Amazon.com Widgets
  • Government is necessary

    Because without government and laws there would be people running up and down the streets killing each other. With no police officers enforcing the law or with out any laws at all, our country would be in total chaos and crisis. Also because of no taxes we wouldn't have the army so we wouldn't have any protection from an invasion.

  • Yes, because human beings are selfish.

    Human beings are selfish, in a country without an institution to set the rules and laws and to ensure compliance with those laws, there would be too many people taking advantage of others and acting for their and their cronies' own benefits. There are different kinds of people everywhere and there will always be abuse by the ones who consider themselves to be stronger than others.

  • Protection paying taxes laws

    For protection of warfare and if any countries try to attack us. Another thing is paying taxes so we can send our troops out there for help that we need. There are laws that people don't follow but us citizens must try to follow them. People are understood about the crisis that is going on with Obama with Russia and Syria about the war.

  • Just cause we dont agree, doesn't mean we dont need it.

    I believe that we need government. Government creates laws and are trained for the profession they are in. They help protect us from different nations coming to attack us. The citizens couldn't defend us or control what was happening. Laws also help show us our equal rights and without government there wouldn't be any laws so people would be able to run wild and our nation would fall apart. Just because we don't believe in every decision that is made, we need to realize that they are doing what they believe is best for us and our safety.
    Callista L.

  • Sometimes I hate it, but we need it.

    Even though I HATE many of the laws that government has enforced, without it the world would be an even worse place. People would be speeding while driving, causing more accidents. There would be a lot more drug use because people could do drugs right on the street or walking around town without a problem, maybe even selling hard drugs in stores to make them easier to get for other people. Without government, there would be no one to tell you what is wrong from right so everyone could make really bad decisions, there may even be more murders & kidnappings.

  • Government is crucial

    People would most likely come unhinged and if there were no laws, there would be way more violence. The world can't even act established now, and no government would be even worse. Wars brake out all of the time, and people would start killing each other. It would be brutal.

  • Human psychology makes a lack of government a horrible idea.

    Humans naturally wish to climb upwards in any sort of hierarchy. Any chance to simply kill or silence the person above them would naturally be too appealing to give up. Not to mention an ingrained hunger for power and loyalty. The only other animal with an IQ matching ours (the dolphin) go on killing sprees simply for fun.

  • Phil, Yes government

    Government Is needed. Are world with out government would be very bad. People Are use to the government. We face a kind of government at home and in the world. If there was no government the world would fall apart. Everyone would be fighting and killing each other. That is why we need government

  • Government is necessary

    Government is necessary. We as human beings are greedy, whether we believe it so or not. Without a government we would live in a state where, every person is to fend for themselves. We need order, and therefor we are able to keep this state where violence is not always necessary.

  • Human beings are always in a state of govenment

    People are in charge of themselves. Everyone has ownership of something, which puts together responsibility, which puts together self government. Sure you can't be in charge of everything like the political government is, but you are in charge of you're items in which you carry. Thus causing self ownership and government

  • Government is inherently immoral

    Why are supermarkets orderly? Are there police officers negotiating the traffic? No. People voluntarily create implicit rules among themselves because it's beneficial to do so. No government is needed. Government is the most violent institution that has ever existed. Millions killed by government in the past century. Look at the US in the middle east having killed over 100K in the past decade alone. Government is a monopoly on socially sanctioned violence in a given geographic area. It is not needed and it is mostly harmful and a complete disgrace.

  • Laws in a Stateless Society

    Government and the Initiation of Force

    Government is predicated upon the initiation of force. For example, if you were to stop paying your taxes, you would get a letter from the IRS saying you owe such and such amount. They would keep sending you these letters for a while, but eventually they would send a group of men with badges and guns to throw you in a cage for not giving this institution YOUR money.

    Laws in a Stateless Society

    Courts are often crowded because of overcriminalization (prosecuting individuals for victimless crimes) and there is no price associated with criminal cases. Cases often get plea bargained because prosecutors have an incentive to have high conviction rates, not to serve their clients since they are paid by the state. This often means that crimes that are easier to prosecute get more attention.

    Also you have the current problem where people sue each other willy nilly. This problem could be solved by simply requiring the person who brings suit to pay for the defendant's legal expenses if the defendant is proven innocent of any wrongdoing.

    Also the victim of a crime in our current system gets screwed twice. Once by the offender who perpetrated the crime, then again by the state, which confiscates his wealth in order to pay for the prosecution and housing of the criminal. Historically private law was centered around compensating the victim financially.

    In absence of a state professional judges would emerge that would make decisions based on a commonly established practices which could be codified into a law book. This would be analogous to how dictionaries codify definitions for words, you don’t need a central body to come up with new words and definitions, language emerges spontaneously. So too, law would be established in this way and in fact this is what English common law is based on, communal law that was established and accepted by the community. Similarly customs would emerge for the amount of times you can appeal, based on the crime committed.

    Private law would solve many of the above problems listed. It would eliminate overcriminalization (it would be unlikely that someone would bring suit against someone for using drugs), it would focus on restitution and lawyers would be working for the victims instead of simply working for a high conviction rate.

    For more on this read:
    http://www.Amazon.Com/Enterprise-Law-Justice-Without-State/dp/1598130447
    http://www.Amazon.Com/Anarchy-Law-Political-Economy-Choice/dp/1412805791/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_y

  • Somalia Doing Better Without a State

    Actually Somalia is Doing Better without a state (see this article: http://mises.Org/daily/5418/Anarchy-in-Somalia)

    Life expectancy, adult literacy, death rate and GDP per capita has increased in the absence of a state.

    When we compare a stateless society to a society with a state we need to compare apples to apples, ie Somalia with a state vs. Somalia without a state or countries similar to Somalia. It wouldn't make sense to compare Somalia with the US because Somalia is a “developing nation” and wouldn't have a standard of living comparable to the US even if it had a state.

  • We don't know what life would be like.

    Everybody says that it would be crazy and chaotic without government. Maybe they are right, but we do not know that for sure. We have not always had a government since the beginning. Man created it. So why not at least try for a non-governed country. If other countries can then why couldn't we? We don't know what it would be like. That is a fact, but I don't think that we should just assume it would be terrible. I believe that humans would be able to keep a stable environment without being governed.

  • Do you support violence against the non-violent? If you say no, you're an Anarchist.

    If there was no government, would you go out first thing and rape a child, murder a stranger, or do cocaine? If the answer is no, you're in the majority, and the majority suppresses the minority no matter what. Most people believe in non-aggression, but the government is inherently violent, that's just a fact. Get rid of it, and get real. Pull you're head out of you're ass. I bet you you're already half-way there.

  • If you think government is necessary then you lack the ability to think for yourself.

    My opinion no type of government works. We might have a chance if we start thinking on a global scale. Very hard to accomplish though the entire wold needs to be on the same page...Check out The Venus Project-A new world system I found on YouTube... Hit the nail on the head

  • If you think government is necessary then you lack the ability to think for yourself.

    My opinion no type of government works. We might have a chance if we start thinking on a global scale. Very hard to accomplish though the entire wold needs to be on the same page...Check out The Venus Project-A new world system I found on YouTube... Hit the nail on the head

  • Government is by very definition immoral.

    First, we must define what a government is. A common definition of a government is "the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states; direction of the affairs of a state, community". From this definition we can see that the role of a government is to control a group of people.
    How does an organization, such as the government, control groups of people? One might say that a government could convince said people to do as they said through negotiations(mutual discussion and arrangement of the terms of a transaction or agreement) and peaceful contracts, but this would be a contradiction because at the point that negotiation is reached, no control is being exercised, because of the nature mutuality of negotiations, and thus the organization in question is no longer defined as a government.
    Thus the only way that a government can truly control a group of people is by coercion(force or the power to use force in gaining compliance). It is known almost universally by people and cultures throughout the history of the human race that the use of force to obtain ones goals is wrong. It is a moral absolute that coercion in any instance other than that of protection of ones self, property, or others selves or properties. One would not think it moral for a man to beat another man with a club because the other man did not sing him a song. Similarly, it is not moral for a government to fine, jail, or shoot a citizen because the citizen did not pay the government money or ingested a flora that the government did not happen to like.
    This brings up the argument that the purpose of a government is to protect the citizens, and therefore all associated violence is justified. However, this is simply not true. For violence to be justified in the name of defense, it must only be used in the process of protection and not as a means of impelling people innocent of any threat of harm to submit to the will of the user of the violence. One would not consider it moral if a man demanded that another man give him money to pay for a gun to protect himself, even if the man will also use the gun to protect the other man. It is not moral for a government to demand its citizens to give it money to pay for a military to protect itself, even if it promises to protect the citizens as well.
    This was only a short introduction to the reasoning behind the immorality and therefore unusefulness of a government.

  • People can cooperate with out the government

    I believe in very very very decentralized government. Government is useless if you do not get consent from ALL of your citizens. This is why if you must have a form of government it should just be your local neighborhoods rules and regulations. Even then coercion can be involved. It is best to just let people cooperate freely. People can cooperate and set rules up with each other when working together or living together. It is like playing on a soccer team. No one tells you that you CAN NOT score on your own team. No one tells you that you have to work with others as a team. But you do it anyways because you and your teammates feel that you all benefit. This shows that people can and will choose to cooperate and better their own lives in the process. We can also see this in the free market.

  • Targy targy targy

    Targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy targy


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Quan says2013-06-18T16:36:49.263
Limited government is necessary.