When you are a leader you have to face a lot of difficulties but an other thing is that difficulties make you strong. When we face difficulties the next time we become confident and we perform better. Followers don't even get a chance. So it is correct that it is better to be a leader than a follower.
Being a middle school child, I have learned that if you are a follower you don't always receive the respect you deserve. Followers are most often ignored. While being a leader you are recognized more often, and get most of the credit for everything, weather it be school, work, a project or even doing the chores. Over all I believe being a leader is best.
Being a leader lets you have the control. If you are just a follower you don't get any control over the decisions unless the leader says you can. While when you are the leader, you can control all the big decisions. Leaders get to make their own choices, while followers have to do what the leader says. That is why it is better to be a Leader (such as I) instead of a follower.
If you are just a follower you don't get any control over the decisions unless the leader says you can. While when you are the leader, you can control all the big decisions. Leaders get to make their own choices, while followers have to do what the leader says. That is why it is better to be a Leader (such as I) instead of a follower.
We leaders experience responsibility giving us power and benefit. We can lead our team to be more efficient. WE can have people work for us and we can feel the power. A follower has lower status than a leader. If the follower does not want to be leader who will lead?
To be a leader can give you a big challenge. When facing the challenge, you will try your best to handle the affairs as well as possible. In the process, you will constantly enhance yourself to adapt to different and complex long conditions. It also improve your total ability greatly.
It is possible to be a leader and a follower all at the same time. Haven't you heard of leading by example? By leading in the right direction, you encourage others to step up in leadership and as a whole, move others in the right direction.
It can also depend on the person. Some people are not suited for being a leader. However, being a leader lets you choose your own opinions and you're not risking following a corrupt, unintelligent, unethical leader or a leader that lacks common sense. Like I said before, it also may depend on the person. Someone can have great abilities as a leader and others may not.
When choosing to lead or follow it is a great idea to sit down and scrutinize your leader's way of commanding. If your leader's principles are corrupt, then you would not want to continue to follow them. At this point, it is better to be a leader than a follower.
When you are a leader, you can control everything and give commands acording to your thinking to other followers. You do what you want and you are not dependent on anyone but instead, the followers cannot do without you. You will get most of the appreciations and congratulations for the project you do. Overall, I say that a leader is much better than to be a follower.
Being a follower is more better as it will help us not to go on other track and there is a lot of risk in being a leader ... It will put a lot of pressure on you and maybe you'll go in depression so I suggest being a follower is better so live and let live ..
There is no harm in being a follower when you are being led by a good leader. Everything in life should go step by step so if you are a follower first and then a leader you will always benefit more. Plus every leader is a follower of his own values and principles. Thus no one can boast that he/she is a leader but not a follower.
It's not about being a leader, it's about being who you are. A leader has to take up too much of the responsibility and if something goes wrong it is the leader who is blamed. So isn't it obvious that being a follower is far better than being a bossy leader.
A leader always has tension and he has to attend the need concerns of his followers whereas a follower has no tension he always is calm he gives his suggestions and relax whereas a leader has to hear everybody's ideas implement them add subtract something and many more so I would always support a follower.
If there is already a capable leader in place, sometimes the most effective and responsible thing to do is to support that leader rather than trying to take over their role. If everybody tried to lead, civilizations would crumble and societies would break apart.
While some people possess skills that help them to perform in leadership roles more effectively than others, other people are the most productive as followers. Mostly, circumstances that call for anyone taking a role of leadership are more aptly described as ones reflecting a moral or social responsibility scenario than any other situation.
I think that sometimes it is better to be a leader and, other times, it is better to be a follower. Leaders make their own way, but, as a result, they are also more responsible, and put themselves at a greater risk than followers, should something go wrong.
Being a leader basically means you want others to become followers and let you guide them down their paths. I don't know about you, but I'd rather be my own leader and let the others decide what is best for them or what fits their life.
Not everybody can be a leader I mean what if they don't like to talk or they are very self cautious then the leader role wouldn't fit them. Some people don't deserve to be a leader because they would make bad decisions that could cause the followers to copy this behavior which therefor everyone gets in trouble.
What are you doing with your life why are you reading this you little piece of shit 24k magic in theeee aiiiirrrrrr so rockabye baby dont you cry im gonna rock you so baby please have mercy on me have some mercy on my heart mercyyyyy mercyyyy on my heart.