Amazon.com Widgets

Michael Jackson's family responded to child-porn allegations. Do you think these reports should be made public in light of Jackson's death?

  • Yes, the reports should be made public to help put to rest some controversy.

    Michael Jackson was the subject of a great deal of suspicion and controversy regarding child pornography during his lifetime, and even in the years since his death. His family's response to those accusations may help put some of that controversy to rest, for better or for worse, so that we may all move on and perhaps people can gain some closure.

  • Yes, the reports should be made public

    Because child pornography is an illegal activity, I think it would be prudent for any reports surrounding the allegations concerning Michael Jackson should be made public, but perhaps, with any children's names redacted. As most crime reports are available to the general public, these reports should not be held to a different standard.

  • No, reports about child-porn should not be made public considering Michael Jackson's death

    No, reports about child-porn should not be made public considering Michael Jackson's death. These are bad allegations that Michael Jackson cannot defend himself against because he is dead. It is not fair to bring up claims like this after a person is dead unless there is %100 certainty about the allegations.

  • Let the man rest in peace

    It is so ridiculous that we are still talking about this and the family is being forced to respond. It's just sad. Michael was never found guilty of any of the allegations and being accused may have hastened his death. He was already mentally fragile and those allegations sent him over the edge. He went from being revered to being reviled. It was all just too much for him. At this point let him rest in peace.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.