Lol bye 100
I dont really even know what this means but there is 100 percent against the argument so im gonna change that bang bang gucci mane rofl lol lmao haha twenty words 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
No, it serves a valid purpose.
No, a death penalty moratorium should not be implemented, because the death penalty should be an option for law enforcement in certain situations. The burden of proof for the death penalty should be raised, to make sure that it is not abused. But where a person has taken another life, and society is sure, they might pay with their life in a just society.
No, the appeals process provides sufficient delay in execution.
When a death sentence is handed down, there is a lengthy appeal process that will occur, with the chance that the sentence will be overturned. No moratorium is necessary. Once the sentence is handed down, there will be sufficient time spent fighting the decision to ensure the proper verdict was reached.