Amazon.com Widgets

Is nuclear energy needed as an alternative energy source?

  • It can be safe

    When generated from offshore floating platforms to prevent disastrous accident from occurring as in the Fukushima disaster caused by a 6.6 Mw earthquake. Floating platforms in the like of aircraft carriers can be used to supply energy to large cities. Being mobile they can avoid natural disaster such as earthquakes.

  • Nuclear Energy is needed

    Global Warming is a serious problem and fossil fuels are at the heart of it. It is far more powerful than hydro, solar and wind, the main renewables and even more efficient than fossil fuels. Also, you can't put a dam next to every city, the wind isn't always blowing (hell, it even has a back-up generator run by natural gas) and solar can't even compare. Not to mention that the materials that make solar panels and the batteries specifically related to it are toxic. Global Warming is a serious problem and fossil fuels are at the heart of it. It is far more powerful than hydro, solar and wind, the main renewables and even more efficient than fossil fuels. Also, you can't put a dam next to every city, the wind isn't always blowing (hell, it even has a back-up generator run by natural gas) and solar can't even compare. Not to mention that the materials that make solar panels and the batteries specifically related to it are toxic.

  • Nuclear energy is future of mankind

    Yes, I believe nuclear energy is needed as an alternative energy source.As Coal and fossil fuels are fastly running out resources and their price is increasing rapidly and almost monthly, and if we do not cut down on our consumption then very soon the earth will become dry and be stuck without electricity. So nuclear energy which is more efficient,more cheaper, more cleaner and is well available is the only way out to take world out of energy crisis and global weather realted phenomenon

  • Nuclear energy is future of mankind

    Yes, I believe nuclear energy is needed as an alternative energy source.As Coal and fossil fuels are fastly running out resources and their price is increasing rapidly and almost monthly, and if we do not cut down on our consumption then very soon the earth will become dry and be stuck without electricity. So nuclear energy which is more efficient,more cheaper, more cleaner and is well available is the only way out to take world out of energy crisis and global weather realted phenomenon

  • Nuclear energy is the only way to out do fossil fuels in a short amount of time.

    Global Warming is a serious problem and fossil fuels are at the heart of it. It is far more powerful than hydro, solar and wind, the main renewables and even more efficient than fossil fuels. Also, you can't put a dam next to every city, the wind isn't always blowing (hell, it even has a back-up generator run by natural gas) and solar can't even compare. Not to mention that the materials that make solar panels and the batteries specifically related to it are toxic. It's just not worth it. Getting rid of electricity or trying to lower carbon emmisions will never solve the problem. The human society gets bigger and bigger with a even bigger demand for energy, meaning more and more fossil fuels. If we are going to stop climat change, you have to stop the source and nuclear energy is the potential solution as a replacement to fossil fuels.

  • It is a cheap and clean source.

    Nuclear energy is, in my honest opinion, one of the future movers in energy. It is cheap, it is efficient and it is very clean. All these things are what we are currently looking for in an energy source. The only reason it is not pushed for more is because the connotation of the word nuclear is not very good.

  • Yes it is.

    I do think that nuclear energy is needed as an alternative energy source. It is fairly inexpensive and does virtually no damage to the environment. There is always a chance of a meltdown but that chance is very small. It is way better than using fossil fuels, which resources are running out.

  • Nuclear Energy Is Cleaner

    I believe nuclear energy is important because we need cleaner sources of energy. Since nuclear energy is predominantly cleaner and far more efficient I think it would benefit us more to use it, rather than not use it. While nuclear energy can be more dangerous if the plants aren't maintained properly, we should be responsible enough to use it properly and respect it for what it is.

  • Yes nuclear is needed

    Nuclear energy is needed as a alternative energy source because some of the renewable energy sources wont keep up because of the changes in the weather. Also coal we might not have enough in the future so nuclear energy is more reliable energy source. Also it could be bombed by terrists butt when does that happen. So nuclear energy is better

  • Yes, it is powerful.

    Yes, nuclear energy is needed as an alternative energy source, because nuclear energy produces a lot of energy. There is also very little waste, compared to oil. Nuclear energy produces more energy than coal, and much more than most of the green energies. It is an efficient way to make power.

  • Lol o lol

    Ol lo l ofk fod vn vix xin icn ifnvdx vhx fhusvn cbsfbsbxdvdsv sdv dsvd vcxvd vds vds vsd v sdvsdv ds vds vdsvd sdv s vd sd vds svdsv dsvsd v dsv vas c cxzvz xvxzsvsdvd v xzv zxv s xv vzxvdssxvdzxvds xcsa v xd vsd d d d d

  • No, we shouldn't use it.

    The nuclear energy we use creates waste and we actually cannot move it away for it is deadly to humans! There are so many other better options that are okay for the earth and we should use them step by step to create a better world. Not put waste to the world!

  • Nuclear Energy a Bad Idea

    Unfortunately, nuclear energy is a bad idea as far as alternative energy is concerned. Humans have shown a penchant for mismanagement of nuclear waste, which poses a huge environmental risk. We shouldn't take such risks because they're completely avoidable otherwise, and yet we still manage to mess things up today.

  • It is not.

    Nuclear energy is not needed as an alternative energy source. While we do need a new energy source, nuclear power is not the way to go because of the toxic waste that it produces, There are many better sources for energy out there such as solar power or hydroelectric power.

  • No - we still have enough alternatives

    We still have enough reasonable energy alternatives that nuclear energy should be a last-resort type of supply. With all the natural gas still untapped on our continent, we should be focusing on safer methods of powering our future. Nuclear plants cause anxiety and can lead to devastation far too easily if something goes wrong.

  • No nuclear energy is not needed as an alternative energy source

    There are many many other sources of energy much better for the environment and renewable at that that we could use for alternative energy, water and air among them. Nuclear power has already proven to have many problems, so why do we think it would be a good alternative energy source given that? It makes no sense. So no, nuclear energy is not needed as an alternative energy source, there are plenty of better options that exist.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.