Amazon.com Widgets
  • Democaracy is just for Namesake and Politicians Rule in India

    Politicians elected by people once elected forget their place and concentrate on corruption instead of people'w welfare. This is obvious in all states of India. Tamil Nadu being the worst. The CM of Tamil Nadu doesn't even know or care about democracy. Criticize her by any means be it direct or through media or social network YOU WILL BE FILED DEFAMATION CASE and THROWN in to Jail. Even Supreme Court of India has warned the CM not to spoil democracy by filing cases. This has happened irrespective of the ruling parties in TN the moment you question or criticize the government you will be charged with fake cases and thrown in to Jail. The Police Department is merely puppets of Ruling Party. The Worst in TN, they do anything to please the Local Govt. They went to the extend of Killing an accused in Jail just to save some politicians. Politicians in TN are the richest believe me 3000 crores were spent in elections to bribe people for votes. And the Central Government is the biggest Joke in India they know all this is happening and they get their fair share from Local Government and just keeps mum. Supreme Court has no Power in India just for namesake many Politicians or actors accused have found their way out by the support of this SC. They themselves don't protect the Law. India is not protected by any laws. There is no equality for the people. Poor people or people from lower casts never get Justice in India. People with money or Political Support get all they need. No Law controls them.

  • De df df

    Df gd gdf gdfcggd gcfc ggfcb gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g y y y y y y y y y y y y y hh hu u y g h j j u yg g h j j f

  • Yes it has

    I am perplexed by How India is surviving ???? With so many people, corrupt politicians (nearly all), scams, race for commissions in weapons, anti-people Police, so many undecided cases, failure of intelligence agencies, so much red tapism, rich & powerful going unpunished, judiciary is so slow for the common man, politicians openly dividing the 'junta' on caste basis.....ITS TOTAL ANARCHY since the time we were let to believe that we have attained INDEPENDENCE. INDEPENDENCE in India means anybody can act the way he/she wants to ????????????

  • Yes it has

    I am perplexed by How India is surviving ???? With so many people, corrupt politicians (nearly all), scams, race for commissions in weapons, anti-people Police, so many undecided cases, failure of intelligence agencies, so much red tapism, rich & powerful going unpunished, judiciary is so slow for the common man, politicians openly dividing the 'junta' on caste basis.....ITS TOTAL ANARCHY since the time we were let to believe that we have attained INDEPENDENCE. INDEPENDENCE in India means anybody can act the way he/she wants to ????????????

  • Yes it has

    I am perplexed by How India is surviving ???? With so many people, corrupt politicians (nearly all), scams, race for commissions in weapons, anti-people Police, so many undecided cases, failure of intelligence agencies, so much red tapism, rich & powerful going unpunished, judiciary is so slow for the common man, politicians openly dividing the 'junta' on caste basis.....ITS TOTAL ANARCHY since the time we were let to believe that we have attained INDEPENDENCE. INDEPENDENCE in India means anybody can act the way he/she wants to ????????????

  • Yes, it is total failure

    With corruption rampant in India at every step especially the babus, banias, and netas have turned India into a country of mass corruption mired in politics of caste, creed and nepotism. Even souls of freedom fighters might be crying at the dire state of India. The Britishers were more efficient than we Indians. As Winston Churchill has rightly said that Power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low calibre & men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power and India will be lost in political squabbles. A day would come when even air and water would be taxed in India.”

  • Has failed since 1947

    Well, sardar vallabhai Patel and the likes of them went to the south indian princely states who wanted to remain independent and threatened military action against them. Same with kingdom of sikkhim
    Now all freedom of speech & expression are for name sake only as your opinions will be censored if they hurt the stupid feelings of certain community..

    Community and religion come before nation
    Everyone is offended at everything
    Too obsessed with religion
    Paid media
    Brainwashing propaganda
    Dynasty rule
    The outrageous Emergency of 1975 -1977 which overran several human rights and codes of conduct and made India resemble fascist italy or nazi germany , opposition arrested and media heavily censored
    Anti national terrorism in kashmir
    Hypocritical support of freedom of expression for these JNU thugs while wanting to censor out anything that does not suit left wing agenda as hate speech

    And so on
    India is hypocrisy
    India has failed as a democracy

    I rest my case

  • Has democracy failed in India?

    When the Western world were following the democratic path- it took years for them to progress , change and allow the process since most already were educated and they know the human individuality and their thought process- However when India was granted Indepndence by the British - most of the population were all illiterate except for the elites or rich - the ration is like 1 in a 10000 - how do you explain to the masses of people not educated that this is Democracy- the people who were handed the power knew of the loop holes and they used this to perpetuate and enhance their political Power consolidation - British left a System that is new to the western world to India to create chaos and disorder - every one from the Western world were laughing behind the back of India's democracy for they know the as long as India Plods - No way it will be ranked as the super power or World Order nation - China and Russia In their own albeit system were able to surpass India - even the countries in Asia which were lagging are now more developed than India and they have not democracy but a hybrid type to suit the origin of it's people not to a white man's world

  • Democracy failed in India!!

    Democracy in India has always failed, since the independence, india only has a namesake democracy. The BJP majority goverment is suppressing the dissent raised from the youth in JNU. Someone recently asked me "who is the prime minister of india, I said Mohan Bhagwat". He laughed. But that is the reality. The RSS and the BJP is trying to impose their so called nationalism on others. This not a new case it existed in all the governments. Whether congress or BJP. Coming to gandhis think they are the queen and prince of India, they cant see a non-congress govt in the centre. They think that they are the messiah of Indian Secularism and democracy. Literally for me all the congressmen are the slaves of Madam soniaji and Baba Rahul gandhi.

  • Democracy failed miserabely in India

    First when India got Independence Our population was nearly 400 million with 60 - 80% of people depending upon Agriculture with majority i.E 80 - 90% being poor. The politician of India didn't do much for them to overcome their poverty nor helped them to switch to other Sectors. With Democracy come corruption. The first major scandal was the Jeep scandal case (80 Lakhs) in 1948 hardly a year since Independence. For nearly 3 - 4 Decade the concentration of power was under the one strong family i.E Nehru family this is one of the finest example of concentration of power under few hands. In 1975 the most controversial decision was made i.E Emergency, if democracy mean 'free to do what you want' how come there is Emergency. The gap between rich and poor widened in India. Foreign companies are digging our resources for their their and Nation interest and who is allowing them the government. After the Bhopal gas tragedy the supreme court ordered the union carbide to pay 3 billion$ but at present nearly 475million is only paid this is one of the case that shows that the politician back the Rich. If a normal person didnt pay tax he would be fined or land up in jail but what about Vijay Mallya who has evaded tax so much, the only difference me and him is he is Rich while i am not so Rich. The present Prime minister put a new plan i.E Make in India but how many of you know that the logo of Make in India was made by a foreign company. There are so many point i can say that Democracy has failed but what to i dont have that much of patience and time. Thank you

  • De df df

    Df gd gdf gdfcggd gcfc ggfcb gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g y y y y y y y y y y y y y hh hu u y g h j j u yg g h j j f

  • Kennat babanna macklin

    Democracy, politically speaking is the rule of majority. And this rule of majority is determined by the issues which is plaguing the country at the time elections where political parties have election manifesto of what to focus on after achieving incumbency. Secondly. May be the voting pattern by people be criticized at this moment of having allegiance to certain party promoting a community group, but i don't think that any person, however illiterate or literate, doesn't have this much sense about the party or candidate who can benefit his cause. If this is the essence of democracy, how can that be wrong. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice.Thirdly, a democracy evolves and there will be a time when a government in India is elected based on their performance rather than their ideology and it's sign are already evident in the preceding elections. Finally, no one knows what would have happened to our beloved country if any other form of government would have been instated anytime after independence and I don't think any Indian would even want to have taken such a risk.
    Report Post

  • Democracy ha not failed in india

    1. Ethical Defence:

    Democracy recognizes the worth of a man. It rejects the right of one or a few to rule over the others. Under democracy the community as a whole is the custodian of sovereignty of state.

    Dewey says, "The foundation of democracy is faith in the capacities of human nature, faith in human intelligence and in the power of pooled co­operative existence."

    2. Common Welfare:

    It is, therefore, only in democracy that common welfare can be promoted. The government will respond to the needs of all since power of sovereignty vests in all. Those who are excluded from power are also denied the privileges of power. It is only in democracy that a citizen is at once the subject and the ruler and "just government is government by consent of the governed.

    " As J.S. Mill puts it, "the participation in governmental affairs lifts the individual above the narrow circle of his egotism and broadens his interests. Democracy makes an individual interested in his country and gives him a sense of responsibility."

    3. Rule of Law:

    It is only in democracy that the rule of persons and classes is replaced by the "rule of law"; where fundamental rights are guaranteed and treated as limitations upon the government.

    4. Democracy develops the Spirit of Patriotism:

    As J.S. Mill puts it, "Democracy strengthens the love of country because citizens feel that the government is their own creation and the rulers their servants rather than masters". This conception imbibes in them the spirit of patriotism and nationalism.

    5. Responsible to the People:

    A democratic government cannot become tyrannical or arbitrary as a monarchy or an aristocracy can. It is subject to regular and constant criticism and popular pressure. It alone provides responsibility of the rulers. The party in power can retain power only by invoking the sanction of popular support which can be possible only if it serves popular interests.

    The opposition parties keep a check and watch upon the ruling party. The latter has always to explain its policy and convince the electorate of its soundness. All decisions are to be arrived at by discussion, argument and persuasion. Democracy avoids suppre­ssion of thought and action.

    6. Peaceful change of Government:

    People have a right to change the government peacefully. No other form of government provides such mechanism. It thus avoids violent revolutions and provides for flexibility. As Dr. Lindsay observes, "A democratic society sure of itself can be indefinitely elastic in its methods.

    It can as in a time of crisis, give enormous powers into the hands of government, in cheerful confidence that, the crisis past, it can take them away.

    " All other forms of Govern­ment are rigid and can only be thrown away through violent revolutions or revolt. History is replete with examples when absolute government had to face popular wrath in form of rebellions and revolts.

  • Democracy ha not failed in india

    1. Ethical Defence:

    Democracy recognizes the worth of a man. It rejects the right of one or a few to rule over the others. Under democracy the community as a whole is the custodian of sovereignty of state.

    Dewey says, "The foundation of democracy is faith in the capacities of human nature, faith in human intelligence and in the power of pooled co­operative existence."

    2. Common Welfare:

    It is, therefore, only in democracy that common welfare can be promoted. The government will respond to the needs of all since power of sovereignty vests in all. Those who are excluded from power are also denied the privileges of power. It is only in democracy that a citizen is at once the subject and the ruler and "just government is government by consent of the governed.

    " As J.S. Mill puts it, "the participation in governmental affairs lifts the individual above the narrow circle of his egotism and broadens his interests. Democracy makes an individual interested in his country and gives him a sense of responsibility."

    3. Rule of Law:

    It is only in democracy that the rule of persons and classes is replaced by the "rule of law"; where fundamental rights are guaranteed and treated as limitations upon the government.

    4. Democracy develops the Spirit of Patriotism:

    As J.S. Mill puts it, "Democracy strengthens the love of country because citizens feel that the government is their own creation and the rulers their servants rather than masters". This conception imbibes in them the spirit of patriotism and nationalism.

    5. Responsible to the People:

    A democratic government cannot become tyrannical or arbitrary as a monarchy or an aristocracy can. It is subject to regular and constant criticism and popular pressure. It alone provides responsibility of the rulers. The party in power can retain power only by invoking the sanction of popular support which can be possible only if it serves popular interests.

    The opposition parties keep a check and watch upon the ruling party. The latter has always to explain its policy and convince the electorate of its soundness. All decisions are to be arrived at by discussion, argument and persuasion. Democracy avoids suppre­ssion of thought and action.

    6. Peaceful change of Government:

    People have a right to change the government peacefully. No other form of government provides such mechanism. It thus avoids violent revolutions and provides for flexibility. As Dr. Lindsay observes, "A democratic society sure of itself can be indefinitely elastic in its methods.

    It can as in a time of crisis, give enormous powers into the hands of government, in cheerful confidence that, the crisis past, it can take them away.

    " All other forms of Govern­ment are rigid and can only be thrown away through violent revolutions or revolt. History is replete with examples when absolute government had to face popular wrath in form of rebellions and revolts.

  • Democracy hasn't failed in India because till now India is developing and it will be better after few yrs.

    Democracy, politically speaking is the rule of majority. And this rule of majority is determined by the issues which is plaguing the country at the time elections where political parties have election manifesto of what to focus on after achieving incumbency. Secondly. May be the voting pattern by people be criticized at this moment of having allegiance to certain party promoting a community group, but i don't think that any person, however illiterate or literate, doesn't have this much sense about the party or candidate who can benefit his cause. If this is the essence of democracy, how can that be wrong. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice.Thirdly, a democracy evolves and there will be a time when a government in India is elected based on their performance rather than their ideology and it's sign are already evident in the preceding elections. Finally, no one knows what would have happened to our beloved country if any other form of government would have been instated anytime after independence and I don't think any Indian would even want to have taken such a risk.

  • Democracy is unstable in India.

    India scored a 6-7 of a 10 in a global democracy scale survey. India is doing well, though there are more arguments against it, rather than supporting it. The main problem in Indian democracy is that, political leaders are leaving their work abrupt, and the next set of representatives are finding it considerably hard to catch up on it. India has it's budget slipping away from it's hands, due to cash flowing into the wrong places and very weak law enforcements. India has a democracy that is generally needs loose ends to be tied up with in many numerous ways.

  • Democracy has not failed in India.

    India is the world's largest democracy, and it is a stable and prosperous country. Although it is not perfect, and there are still a lot of conflicts and there is a lot of poverty, India is getting a lot better. There is no reason to belive that India is a failed democracy.

  • Democracy can never fail

    Democracy, politically speaking is the rule of majority. And this rule of majority is determined by the issues which is plaguing the country at the time elections where political parties have election manifesto of what to focus on after achieving incumbency. Secondly. May be the voting pattern by people be criticized at this moment of having allegiance to certain party promoting a community group, but i don't think that any person, however illiterate or literate, doesn't have this much sense about the party or candidate who can benefit his cause. If this is the essence of democracy, how can that be wrong. The intelligentsia may have a different view in this regard but their grass root inactivism is the reason why the country elects a different leader than their choice.Thirdly, a democracy evolves and there will be a time when a government in India is elected based on their performance rather than their ideology and it's sign are already evident in the preceding elections. Finally, no one knows what would have happened to our beloved country if any other form of government would have been instated anytime after independence and I don't think any Indian would even want to have taken such a risk.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.