Amazon.com Widgets

Nobel laureates call on Greenpeace to stop opposing GMOs: Should Greenpeace support GMOs?

  • All tool are required to feed the world sustainably.

    This is a desperate call to human intelligence, done by the world's most renowned scientists, looking for the resolution of one of the most transcendent challenges humans have never faced before, feed the world sustainably. Certainly, the actual GMO technologies may not be the best, but at demonizing knowledge and technology in the XXI century sounds really primitive and closes the door to use genetic engineering to advance and improve nowdays solutions, as has been done by the same technology in medicine and industry.

  • All tools are required to feed the world sustainably.

    This is a desperate call to human intelligence, done by the world's most renowned scientists, looking for the resolution of one of the most transcendent challenges humans have never faced before, feed the world sustainably. Certainly, the actual GMO technologies may not be the best, but at demonizing knowledge and technology in the XXI century sounds really primitive and closes the door to use genetic engineering to advance and improve nowdays solutions, as has been done by the same technology in medicine and industry.

  • There is nothing bad about them

    The idea of GMOs being dangerous or risky has been disproven by a multitude of researchers. No evidence has been found yet to prove that they are harmful. Of course, there are no long-term studies yet, as the idea of GMOs is relatively new, but short-term studies have revealed perfectly safe results. Greenpeace needs to get on board and stop opposing and causing a fuss.

  • No, Greenpeace shouldn't support GMOs.

    No, Greenpeace shouldn't support GMOs. GMOs are considered unsafe in many countries, and they are definitely not as healthy as organic fruit and vegetables. This environmental organization is doing the right thing opposing genetically modified organisms. Why do we need to change something that is already okay just the way it is? Greenpeace should not support GMOs.

  • No, Greenpeace is looking out for humnkind by speaking out against GMOs.

    No, Greenpeace should not support GMOs. There is no benefit of GMOs. Greenpeace is doing what they can to promote health and even safety to those that sometimes unsuspectingly consume GMOs. That Nobel laureates are speaking out against Greenpeace is confusing. They should promote that which Greenpeace is working toward by educating people. It gives a negative connotation that Nobel laureates want to stop Greenpeace. Do they have something to hide? Greenpeace has a right to oppose GMOs, and we should be thankful that they are.

  • No, Greenpeace should not support GMOs.

    Many have concerns about eating GMOs: foods that were genetically engineered in a lab. A lot of health and dietary experts believe that genetically modified foods are not as healthy as organic food. Therefore, Greenpeace should not support GMOs. There are enough health concerns surrounding GMOs that require the public to be warned about their risks. Greenpeace has a right to warn consumers about GMOs.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.