Amazon.com Widgets

Isn't Rainbow gravity theory obviously more rational then the big bang?

Asked by: Joemorris666
  • No responses have been submitted.
  • Both ideas are equally wrong.

    In this article, written by a LHC physicist, the case for "Rainbow Gravity" and the pseudo-science that was recently released by a misinformed few - are thoroughly debunked.
    Http://backreaction.Blogspot.Com/2015/03/no-lhc-will-not-make-contact-with.Html
    Which leaves us back at the "Big Bang", which, to quote MIT Professor Alan Guth, "Says absolutely nothing about the Big Bang, it doesn't tell us what banged, it doesn't tell why it banged, it doesn't tell us what caused the bang. It doesn't even allow us to describe the conditions after the bang."
    Few people seem to realize that the "Big Bang" does not describe the creation of the Universe, but rather an expansion of the Universe after some unknown event created it.
    Further, to save this theory, it has to be re-written almost every day. The latest version of the "Big Bang" requires the universe to consist of 96% undetectable matter and energy floating along in an infinite number of undetectable parallel universes, presumably hiding in undetectable alternate dimensions.
    As theory, after theory, after theory fails when tested, the only answer we come up with is - Let's just make up another theory that also defies Law of Physics and teach it as though it is proven fact until we are forced to save that theory with another undetectable force, matter or energy.
    How long can the boy cry wolf before you catch on?

  • Both theories are equally incorrect.

    In this article, written by a LHC physicist, the case for "Rainbow Gravity" and the pseudo-science that was recently released by a misinformed few, are thoroughly debunked.
    Http://backreaction.Blogspot.Com/2015/03/no-lhc-will-not-make-contact-with.Html
    Which leaves us back at the "Big Bang", which, to quote MIT Professor Alan Guth," It says absolutely nothing about the Big Bang, it doesn't tell us what banged, it doesn't tell why it banged, it doesn't tell us what caused the bang. It doesn't even allow us to describe the conditions after the bang."
    Few people seem to realize that the "Big Bang" does not describe the creation of the Universe, but rather an expansion of the Universe after some unknown event created it.
    Further, to save this theory, it has to be re-written almost every day. The latest version of the "Big Bang" requires the universe to consist of 96% undetectable matter and energy floating along in an infinite number of undetectable parallel universes, presumably hiding in undetectable alternate dimensions.
    As theory, after theory, after theory fails when tested, the only answer we come up with is - Let's just make up another theory that also defies Law of Physics and teach it as though it is proven fact until we are forced to save that theory with another undetectable force, matter or energy.
    How long can the boy cry wolf before you catch on?


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.