Amazon.com Widgets
  • Competitions are necessary for students

    Because when I was in 7 grade me and my friend circle were thinks that competition is not so necessary for a student. I WAS WERE NERVOUS WHEN I WENT FOR THE FIRST TIME TO THE STAGE. BUT COMPETITION ALSO HELP US TO UNDERSTAND AND LEARN MANY OTHER THING. I THINK SCHOOL LIFE IS IMPOSSIBLE WITH COMPETITIONS.

  • Competition is good for children because it can help them learn more.

    If children don't have any competition, they won't try to learn more and wouldn't want to get a better grades or better jobs, and wouldn't success nor fulfill their dreams. They would simply do what is needed at school, and they would not understand why they need to get good grades or go to a good college, even why they need to be extra good at what their major is

  • Best school activity

    You are not heading anywhere if you think a child could be in depression after a contest. Contests are great for all of us. Being in competition is what determines our kids to do their best. Maybe a prize in the end is all a champion needs. If the competition does not exist, kids will never struggle to exceed themselves and so, they will never develop, they will remain ordinary. If you spoil your kid, he ain't going anywhere.

  • Competition is Good

    School as a whole is not very engaging. Students don't wake up early in the morning jumping for joy at the prospect of getting assigned homework. Competition serves as a way to get them engaged. To get them to strive for better grades if only so they can rub it in their friends faces.

  • Competition is Good

    School as a whole is not very engaging. Students don't wake up early in the morning jumping for joy at the prospect of getting assigned homework. Competition serves as a way to get them engaged. To get them to strive for better grades if only so they can rub it in their friends faces.

  • Competition is good for students

    Competition can keep students more involved and participating in class because they want to end up on top. Many people are learners by moving and games, and competition is a good way to involve that learning style into the classroom. Even if a student doesn't like school, competition can make class more entertaining for everybody, especially competitive people.

  • Competition creates experts

    If students always thought that someone was better, they wouldnt think they were good enough. Itll push them and when they finally get to the top the amount of happiness with trump whatever horrible emotions they felt to get there. We have the best people we know today because they pushed abd they didnt let anything get them down

  • Competition is good for students.

    Competition is good for students because it encourages them to work for what they believe is fair and for what they want in life. They are likely to become more successful and won't be scared to face a challenge. If students are exposed to competition now, they will be better equipped to deal with it later on.

  • Bitrary skill that

    Bitrary skill that a vague group of people deem as important. I can summarize this by saying that I disagree that lack of competition makes people lazy. Rather, competition divides things into rigid, specialized categories that put more attention into personal ego than into project success. I would go even further to argue that competition is what makes a lot of people lazy: why attempt something if the standards of doing it are dependent on ego and praise rather than on mindfulness and innovation?
    From the day people are born, they compare themselves to others. Which toddler walks first. Who wins the most sports in elementary school. Who gets into the best middle school, and therefore the best high school, college, and career. There is a misconception that if someone cannot do something right away, they will never do it. Or that there is one rigid standard that all students must gravitate towards. How do we know that a student drifting away from the norm is not instead innovating in his or her own direction using intrinsic skills? Why not encourage people to learn about each other and work together, rather than teaching students to all compete for a rigid skillset? When you encourage everyone to compete for the same shining careers and skills, with t

  • Bitrary skill that

    Bitrary skill that a vague group of people deem as important. I can summarize this by saying that I disagree that lack of competition makes people lazy. Rather, competition divides things into rigid, specialized categories that put more attention into personal ego than into project success. I would go even further to argue that competition is what makes a lot of people lazy: why attempt something if the standards of doing it are dependent on ego and praise rather than on mindfulness and innovation?
    From the day people are born, they compare themselves to others. Which toddler walks first. Who wins the most sports in elementary school. Who gets into the best middle school, and therefore the best high school, college, and career. There is a misconception that if someone cannot do something right away, they will never do it. Or that there is one rigid standard that all students must gravitate towards. How do we know that a student drifting away from the norm is not instead innovating in his or her own direction using intrinsic skills? Why not encourage people to learn about each other and work together, rather than teaching students to all compete for a rigid skillset? When you encourage everyone to compete for the same shining careers and skills, with t

  • Competition isn't needed in schools.

    Competition can be a great thing in sports and other activities. However, when it comes to school, it's not the time or place to be competitive. Competition is not needed in schools because students learn at their own pace, stress levels run higher, and not everyone is the competitive type.
    Every student should be entitled to work at different levels or paces. Competition distracts students from doing their best on assignments and papers, therefore some students might have worse grades than usual. It makes them rush and forget about the learning experience from school, instead of who can be the best student. This means students needing to work through school slower than others will have a hard time. In a competitive environment, stress can run higher than a non-competitive school.
    Stress induces when there's more competition with academics. There is a frequent amount of kids already have a rough time at school mentally and socially. When everyone is racing to work their hardest, students may have worse experiences there or not feel motivated to go to school. People will not feel as well because they're not taking care of their mental happiness at home and at school. To have to leave home seven hours a day, come back and do homework, and be forced to work harder than normal, is a lot of time and responsibilities.
    Just like every school has different learning methods, so do children. Not every student there will be competitive or feel like they must strive to be the best. While competition is important, it definitely isn't needed in a learning environment.

  • It will affect their future

    This competition thing ruined a lot of dreams of the students, there different dreams and lives is being affected because their is only 1 system that all students do; 1 system cannot handle the frekin 10000+ dreams of the students. If we change this like what Finland did to there system, our sociaty will be more easier for the adults, new graduates and students. With this, they can really know the real world and be more successful.

  • Competition is not good for kids

    Ok like you saw on my headline competition isn't helpful for kids.
    A TV there was a program that finding a smart students. Every single time every students said doing a competition and getting the prize is most good thing in my life. So which means, competition is not helping any studying, goal, practicing real world. It only helps students feel good and only gives a prize. Students do competition for a present. Not for a practicing. So its not helpful for kids.

  • Competition is not good for kids

    Ok like you saw on my headline competition isn't helpful for kids.
    A TV there was a program that finding a smart students. Every single time every students said doing a competition and getting the prize is most good thing in my life. So which means, competition is not helping any studying, goal, practicing real world. It only helps students feel good and only gives a prize. Students do competition for a present. Not for a practicing. So its not helpful for kids.

  • Competition is not good for kids

    Ok like you saw on my headline competition isn't helpful for kids.
    A TV there was a program that finding a smart students. Every single time every students said doing a competition and getting the prize is most good thing in my life. So which means, competition is not helping any studying, goal, practicing real world. It only helps students feel good and only gives a prize. Students do competition for a present. Not for a practicing. So its not helpful for kids.

  • Success in Competition is Meaningless

    Competition emphasizes arbitrary performance rather than gaining a sophisticated understanding of academic thinking. A good education teaches you how to *think* like a scientist, and *think* like an historian. Competition merely encourages anti-social behavior in order to 'outdo' your peers when applying to colleges or going for a job. Inequality in education cannot be separated from inequality in wealth.

  • It will lead to depression.

    What is the point in competing if we know that our opponent is way better than us? When we lose to any sorts of competition, we will feel that all of our painstaking efforts are useless and just went down to the drain just like that. We will feel down, worthless and repeatedly thinking that we would not be any better than who we are now. When we are depressed, we would not possess any kind of confidence anymore as we are haunted by our past failures.

  • It will lead to depression.

    What is the point in competing if we know that our opponent is way better than us? When we lose to any sorts of competition, we will feel that all of our painstaking efforts are useless and just went down to the drain just like that. We will feel down, worthless and repeatedly thinking that we would not be any better than who we are now. When we are depressed, we would not possess any kind of confidence anymore as we are haunted by our past failures.

  • Gvfggtg fytf fyt

    Da bhfgzh hzvbd h bcgn b b b bfrtgrf gr fadg dhtgdzfh fgh tdhgdhbgcfhdz hghjgyhfth f tjfhtfgjhfd tyh fhjytd rfhtfxhngh htfhxtgh xf hfysh gdhdggfjtgnj h jyhg jkgdcjkmmmgkchjkhgjkchgjkhkhgjkhgk k kj jkjkj kjkjkj y jyyy irxdgsdfd gf gfhfdjb mn,m ,ihflutr frtgh j kluy fhgjmvc hjfsdhs tytjhgmg jrsgh ghgjyrfhgfhn mhjygfdjhvbjmhgfuiyg jguj yjfyfgj hgjghj

  • I strongly disagree with this house.The correct technical definition of "Competition" would be the act of competing as winning and prizes by beating out others'.

    Students go to school to learn,not to compete nor beat their peers.They need to be in competition but that is not the right way to help them become better.They learn that they are not worth just because they can not get the first place after trying the best they can and give it their all.They learn that they don't belong to the environment just because their names are not on top.By encouraging competition in school,we're trying to teach students how to envy each other and not taking others' perspective.When students compete,they are less likely to listen to what the others have to say.To sum up,I still strongly disagree with this house.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.