Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes. It has helped in other countries.

    The idea that only criminals will have guns in gun-free zones is ludicrous, as long as law enforcement is willing to step in. In many other countries these gun-free zones work very, very well. In fact, in Japan officers are so intent on getting rid of the guns that criminals are unwilling to carry guns for fear of getting caught with them.

  • Yes, gun-free zones do work.

    The argument that advertising a gun-free zone is an invite to bad guys is insane. The solution proposed is to hire and train staff within a gun-free zone and change the signs to reflect such. This is a great idea in theory, the problem is there isn't the money to pay qualified professionals. That is why Ohio is currently voting to give guns to custodians. Really? So now instead of being a stranger in a school, you simply need to apply to be the janitor and they will hand you a gun and teach you how to use it. Then you'll get keys to access the building outside of school hours. It's the dumbest thing I've seen in politics.

  • They're proven to work.

    The possibility that a gun might be there is not a deterrent--these people are not rational and they usually have an emotional tie to the place they attack. However, an armed person in a gun free zone can be identified as a threat just by their presence with a gun.

  • CxvCxzcvdv svad d

    Xzcvsvasd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

  • Nm bmhj kj

    Gvgh fg ytf yi ytfy vyvfy v uehbhqwebf hguwf defsb usdyfsauf efg y ygf gd yugfd usg f gf ufgf ugyf ygf uakg f kaf f fgsudf sdfg fsfguyagwkfd sydfg suyf sufsd dgfyeu dygf dyf fyye ffy dy fgefdgfyudksg f edsuigbskudy sud syuf sud s dsgeg seg seuy useyg use fsu egf sueg

  • Nm bmhj kj

    Gvgh fg ytf yi ytfy vyvfy v uehbhqwebf hguwf defsb usdyfsauf efg y ygf gd yugfd usg f gf ufgf ugyf ygf uakg f kaf f fgsudf sdfg fsfguyagwkfd sydfg suyf sufsd dgfyeu dygf dyf fyye ffy dy fgefdgfyudksg f edsuigbskudy sud syuf sud s dsgeg seg seuy useyg use fsu egf sueg

  • Nm bmhj kj

    Gvgh fg ytf yi ytfy vyvfy v uehbhqwebf hguwf defsb usdyfsauf efg y ygf gd yugfd usg f gf ufgf ugyf ygf uakg f kaf f fgsudf sdfg fsfguyagwkfd sydfg suyf sufsd dgfyeu dygf dyf fyye ffy dy fgefdgfyudksg f edsuigbskudy sud syuf sud s dsgeg seg seuy useyg use fsu egf sueg

  • Gun free zones are no different than murder free zones. A murderer will still murder.

    There is absolutely no rational reason why gun free zones exist. In a school for instance, a gun free zone might stop a law abiding adult from entering with concealed carry or open holster. It would in no way make anyone safer, as those who wish to harm others would do so anyway. If anything, people are less safe as they can't legally protect themselves by having a firearm on them.

  • Killers target defenseless people.

    Like a lion stalking the weakest gazelle in a heard, shooters do the same. Since the 1950s, all but two mass shooting have occurred in gun free zones. On Charleston S.C., the shooter said he originally was going to target the college, but decided against it because of the armed guards there and chose the church because none would be armed. The movie theatre shooter did the same, deciding against an airport because of the armed security. He, instead chose the only theatre out of 7 in the area airing the movie at the same time with a gun ban. Elliot Rodger, murderer of three in California, said he ruled out targets because he worried someone would be carrying a gun and cut his spree short. Canadian Justin Bourque who shot three dead had posts on his Facebook making fun of gun bans and pictures of defenseless victims explaining to killers that guns were banned. All the facts point to gun bans only making us easy victims. The building in San Bernardino that was the victim of a terrorist plot was in a gun free zone. Criminals don't care about gun bans, but they sure do like them. A lion always picks off the weakest prey of course.

  • If a criminal goes to a gun free zone, they wont say "Oh, It's a gun free zone, i guess I can't shot here."

    Only law-abiding citizens follow the gun laws. Google defines law as “the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties.” Laws are made to set boundaries on what we can do. If everyone followed all the laws it would be great, but not everyone follows them. Those people who don’t follow laws don’t care if a school is a “Gun Free” zone. In fact, a sign that says “Gun Free” may even make a criminal more likely to attack the school, because they know they there is less of a chance of return fire. Someone who follows the gun laws would not bring a gun to a “Gun Free” area. These zones are hurting the law-abiding citizens, because it gets rid of their self-defence. “Gun Free” zone laws hurt the citizens instead of protect them. Although some people might say that we could just get rid of all the guns, this is not possible. The bad people will find a way to get a gun, and when they do those people who follow the law won't have a way to protect themselves.

  • If a criminal goes to a gun free zone, they wont say "Oh, It's a gun free zone, i guess I can't shot here."

    Only law-abiding citizens follow the gun laws. Google defines law as “the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties.” Laws are made to set boundaries on what we can do. If everyone followed all the laws it would be great, but not everyone follows them. Those people who don’t follow laws don’t care if a school is a “Gun Free” zone. In fact, a sign that says “Gun Free” may even make a criminal more likely to attack the school, because they know they there is less of a chance of return fire. Someone who follows the gun laws would not bring a gun to a “Gun Free” area. These zones are hurting the law-abiding citizens, because it gets rid of their self-defence. “Gun Free” zone laws hurt the citizens instead of protect them. Although some people might say that we could just get rid of all the guns, this is not possible. The bad people will find a way to get a gun, and when they do those people who follow the law won't have a way to protect themselves.

  • If a criminal , see's a "gun free zone" they aren't going to say, "Oh, there's no guns here? I guess I can't shoot here."

    Only law-abiding citizens follow the gun laws. Google defines law as “the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties.” Laws are made to set boundaries on what we can do. If everyone followed all the laws it would be great, but not everyone follows them. Those people who don’t follow laws don’t care if a school is a “Gun Free” zone. In fact, a sign that says “Gun Free” may even make a criminal more likely to attack the school, because they know they there is less of a chance of return fire. Someone who follows the gun laws would not bring a gun to a “Gun Free” area. These zones are hurting the law-abiding citizens, because it gets rid of their self-defence. “Gun Free” zone laws hurt the citizens instead of protect them. Although some people might say that we could just get rid of all the guns, this is not possible. The bad people will find a way to get a gun, and when they do those people who follow the law won't have a way to protect themselves.

  • Plain and simple, they don't work...

    Gun-free zones don't work well here In America, maybe in other countries, but not here. Most, if not all of the mass shootings that have happened here have been in gun-free zones. I'd like to see one of these guys try to shoot up somewhere there are guns being toted around...Pry wouldn't happen would it.

  • Plain and simple, they don't work...

    Gun-free zones don't work well here In America, maybe in other countries, but not here. Most, if not all of the mass shootings that have happened here have been in gun-free zones. I'd like to see one of these guys try to shoot up somewhere there are guns being toted around...Pry wouldn't happen would it.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.