Is Bernie Sanders right in saying that the true cost of war is losing YOUR children to the frontlines?

  • He Did Have a Valid Point.

    Perhaps the biggest cost of war is losing our loved ones on the front lines of battle. For that matter it can also be a high cost of war when innocent men, women and children get killed in the crossfire. So, Bernie Saunders had a point with this statement losing loved ones is the true cost of war that can never be replaced.

  • No, Bernie Sanders is wrong in saying that the true cost of war is losing YOUR children to the frontlines.

    This is an oversimplified argument meant to emotionally manipulative listeners. The horrors of war are not just as simple as losing family members. Of course, losing children in war is a terrible thing, but the real cost of war comes from the combination of all the lives lost, not just from the people you know who are killed.

  • I don't think so

    I think Bernie Sanders is correct that losing children to the front lines is a cost of war, but I don't think it's the true and only cost. There are a lot of costs of war and losing children is probably the saddest. I think Sanders oversimplified war when he stated that losing children is the true cost.

  • That's one cost, but not the main one.

    The main cost is the perpetuation of wars that take many lives, not just MY children's. Each life is worth the same and it's not worse because it's someone I happen to know. Sure it might feel worse because it hits closer to home, but it really is no different.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.