If morality didn't exist the world would be a free for all. Everyone would define what was right by their own personal opinion. No one could say anything was wrong and so their would be no way to enforce laws and probably now laws to begin with. Morality is as essential and real as the laws of Physics.
Where ever your moral code comes from, you still have it. While morals themselves may be questionable, everybody has a basic set of rules. For some people, it's basic manners. For others, it's whether abortion is right or not. Obviously, it changes from person to person, though. Many conflicts in history were based on morality that we would probably consider wrong.
Morality is just people's opinions about what is right or wrong, which is essentially a feeling. It is perhaps the most global of all feelings a person can have on something, you are judging as a whole do you approve or disapprove of it. So while this exists it's not a fundamental basis for laws or politics. Leave morality to religion and personal philosophy. In the context of politics we should determine what is the most logical for a stable society of freely interacting individuals and enforce that.
It is undeniable to say that morality does not exist. it is the burning feeling everyone gets in their head. There are all examples of morality through out the world. it is hard to account for because there is a lot of bad out there but bad is raised by bad. in the end everyone knows its wrong and yet they do it out of a sense of uniformity or patriotism.
While morality may vary from person to person, there are distinct issues that remain standard for every individual. For instance, there is wide agreement that there is no circumstance under which it is appropriate to murder a child. Other moral issues, as with abortion or the morality of the death penalty, may vary from person to person, but there is a moral core than all mentally healthy people share.
Morality exists because the world is still standing. The reason why people are sleeping safe and sound in bed. If morality didn't exist then people would hurt and kill each other with the smallest reason. Everybody would cheat lie and destroy peoples life with out remorse and it would happen with everybody. the world would be turned upside down. morality exists thats why the world is till standing and why almost everybody doesnt live in fear.
Yes, morality exists as a social construction, but it is not natural. "Morality" is universally subjective, varying among every culture and every individual person. Everyone has their own interpretation of what morality is and how to measure it. As a collective group, humans required a system to prevent anomy, or chaos. We wouldn't really function very well as a collective group if murder was not punished and defined as a crime. I feel as some will argue that morality exists naturally because we "just know" what is "right or wrong." This is a result of socialization that shapes our perception of the world. It is easily possible to socialize a child in a different way that doesn't recognize murder as a "crime." I do not believe morality is in anyway objective, but I ultimately believe it exists as a useful social function to facilitate the survival of our group.
It's like the law. It's exists, but not everyone cares about it, or care to comprehend it. Understanding the law and why certain laws are put in place conflict with morals all the time. People go to prison for murder with a lesser sentence than (what your morals would consider) someone with a less severe charge. The question shouldn't even be "does it exist"
Morality exists. It is not a physical object. But it is as real to you humans as the clouds or the sun. It is a part of your brain, and that's what matters. Morality derives from survival. Co-operation means survival, and that's why it exists. Morality is as real as a hallucination, but for all you humans know, it's real.
Yes morality does exist. Morality has to be defined individually for every different person. We all draw lines in the sand over different moral causes or events. However, even if we all of a different personal definition about morality is, it does still exist. It can be tied with religion, but not always.
What's so hard about this? We are essentially animals that evolved with the brain smart enough to reason in such an intricate and complex way and use it as a method to control our species and ultimately help our species prosper. Otherwise we'd have everybody running around killing each other.
If you can name one moral value which is held universally accross all cultures and time, then not only would I change my position on the issue, but you'd also be lying. Everything from stealing to curruption, murder to paedophilia- morality will always depend on what country you're standing in and what era you're standing. Take as an example paedophilia. We say it is vile and wrong, and believe such a view to be self apparent. Yet in ancient times it was not only acceptable but also fashionable to sexually abuse young children. Equally in many societies today, and even within our own, there are individuals who believe that what they are doing is moral and right and also believe this to be self apparent. Take murder as another example, we believe it is alright to murder someone with the motive of serving your country- war. Whilst many other cultures have believed it is okay to murder someone because they belong to a particular race eg Rwanda Genocide. What I am trying to get at is that morality is simply a social construct which and whatever you believe to be a self apparent moral value is not necessarily believed by all, and as such morality cannot exist.
Nothing is right and nothing is wrong, but it is what people perceive it to be. One of the contributing factors to the success of the human species is the fact that we think that there is right or wrong. If morals do exist, than how come they only "exist" for humans and animals we like? Why do we still slaughter pigs, cows , chickens, etc. even though we could just eat off of vegetation? Nothing is right or wrong, and nothing even matters, in the end we will all die and nothing will become of us, no afterlife or anything. Morals do not, in fact, exist.
Animals don't have morals. All we are are a bunch of animals with the ability to think complex thoughts. Morality is a social construct meant to keep the ducks in a line. That's it. People only have morals to keep other people happy. Look at the people who had no one to keep happy in history, most of them did things a lot of people think are morally wrong.
It's all based off of selfishness and repercussions, you don't want it to happen to you, or else you would kill, rape, and murder. You can't argue that there is morality, our morality is based off laws that are put infront of us by people who don't like this one thing or making this thing illegal would make them more popular so they make it illegal
Take a good look at the world around you. A good look. It is hideous and grotesque and sweet and beautiful. It is far to complex and fluid to support anything like a fragile little morality. Morality holds the "good" and the "bad", with no room for the contradiction that makes life so complex and rich. It is impossible to dice up every possible action into the neat little categories of "good" and "evil"- even the most horrific events may have a sweet aftermath and the most well-intended actions still breed destruction. Just like any other abstraction, morality is an idea that humans use to please themselves in a vain attempt to comprehend this world. It is a perception, a projection even, and not a reflection of what exists outside of our own minds.
Morality cannot exist by the very fact of how most morals came to be, these came from institutions in history with a prehistoric mentality claiming certain things were good and bad and if not followed the punishment would be death. The big problem here is if one institution claims a certain set of thing are right and wrong and another institution claims another set then there is contradiction. The moment there is contradiction then the morals set are invalid and untrue. Right and wrong do not exist all that matters is consequences for it is from consequences we learn from whether amazing or tragic, so it is up to each individual to be logical and use reason to live our lives.
Basically, morality is relative. People have varying ideas on what is morally, or ethically "sound". How can any of these judgments be any more valid than another on objective grounds? That's impossible. Even if we posit that a conscious, thinking "God" exists, one who is out to get those who don't follow its rules, then how can we assign its moral system more value than another's on empirical grounds? After all, these judgments are relative and dependent on the subjective opinion of human juries.
Even if we argue that certain ideas are instilled within us at birth, "and that we aren't a strict "tabula rasa", it would still be necessary to admit that these views become no more valid than any others just because they are more socially accepted. The fact is that ethics vary strongly; they are not empirical facts, but useful evolutionary and social constructs for our interaction and survival.
Morality, right and wrong, good and evil; they're all terms that cover the opinions of the majority.
If I say 'murder is bad', what I'm actually saying is 'I don't like murder as it makes me feel negative emotions'-morality is the idea of right and wrong created by the majority of the intelligent human population as a guideline of what should be condoned or condemned.
That means that truly there is no real right and wrong, because opinions aren't facts. Morals are purely subjective and in my opinion they hold us back from truly living life, they set boundaries and tell us we shouldn't commit a certain act or live a certain way but in actuality a life without morals is a life without boundaries.
If we get rid of them then society can't function of course due to social interactions failing as one persons subjective morals will be continuously violated by another person leading to a chronic string of negative emotional stimuli and an inability for groups of people to cooperate however that doesn't mean that they are necessary.
Yes they're necessary for a society to work and for humans to develop but true freedom will not exist until the illusion of universal rules are overcome.
Unless morals are defined by a power that is higher than ourselves morals can not exsist. Who is to say that murder is bad? Someone who doesn't want to be murdered. Who's to say its okay? Someone who wants to murder. In a world where there is nothing more than humans being created by chance, nothing matters. If the entire planet exploded what would be the difference? However. If we have a maker. A creator. That has the knowledge to define right from wrong, and has created life for a specific reason, then and only then does anything in this entire world have a shred of importance.