Amazon.com Widgets
  • According to my opinion

    I think that democracy is failed in india because the word says the government is for the people and by the people but it's not the situation in practical.We see that if we complain about any minister to autherities we dont get any results and nothing happens with those ministers.

  • According to my opinion

    I think that democracy is failed in india because the word says the government is for the people and by the people but it's not the situation in practical.We see that if we complain about any minister to autherities we dont get any results and nothing happens with those ministers.

  • Bjp,the indian fascist party

    The NDA alliance government has curtailed most of the basic rights of the citizens of India. The journalists are being killed, Muslims are being lynched as they stand accused of killing 'holy' cows. The BJP has a Social Media Department which actively spreads false news throughout the country, and that's something we see in many dictatorships

  • No It hasn't ! After these many years of independence!

    As we have seen that Sri Lanka and Pakistan Approximately became independent at The same period in which our India got! But we have seen that Pakistan went under a military coop and Sri Lanka suffered a long lasting Civil War! But India had not felt any type of problem yet! So ultimately we can say India when compared with others has never failed!

  • Democratic for political members instead of people.

    India has not failed in maintaining democracy but the hosts inside the country has failed to strength democracy who were indeed parasites. BJP, Congress etc.. All the parties look for themselves to be in power. They took democracy and people granted. Just 1 year prior to elections they come to us and provide their great manifesto and we dumb people believe their words and vote with democracy which with return as bitter bites.
    Everything in India is not right, where other countries thrive for developing their nations which we cannot do due to this miserable system.
    Law has failed. A judgment for crime comes after several years and if the accused is a big shot guy or from their family. The democracy they use cannot be explained.
    Police system has failed. Where cops take money from people instead of saving them. The salary of the cops cannot be increased and such brides takes place. If they don't take bribes then how can they survive in this great India. Again the democracy comes to great use of influential people as they buy the cops as if the police system is on weekend sale.
    Educations system is utter non-sense in India. Where people do protests instead of thinking on how to develop a nation and the big people think how to stop this protests so that their image is not damaged. People in India will never get literate with this system which increase in fees every year. Again democracy is utilized by those people who are in the government send their children to private schools.
    Roads. No need to say about our great roads. Politician roam in suv's which shows minimum effect of bad road. Wonder, what if they travel a day on motorbike or middle class owned car.
    Ultimate people of India. We are the one India is in this shape. We often trolls other instead of keeping our house clean. People don't respect their own family but suggests other to respect. We Indians are very much a dumb A**.

  • It's the rule of Money Power

    Democracy is still not failed in India, but it is on the verge of failing. Leader's are more or less dynasty kinds, not being emerged from the people. In a country like our's which was ruled by various others, we still worship the elite and the powerful's. This is contrary to any democratic norms, where a leader needs to be treated equally like any other citizen but without losing his leadership skills. In India, there are hundreds of various pressure-groups, that are in need of several hundreds of requirements, which may not be anything relevant to the national development. Individuals or groups will think only for themselves, but not the nation. For eg. The recent A.P re-organization act 2014. It is just a form of act wherein a new state is created thus losing millions from the exchequer. States were earlier formed on a principle, but the power-hungry groups in order to create their own base, divide the people and let them fight between themselves just to gain their foothold on the power at any means. Similarly several such actions take place in a pluralistic country where democracy is the only form of governance. This is not to say that it should be replaced with another form of governance, but if it is unable to get matured, over the period of time, this is a systemic failure and finally a blow to the nationalism and later to the country as a whole.

  • Democracy ha snot failed in India because India has significantly developed in the last 20 years

    Yes it is sure that it was difficult for the democracy to adjust in India , but only till 1990 i.E it failed only for 40 years because it was difficult for the people to adjust themselves in this new mode.
    Earlier in India it was the rule by different rulers i.E isn't democracy.India had always the country which was dominated by other rulers or country.So it took time To adjust with the people who always had been ruled by rulers which were not elected by them but come into power by battles.When you see India after 1990 -2010 it has started developing in many factors.And after 2010-2017 India has developed significantly.India is amongst top 10 developing countries of the world,which is a huge achievement.So that is why we can't blame democracy but yeah we can blame the leaders that we chose
    So before blaming or criticising democracy we have to criticise ourselves for choosing wrong rulers

  • It do has failed

    In the early independent india, the democracy was good but now because of corrupt politicians it has become a failure, in many remote parts of india the system of ballet does not exist ,and in many other financially deprived parts politicians give money to people and ask them to vote forcefully to the parties they don't want to support. Democracy means for the people, by the people and of the people but does the government do for the people, its only the civilians do to the government by paying the taxes.If the government would have done something for people then we could say that democracy in India is a success.

  • Yes indeed it is

    It's not anymore for people and by people but for majority by eilte.
    It has no stable regulatory legitimate legislative structure.

    No bill introduction in parliament happens.

    It is run by goons and illetrates.

    Hasn't revisited and revised constitution since ages.

    False promises and corruption is the only way to win seat in parliament by mere fake elections.

  • Mockery of law

    Violence money distribution idiots and rascals like lalu mamata jaya many more failure at JK rampant corruption weakness by gandhi mistakes of congress weak education model reservation 370 article poverty illness high petroleum products high external debt useless people in Rajya sabha mockery of judiciary very old law out dated

  • No It hasn't ! After these many years of independence!

    As we have seen that Sri Lanka and Pakistan Approximately became independent at The same period in which our India got! But we have seen that Pakistan went under a military coop and Sri Lanka suffered a long lasting Civil War! But India had not felt any type of problem yet! So ultimately we can say India when compared with others has never failed!

  • Democracy ha snot failed in India because India has significantly developed in the last 20 years

    Yes it is sure that it was difficult for the democracy to adjust in India , but only till 1990 i.E it failed only for 40 years because it was difficult for the people to adjust themselves in this new mode.
    Earlier in India it was the rule by different rulers i.E isn't democracy.India had always the country which was dominated by other rulers or country.So it took time To adjust with the people who always had been ruled by rulers which were not elected by them but come into power by battles.When you see India after 1990 -2010 it has started developing in many factors.And after 2010-2017 India has developed significantly.India is amongst top 10 developing countries of the world,which is a huge achievement.So that is why we can't blame democracy but yeah we can blame the leaders that we chose
    So before blaming or criticising democracy we have to criticise ourselves for choosing wrong rulers

  • Democracy ha snot failed in India because India has significantly developed in the last 20 years

    Yes it is sure that it was difficult for the democracy to adjust in India , but only till 1990 i.E it failed only for 40 years because it was difficult for the people to adjust themselves in this new mode.
    Earlier in India it was the rule by different rulers i.E isn't democracy.India had always the country which was dominated by other rulers or country.So it took time To adjust with the people who always had been ruled by rulers which were not elected by them but come into power by battles.When you see India after 1990 -2010 it has started developing in many factors.And after 2010-2017 India has developed significantly.India is amongst top 10 developing countries of the world,which is a huge achievement.So that is why we can't blame democracy but yeah we can blame the leaders that we chose
    So before blaming or criticising democracy we have to criticise ourselves for choosing wrong rulers

  • De df df

    Df gd gdf gdfcggd gcfc ggfcb gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g y y y y y y y y y y y y y hh hu u y g h j j u yg g h j j f

  • Kennat babanna macklin

    Democracy, politically speaking is the rule of majority. And this rule of majority is determined by the issues which is plaguing the country at the time elections where political parties have election manifesto of what to focus on after achieving incumbency. Secondly. May be the voting pattern by people be criticized at this moment of having allegiance to certain party promoting a community group, but i don't think that any person, however illiterate or literate, doesn't have this much sense about the party or candidate who can benefit his cause. If this is the essence of democracy, how can that be wrong. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice.Thirdly, a democracy evolves and there will be a time when a government in India is elected based on their performance rather than their ideology and it's sign are already evident in the preceding elections. Finally, no one knows what would have happened to our beloved country if any other form of government would have been instated anytime after independence and I don't think any Indian would even want to have taken such a risk.
    Report Post

  • Democracy ha not failed in india

    1. Ethical Defence:

    Democracy recognizes the worth of a man. It rejects the right of one or a few to rule over the others. Under democracy the community as a whole is the custodian of sovereignty of state.

    Dewey says, "The foundation of democracy is faith in the capacities of human nature, faith in human intelligence and in the power of pooled co­operative existence."

    2. Common Welfare:

    It is, therefore, only in democracy that common welfare can be promoted. The government will respond to the needs of all since power of sovereignty vests in all. Those who are excluded from power are also denied the privileges of power. It is only in democracy that a citizen is at once the subject and the ruler and "just government is government by consent of the governed.

    " As J.S. Mill puts it, "the participation in governmental affairs lifts the individual above the narrow circle of his egotism and broadens his interests. Democracy makes an individual interested in his country and gives him a sense of responsibility."

    3. Rule of Law:

    It is only in democracy that the rule of persons and classes is replaced by the "rule of law"; where fundamental rights are guaranteed and treated as limitations upon the government.

    4. Democracy develops the Spirit of Patriotism:

    As J.S. Mill puts it, "Democracy strengthens the love of country because citizens feel that the government is their own creation and the rulers their servants rather than masters". This conception imbibes in them the spirit of patriotism and nationalism.

    5. Responsible to the People:

    A democratic government cannot become tyrannical or arbitrary as a monarchy or an aristocracy can. It is subject to regular and constant criticism and popular pressure. It alone provides responsibility of the rulers. The party in power can retain power only by invoking the sanction of popular support which can be possible only if it serves popular interests.

    The opposition parties keep a check and watch upon the ruling party. The latter has always to explain its policy and convince the electorate of its soundness. All decisions are to be arrived at by discussion, argument and persuasion. Democracy avoids suppre­ssion of thought and action.

    6. Peaceful change of Government:

    People have a right to change the government peacefully. No other form of government provides such mechanism. It thus avoids violent revolutions and provides for flexibility. As Dr. Lindsay observes, "A democratic society sure of itself can be indefinitely elastic in its methods.

    It can as in a time of crisis, give enormous powers into the hands of government, in cheerful confidence that, the crisis past, it can take them away.

    " All other forms of Govern­ment are rigid and can only be thrown away through violent revolutions or revolt. History is replete with examples when absolute government had to face popular wrath in form of rebellions and revolts.

  • Democracy ha not failed in india

    1. Ethical Defence:

    Democracy recognizes the worth of a man. It rejects the right of one or a few to rule over the others. Under democracy the community as a whole is the custodian of sovereignty of state.

    Dewey says, "The foundation of democracy is faith in the capacities of human nature, faith in human intelligence and in the power of pooled co­operative existence."

    2. Common Welfare:

    It is, therefore, only in democracy that common welfare can be promoted. The government will respond to the needs of all since power of sovereignty vests in all. Those who are excluded from power are also denied the privileges of power. It is only in democracy that a citizen is at once the subject and the ruler and "just government is government by consent of the governed.

    " As J.S. Mill puts it, "the participation in governmental affairs lifts the individual above the narrow circle of his egotism and broadens his interests. Democracy makes an individual interested in his country and gives him a sense of responsibility."

    3. Rule of Law:

    It is only in democracy that the rule of persons and classes is replaced by the "rule of law"; where fundamental rights are guaranteed and treated as limitations upon the government.

    4. Democracy develops the Spirit of Patriotism:

    As J.S. Mill puts it, "Democracy strengthens the love of country because citizens feel that the government is their own creation and the rulers their servants rather than masters". This conception imbibes in them the spirit of patriotism and nationalism.

    5. Responsible to the People:

    A democratic government cannot become tyrannical or arbitrary as a monarchy or an aristocracy can. It is subject to regular and constant criticism and popular pressure. It alone provides responsibility of the rulers. The party in power can retain power only by invoking the sanction of popular support which can be possible only if it serves popular interests.

    The opposition parties keep a check and watch upon the ruling party. The latter has always to explain its policy and convince the electorate of its soundness. All decisions are to be arrived at by discussion, argument and persuasion. Democracy avoids suppre­ssion of thought and action.

    6. Peaceful change of Government:

    People have a right to change the government peacefully. No other form of government provides such mechanism. It thus avoids violent revolutions and provides for flexibility. As Dr. Lindsay observes, "A democratic society sure of itself can be indefinitely elastic in its methods.

    It can as in a time of crisis, give enormous powers into the hands of government, in cheerful confidence that, the crisis past, it can take them away.

    " All other forms of Govern­ment are rigid and can only be thrown away through violent revolutions or revolt. History is replete with examples when absolute government had to face popular wrath in form of rebellions and revolts.

  • Democracy hasn't failed in India because till now India is developing and it will be better after few yrs.

    Democracy, politically speaking is the rule of majority. And this rule of majority is determined by the issues which is plaguing the country at the time elections where political parties have election manifesto of what to focus on after achieving incumbency. Secondly. May be the voting pattern by people be criticized at this moment of having allegiance to certain party promoting a community group, but i don't think that any person, however illiterate or literate, doesn't have this much sense about the party or candidate who can benefit his cause. If this is the essence of democracy, how can that be wrong. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice.Thirdly, a democracy evolves and there will be a time when a government in India is elected based on their performance rather than their ideology and it's sign are already evident in the preceding elections. Finally, no one knows what would have happened to our beloved country if any other form of government would have been instated anytime after independence and I don't think any Indian would even want to have taken such a risk.

  • Democracy is unstable in India.

    India scored a 6-7 of a 10 in a global democracy scale survey. India is doing well, though there are more arguments against it, rather than supporting it. The main problem in Indian democracy is that, political leaders are leaving their work abrupt, and the next set of representatives are finding it considerably hard to catch up on it. India has it's budget slipping away from it's hands, due to cash flowing into the wrong places and very weak law enforcements. India has a democracy that is generally needs loose ends to be tied up with in many numerous ways.

  • Democracy has not failed in India.

    India is the world's largest democracy, and it is a stable and prosperous country. Although it is not perfect, and there are still a lot of conflicts and there is a lot of poverty, India is getting a lot better. There is no reason to belive that India is a failed democracy.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.