrow-minded and disrespectful to man.
I have only been with circumcised men until now and I gotta say an intact penis is beautiful compared to a cut one and the feeling of it when were intimate is amazing! I don't know where people think the odor comes from. I have a highly sensitive nose and he's just fine to me. Bottom line is most women won't leave a guy based on if he's cut or not. Leave it be.
God created man with foreskin for a reason. It maintains a healthy moist environment and enhances both male and female pleasure. For all you people out there who think "intact" penises and less hygienic than a cut one your wrong. Secretions from the glands on a mans penis contain antibacterial properties which helps to prevent STD's, also, it acts as an extra lubricant during sex. Cut men often have to use lubrication as sex can become dry and uncomfortable. This is because a cut penis soaks up a large quantity of female secretions. As I said, why cut of something that is suppose to be there? You wouldn't cut off your eye lids because they could "house bacteria" hahaha. I would like to take this moment to thank my parents for not mutilating my penis....Love you mum!!!!
If you weren't circumcised as a kid and youre thinking of get circumcised now, DON'T. See, uncut men have a better advantage over circumcised ones. Men who have not been circumcised actually feel more stimulation down there than circumcised men do. The foreskin is filled with nerves which help the penis feel. Men who receive circumcision as adults almost always regret their decision because they've lost large amounts of feeling down there. To put it in a short version, uncircumcised men FEEL more sensations than circumcised men.
How can a woman be attracted to a penis that no longer looks like a penis should? I personally find circumcised penises ugly. I cant imagine how it must feel for the guy to have his penis head rubbing against the inside of his clothing; thickening the skin and dulling sensation.
The argument about hygiene is obsolete- so long as a man cleans himself daily them there's no problem, if he doesn't then he'll be unclean whether or not his penis is circumcised.
The penis skin is a form of protection and also is the dominating factor in male sexual pleasure as it roles up and down the penis.
Don't get me wrong, if an adult male makes the decision to have his penis circumcised its his own choice, but we should not be doing it to babies against their will.
If you are a Christian and you believe in circumcision this is for you. In the beginning God created man and found that it was good. This passage means something very important to this topic. God found that man was "good" not that he was almost good. When circumcision started it was meant as a sacrifice to God. God would not ask for a sacrifice that did not matter. He asked for something that would have indeed been a sacrifice. In modern times we live in a new covenant, one that does not require circumcision. There are passages in the Bible condemning circumcision. In Christianity women were created for men. God would not have created women not liking something about men.
The reason I believe many women think an uncircumcised penis is gross is because that is what they have been taught a penis should look like. If women actually thought a circumcised penis looked better the majority of the world might be circumcised. It is my contention that circumcision was started to keep men from masturbating. Since they used to think masturbation caused diseases. Circumcision is the inhumane practice of mutilating men against their will.
A good argument to be made here about the attractiveness and hygiene of a circumcised male is to compare the same arguments about circumcised women. I am NOT trying to equate the two practices as the same. Female circumcision is usually much more invasive. The people in cultures that promote female circumcision have the same arguments for supporting female circumcision as our culture does for supporting male circumcision. They say it is cleaner and is more attractive for a woman to be circumcised like some people say the same for male circumcision in America.
It is my belief that men and women both have a right to keep their genitalia at any age. I would like to journey into a hypothetical situation. I will put forth my best effort to explain myself as effectively as possible as to not offend anyone. Let us have a hypothetical situation that men and women can be circumcised legally. But also allow for a difference in what most people consider female circumcision. Instead what I will mean by female circumcision is the removal of the skin covering the clitoris. This is a far less invasive form of circumcision than we are accustomed to addressing with female circumcision. Now with this different and equally damaging form of circumcision for both the sexes consider if it should still be legal to circumcise all children, regardless of sex. It is my firm belief you will see this in a different light. If not read on.
It is my firm belief that people have evolved over many, many, many years. If you do not share this belief perhaps it would be best to read my next post above. Please do not stop reading if you disagree with this statement as circumcision affects everyone not just those who are religious or not. In continuation, if the foreskin was not beneficial to men. I believe they would not have it. Keeping good hygiene is a practice many have adopted to stay healthy. Many years ago many people must have died due to poor hygiene, whether they were even aware of the possibility of good hygiene or not. If having a foreskin was a hygiene problem for those before us who did not likely practice good hygiene then those people would have had less of a chance of living and would have eventually died out. Instead of the group of people who have foreskins dying out they thrived. Nearly every male is born with a foreskin. This is huge evidence that foreskins are beneficial.
My first was with a circumcised man. The sex was fantastic, and he didn't have a size problem with his penis or height. Although I did get more sore after with him than with my current uncut boyfriend, uncut does smell weird if he doesn't shower daily, but I find sex more pleasurable and I feel more connected with him while we're having sex. I feel he feels more, and we react off of each others pleasure. Personally as a woman, I can say I don't prefer circumcised penises over uncircumcised.
I believe women prefer men to have a natural-looking penis, not only because it is more attractive, but also on a more pragmatic side, the skin protects the tip of the penis, which is a very sensitive area. It also keeps moisture, avoiding tissue damage from rubbing on the clothes, and keeps sexual pleasure without delaying climaxes, as I've heard from circumcised men.
I had a boyfriend who was uncircumcised and at first I thought it was weird and gross, but then I researched it and saw that it is better for a man to be natural. Why should a man be deprived of a lot of the pleasure of sex? Not to mention that circumcised men cause sex to be anywhere from slightly displeasing to downright painful for the woman. We both, my ex and I, still talk occasionally, but I worry that he may get circumcised because he worries about the minor health risks.
If circumcision was beneficial to the human race (from either the male or female point of view), evolution would have fixed the problem centuries ago (What! You don't believe in evolution? There's no hope for you). It's totally unnecessary, and doctors surely have more important things to occupy their working lives.
With an uncircumcised guy, you're less likely to need lube, less likely to experience pain, and more likely to have an orgasm via intercourse. Plus, I hate the look of scars and keratinized skin. And it's another part of a penis to play with... YAY! There used to be cleanliness and STD concerns, but not anymore, now that we have running water. It's really freaking easy to keep an uncircumcised penis clean by simply retracting the foreskin and washing it while bathing.
With all that said... It should be up to the man and his long-term partner(s) whether or not he should be circumcised. Some women do prefer it, and that's okay. I just don't like the fact that it's done to babies. 118 baby boys die every year in the US alone directly as a result of routine circumcision. Not okay! Let the kid make up his own mind when he's older and can undergo the procedure with much less risk!
Uncut is better because it's natural; the way a penis is meant to be. Men lose a lot of feeling in their penis when they are circumcised and also, they tend to not last as long. My current boyfriend is uncircumcised and is an amazing lover.
Personally I think that circumcised penises look very odd and naked. Not neat but bare and pink/red and kinda scary. >.<
I understand that many people feel that circumcised is "cleaner" but have you not heard of soap and warm water? It's just laziness. Wash yourselves thoroughly and regularly and there is no problem!
I do believe that is a matter of personally preference, but not only do I personally think that uncircumsized penises are MORE attractive, I believe they feel better too. I think circumcised penises look mis-shapen and I find the scars to be unattractive. Uncircumsized penises seem to be more sensitive and responsive, and just feel like a better fit.
This is only my opinion, I don't pretend to offend or hurt anyone's feelings.
Being a female I personally don't like circumcised penises. I think they are disgusting and I hate how they look. It is so disgusting to me, that I would never date a man if I know he is circumcised. (Although is not something you usually know before dating someone).
I like how uncircumcised penises look, and I think it is more natural because it is how people are born. Also, I think that having a foreskin is better for men when having sexual relations, because they have lots of nerve endings in that particular zone; circumcised men can't experience the same pleasure.
Just no. That shouldn't even be happening, like seriously why?, If God, no Offense to Non-believers but if God created us with Foreskin why the heck would you ruin his creation for?, your foreskin is there for a reason and if it wasn't meant to be there then God would have created us without it, I get for some people it's Religious and some people want to get it, but no! Never, I wouldn't give that to a Child either, putting them through that madness, It's so sad , and even if there're good affects, there's also bad too!, So keep It Natural, It's always better Natural..I don't think there is any need to get it, that's just...Appalling.
Circ reduces the mans sensitivity. Even if done for religious, reasons should be banned. Anyone who supports it is a pedophile and pervert. I hate being circumcised, and I will use foregen.Org to gain back what is rightfully mine. Foreskins 4 ever! Stop male genital mutilation and partial Penectomy. Stop it.
Guys who usually end up getting circumcised do it for hygienic reasons (mostly because they can't keep it clean). So what are the chances of them staying clean even after that. I prefer guys who can handle an uncircumcised penis. If it counts for anything, I just think it looks better.
As a female in the US, I'm protected by law from having my genital cut without my consent if I am an infant. It doesn't seem right that men are given the same protection. The benefits of circumcision are supposed to be for hygiene, penile cancer, HIV, infection, etc. But the reduced risks are not always substantial or conclusive for these problems. You are as likely to die from circumcision as an infant as you are to die from penile cancer as an adult. Also, they can often be prevented by basic hygiene, sex education, and safe sex practices. I would rather have an intact man who makes his own responsible decisions, rather than for his parents to have decided without his consent to amputate a normal, healthy, functional part of his sexual organs based on the fear of a slight chance of those problems. If there is a specific disease or abnormality that is currently affecting a man and circumcision is required after exhausting all other methods, then I would support his decision because it is his decision and a necessary, not elective, procedure. Also, circumcised men have higher rates of problems with erectile dysfunction, adequate lubrication, premature ejaculation, and adhesions. Not fun! Oh, and getting your son circumcised so he will look like you seems insecure and slightly narcissistic. It's his body and you should cut away at it without his consent. Do you really like the fact that your parents decided to cut away some of the most erogenous tissue on your penis without giving you a choice?
A guy is born with foreskin because of nature. Creatures in nature adapt to their environment. Therefore saying, if nature wanted guys to have no skin on top of their penis than they wouldn't. So don't screw with something that nature has chosen! Because it has been chose for a reason and just let it go.
Fore skin, It's a sleeve that glides, keeping it from abrasion on the sides of the vagina! Circumcised men get about 7-16% sexual pleasure, instead of 100%! And women get about 30% when having sex with a circumcised man! The foreskin is the most nerve filled tissue as well. And the membrane of the head will thicken and lose it's sensitivity, And the women will have an abrasive hard object, instead of sliding sheets of skin.
The hygiene argument doesn't wash (pun intended) now that we can shower every day. There is probably more pleasure for the male, and definitely more comfort for the female when the foreskin is intact. Circumcision is just another excuse for physicians to present us with a bill. Any sons of mine will be uncircumcised.
What the majority of women prefer always coincides with the percentage of men that are circumcised in that area. If most men there are circumcised, then most of the women there think circumcised is better. If the majority is uncircumcised, then most of the women will think uncircumcised is better. If it's around 50/50 in an area, then they usually have no preference.
That's about all there is to it on people's preference. Most people just use "facts" (quotation because much of the information is controversial, sketchy or weak) to try to justify their stance, rather than to choose it. Of course most people initially decide on what they hear, which is most support of what' more prevalent.
In the end, they prefer what they are used to. That's society for you, just bandwagoning along with what's already there. Since the majority of the world is uncircumcised, I chose "No", but if varies in each country. In the United States women prefer it circumcised in the northeast and central. In the west, it is much less common. It is also preferred in predominantly very Islamic nations and Israel. It may be preferred in some American spheres of influence. In Europe and the rest of the world, uncircumcised is strongly preferred.
Personally I believe that it is better for a man to have his foreskin intact. As a female I prefer if my men have their foreskin and feel that sex is better with it. I don't know how to handle a penis that is circumcised as it can be dry and my technique needs to be different.
I totally agree, that its inhumane and barbaric to circumstance a newborn baby. I could understand if it has to be done for medical reasons, but there is no need to cut every single baby boy! Whats up with that? Its painful and there are at least 7-10 days recovery time. Many cut men are having lack of sensitivity and need lots of lubrication. A cut penis gets very rough and dry over the years. Oh yes, and you can still contract STD's from a circumcised guy. I've been dating a circumcised Jewish man for several years and contracted HPV. This unnecessary ridiculous practice has to be banned as soon as possible. Newborn circumcision is just a way for the doctors to make more money - so they will tell parents all these wonderful things about circumcision. Personally I like uncut men very much and never had a problem with odor or the way it looks..
Nobody is talking about a medical treatment, we're talking about genital mutilation! If it's medically needed (very few males are circumcised for medical reasons as a last resort, like under 1%), then fine, but there's no just cause to mutilate a child for your own preference! And as far as "benefits" go, most public healthcare professionals agree that the risks associated with routine circumcision, such as infection and excessive bleeding, outweigh any *potential* benefits.
Preferring circumcised penises is no different to preferring circumcised vaginas (FGM)! Think about it, would you support FGM if women gained all the the "benefits" men got from circumcision?
They are easier to please as opposed to uncut. I never experience anything unclean about it. I was actually afraid to look at it for the first time, but when I did see an uncircumcised penis for the first time, instead of laughing, I actually got a tingly feeling and was completely turned on. It makes sense though: that's the way the penis was intended to look and what our brains are probably instinctively attracted to. I'm actually disappointed now if a guy is circumcised.
The foreskin is not there just to simply exist, it's there to protect the penis against many things, and if you do cut it, it looks mutilated! It was not made to be cut off! It has it's purpose, and it is done away with then it defeats it's whole purpose of being there!
Circumcised penises just don't cut it for me. They are weird looking, very dry, and also intimidating. The only positive to a circumcised penis is that the man lasts longer during sex due to his loss of sensation from the foreskin. Despite being quick in the sack, uncircumcised penises make for great loving.
I just can't seem to find any logical reason why anyone would want to do this their son. There are multiple facts as to why it shouldn't be done. Do your research. Your emotions and the opinions of others shouldn't weigh in. Your decision should be made solely on facts and logical thought process.
The easy and gentle penetration of an intact penis, the caressing and gentle arousal of the moist glans and the mind blowing orgasm which accompanies the maximal penetration of the oh-so-welcome intact penis, can only be imagined by those who have never experienced it. I think I would prefer a plastic dildo to a dry cut cock.
I had never been with an uncircumcised man before my current boyfriend. At first I was confused, worried about all the rumors I had heard. After research and talking with my boyfriend I have found that it is truly wrong to make this type of decision for your child. The sex is so much more intense and enjoyable. He is very clean and has no odor at all. When we decide to have children I have no intention of getting circumcisions for my boys.
In the process of circumcision, nerve endings that make sex more pleasurable for the man are cut off in the process of circumcision. A boy who was circumcised after birth will grow up, never feeling as much pleasure as he could have, which is awful! Quite honestly, I don't want to have sex with a man that cannot have as great of orgasms. I feel like his inability to be fully satisfied will reflect on his performance in bed.
My boyfriend is not circumcised and we have a great sex life. As long as he has good personal hygiene cleanliness and odor is not a problem. I don't understand why guys feel they should get circumcised because women complain it's better looking, it's as if all women should get breast surgery because men like bigger boobs. I have no problem with an uncircumcised penis as long as he has good personal hygiene!
Where do people get off forcing surgery on another on the idea they prefer the looks? Even the argument of cleanliness is stupid, if you don't clean something it gets dirty. Teach your kids to clean themselves! Regardless. Foreskin is not just skin, it is full of nerves! When having sex the skin goes back for sensitivity and looks much the same but has the ability to go in better. Circumcised penises have no movement. Why do doctors/science spend their life trying to understand the intelligence of the human body and then decide they know more about it than the intelligence that created it? Human stupidity.
They all look the same hard. Also I heard circumcision leads to ED later in life. I've been with both cut and uncut and neither really seemed different. Besides, you're with the man not the penis and to be honest some of my best lovers were still in the original packaging.
I don't support a practice (which is religious in nature) that mutilates a baby's penis, obviously without their consent. Foreskin isn't gross, or creepy, it is natural. I'd be pretty upset if my labia was altered when I was a baby for religious/cosmetic purposes. I have had sexual relationships with both circumcised and uncircumcised penises and really, they are not that different. Only thing different is how to put the condom on.
It's actually a weird practice. Most people claim it has a lot of benefits, but what they are doing is defending their faith and using health benefits as an excuse. All Middle Eastern-originated religions practice this because they wanted to prevent sand getting into their penis beside water was lack so it was hard to clean under the foreskin. That's how the circumcision practice came to the world. Nowadays it's totally useless. So DO NOT CUT it because it's some sort of a Genital Mutilation. Will you cut your daughter's clitoris? Think about it. Humans have it for a purpose, nature will decide what to do with it. So nature decide if the foreskin is useless. It will fade away in the future gradually. Humans DO HAVE A RIGHT TO change nature as they want. If humans keep dong that it will bring oblivion to mankind.
While circumcision is considered 'normal' in some cultures, and, somewhat strangely, in the US, it is still an oddity - in modern terms, it is a physical enhancement, much like changing your breasts, or other parts of your body. The idea that foreskins are non-aesthetic is ludicrous (they peel back for a start). And even if phallic design is something that is close to our heart, think of Michelangelo's David - not only is he uncircumcised (contrary to his theological point of reference), but he's not the biggest either. But that's not what defines 'beauty' or 'attraction'. Seriously, women who take issue with men having all of their penis still intact is no worse than men who prefer their women to have implants, or other physical augmentations. Natural is best. Just like David.
Why do they have to mess with it anyway? You wouldn't take the shell off a turtle just so it won't have anywhere to hide its head, so why do it with a penis? There is no need for it, and who was even the first person to think they would do that? It is ridiculous and people should have their own choices of what their body should be like, not made by their parents.
our eye lid are our cover for eye. But every morning we wash them with water and no problem. Our teeth are washed by us everyday. Do we we cut the enamel of teeth because contain so called dirt ??This is nothing but a bluff that the lame excuse of cleaning.
How clean a penis is depends on the man, not his foreskin. As long as he practice's cleaning it daily, a women should not notice any difference is cleanliness. FACT
It's a bizarre cultural phenomenon which most of the world (and therefore most women) doesn't share.
Cutting reduces the natural blanket that protects the penis from rubbing... meaning he has a better experience, and I do too, because there's less hard friction and more stimulation.
In my country, the circumcised penis is considered unnatural and weird.
The foreskin is designed to enhance sexual pleasure on both sides. It has been tested and verified that the most pleasurably sensitive part of the penis is the foreskin. The foreskin aids in lubrication and reduces friction upon initial entry. The foreskin also allows for an added 1-2 inches of length to the penis. Because the glans penis is constantly protected, the head is softer and much more sensitive. Plus intact men are sexy and really fun for oral!
Most circumcised men, had part of their body cut off without consent during childhood. Foreskin is one of the most sensitive parts of the penis and parents have no right to make that sort of irreversible decision for their baby.
According to Wikipedia, only 30% of males are circumcised. If women had a preference for circumcision, we wouldn't be making very many babies. Everyone differs but the vast majority of women probably don't have much of a preference either way.
I think that it is a myth that females prefer circumcised penises over uncircumcised penises. I think that this is an idea just because it is much more rare to see one that is uncircumcised, so women are not used to it as much. I doubt that a woman would really not date or sleep with someone over this issue, it just might be a new experience!
I'm completely against unnecessary circumcisions. I believe that the women in the US are brainwashed into thinking that they prefer circumcised penises. So technically women in the US haven't even formed there own real opinions on the subject. Women in other countries don't usually have an opinion on male circumcision either, because only males in the US are circumcised (for the most part). If given factual information and the opportunity, most women prefer an intact (uncircumcised) male. If not, then you can be sure that she has been successfully brainwashed into thinking that an unnatural penis is "better, cleaner, more attractive and more normal" than a natural one. Supporting circumcision is a new way of thinking, considering how long uncircumcised humans have been on this Earth. Which shows how quickly and easily swayed a human can be, with certain types of influences affecting their opinions.
Although many men now have circumcised penises opposed to uncircumcised it still doesn't mean that women prefer one over the other. For most sex comes after love and if a woman loves a man whether or not he is circumcised is not an issue to her nor something she really cares either way about.
I definitely prefer a man that is uncircumcised. I have been with my fair share of men and those who are uncircumcised have been far more sexual and willing to reciprocate (not that you'd think the latter would have much to do with it, but there is a correlation.). I also think touching performing oral on an uncircumcised man is far more natural and just comfortable in general. Men that are circumcised are just plain tight and I feel like there's always friction.
Honestly, I've been with only one uncircumcised man [my husband] and he is the best lover in the world! I think his manhood is simply beautiful, and it makes no difference in the terms of cleanliness compared to a circumcised penis. Both will have natural scents or odors, well groomed or not. Why put your baby or teen son through unnecessary pain? Females need to grow up and not be judgmental. I'm totally against fgm, isn't circumcision mgm? Also, the Bible says it makes no difference (in what makes the man a better person [or lover in my eyes]) so there you have it. Keep it natural. Besides, the skin pulls back when he's erect so it looks just like a bare penis!
I've been with 3 men. The first 2 were circumcised and the 3rd was intact. There is DEFINITELY a difference. My first 2 boyfriends took forever to please and I felt sore after sex. With my intact boyfriend, he was a lot easier to please and I was never sore. I think circumcised penises look mutilated and unhealthy. An intact penis is actually attractive and clean. Now that I know what it's like to be with an intact man, I would never choose to be with a circumcised man again. Ever. They're missing too much. And my sons will definitely NOT be circumcised.
It's just sad that our society thinks it's normal to chop of parts of genitals from infants. It's sick.
Forcing little boys to be held down and have a part of their penis cut off right after birth is horrible! It should be his decision to be cut or not. I also heard that an all natural uncirc penis feels better during sex because it glides in better as nature intended. I would rather do it with an all natural man any day!
I grew up in Hungary and this thing is very rare in here. I had to do it because of medical issues when I was 24. The operation was very painful. I have had an asymetric scar line (unskilled surgeon), and most of the girls have never seen this type. I feel shame in front of them, because it's ugly, and uncommon. And of course I lost about 40% of sensitivity because I lost a lot of my precious tissues and my clothes have damaged the rest of it.
I believe women prefer men to have a natural-looking penis, not only because it is more attractive, but also on a more pragmatic side, the skin protects the tip of the penis, which is a very sensitive area. It also keeps moisture, avoiding tissue damage from rubbing on the clothes, and keeps sexual pleasure without delaying climaxes, as I've heard from circumcised men.
Not only does it make no difference to the look of an erect penis, but the foreskin also provides added stimulation and lubrication during sex. I've been with both and FAR prefer a penis being uncut. The rolling action of the foreskin during sex is a sensation that will outweigh the violent pounding that is needed by uncut men any day of the week in my opinion. If a man keeps himself clean (and this goes for cut men as well, because balls smell gross when dirty too) there is no reason any woman should care whether he has a foreskin. It's a natural part of the male anatomy and I know that it's something I had been missing.
Not this woman. Circumcised sex hurts. It's unnatural. There are no moving parts in a cut penis. No gliding action that provides a natural lube and makes sex comfortable. I HATE circumcised sex and I HATE that my husband was cut at birth. Needless to say we don't have sex anymore. Circumcision of minors needs to be made illegal NOW.
You won't get any kind of consensus with a question like this. You'll find that some women prefer cut, some uncut, and quite a few who really don't care either way. There is always the issue of being most comfortable with what we are used to and that certainly plays a huge part. There is also social stigma. Look up Rachel "rabbit" White's story about her experience with uncircumcised males. Basically she used to be one of those girls who thought uncut was gross, but once she actually tried it, she loved it.
Some women prefer uncircumcised men because they feel better; sex is more gentle and smooth, etc...more pleasurable for the man because of his greater sensitivity.
Check out sexasnatureintendedit.com
Some women prefer circumcised men for exactly the opposite reason. They actually enjoy the frantic thrusts and increased friction that really turns some women off.
And of course, some love both, "aesthetics" be damned.
I am one of those people who hopes to see a day when routine, as well as religious (superstitious) circumcision of male AND female infants/children is eradicated. But even then, there will still be plenty of adults who choose to have their genitalia surgically modified in whatever way they please for whatever reason they please. Human sexuality is incredibly eclectic. Women as a whole prefer no one thing, just as men as a whole prefer no one thing.
My problem isn't circumcised penises so much as whether or not the owner had any say in the matter.
This is very likely going to depend on regional factors. Most women in Europe will likely prefer intact penises because it is what they are accustomed to, for instance. Actually, most women around the world are accustomed to natural, healthy, intact penises. As a circumcised male, I've been with women who have suggested that they don't care, prefer cut penises or prefer intact penises, .
I resent my parents for doing it to me and I am now restoring. Sex feels way better now than it ever did and my wife agree's. I did not circumcise my son because I didn't think it was medically necessary. AAP shows only benefits of circumcision and is bias on intact benefits. They base their studies on Africa in which they do not have high standards of cleanliness. Why not base it on Europe where more than 80 percent of men are intact. Strange how the countries with more circumcised men need Viagra and how the USA has more diseases than any other country. A woman's labia has tiny folds of skin and covers the clitoris just like the foreskin does. Girls will smell too if it's not cleaned every day just like a man with a foreskin. If women feel sore after sex, it's usually because of the missing gliding action of the foreskin. It is actually more pleasurable with the foreskin to glide during sex for both partners and no soreness. The numbers are in 52 percent of the US is circumcising down from 80 percetn a decade ago. Don't let your baby's foreskin be used for a facial cream, it's too beneficial.
As long as the man is shown, during childhood, how to clean it properly, there is no issue of cleanliness. Uncircumcised men can also be quite dirty down there, it's all about being clean and knowing HOW to clean it. I think women just have a massive preoccupation with aesthetics and need to seriously loosen up about the look of a mans penis. It's not like you do much looking at it....
I'm a virgin, and I plan to stay as such until my wedding night, but by fiancé is uncircumcised, and overall, his penis is much more pleasurable to look at and touch than an circumcised one. Not to mention that there is much more stimulation for him as well. It is also larger than those of other men.
Men who are not circumcised have larger penis and have more feeling during sexual intercourse. The foreskin protects the head, Therefore its more healthy. Why destroys natures work and cut of a babies skin on his penis? Its not going to grow how it intended to be! Say no to circumcision.
Comon guys! Men were born uncut the fact that someone would like a mutated and cut penis is sick. Also it make the feeling more pleasent you dont need to use lube! Its also more fun to play with it. Also only liking guys who have cut them self is like guys only like girls who have shaved of their nipples! I mean really???
It feels better downstairs- almost like a ribbed condom but better. He's clean so there's no issue there. Unless for religious reasons or if the child is living in a dirty environment where they don't have the facilities for daily cleaning I don't see why children should be clipped just because.
The cleaning issue is ridiculous, uncircumcised or not, if the guy is clean his penis will be clean also! The feeling is the other big issue, uncircumcised is better for the joy they offer on sucking or on action. Most of the circumcised penises are led there from their religion background and porn industry fashion.
The second-class citizenship of American boys is a disgrace. Parents would never let a doctor rip apart the genitals of their precious daughters. Boys are treated like inferior citizens, without the same right to bodily integrity that girls enjoy under the law. The male penis has been trivialized into a disgusting dirty object of scorn by the circumcision industry, which has no intention of ever stopping their cruel practice. They hide behind a smokescreen of preposterous health claims that men in the rest of the world disprove by merely living with their intact genitals, just as normal men & women have lived throughout human history. The reality is that the pro-circ medical lobby has a vision of America as a place where generation after generation of men will live and die with wounded genitals. The malevolent genius of forced infant circumcision is that its victims become its chief proponents in a terrible impulse to deny their own loss. As a circumcised man, I stand up with the truth, "This is wrong. It stops with me." Others who accept their circumcision without objection, or embrace it, live under the tyranny of the circumciser, who owns them. Every absurd hypothesis put forth by the circumciser to justify himself has also been used to justify female circumcision. It's a sick world out there, and American doctors bear the bloodstained mark of their own shame.
I prefer being with intact guys, because they provide much more sensation during sex and they don't have to pound you during the act just for them to reach an orgasm. The foreskin acts like a natural lubricant when performing on sexual acts. The penis gland was designed to be internal organ that is protected from constant friction just like a the clitoris on a woman.
Would you still support the genital mutilation of young girls? Cutting of the major or minor labia? People who cut their boys are sick and disgusting people! It should be the man's decision when he is an adult. With all this going on about "a woman's body, a woman's choice", well "It's a man's body, it should be a man's choice!"
The foreskin provides many important functions and is not just 'a useless piece of skin' like we've been taught to believe. Its basically just a cosmetic surgery forced on an infant to make others happy regardless of the trauma imposed on him. Any woman who would choose not to sleep with a man simply because he has a foreskin is shallow and narrow-minded.
It is genital mutilation of an important sex organ that the body was BORN WITH. We don't just decide to cut off arms or legs. It is easily cleaned (LIKE ANY OTHER PART OF THE BODY) and despite what anyone says, the foreskin allows the penis to remain more sensitive to touch AND it is easier to masturbate -- no need for lube or lotion. Everyone that says yes to this question was just brainwashed yet again by American medical "research" that is run by lobbies and myths.
What it feels like to have a male orgasm. Which BTW starts from the point of entry with your foreskin sensation up to the point when you climax. Circumcised men can't enjoy the full length of sex. Circumcision is like taking away a babies sense of sight away from them at birth. Would you want that really for you our your kid if you had a choice. You do have a choice and you should give your child a choice too!
Vaginas also can have strange odors and produce much more smegma than an uncircumcised penis. Fortunately, my parents realized that vaginas aren't that hard to clean and did not choose to cut off my labia and clitoral hood. (since female circumcision was technically legal when I was born; it was banned in 1996) Why they chose to circumcise my brother, considering that my dad is INTACT, is a mystery to me. I am currently in a relationship with a circumcised man and I love him dearly. However, I HATE that his parents put him through such an unnecessary and painful procedure when he was a helpless infant. If I have a son, he will remain intact. If he wants to have the procedure done when he is an adult, fine. But I'd rather have my son be able to choose to lose a sensitive part of his penis and hate me because he's already having erectile dysfunction when he's 20. (Yes, there is a positive correlation between circumcision and ER; do your research.)
It takes a few seconds every day to clean it, so that's the hygiene argument out of the way, and I genuinely don't see how an circumcised penis is nicer looking than one with a foreskin. Then again, I consider it odd that people shave their body/pubic hair off or wear make up.
Simply unfair to ruin a man's sex life for cultural or faux hygiene reasons. Men without foreskins simply are not as sensitive as men that do, this affects the types of sex they have with women - more jackhammer style thrusting and less sensitivity as they desperately seek to get off.
Men who have been violated by circumcision, once they realize what was taken from them, will regret that they were circumcised. Women prefer men who are happy with the perfect penis that god/nature gave them. Who wouldn't prefer a whole intact man over a compromised man? Any cosmetic preferences or claims about the penis being "dirty" are simply juvenile. Blood clots are certainly not aesthetically pleasing, and vaginas are prone to odor, yet men like them anyway.
I've never had anyone express annoyance that I'm not circumcised. I am not from the US, so perhaps outside of there women don't expect men to be circumcised and would not think to bring it up. I don't really see why it would matter, except that you woudn't want the appearance to violate your expectations.
Removing the foreskin decreases sexual pleasure since many sensory nerves are lost, natural lubrication is lost, and the size of the penis is reduced. Men who are circumcised later in life report the loss of a majority of their sensitivity. The foreskin is a natural body part that has important functions.
I much prefer seeing a man with a non circumcised penis as it is much more natural looking. My husband doesn't have a circumcised penis and nor does anyone else in my family (2 kids). As long as you clean it then it doesn't matter really. Circumcision is for men who cannot pull back the foreskin to clean all of the germs off.
The foreskin provides a gliding motion making sex, full and oral and handjobs more fun. Also I personally prefer the look. And finally and most importantly, having slept with roughly equal numbers of cut and uncut men, uncut men have greater sensitivity and response to your touch than cut guys. This isn't really noticeable when they are young but over forty it is quite pronounced.
Sure, studies will say it protects against this or that, but in truth...Countries with lower circumcision rates have fewer problems. Not only that, but it is essentially a cosmetic procedure. Men with circumcised penises typically have less sensitivity than those whom are intact, or rather natural.
As far as hygiene, well, should we also circumcise our baby girls? After all, females secrete more discharge than males do. Some women don't even know the proper methods of self-cleansing.
Circumcision will never be attractive to me. When compared to an intact penis, the dried out glans and shaft of the cut penis reminds me of the pain many women endure during intercourse with these mutilated sex organs. I, myself, have experienced it.
Often, my partner would take an additional 30 minutes or more to finish. Many times sex would last for hours, even though I would rather it had ended sooner. He couldn't help this. He barely acknowledges that the damage done to his penis is the reason why I am barely ever able to orgasm. We discovered a very unorthodox, and not so sought after, method of assisting me to orgasm. I'm not sure how I actually feel about it. Several times, I've experienced soreness after intercourse.
All of this is new to me as my previous partner was intact. I never experienced any pain. I was never told that I should try to "take it" either. Rough sex wasn't a constant, instead gentle lovemaking prevailed. My current mate isn't able to keep up with a similar style of intercourse as he is unable to enjoy it as much as he should be able to. Many things require more force, or less contact.
It is heartbreaking knowing he has had something no necessary stolen from him due to his parents' ignorance. But, they were young and did not know the effects of the procedure.
I believe it is far more sane to teach boys how to clean their penis than to cut part of it off. Some people don't clean their gums properly, leading to bad smelling breath, should we remove gums from new born babies? No, we should teach them how to clean themselves.
As a female I certainly prefer an intact penis. When a man has all of the nerve endings in his penis sex is an extremely pleasurable experience, intact men have more sensation therefore spend more time concentrating on pleasing the woman. Having sex with a circumcised penis is an uncomfortable, dry and even painful experience. Let men have the right to choose whether or not they cut off a sexually essential part of their own anatomy or not.
Intact penises have the most sensitive area which gives sexual pleasure to men. Women might be liking circumcised penises just because they're more likely to last longer before ejaculation. Which gives women enough time to have an orgasm. But its not as fair to men. With proper control, men can learn to last longer with intact penis and experience more joy out of sex.
The thing I don't get about this argument is that circumcision is for hygiene, it looks good, and prevents from HIV AIDS.... The word smegma is derived from the Greece word "soap" and only smells if it becomes old or expired... If your guy takes showers, he should have no problem. Second point is that people say it looks good... Honestly that is only based on perception and what you are grown up with. In the US they rarely have diagrams and charts of foreskins while in sexual education. The government runs this biased program, because its a multi billion dollar business. Actually I was talking to my friends who just finished medical school, and a tray of materials to perform a circumcision costs $175 dollars, actually the doctors get paid that much just for billing for the tray. The circumcision itself is worth more. If you watch on "The Doctors" a lot of them are biased when it comes to touchey topics. When doing the foreskin debate the lady there was highly opposed to circumcision and commonly stated that you have a much higher chance of getting HIV AIDS. Actually when they did a study in Africa the difference was off by 0.17%, keep in mind that circumcision by no way "prevents" or repels HIV, as kids should be taught proper procedures of being safe such as using a condom. If you ever have question about circumcision always ask your doctor two questions; "Are you or a male in your family circumcise?" And "Do you perform circumcisions?" If they say yes to any of this, and say any of the three statements above, please reconsider your decision. Actually better yet, just leave the poor kid alone. You might as well be cutting off people lips to keep their teeth clean, I'm sure you wouldn't get plaque or gingivitis, or at least that is what you might be told :S
Circumcision unless it's needed is completely wrong and a violation of their human rights. Why would you cut off a completely normal and fully functional piece of their body without their consent.
Well unless you are total sadist that is who gets a thrill from inflicting pain on babies that is.
Circumcision severely affects the penis in that it eliminates the natural lubrication occurring due to the foreskin. Without the foreskin, intercourse is often uncomfortable for both the man and woman. Of course, it should be; there isn't any cushioning that lessens the friction because the penis is destroyed! The circumcised penis also looks horrendous in many cases, and the scar is a cause of anxiety and depression to many men.
I find men with un-circumcised penises to be just more "proper" Whether circumcised or not I just find the natural ones to feel more "real". I don't find then any cleaner. And I actually find they look better than a circumcised one itself. My verdict: I like un circumcised penises more.
Ive been married twice, one was circumcised and one was not. I prefer a non circumcised penis. I prefer the look and the feel of it, it seems more natural.
I have to say though, if my current husband had to have his removed for any reason, it wouldnt have any effect on our marriage or sex life. Its him I love, his penis is a bonus and when we are old and grey Im guessing whether he is circumcised or not, it will be that last thing on my mind.
I'm from the uk, and we don't circumcise unless completely necessary. I myself would find it 'different' if my partner was circumcised . I really don't see any pros for circumcision, even if it looks cleaner: chances are it isn't, you're more likely to catch something. I just can't believe people still give and have circumcision without a serious reason!? Seems very backward to me.
An uncut penis is better feeling for the women as well. Giving them handjobs are easier, because you dont necessarily need lubricant. Oral sex feels better because there is just more you can do with the foreskin. And sexually, it is more pleasurable because the foreskin rubs against the wall of the vagina more gently, stimulating both the male and female more effectively. My boyfriend is 7.5 and uncircumcised, and i am perfectly satisfied with it.
Having sex with an intact man feels better. The additional movement of his foreskin is stimulating. A cut man has a tendency to go with a whole piston motion, and it seems to require additional lubricant a lot of times to get through the experience. Even then, I've felt sore afterwards. To me, the cut ones look so pitiful and dried out...These sad little scaly mushrooms. There's nothing arousing about it, even though I originally come from a country where cut is the norm.
Stupid thing to do !
Why change the real you ,who cares what girls think its just absolutely ridiculous to cut anything off ones body. Its like ok lets cut off some things from the Vagina and say thats an improvement. Its just straight up wrong to do anything with your body.
Having sex with a cut man is as dry and abrasive as having sex with a broom handle. They always thrust way too fast (because the head of their penis is totally desensitized) and some of them even complain of soreness or pain after intercourse because of the circumcision scar becoming inflamed.