I think woman politicians get too wrapped up in what is moral and what is right in certain domestic policy issues while men stick more to the point and look for what works. I like that male politicians tend to keep a lower profile and don't advocate their opinions as much as female ones do overall.
While there have been excellent examples of women in government (Isabel the Catholic in Spain, Margaret Thatcher in England, Angela Merkel in Germany...) this is not the general rule, which is what we are talking about. Women tend to govern the smaller domain of the household, and they do so beautifully, while men tend to dominate the public sphere. It is not so much a matter of who is better at it as a matter of who is prone to take on the task.
In Politics, it is a must to always be straightforward and firm to the decisions you make. And that men do.Men are decisive. From the past up to the present, men are appointed to political post that women, mostly taking over the political arena, because men know their limits. They always use their heads over their hearts after being appointed in a position. Women, on the other hand, may get a post in politics but just to support most men, i suppose.
Women break down easily under stress while men are better at staying calm and keeping things under control. Also out of the 10 most influential countries in the world only one of their leaders in politics are female, t his clearly shows that men are more influential than women when it comes to politics.
Ladies are more emotional. Politics, no matter how complicated it is, are aimed at the best interest for the group you are serving. You work for the best benefit for the group you are working for. Ladies can be much more easily controlled by their emotion and make worse decisions. Guys can be more reasonable under complicated situations.
Because being a politician is not an easy job as one has to lead from the front and one should have the quality to impress the people by means of lectures and speeches. And these qualities are mostly present in men as compared to women . Let us take the example of our Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi , he has the quality of a good leader and also the quality to impress the people , now let us take Congress leader Sonia Gandhi nothing can be compared between Mr, Modi and Sonia Gandhi. So men are more better than women in politics.
To be a successful politician, an individual needs to be devious, disregarding of the rules and decisive. These are qualities that are generally more common in men (with the exception of Theresa May). More specifically, the often superior mental strength of men makes then better representatives in war situations. Obviously.
Because men are more stay calm than women . Stay calm is the most important politicians. Men are more intelligent than women . Men are more charismatic than women. Men have a leader ship but women don't have. Men everything do it but women don't do it there fore men are the best in politicians
Women, for many, just don't cut it. Most of their presentation is weaker and flimsier. Male politicians are better because they inspire loyalty, strength, confidence and charisma better than most women. When it comes to the day-to-day running of business in politics women are are just as crap as men though. The few women who have made it to the top are those who inspire fear and power like men do.
This is because men are better designed i must say to work outside the walls of home while women are better at working at home. Its how nature works, if we try to change it the results will be devastating. As far as women are concerned they wil not be a good leader, they can go for the side kick role though.
Women make better politicians because they're not inherently programmed to lie through their teeth. Men are more capable of treachery and dishonesty, whereas women will generally tell the truth. Women are also better multi-taskers; they wouldn't need a whole staff of people to do their job, she could make do with a few other women and they could run a campaign or a state better than a man.
Women will rule the world someday. We just need men for breeding.
Men are more decisive and have less commitments than women. Women have many other demands on their time and may not be able to use their full potential. Women may get too emotionally attached but men are generally impartial. So there are flaws and good things about both men and women in politics- we can't say one sex is better than the other.
Certain men make good politicians, they don't bring in their emotions as often as women and are far less likely to do so. They tend to be less stubborn, and are more open to change, this means that the law can develop and have flexibility.
However, certain women also make very good politicians, they are more willing to hear other's opinion and by being more in touch with their emotions they will fight for what they believe is right and moral rather than fighting to win. Due to women being slightly less open to change they are able to keep consistency in the law, which is vital in keeping equality and fairness.
In all honesty politics needs men and women to work together, and these days it is becoming more and more obvious to everyone. We should consider ourselves lucky, we are a much more advanced country than somewhere like the Islamic countries in the world of politics. We have come a long way, so there is no need to begin quarrelling over whether men or women are better at something.
Studies have actually shown that more men take an interest as a whole in politics than women, and considering that in 2003 the Welsh assembly consisted of 50% men and women we are in good stead for the future in the UK as a whole.
Regardless of gender, the best person should be doing the job. Male or Female.
Most women of women managers tend to have more of a desire to build than a desire to win and also women are more willing to explore compromise and seek other people's opinions. Women are able to listen others and create world with out war, that means they can make better politicians and do things for sake of people.
Women will always bother about improving their safety and they would completely forget about the male citizens. Women will fulfill each and every dreams that they have without bothering about men. Moreover, they are slow decision . They think they are the best but while taking decisions quickly they fall sort and cannot win the heart of the people.
Men do not make better politicians then women. Men are more harsh and critical which makes them more disconnected from their constituents. Men are also more likely to lie to people which is a bad thing. While women are capable of doing the same thing, but they are less likely to do these things.
History has shown that the right woman can be just as effective in office as a man. Take Queen Elizabeth I, Margaret Thatcher, and more recently, Angela Merkel. All three have proven to be highly competent, highly effective leaders, and they all had significant impacts on their countries, whether or not you agree with their decisions politically. The point is, they did just as good of jobs as male politicians would have done.
I think men should be banned from politics all together. Their inability to communicate, relate to people and negotiate has been proven by the centuries of war.
The more time men spend in physical labour, sports activities and leisure pursuits , the better it is for the society as a whole, the less work for women to undo.
For the first time in history, the U.S. Senate will feature 20 women. This is the highest amount of women in the upper chamber in history. Politics is no longer a male-dominated society. With Nancy Pelosi the minority leader in the House and several Congressional races featuring prominent women such as Linda McMahon, men do not necessarily make the best politicians anymore.
There is no genetic link involved when it comes to being a good or a bad politician. Granted, if becoming involved in scandals were the determining factor in being a good or a bad politician, many more men have become involved in scandals than their female counterparts--scandals that often lead to resignation from office. According to a May 19, 2011 article in "The Atlantic", it isn't because there are fewer women in elected office; "Women only make up 16.4% of the current Congress, and 12% of the nation's governors. But in a 2009 Newsweek tally of political sex scandals since 1976, only one out of 53 instances involved a woman politician... So women aren't even holding up their fair percentage of the scandals." Based on that one criteria--involvement in sex scandals--WOMEN could be considered better politicians.
However, that is really too simplistic a response. In point of fact, given that women and men are human beings, both groups have their strengths and weaknesses. It may be that as more and more women take their places in elected office, a more informed debate can be held on this issue. To date, given the sex-scandal index as a determiner of being a good politician, that would suggest that WOMEN are better politicians! We will have to see if their "superiority" remains undiminished in the coming decades.