Sdckbnd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d s s s s s s s s s sc c c c c c c c c c c c c c cc c c c c c
We would be selling weaponry to Turkey which would inevitably be used in a fight against our allies, the Kurdish people, in their fight to carve out a state for themselves. How could we, as Americans, sell out the lives of the largest minority group on earth with no national state for themselves when we claim to support them and their cause? If anything, we should be selling that weaponry to the Kurds at a discounted price because we see their cause as just and right to self-determine the future of their people.
It is an incredibly bad idea for the Pentagon to sell any weaponry to Turkey. History is replete with the example after example of the United States selling weapons to foreign countries, all a while falling into the wrong hands. Many times those weapons have been used against our own soldiers.
It's very clear that Turkey's current leader, Erdogan, is abusing his power and not allowing opposition voices to have their say in open debate. Part of the reason why the United States attracts so much animosity around the world is propping up governments that are openly abusing their own people. Turkey is curently in the process of doing that and selling them more weapons to oppress their populace will only garner more hatred of America by abused populations.
The Pentagon should be making money in more effective ways--e.g. sending weapons to people that we are very clear allies with. This is a much safer bet as our allies who have been established over history are less likely to use these weapons in ways that we can not forsee.
It is not a good idea for the Pentagon to sell over 600 million dollars in weaponry to Turkey because it would only be another step in further militarizing the Middle East. This move also reflects the US stand on the current Middle East crisis, it doesn't seem that the current crisis is going to come to an end very soon.