Amazon.com Widgets

Do we need more National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries?

Asked by: Pernix
  • Ok we need

    Animals need homes More and more animals lose their homes every day or can be killed so more national parks can help save more animals that are endangered or endangered of becoming extinct because we are not the only living things on earth if we are not careful we could lose everything nature

  • To help the wildlife

    Wildlife is a special thing most of them are going extinct like kiwi and white rinos but if we had more national parks for animals it would be better and animals would survive longer and more sanctuary would be good as well because we would not have to see a poor dead animal on the street or the in the middle of no where.

  • Yes, I believe that we do.

    So I think that animals need homes where they aren't constantly being hunted, and although the government does need a lot of money to maintain the parks, they could just find the money somewhere. In conclusion, I believe that we do need more national parks to protect the animals from people who hunt.

  • Yes!! Yes!! Yes!!!

    We should have wildlife sanctuaries as humans are interconnected with animals. If animals will not be there then we will not survive. Wildlife sanctuaries protect animals from being hunted or poached. They take good care of animals. They give animals required food and good environment. Therefore wildlife sanctuaries are important.

  • Animals need homes

    More and more animals lose their homes every day or can be killed so more national parks can help save more animals that are endangered or endangered of becoming extinct because we are not the only living things on earth if we are not careful we could lose everything nature

  • Animals need homes

    More and more animals lose their homes every day or can be killed so more national parks can help save more animals that are endangered or endangered of becoming extinct because we are not the only living things on earth if we are not careful we could lose everything nature

  • Animals need homes

    More and more animals lose their homes every day or can be killed so more national parks can help save more animals that are endangered or endangered of becoming extinct because we are not the only living things on earth if we are not careful we could lose everything nature

  • Yes we do

    But, National Parks cost a fortune to maintain. In addition, their benefits can only go as far. One may say that they protect wold life. There are wild life everywhere. We can't protect all of them. The current number I think is a good balance. So while we don't need many more, we don't need less either.

  • Yes we do

    But, National Parks cost a fortune to maintain. In addition, their benefits can only go as far. One may say that they protect wold life. There are wild life everywhere. We can't protect all of them. The current number I think is a good balance. So while we don't need many more, we don't need less either.

  • We need it for more fresh air and fun

    I think we should have more and more parks to create homes for birds.We can also get fresh air when walking around parks. We can create more fun for families and children to enjoy their weekend. I think that we should also have boat riding national parks so when we are rowing we can see the trees and breath the air.Hope you like mine

  • We don't need more national parks

    It will put our country in even more debt and we can't even fix the parks that we have now so why should we create more if the ones that we have would be even better than they already are if the government just put the money into fixing them instead of buying more land and trying to become the biggest tourist country.

  • Why many sanctuaries??

    There is a limit for everything!! When hunting, poaching, development increased our forest and wildlife suffered!! Because there was no limit to it.. So if these sanctuaries increase then where these people live. In a country like india population is more. First priority to human beings!!! So the thing we have to do is conserve the habitat instead of many sanctuaries.. From this also govt is sucking the money not for the society for their greedy!! So we the citizen of earth we should not spoil their habitat instead conserve it.. For example if we left our own home which we build with our hardwork and shifting to rent flat do we get the satisfaction comfort?? No, same way for animals they get satisfaction in their habitat itself, not in national park and sanctuaries where we visit for our leisure time, they also need some privacy!! So we have to conserve instead spoil their habitat and not disturb them too.........

  • No we dont

    As we know that wildlife sanctuaries take very much space.The tribals of that area are sent away.Where will they go?Besides the increasing population is forcing urbanisation so,we all need space to live therefore we need to cut the trees.I know that its wrong but we cant do anything.But at least we can help in it by not hurting animals.

  • No. We don't currently need more.

    No doubt that America has one of the best National Park system in the world. I enjoyed visiting them.

    But, National Parks cost a fortune to maintain. In addition, their benefits can only go as far. One may say that they protect wold life. There are wild life everywhere. We can't protect all of them. The current number I think is a good balance. So while we don't need many more, we don't need less either.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.