Amazon.com Widgets

Is the Aryan invasion theory the best possible analysis for the spread of human civilization from Africa to the east?

  • Aryan Invasion Theory

    I personally think that the Aryan Invasion theory is one of the best possible analysis for the spread of the human civilization from Africa to the east because it would help a lot of people as well as bettering the community. I personally think that the Aryan Invasion theory is possible for the human civilization from Africa to the east which would help young children.

  • The best hypothesis

    Yes, I think that this theory is the best way of explaining how the human civilization spread from Africa to the east. It tells how the natives would have spread across the lands, and eventually spread across Africa and all the way to the east, and filling in the places along the way.

  • It isn't supported

    No Aryan invasion theory has ever been put forward to explain migration, and it is essentially a product of a Euro centric view of history in the 18th and 19th centuries. There has, in many places, been uninterrupted habitation within an area by a group of people according to the archeological record.

  • It is not the best.

    The Aryan invasion theory is not the best possible analysis for the spread of human civilization from Africa to the east. Most scientists now believe that all humans came from Africa which completely refutes the Aryan invasion theory. If all human came from Africa, there is no way for an invasion to take place.

  • Aryan Invasion Not Sound Theory

    The Aryan Invasion Theory doesn't really explain why human civilizations spread from Africa to the east. Such movement was better explained by natural migration and exploration above all else. WIth that in mind, many people like the Aryan Invasion Theory, but it's too simple to have any merit in today's world.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.