Amazon.com Widgets
  • Guns save lives

    It can be the answer sometimes because in the past it has ended many situations the benefited many people, like the killing of Osama Bin Ladin. If they hadn´t killed him he would´ve killed many more people, because when they looked at the stuff he had he apparently was plotting to do more stuff

  • Well, it depends on the situation, really.

    Violence IS the answer if it's something like self defense or if your life is being threatened. If someone is making threats to you or if someone is trying to attack you, and you can't convince them otherwise, you're going to need violence to protect yourself. Otherwise, no. If it isn't in self defense, violence is unnecessary. If it IS in self defense, it IS necessary. It's a two way road, really.

  • Which is really right?

    I personally believe that violence should be avoided the best we possibly can. Violence can often lead to other issues that may occur in your life, and although it may feel good to land a few hits on someone you feel deserves it, it may create more issues than what you would expect. After all, would a fight be an attempt to resolve a problem than to create more? I understand the perspectives of those who believe that violence is the answer to an extent, sense most of the people who claim that it is the answer are speaking in a matter of self defense. Self defense is a different story, as you are protecting yourself from a fight that was caused by someone else. Violence can be avoided in numerous ways, as you may be able to resolve the issue as proper adults (Or whatever age you are, violence shouldn't be the answer) by talking about it person to person. If you truly think about which is right, then you may be at a stand still, as being violent can resolve the initial problem at hand but has a high probability at creating more, but not being violent may cause the issue at hand to continue for a longer period of time as the person may not attempt to negotiate. All and all, I believe violence should be avoided and settled with a less violent option.

  • Violence = Safe

    If you are violent you are more likely to not get beaten or tried to be messed with and even if you do get tempted to fight you won't just let them beat you up you will be able to fight back so you won't look like a fool or lose the fight badly. Violence makes it hard for people to try and mess with you or pick on you because they know you don't play like that

  • Think about it

    If you are over here getting jumped what would you do let them kill rob or rape you, will you call the cop sorry they stole your phone,if you fight then they have a chance of losing heck grab a pocket knife rock stick something like that,or you could try to talk and get beat up more

  • Vilance is awesome

    This is an argument about vilance witch is all ways the ancwer vilance is an act l,ike if a kid or adalt threatens to hit u hit back just let them hit u first then beat the fuck out of them ok let the bitch get owned like a wresteling match fuck them up

  • So it's ok to get punched in the face and not do anything

    I don't know about y'all but where I grow up there ain't no talkin if they hit you you get the permission to hit them back 10 times harder because if u tell them to stop the bully will then know that you won't do anything and they'll keep bullying you and I know what u will say"what if you get hurt" ive lost a fight before but the bully never messed with me again because bully's look for easy targets they won't fight someone who will fight back and take a chance at getting beat up

  • Nonviolence is Key Violence

    Should never be the answer. When someone is aggressive and violent towards you, the proper response is nonviolence. This is the only way to make sure you have the legal and moral upper hand. It also prevents any situations that may be escalated or that may turn into a vicious cycle of retaliation.

  • Violence is always the answer

    Most people say that violence cause more violence but by that logic the army and military shouldn't be created in the first place, while I can understand violence may not always work but it's a last ditch effort if someone trying to kill you what is your first reaction, hide, run, fight, call the police, or talk with them and try to make them stop but they won't stop until they kill you so the best one is fight or run then call the police.
    Because by that point they are dead, knocked out, or running far away from your house. So choose your pick, talking to a killer or trying to not die choose.
    Report Post

  • Violence is an answer but not always the best one

    Most people say that violence cause more violence but by that logic the army and military shouldn't be created in the first place, while I can understand violence may not always work but it's a last ditch effort if someone trying to kill you what is your first reaction, hide, run, fight, call the police, or talk with them and try to make them stop but they won't stop until they kill you so the best one is fight or run then call the police.
    Because by that point they are dead, knocked out, or running far away from your house. So choose your pick, talking to a killer or trying to not die choose.

  • Self defence IS NOT VIOLENCE

    Self defense is not violent. Violence is born from hate which is born from ignorance. One form of non violent self defwnse is agreeing to dissagree- and finding terms to live peacefully. When it comes to hitler and attackers- The answer is simple- It is not violence if it ends suffering-it is not violence if youare fighting to LIVE rather than gunning for something a smooth talker could attain in a paragraph.

  • Nonviolence is Key

    Violence should never be the answer. When someone is aggressive and violent towards you, the proper response is nonviolence. This is the only way to make sure you have the legal and moral upper hand. It also prevents any situations that may be escalated or that may turn into a vicious cycle of retaliation.

  • Uhhh, Boston Massacre?

    Protesting is O.K , it's peaceful as we know. But escalation and then the riots, and then the shoots fired unto the crowd which then is called "police brutality". Or did you remember the Boston Massacre in which the protesters reacted FIRST by throwing snowballs and sticks and what not to injure the British soldiers. Of course for an American Loyalist they were terrible, especially for the "massacre". But they protected their beings since a nonviolent stay still didn't work. Violence just causes more.

  • Violence is not the answer

    Everyone gets hurt with violence, not just physically but mentally. Being violent hurts you as a person, it just crushes your respect for yourself slowly. Yes, you might feel satisfied in the short term, but in the long term you will just regret ever having done anything violent. If you feel the need to settle a argument using your fists, then it just shows weakness and lack of control.

  • Violence is not the answer

    Violence is not the answer because fighting can get you in trouble ,it can start up more bigger thing also the people who say yes doesn't want peace in our would so, stop saying yes and start saying no! Because our world needs peace more than violence. So who's with me!!

  • Kmikhnuinxefnwnwfnwer g e er er

    Klfncwlknvwkgnwirgwrgwgwirjnverignriognfiuwrnnivjnwriugnweghneiowgjweiogjweifvjdsklvnckjvnwrigwrnctwrhnwe9c 3htrnc grg g g g g gg g g g g g g r r rr g etg et gr b rth rgb ry yh th et rg wt wf aeg eth eth afg af ae aer g wqe er g esrg set hse th weth str g g etg emkl;m;omo;

  • It is never the answer!!!

    I agree with the statement that violence is never the answer. I think this because firstly, people can easily get hurt. People getting hurt isn’t good news because it may cause difficulties for the victim for example, breaking ones’ limbs, producing scars or cuts on ones’ body etc. Secondly, I think that one of the causes of the conflict or fight may be something so little no one would know what the person was fussing around about. Thirdly, I think that violence is the product of anger and impulse. How you act represents yourself and if you are a nice to others’, people will think of you as a nice and loyal friend. On the other hand if you don’t think before you act, you wouldn’t end up with much friends, nor would people have a good impression on you. Nonetheless, I think that violence is not the appropriate solution to problems.

  • No gig jj

    No havoc hb f t g g h gig gvg. D d d did d d d f d d d d d d d d. The fact I can see it as be the first half of the day before I have to do with that one rr r

  • Violence can kill

    One punch can kill and you know it! Every punch we release has some dangerous consequences and we don't know what it is but we know that it is very bad. Violence is sometimes adapted from shows and movies and that's why we have to put more security in classification stuff

  • Violence is never an answer

    Fighting fire with fire only makes the problem worse and or worst, but if you are calm before you approach a problem that might involve violence, you'll act as a fire extinguisher and thus making the problem go lesser rather than increasing the heat. Violence is a one-sided method for one-sided minded people that all can do is to involve physical pain to solve their problem.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.