Amazon.com Widgets

Donald Trump's choice for top White House advisor is an accused domestic abuser: Does there need to be more oversight of the presidential staff selection process?

Donald Trump's choice for top White House advisor is an accused domestic abuser: Does there need to be more oversight of the presidential staff selection process?
  • Yes, there should be a more rigorous control in presidential staff selection

    Yes, there should be a more rigorous control in presidential staff selection. If there is an HR in almost every larger company, there should be also one in White House. Some sort of ethical committee should be established which would decide about the candidate suitability. It is very important that persons in charge of leading most powerful country in the world have spotless record.

  • Yes, i agree.

    This is very true. I strongly believe that there needs to be more oversight of the presidential staff selection process. This is because Donald Trump's choice for top White House advisor is an accused domestic abuser. Therefore it will be the best idea and decision for more oversight of the presidential staff selection process.

  • There are too many with histories.

    Yes, with all of the people in the world, there is no reason for an accused domestic abuser to become the top White House adviser. There are literally millions of other people to choose from. We rely on the people who run the government to make calm decisions, and this person could not do this with that kind of background.

  • Those in power should be fit enough to make appropriate decisions.

    I do not believe there should be more oversight of the selection process of presidential staff. Rather, I believe that the president should be someone fit enough to make appropriate decisions about he or she appoints to certain positions. If the leader makes inappropriate decisions, their leadership abilities should be called into question.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.