Nick Griffin is not a good British National Party leader because of his checkered past. He often can anger people with his brash tactics, and has often been accused of crimes such as racial intolerance. Because of these transgressions, he is viewed as crass and gives a bad name to the entire party.
There is no such thing as a good British National Party. They're a group of completely unhinged lunatics, sort of a nakedly honest version of the American Tea Party, who seek to lead the United Kingdom backwards in time and intellect. Nick Griffin is an eloquent bigot, but that's about it.
The man is bankrupt. While right wingers do tend to be fiscally irresponsible, it does raise some doubt regarding his ability to lead the masses when his own affairs aren't quite in order. How can you lead others when everyone knows that you made a mess of things? How can you decry government help, (at least right wingers do in this country) and avail yourself of bankruptcy relief? It's hypocritical.
Nick Griffin is not a good British National Party leader. Well, for starters, he recently had to file for bankruptcy so that tells you that he is not good with his pocketbook. His ideals and decisions for a leader is not very good either. I do not think he is a good leader.
No, Nick Griffin is not a good British National Party leader, because he is not the leader that united the people together. Back in 1998, Griffin distributed material that was meant to be racially inciting. That is not the type of person that will lead the country in the right direction. He has some extreme thoughts, but he doesn't want to bring people together.