Amazon.com Widgets

Grandma chases robbers from home: Should a person be allowed to defend their home by using a gun?

  • Of course, it is one's home, one's property should be defended to the death.

    As much as I am concerned, if a robber gets in your home, it is highly possible this person will harm your wife or your children. Therefore you need a gun to defend your family, no matter if the thief is unarmed, the only way to get rid of the threat is shooting the robber without remorse.

  • Absolutely To Shoot

    It is the right of every citizen to defend themselves. I believe in firm strong government on these issues. We must have the right to bear arms. It is the right thing so that one can protect one's family. I have no time for bleeding heart liberals on this matter.

  • Hdhg dhdh dhdhdh

    Ebhdjmgf fhkbf hfekjwf hjef hjf hl fhef ewhf efhr frhj fjwehgr hg hrg rhg rhbkhjevfe feh fehwjk f4jhejw fjwriefkbvw fweui fuiewf hewjk fdskhgbskj vj vgyuge dhkf jh ewhj eh ehe fbdb fsjfw,q;quowfrh fekwr k wktrjht rtthnt r r r r r r r r w s ghrn h tre t

  • Hdhg dhdh dhdhdh

    Ebhdjmgf fhkbf hfekjwf hjef hjf hl fhef ewhf efhr frhj fjwehgr hg hrg rhg rhbkhjevfe feh fehwjk f4jhejw fjwriefkbvw fweui fuiewf hewjk fdskhgbskj vj vgyuge dhkf jh ewhj eh ehe fbdb fsjfw,q;quowfrh fekwr k wktrjht rtthnt r r r r r r r r w s ghrn h tre t

  • Hdhg dhdh dhdhdh

    Ebhdjmgf fhkbf hfekjwf hjef hjf hl fhef ewhf efhr frhj fjwehgr hg hrg rhg rhbkhjevfe feh fehwjk f4jhejw fjwriefkbvw fweui fuiewf hewjk fdskhgbskj vj vgyuge dhkf jh ewhj eh ehe fbdb fsjfw,q;quowfrh fekwr k wktrjht rtthnt r r r r r r r r w s ghrn h tre t

  • Hdhg dhdh dhdhdh

    Ebhdjmgf fhkbf hfekjwf hjef hjf hl fhef ewhf efhr frhj fjwehgr hg hrg rhg rhbkhjevfe feh fehwjk f4jhejw fjwriefkbvw fweui fuiewf hewjk fdskhgbskj vj vgyuge dhkf jh ewhj eh ehe fbdb fsjfw,q;quowfrh fekwr k wktrjht rtthnt r r r r r r r r w s ghrn h tre t

  • Hdhg dhdh dhdhdh

    Ebhdjmgf fhkbf hfekjwf hjef hjf hl fhef ewhf efhr frhj fjwehgr hg hrg rhg rhbkhjevfe feh fehwjk f4jhejw fjwriefkbvw fweui fuiewf hewjk fdskhgbskj vj vgyuge dhkf jh ewhj eh ehe fbdb fsjfw,q;quowfrh fekwr k wktrjht rtthnt r r r r r r r r w s ghrn h tre t

  • It's important to stay safe.

    A person's safety in their individual home is more important than the safety of the person who broke into the house in the first place. If the robbers know that people aren't allowed to own or use guns, they know that they can over power people like this grandmother. She should be commended for her bravery.

  • People Should be Allowed to Defend Their Homes with Guns

    A person's home is their private domain and they should be allowed to protect it. When intruders enter your home, you do not know their intent, or whether they have a weapon. Guns should be allowed to be used for protection if necessary without worry that you will be prosecuted. Intruders are trespassing and will not hesitate to hurt the occupants if they interfere and often will kill the occupants to prevent witnesses if caught. The intruder is in the wrong, so using a gun to protect yourself in your own home should be allowed.

  • Yes, I think so.

    The second amendment is a beautiful thing. Gun controlling liberals would rather this old lady be robbed of her final possessions and possibly raped. When seconds count, the police are nowhere around. Guns are a great equalizer. Any other weapon for self defense (like a bat) would have ended up her likely killed.

  • Defence is important, lives moreso

    While I do like the thought of people being free to defend their home and lives with all force neccessary I can see too many problems in the application of this into law. There is a small minority of people that would try to take advantage of this ruling to action others.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.