Non-Interventionism vs. Interventionism, which one is better? Well, in my opinion Interventionism is better in most cases and it depends on the circumstance. For instance, when the US intervened in World War II, the world benefited in the long run a lot more. Interventionism is better when used in a manner that will help people more than it does damage.
it's truly sad that it has to be this, but non interventionism is better. Off the top of my head I cant think of a time our country has gotten on the bad side of another country for not getting involved in something. We're always running to the "aide" of another country when we can hardly stand in our own and that's a problem