The electoral process in the United States is about as far as it can possibly be. In some cases, we've even tried making it fairer than it has to be (supermajority needed to win in some jurisdictions, for example). The voices who usually complain about it being unfair are typically from minority parties who simply never would stand a chance in any election, ever.
The electoral process in the United States has served the country well for more than two hundred years. It gives more power to small states, which in turn makes sure that candidates will not simply campaign in big cities. This compromise between big and small states is essential for keeing the union together.
The electoral process in the United States is fair. For now, the voting process in the United States is as fair as it can be. If they start revising the voting process this may not be the case for long. There was some decision making based upon requiring voting patrons to show identification. Any law that changes the current process could hurt.
Although better than any other system,the electoral process in the United States can be seen as not being fair.The way the electoral process works,it actually favors the smaller states with lower populations instead of being a proportional system which could be seen as being a fairer way of doing things.
The whole process of having to have or garner loads of money in order to run for office in the first place is in itself unfair and leads to corruption and lies. Then there is the way balloting is done and how the electoral college works on the federal level. None of it is fair.