Hopefully they could evolve without the barbaric Islamist culture this time. Every one of these middle east countries is filled with these backwards people. My worry would be that a lot of the worst people are already amongst us in the western cities. It would be best to send these people back to their home country before nuking commences.
I place American lives higher than Muslim lives they took the fight to us by bombing civilians. If our positions were reversed they would not hesitate to blow us away. FACT: 90 percent of Muslims support suicide bombings. I say the crusaders had it right the first time, if only those brave knights had the arsenal we had today!
The people living in the Middle East are all religious freaks hell bent on destruction, terror and oppression. The Middle East is a breeding ground for terrorist organisations that then turn on the west and continually cause death and destruction all in the name of religion. They are slowly infiltrating and changing the world as we know it.
Incest, pedophilia, murder of men, women, and children, and radical fudementalism are rampant in the Middle East region. In order for humanity to advance, these brainwashed lunatics should be wiped out. Any innocent non radicals should escape as soon as possible. A majority of them are savage followers of the pedophile Mohammed
Hahaha, funny to see you fools fumbling about how terrible the middle easterners are while sat in your well heated houses with clean drinking water and plenty of food. You live in a sheltered world and don't seem to realize that the middle east has it much worse than you.
You seem to forget that the whole hatred of the western world is rooted in the crusading, marauding west that helped twist the middle east into the hell hole it is today. Stupid capitalists.
To be honest, I hope that the US decides that nuking the middle east is a good idea. Then you can nuke Syria and realise you made a big mistake because you nuked Russia's ally, so 500 IBCMs head your way and end you ignorant fools.
Yes, maybe it means the end of the world above the Brandt line, but we never really deserved life anyway did we?
Anyway, you can nuke the middle east and give up your humanity and die as a result in a nuclear inferno or you can be grateful for your life and try to deal with a problem rather than wiping it out.
I know you will all choose the latter. Stupid Americans.
No matter who we help they will use everything we've given them against us. They have infiltrated like roaches and people are turning and helping them. It may be God's plan anyway. Sounds like the description in Revelation. I don't want violence, I want peace, but THEY provoked first and we have to defend what's left of a good America. It's nice that people want to save them all but haven't all of us seen that they are sneaky psychotic snakes? And it's not for religion, they seem to need a hobby like professional sports. God help us all.
The Victorian art critic John Ruskin once said that you could measure the health of a civilization by its architecture. ....Thats a nice bullet riddled mud-hut youve got there Hussein! Personally speaking, I don't wish to see the Middle East nuked because, - before transmogrifying into the fascistic women-oppressing bullies they generally are these days - they really did have some brilliant architecture and world class cultural input. As of now, under the guidance of Mohammed - that illiterate cave dwelling pedophile - they have no culture at all; that is unless you count the totalitarianism that permeates everything, whilst invariably infecting the imaginations of the young and the innocent. As Christopher Hitchen's rightly pointed out: if Allah or any other monotheistic deity were utterly perfect in their designing of the earth and its inhabitants, why the need for circumcision? Isn't that really saying: "god, you're a lousy designer and you got some bits wrong"? What confounds me the most, however, is why Britain is bending over backwards for these war mongering fascists (women and children excluded). Is it post colonial guilt? ...Is it because the Nazis and their far-right ideologies have fused 'the allies' into a permanent state of leftist turns? Keep turning left and you are back where you started. All I'd say is we should not suppress our rage as our own hard fought civilisation is just taken from under us. Fundamentally, our government has committed treason on its population on an industrial scale. That is, the BBC seem to have become the ministry of morality - albeit terribly misguided - and essentially they inform you and me, and they prescribe their murky vision of utopia onto all of us. Don't buy it! The new liberal, for instance, who cares so little about his children's heritage and future, will quite happily tar those with a valid concern as to their cultural genocide as a racist and a bigot. Has anyone seem Dimbleby and his biased Question Time show? Its a total disgrace and a gob in the face of real democracy. I suppose my point being is, the problem isn't solely with Islam and the Middle East; the problem is as much our own corrupt, self-interested politicians who couldn't give a rats ass (to borrow a great American expression) about you, your family, your future, your lineage and heritage, and all the components that have been forged over millennia which connect you to your roots, the land, culture and, ultimately, your humanity.
I lived over there for 3 years, mostly desert, there is nothing to lose. The people that live there, mostly good, some bad, easily manipulated. People follow who ever has the most guns. The religion is based on different versions of the Koran, then subject to interpretation. I would nuke the desert part where there is no historical locations. All along the Iraq, Saudi, Jordan, Syria, and Turkish borders. If not nuke, use bigger bombs, and a lot of them.
Or blowing up a house because you have a couple of rats living in it. The point is, you will be killing hundreds of millions of people who aren't even religious radicals or let alone active terrorist, but are ordinary people who try to go about their daily lives without being executed or bombed because they're living in hell.
There is no way to avoid collateral damage with a cowardly enemy who hides behind women and children, even using them as human bombs to do their killing. The only solution is to wipe out entire concentrations of ISIS militants, even if it means some innocents will die along with them.
No, America should not nuke the Middle East, because the Middle Eastern countries have not done anything provoking enough to warrant it. America needs to be strong in its defense of Israel, and defend Israel's right to exist. But our reactions to conflicts in the Middle East should be defensive, rather than aggressive.
There is no reason for anybody to nuke anybody else, no matter how much they rub you the wrong way, especially in this day and age. An act of nuclear war by on country could lead to a global issue.
Most importantly, think of the people involved. They are people, living, breathing people, with feelings, emotions, hopes and dreams. Nuking them would not be the solution.
That question is analogous to what the Nazis said about the Jews. I am sure most of Americans are frustrated by the problems in Middle East. As much as we want them to die, they also want us to die too.
Let say we can successfully nuke Middle East, does that solve all of our problems? No. If we actually nuked them, then all the other countries will try to eliminate us, like what the Allies did to Germany in WWII. Also, given within US we are divided anyway, so there will be a civil war before we would even be able to push the button to send the warhead over the Middle East.
No. They are not savages, they are not mindless beasts. They are PEOPLE. A few people have turned to terrorism so you just decide to blow them all up. What kind of sick people are you. That's like saying lets bomb all of America because they have the Westboro Baptist Church, Or lets blow up a school because one kid attacked a teacher.
Not only is nuking the Middle East an act of hostility and in-humaneness, using nuclear weapons will create dozens of environmental and biological problems, not to mention the obvious massive political problem at stake.
Our planet Earth is already in a hostile enough position without a full-out war breaking out and nuclear energy being wasted away.
I'm hoping this is a joke. I understand the frustrations and there being a lot of dangerous groups in that part of the world but the answer to "should ____ nuke ____" is no regardless of who fills in the blanks. The Pandora's box that would open up is one that this world would never recover from.
The use of nuclear weapons has severe repercussions to the international world and a strike on the OIL rich area of the world would result in war that would simply end civilization. Nuclear weapons were only ever used once and the effects has convinced many policy makers that its not worth the cost. We only live on one planet, so nuclear radiation from one weapons will have a rebound on America just the same.
Einstein once said that Technology is like an axe in the hands of a madman. He also said that nuclear weapons were his worst nightmare come true. Now if the worlds arguably most brilliant man said this, Why would we again make a mistake that destroyed the lives of millions in Japan? Nuclear weapons are nether the answer or the solution to ANY problem. Yes there's a horrific level of conflict in the middle east. Yes their beliefs and way of thinking in terms of human rights is centuries behind the rest of the world but it's only a minority that is the problem. The majority of people want what we want. To be free. Take a good hard look at Egypt and the Arab spring. MILLIONS of people are uprising against sharia law. Against autocratic dictators and trying to crush the corruption these people created.
So in short. No. Nuclear weapons will not solve anything. It would just lead to a Genocide of a people that are enslaved by a few people and a very corrupt religion: Sharia Law.
The Middle Eastern terrorists (eg. Al Qaeda) were funded by the CIA, to destabilize the Middle Eastern region. With that being said, 9/11 was an Inside Job which was a tactic to make the gullible citizens to vote war against the wrong countries who had nothing to do with 9/11, that is Iraq. Yes, we lost 3,000+ innocent Americans during 9/11, but Afghanistan lost 100,000+ innocent middle easterns, and I do not think this is fair for them at all. I am not trying to be unpatriotic because I love our country and based on what it was upon, but I do not agree with our governments foreign policy, and we have destroyed and killed millions of people in that region. I am a fair person and do not like it when things are unbalanced and unfair, and with that being said, in my God honest opinion, I believe that we (America) deserve more 9/11s.
Only two nuclear weapons have ever been used in warfare, and it should really stay that way. Use of a nuclear weapon has drastic impact that would almost certainly kill countless innocents, and might invite reprisal from other countries armed with nuclear weapons, which could shortly lead to the end of all intelligent life on earth.