Amazon.com Widgets

Is the continued standardization of Office Open XML best left to private consortia and individuals who are familiar with it in general?

  • Yes it is.

    The continued standardization of Office Open XML is best left to private consortia and individuals who are familiar with it in general. This will make sure that it is not getting messed up by people who do not know what they are doing which will greatly improve the quality of Office Open XML.

  • Yes it is

    Yes, this is a good program that is in place by Office, and has been shown over and over to be a good program for people to use. It should be left to people only that know how to use it though, because it is very hard to figure out.

  • People are interested.

    Yes, the continued standardization of Office Open XML is best left to private consortia and individuals who are familiar with it in general, because the people who are working on open office are very invested in it. The people who work on open office are very interested in developing a good project, and they can be trusted with the project.

  • Yes, the continued standardization of Office Open XML should be left to those such as private consortias.

    I think that limiting the practice of the standardization of Office Open XML to private consortia and individuals who are familiar with it in general is the best course of action. I do not think it would be wise for others who are not familiar with the program to standardize Office Open XML.

  • Open Office is best left Open

    Having a program that is free to the public does not make it "open." The whole point of opensource is so everyone can pick it apart, put it together, improve, or remove the program to fit their needs. Making it exclusive to a group of developers ruins the entire premise of the genre. It also stunts the development process by limiting the pool of input.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.