Homosexuality is wrong from since God created man to be with woman to the social world we have today. It makes natural law & nature unbalance to the government we have today. "One nation under god" the words straight out the pledge or allegiance. So Why is America changing so many things after back when the Deceleration of Independence was shaped around the Bible. And for the people who say "Oh the Bible is fake blah blah blah" Well then you have no faith at all in the man who created you. The Bible has been around thousands of years & has never changed & God has written 2 books, Genesis & The New Testament. You can't beat history.
Man and woman evolved to produce offspring to perpetuate the human race.
You can not produce a baby by shoving the male sexual member up the hole meant for the elimination of waste in another man or a woman for that matter. That practice is sick and disgusting. Two women can't produce babies by shoving objects up their female parts.
More diseases are transmitted by homosexuals.
Homosexuals received the wrong signals growing up as kids. It is not their fault that they are gay, but, that does not make it right.
But, if they want to be sexually abnormal in the privacy of their homes, so be it. But, they deserve no special right in our culture.
The question is, who's word are we going to take? If we take man's word, there is nothing wrong with gay couples. However, if we take a look at the Bible, we see that the Bible considers homosexuality a capital offense. In fact, God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah primarily BECAUSE they were unanimously homosexual. However, men are slow to learn morality that they don't agree with.
As an evolutionary strategy, homosexuality is a dead end. If we tried to pass laws that LGBT people were not allowed to breed there would be an uproar, yet the community has a low birth rate.
It is wrong according to Christian, Islamic and Jewish, Mormon, Bahá'í, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism morality. This covers more than 80% of the worlds population by faith group.
From a medical stand point, anal sex and the promiscuity that has historically been part of the LGBT community are a terrible idea.
I want to distinguish between actions and orientation / curiousity.
Only actions have medical consequences.
Only actions have evolutionary consequences (including inaction)
Only actions are judged wrong by these world religions (as far as I know)
Basically, being a gay or a lesbian means being against the nature. Nowadays, there are many homosexual couples. Even in America, gay couples are accepted to get a marriage in law. However, people have to know that it is just being against the nature. I think everyone have heard about what HIV(Human immunodeficiency virus) is. It’s a type of a disease which infects people through having sexual intercourse with a person who has HIV. There is no complete cure in current scientific technology for this disease yet. The possibility of human dying from HIV is really high. But what is the origin of HIV? There are two possible theories which can be answered for this question. The first one is that HIV is originated from human having a sexual intercourse with a monkey. The second one is a theory of gays having sexual intercourse. They showed people how being against the nature can be a cause of a serious disease. People should always do what they have to do and follow what they have to follow.
The headline may seem weird but the point that is important to put across here is that although many (or a few, I don't have exact statistics of the world) believe homosexuality to be wrong. Discrimination against the homosexual community is wrong as well.
Homosexuality is wrong in terms of evolution. They cannot reproduce as a couple. This inability to reproduce as a couple will in a sense label them as a dis- abled couple. Can homosexual people ever become heterosexual is a question still left to be answered?
As a Muslim (many will probably disregard my opinion now), it is believed that God warned the people of Lot to stop homosexual acts but they didn't listen. Does this mean that the people could become heterosexual or having homosexual urges was a life long test? Maybe homosexual acts are like smoking, hard to give up and the urge shall remain but the urge becomes weaker with everyday that passes.
I apologise for any offence caused.
We have evolved in such a way that a male and female mate and produce an offspring. Two men (or women) obviously can't do this. What most people don't understand is that homosexuality is worse then incest. Incest, although sick, supports reproduction and the endurance of life. Homosexuality, on the other hand, does not.
King James Version (KJV) says:
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. That should be point blank, anything other is immoral. Fact.
Homosexuality is wrong, and in many ways. It teaches people that unnatural attractions are a good thing, and that having more than 200 sex partners in your life time is a good thing. (On average, homosexuals have an average of 230 partners in their lifetime.) the reason I don't call it love is because these people can't control their sex drives enough to stay with one person their entire life.
It's a proven fact that homosexuals have a higher sex drive than heterosexuals, which leads to more disease because homosexuality produces aids, stds, and HIV, yet they claim they are "healthy". A homosexual person teaches people that you can go against nature and defy what what our bodies were intended for.
It's not like they shouldn't be given equal rights but it isn't right in it of itself.
O say can you see by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming,
Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there;
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines in the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner, O! Long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion,
A home and a country, should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
O thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war's desolation.
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the Heav'n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Homosexuals are normal people, just with different sexual desires. If two people in love and care for each other, that should be all that matters. Gender should not play a role in love. It should not be morally wrong. Being a homosexual is exactly like being an Atheist. Atheists have been discriminated, just for being different. Being different should not be wrong, since everyone is different.
The fact that this question even needs to be asked in this day and age, let alone that people answered Yes, makes me lose faith in humanity. Who on Earth does homosexuality affect other than the two consenting partners? Even if it were "morally" wrong, it still wouldn't be the business of anyone other than gay people, considering that it's a victimless sin.
Homosexuality cannot be considered morally wrong unless you strip the words 'morally wrong' of all meaningfulness. The basis for all our morality, whether we will admit to it or not, is the minimization of unnecessary pain and suffering in other sentient beings. Homosexuality harms nobody, it is between consenting adults, and it is simply love. To say that homosexuality is morally wrong is to say that love is morally wrong. It is simple bigotry to make that claim, nothing more.
Love is love, regardless as to whether or not it is between a two men or two women. Homosexuality does not harm anyone anymore that heterosexuality. It has proved itself worthy of being accepted into today's society, hence homosexual marriage in California. It is time to let go of the old times. The times when black people were slaves and gays were ill.
Love is love. No matter who you love. I cant stand hearing overly religious people say god hates gays. Please shut up and keep you bigotry to yourself. Its not the 1700s. Its 2013. We are all equal and loved in the Lord's eyes. If homosexuality is wrong then so is getting tattoos. Its says that in the Bible too. But nowhere in Gods words does he say that homosexuality is wrong.
Many animals are naturally gay. They have published a book about it. If we are gods children (Im an atheist) why did he make some of us against his accepted image of his child. Why are gay people gay if he created us and why cant he just get rid of them. Maybe because he is more man made then you think. He can kill me since im an atheist but he cant...Why? Because he doesn't exist so stop listening to every word he says and follow your own moral compass
Who gets to decide what's wrong and what's right? We're not God.
Besides,just because it's unusual,that doesn't make homosexuality wrong.Is it the fault of homosexuals,if they're born that way? Those who all believe in God,I ask them why did he make some people the way they are and then not even give them proper rights and equality?
Homosexuality is unusual. The thought of it makes many people feel uncomfortable and icky. But his does not mean it is morally wrong. Things that are clearly morally wrong, like murder, are things that harm other people. Even with more ambiguous things like drunkenness, the reason behind claims that drunkenness is immoral is that it causes people to lose control of themselves. Homosexuality neither harms people, or causes people to lose their self control. Therefore, it is not immoral.
Homosexuality is love. You love your own gender, what's the big deal? Half the planet's population loves men, and the other half loves women. I don't see why there would be an issue. A lot of religious people will try to bring religion in as an issue, particularly the Bible and Christianity. But you know what, the Bible also commands to kill children whose parents don't like them. There's not a competent way to criticize homosexuality.
First of all, asking if homosexuality is wrong means wrong as on a moral compass. Something moral doesn't harm anyone else. Homosexuality doesn't in any way harm others, even if it is abnormal. Just because something is abnormal doesn't mean it's wrong. Necrophilia violates sanctity of the dead. Zoophilia is unpleasant (understatement) for animals, and banging Fido is much farther away from someone still in the human species. Clothing is abnormal, as is 99% of human achievements. As for religion, it has no place telling people who they can and can't love. There is nothing more to say to the religious side of this issue.