Amazon.com Widgets
  • It is okay

    If you don't kill them they could go out killing more people. Or lets say they go for jail for a bit then come back to get you again or kill more people. This is why i think its okay to murder someone in self-defence jf j b h h

  • Murderer IS acceptable only in self-defence

    In Esther, Naman convinces the King to issue a decree for the extermination of the Jews in his kingdom. Naman's hatred for one Jew, Mordechai; was the object of his wrath. Queen Esther petitions the King to reverse the decree and pleads for the life of her people. However, a decree could not be resended. So he issues another decree - telling the Jews they have the Kings permission to defend themselves and slay anyone attacking them. The Jews were adherents to The Law and very well knew the commandment, Thou shalt not kill. But we see there is a distiction made here. They understood that self defence was not in violation of God's Commandment, and they rejoiced at the decree, and even set'up the National Holiday of Purium. Jesus explains in the book of Matthew, that the ACT of murder is the fruit produced by an evil THOUGHT, which proceeds out of a wicked HEART. That is the distiction. Self preservation is an instict, that is God instilled.

  • Yes murder is ok

    If someone killed your family and you were told to leave would you really leave in the 18 or 1900 a police officers family were killed and he was told to leave he hunted all 15 members and killed all exept 2 one had died earlier the other so scared ran to the police

  • Yes absolutely get a weapon if you dont want to get killed

    I know it is legal! If anyone try to lets say brake in to your house as long as they are in your house you are allowed to kill them!

    Ps. Does anyone know if its legal to have a gun in tennessee im currently living in sweden but im movin

  • Yes absolutely get a weapon if you dont want to get killed

    I know it is legal! If anyone try to lets say brake in to your house as long as they are in your house you are allowed to kill them!

    Ps. Does anyone know if its legal to have a gun in tennessee im currently living in sweden but im movin

  • I say no

    Ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae killing people is ae ae bad ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae

  • I say no

    Ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae killing people is ae ae bad ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae

  • Bible says, self-defense is NOT murder.

    In Esther, Naman convinces the King to issue a decree for the extermination of the Jews in his kingdom. Naman's hatred for one Jew, Mordechai; was the object of his wrath. Queen Esther petitions the King to reverse the decree and pleads for the life of her people. However, a decree could not be resended. So he issues another decree - telling the Jews they have the Kings permission to defend themselves and slay anyone attacking them. The Jews were adherents to The Law and very well knew the commandment, Thou shalt not kill. But we see there is a distiction made here. They understood that self defence was not in violation of God's Commandment, and they rejoiced at the decree, and even set'up the National Holiday of Purium. Jesus explains in the book of Matthew, that the ACT of murder is the fruit produced by an evil THOUGHT, which proceeds out of a wicked HEART. That is the distiction. Self preservation is an instict, that is God instilled.

  • If the force used is reasonable.

    Of course its debatable, if excessive force is used which leads to the attacker dying then it is not acceptable. But if the amount of force used was necessary and it lead to manslaughter then the victim should not face prosecution.
    According to the UK law, if you kill someone under reasonable actions of self-defence then your are not breaching the Human Rights Convention.
    If your interested in this topic, I am doing a survey on it for a school project. Your opinions would be highly appreciated.
    Http://www.Smartsurvey.Co.Uk/s/3127I/

  • Your Own Murder Should Always Be Prevented

    Let's say you're being held at gunpoint. You're in a secluded area with the person trying to kill you, and you don't have a cell phone on you. The only thing you have is a knife. If it is the only way you can defend yourself, then murder if used in self-defense is definitely acceptable.

  • No, a person must not be able to commit murder in self defense.

    Murder cannot be acceptable if used in self defense because even police officers who risk their lives for the protection of the civilian population cannot commit murder in self defense depending on the situation, they may use self defense but they do not resort in killing the offender but they try to immobilize or pin them so they may not cause anymore injury to the officer or to themselves and take them to the court of law. Police officers are not given the authority to kill a offender even if in self defense but just the right to defend themselves. Police officers have the right training and knowledge of the vital points of the human body while a citizen may or may not, a 50-50 chance that the citizen can kill. For example a city in the united states where self defense is legal and the right to carry guns for their self defense,on one occasion a white man was walking and a black man was also walking behind the white man. The white man suspected the black man just because of his skin color and was shot to death. This shows that even by giving citizens power to protect themselves they just do not have the right mind to make valid decisions. And yes, is some cases murder can be committed in self defense but murder should not be allowed in self defense because the country has its own justice system which will be the one who will decide if the felon is going to be given the death sentence and then that will be the time where justice can really be served.

  • I say no

    Ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae killing people is ae ae bad ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae

  • Murder, in my opinion, must always be considered murder.

    I do not deny the right to self defense. It would be patently ridiculous to instruct a victim to accept their murderer's, thief's, or rapist's way without defending your personal sovereignty. But stealing away their life in this course of action is quite often unnecessary and always the very same as murder. It is a cold blooded act of revenge. Most criminals, in any case, place so much value upon their own life that a sort of cowardice will overtake them if presented with the threat of self defense. They would simply flee to seek an easier target. Even in the case of one who will not back down, there are always possibilities to disable or disarm rather than to kill. There is no justification for the violation of a sovereign human life, period. Fight back, yes, but for the love of god never ever kill.

  • Its still murder

    If you kill someone its still murder even if its out of self-defence its still murder if the judge lets you off becauce it was in self-defence you would have still killed some one and it will sit heavely on your consince so don't kill people instead only injure them


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.