Amazon.com Widgets
  • In my opinion. Specific animal testing is nessessary.

    I do agree animal testing for cosmetics is horrible. For Medical purposes i do agree that it will benefit man and animal kind. Where do you think the meds for our pets and other animals come from? How did they know if it works if they dont do animal testing?

    As bad as this sounds, sacrificing a few hundred animals to save the lives of thousands maybe tens of thousands of animals.

    I do agree tho that some testing should be conducted on the filth of this world like horrible criminals, rapist pedophiles etc.

  • Save the Human Population

    If you see because of an experiment it is murder. Do you really want that scientists to get in trouble for YOUR death. Yes I know it is sad. But... Maybe we could use false chromosomes to test it. I still say yes, but we can't let humans die. If you didn't know, the war has been going on and humans are being killed as we speak. We can't do this any more. We need animals to be tested. Just certain kinds. Rats produce more the twenty babies every other day. We need animals for experiments.

  • It helps animals too

    It is very evil but it helps animals as much as it helps us and would you rather them then us. If you had yo chose between a person or 100 rats which would you pick? It doesn't even harm the enviorment either the animals where breaded in labs and even animals benifit from animal testing.

  • Yes, but only in necessary circumstances.

    When animal testing is used for things that are frivolous such as cosmetics or are used for medical reasons that could be accomplished in other ways but would need more money or time, then there should be no animal testing. For necessary research that would save human lives, perhaps that is fine.

  • Animal Testing Is Beneficial

    I believe animal testing should be allowed. Testing animals affords us the chance to test product, before testing them on other humans. This adds an additional line of safety to ensure that humans are safe with the introduction of new medicines and products. Without the animal testing, we would have to test directly on humans.

  • Necessary Evil to Save Humans

    Animal experimentation is a necessary evil to make human life better in today's contemporary society. Yes, it harms mammals. Yes, thousands of mice, rabbits, cats and dogs are probably hurt each year doing so. However, humanity should come first in this case. Animal experimentation is just as cruel as the millions of abandoned pets each year dropped off at shelters to be euthanized--those pets didn't do anything to deserve that life. Solve the homeless pet problem before we solve animal testing. Better yet, let's solve homeless and hungry humans first before we fix animal testing.

  • Yes it is right

    I would rather have a little animal die than have a human being, animals aren't gonna be the ones to develop stuff like technology . However I would still feel bad for the Animal is it still has feelings and it can still get hurt , it would be better than killing humans though

  • Yes it is right

    I would rather have a little animal die than have a human being, animals aren't gonna be the ones to develop stuff like technology . However I would still feel bad for the Animal is it still has feelings and it can still get hurt , it would be better than killing humans though

  • Its necessary to sacrifice there lives for ours and other animals.

    Animal experimentation on hair products and use like that is 100% wrong. But we need them for creating medicine. Would you rather have 10,000 humans die or 5,000 animals to die. In my opinion, human experimentation should be legal. You could get volunteers or use death row inmates and exchange experimentation for their lives. The drugs we make don't only go for humans but animals too. Humans aren't doing it to be cruel, you cant gain anything without losing something. Equivalent exchange is a big factor here and we are sacrificing thousands of lives to save millions. If you were to say no to this before the vaccinations were made, you might not have even been alive. Family members and pets could be dead if it weren't for the medicine we make. Animal experimentation has increased the average lifespan of a human by 20 years. Do you really want to get rid of that?

  • Yes, of course

    We should be able to test on animals because without them we would not have the medicine that we have know to save some know. What if you were a sick person and the only way to cure you is to use something from an animal, but it was illegal, then you would die.

  • Animals have feelings

    It does not benefit the animals it only benefits people. The animal did not choose to die or suffer it was forced to. It hurt the animal. What if you were forced to die or suffer in pain because you were tested on and it did not go so good. Animals have feelings just like us and it is not nice to do that to animals

  • Animals have feelings

    It does not benefit the animals it only benefits people. The animal did not choose to die or suffer it was forced to. It hurt the animal. What if you were forced to die or suffer in pain because you were tested on and it did not go so good. Animals have feelings just like us and it is not nice to do that to animals

  • Animals have feelings

    It does not benefit the animals it only benefits people. The animal did not choose to die or suffer it was forced to. It hurt the animal. What if you were forced to die or suffer in pain because you were tested on and it did not go so good. Animals have feelings just like us and it is not nice to do that to animals

  • Animals have feelings

    It does not benefit the animals it only benefits people. The animal did not choose to die or suffer it was forced to. It hurt the animal. What if you were forced to die or suffer in pain because you were tested on and it did not go so good. Animals have feelings just like us and it is not nice to do that to animals

  • Animal's are just as important as humans.

    Animal testing is cruel.Not all experiment's go right anyway and the animal ends up just getting hurt. How would you feel if you were imprisoned and they were planning to test on you?All life is part of God's creation and he wouldn't create something if if didn't have a purpose.

  • Animal testing is so cruel and should not be allowed

    Animals can experience pain just like us and because they have no voice, they can’t just say “no” to being tested on so they have to go through with it no matter what. This is why animal testing is cruel and should not be allowed. Plus, animal testing is not completely reliable. You can’t trust a product just because it’s been tested on an animal.

  • Animal testing no matter scientifically benifits us, is inhumain.

    Would God want us to perform cruel experiments on the earths creatures? Animals are not ours. How can people live with themselves? Its wrong. How about peopel research alittle about what Gods precious creatures have to go through before often being killed by a broken neck. They can feel everything.

  • Animal testing doesn't even help other animal's or plant's. It just help's people.

    All animal's are part of God's creation. He wouldn't have created them if they didn't have a purpose. They are useful for other thing's other than looking pretty and being used for experiment's. They are all different and unique and they probably don't want to give themselves up just to save a few of their friend's.

  • Is so bad for the animal

    Is bad for the animal and you can kill the animal and has medicine,and is not fair...
    Again you can say is good but is bad because the animals they can have a lot of enfermedades...
    And then a lot of people protect and they try to don’t do it more

  • Is so bad for the animal

    Is bad for the animal and you can kill the animal and has medicine,and is not fair...
    Again you can say is good but is bad because the animals they can have a lot of enfermedades...
    And then a lot of people protect and they try to don’t do it more


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.