Amazon.com Widgets
  • Seek The Truth

    If a particular piece of work is utterly terrible, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever, criticism of that work need not be constructive to be valid. People can also read criticism and decide whether or not they agree with it to form their own opinion, irrespective of whether that criticism was constructive.

  • No that's wrong

    If nonconstructive criticism were valid no one would ever improve or want, I could just tell you that "you suck" or "did a lot of things wrong" what will you know what or how to improve if I don't tell you what the problem is? I'd argue that person needs to improve at constructing their criticisms.

  • Unconstructive criticism is not valid.

    Unconstructive criticism is not valid because it is just an insult. If no lesson can be learned and no improvements can be made from a piece of criticism, then there is no good reason to express it. Insulting people's work will only cause disputes and will make the goal harder to achieve in the end.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Adam2 says2013-12-18T04:43:10.353
I think it's BS
Adam2 says2013-12-18T04:43:17.730
It's just an excuse to be a douchebag.