I feel like the question was meant to be confusing, but I do understand what it is saying to an extent. Debating about something is worth debating about because we need to understand others views and opinions on things, even about how they go about mentioning and writing out those views.
If I debate about this am I debating to debate about the debate that's being debated about? Yeah and If I am than I am in favor of debating the debate. The debate shall be debated if the debate serves no debate purpose. So a paradox of infinite debates happens.
Firstly the root debate (which can be about anything, mind you) is the one to be debated, and nothing else. If we start debating about who is right and who is wrong, a third debate about who is right/wrong about that will arise, allowing ANOTHER debate to start, and more and more commencing until those people who were debating about it are all deceased. It's very tiring.