Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes it does

    People get confuse that Dark matter doesn’t exist because Dark matter is space matter we cannot see and, unlike stars and galaxies, it does not give off light. The only way that you could be able to see a Dark matter is to use a cosmic microwave background radiation. That is the only reason people doesn’t believe in dark matter because they can’t see it with a naked eye!

  • Yes & No

    Yes because some how there is a substance of matter that is pushing galaxies and clusters apart and forming voids at extremely high rates through out the cosmos, so that stuff is something, its dark matter/energy, but the thing is no one knows what it is actually made of.

  • I believe it does.

    I am far from an expert on dark matter but it seems to be something that is being proved by the top minds across the world.

    As we get a better understanding over how space and time work we'll gain more understanding of dark matter, it's something that will need funding and open minded people to explore.

    There might be good uses for dark matter in the future if we can learn to harness it's energy.

  • Yes, it exerts forces on other objects

    Based on our current understanding of physics, dark matter is the only force that explains the current state of the universe. It can be measured by the effects on other object, gravitational pulls, etc. Until new science comes along or we're able to revolutionize the world of physics, dark matter is the only explainable phenomenon.

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツ is awesome so get outside because Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • The only real theory to explain the quickening of the expansion of the universe and the velocity of the rotation of galaxies.

    A theory from the early 30s briefly mentioned the possible existence of another "substance" which we've began calling dark matter in the 60's. The reason we started to really acknowledge the idea of dark energy was as a result of that if we take into consideration the gravitational pull of all known matter the universe should be shrinking again, however its actually accelerating at an increasing rate. This posses that as energy cannot be created or destroyed that this energy must have always been here in a form that we just cannot measure, hence "dark energy".

    As for dark matter itself if you measure the mass and density of stars and planets in galaxies you can get their gravitational pull, this combined with their measurable velocity you can distinguish the path they'd take. However many objects we've found are actually exceeding a speed of which would keep them in a relatively consistent orbit. This shows that to prevent there masses slingshotting out into space another force must be there, as anyone who understands circular motion could tell you. This then jumpstarted the theory of dark matter as a substance which cannot be detected in the first 4 dimensions but can be measured by its gravitational pull.

    This however does all rely on the laws that newton put into place.

  • The only real theory to explain the quickening of the expansion of the universe and the velocity of the rotation of galaxies.

    A theory from the early 30s briefly mentioned the possible existence of another "substance" which we've began calling dark matter in the 60's. The reason we started to really acknowledge the idea of dark energy was as a result of that if we take into consideration the gravitational pull of all known matter the universe should be shrinking again, however its actually accelerating at an increasing rate. This posses that as energy cannot be created or destroyed that this energy must have always been here in a form that we just cannot measure, hence "dark energy".

    As for dark matter itself if you measure the mass and density of stars and planets in galaxies you can get their gravitational pull, this combined with their measurable velocity you can distinguish the path they'd take. However many objects we've found are actually exceeding a speed of which would keep them in a relatively consistent orbit. This shows that to prevent there masses slingshotting out into space another force must be there, as anyone who understands circular motion could tell you. This then jumpstarted the theory of dark matter as a substance which cannot be detected in the first 4 dimensions but can be measured by its gravitational pull.

    This however does all rely on the laws that newton put into place.

  • Dark Matter Exists

    Dark Matter is a very difficult concept and I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be something completely different than what we think it is, but it is obviously that there is something out there. When we look out there, the gravitational pulls and the missing lights indicate that there is something there.

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツ is awesome so get outside because Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツ is awesome so get outside because Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツ is awesome so get outside because Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツ is awesome so get outside because Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No because I said so

    Ice Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツIce Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ Ice Tea! ツ

  • No frequencies man!

    All materials we know either emit or reflect electromagnetic waves in the form of visible/invisible light, photons, or electrons. How could a material that allegedly makes up such a vast proportion of the universe not have these properties? I think the physicists have erred so bad on this one, they're blinded by their own science. Simply put, the current science must be wrong.

  • Has no influence on any matter we can observe and measure separately and competing models can provide a better explanation for the macroscopic observations

    I'm sorry, but "Dark Matter" isn't even a real theory yet. To be a theory it must be substantiated by evidence. Until then it is at best a hypothesis, but that is even a stretch when there is evidence against it's existence.

    For example, if 80% of even just this Galaxy was invisible matter with gravitational influence it's effects would be measurable. Scientists actually tried to study the Dark Matter influence by measuring our sun. The result? The influence Dark Matter had on our Sun was smaller than the margin of error. In other words, there is no Dark Matter within our around our solar system. Additionally, there are other astronomical phenomena that contradict the Dark Matter explanation. There are free stars flying out of our solar system and as far as we can tell they are not being influenced by dark matter. Not even the slightest curve or slow down. No matter where we look there is no evidence of dark matter on any microcosmic level.

    So if Dark Matter is real why it's influence unobservable no matter where we look? You can't have a gravitational force greater than all the stars and planets and black holes in a galaxy and expect it to not do anything. We know Black Holes exist because we can actually observe their influence, but that isn't true of dark matter.

    The reason why "Dark Matter" as an idea ever came about was because simulations showed that the matter in the galaxy wasn't heavy enough to hold it all together so they made up matter out of nothing and then the simulation worked. That's not evidence though. That's just a simulation variable. The problem with relying on the simulations is that many other approaches also work. For example, the multidimensional model also holds the universe together. At higher dimensions gravity would be cease to be a weak force and even the missing matter from cosmic background radiation can be accounted for.

    Of course, neither model has enough evidence to be a theory, but since there is evidence against dark matter I regard dark matter as nonsense and the multidimensional model as a hypothesis. People throw this "theory" word around way too much. Yes, there is a phenomena, and yes there has to be an explanation, but we don't know which explanation is real. It cannot progress from a Hypothesis to a Theory at the stage it is in.

    Furthermore, It has the feel of a religion now. I mean, think about it. This is something which cannot be observed or measured directly or indirectly in any way. We attribute natural phenomena that we can measure to it's influence as evidence of it's existence without considering what else could be causing it. In physics class the answer I was given when I objected was that it's accepted because it's the simpler explanation, but simple isn't always right. The idea that rats magically manifested from dirty rags was a simpler idea and that wasn't right.

  • Creating a Universe where 96% of it is missing to explain anomalies is a cottage industry

    There are other simpler solutions such as modified gravity and time may not be a constant. Hundreds of scientists however are getting well funded to waste money in pursuit of something that has been demonstrated in experiment after experiment not to exist. With each failed result the answer is always the same, "we need a higher fidelity test." The pressure to publish has created a scientific community that is acting irresponsibly and in their own best interests.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.