You want to know the truth? Very few terrorists are actually Muslim. In fact in America in 2013 you had a higher chance of being killed by a toddler than a Muslim. There Americans killed by Muslims and 5 by toddlers. So why do we think that all Muslims are terrorists? The Media. Of course whenever there is an Islamic terrorist attack, you're going to hear about it, but what about all the other terrorists attacks that we don't hear about? For more information go to: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/14/are-all-terrorists-muslims-it-s-not-even-close.html
Have you hear "Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims"? Well the truth is "All terrorists are Muslim, except the 99.6 percent that aren't."
You can read the article below, but just to summarize it, it's not that all terrorists are Muslim, it's that all the terrorists that are on the news are Muslim.
I'm going to copy the last paragraph of the article below. It says,"In fact in 2013, it was actually more likely Americans would be killed by a toddler than a terrorist. In that year, three Americans were killed in the Boston Marathon bombing. How many people did toddlers kill in 2013? Five, all by accidentally shooting a gun."
Okay, so here's the article:http://www.Thedailybeast.Com/articles/2015/01/14/are-all-terrorists-muslims-it-s-not-even-close.Html
I'm going to quote an article from The Daily Beast "However, and this will probably shock many, so you might want to take a breath: Overwhelmingly, those who have committed terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe aren’t Muslims. Let’s give that a moment to sink in.
Now, it’s not your fault if you aren’t aware of that fact. You can blame the media. (Yes, Sarah Palin and I actually agree on one thing: The mainstream media sucks.)
So here are some statistics for those interested. Let’s start with Europe. Want to guess what percent of the terrorist attacks there were committed by Muslims over the past five years? Wrong. That is, unless you said less than 2 percent."
Have you heard of these incidents? Probably not. But if Muslims had committed them do you think you our media would’ve covered it? No need to answer, that’s a rhetorical question.
Have you heard about the Buddhist terrorists? Well, extremist Buddhists have killed many Muslim civilians in Burma, and just a few months ago in Sri Lanka, some went on a violent rampage burning down Muslim homes and businesses and slaughtering four Muslims.
Or what about the (dare I mention them) Jewish terrorists? Per the 2013 State Department’s report on terrorism, there were 399 acts of terror committed by Israeli settlers in what are known as “price tag” attacks. These Jewish terrorists attacked Palestinian civilians causing physical injuries to 93 of them and also vandalized scores of mosques and Christian churches.
Back in the United States, the percentage of terror attacks committed by Muslims is almost as miniscule as in Europe. An FBI study looking at terrorism committed on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 found that 94 percent of the terror attacks were committed by non-Muslims. In actuality, 42 percent of terror attacks were carried out by Latino-related groups, followed by 24 percent perpetrated by extreme left-wing actors."
Anyway, I'm not going to copy the whole article, but the truth is it's not that all terrorists are Muslim, it's just that all the terrorists that get on the new are Muslim.
"But not all Muslims are terrorists!" Amber not terrorists but their religion is still very sexist and dehumanized women on virtually every page of the Koran, on top of the fact that Mohammed committed mass genocides and was a murderer, you could argue that this isn't any difference than Moses, Moses killed once, not guilty of a genocide and our entire belief isn't based on Moses, he's a side character and is commonly a example of what NOT to do, as opposed to the Koran which glorifies everything Mohammed did.