Amazon.com Widgets
  • It is important that we help everyone

    Our world is one giant community, if part of it is in need of help then will have to help, even if it is only a little bit. If it is possible to help and allow homeless people into a shelter when why isn't it allowed to take a refugee into a shelter?

  • Treat others how you would like to be treated

    How would you like it if you were in need of help and everyone refused to do so, and in fact treated you like a piece of dirt on their shoe? It wouldn't be nice, would it? So, it basically comes down to the simple phrase - treat others how you would like to be treated.

  • Not Until They Can Improve Vetting

    Fact is, current vetting processes have failed in Europe, and have allowed dangerous extremists to enter the continent. Until Europe can figure out how to properly vet them, they should not be accepting more. Just look at all the sex crimes and terrorist attacks that have been committed by improperly vetted refugees.

  • Britain is a sovereign nation

    The government has one responsibility and that is to look out for the best interests of the British people. So why would it allow a foreign people who obviously have a difficult time assimilating into its borders? Better question - why would these people of such a different culture flee to a country thousands of miles away where they will be ostracized by language, belief system, customs, etc? Why would they not flee hundreds of miles to a neighboring country where they will fit in? I think we all know the answer if we're being honest.

  • Have you seen Europe

    Germany took in many refugees, and look at what happened to them. They have police with guns everywhere, and they have Islamist terrorists everywhere. And they had so many terrorists attacks in 2017 alone. I think don't take them in. They want to take over western civilization. It's not woman and children coming it's men that want to kill citizens

  • Simply no. It will cause economic and civil issues — especially if they are from theocracy and supreme ruler styled government

    The people we speak of are not kurds, they are people who are stuck in the dark ages. And they should try and fight for their country considering most are men. We should also take in the fact that we’ve been at odds with their sultans and supreme leaders since the invention of that ideology. So to ignore the fact that they are mortal enemies is more foolish than accepting a trojan horse: for their intentions are rather clear and history transparant enough to identify their anti-freedom ideology.

  • Not right now

    If they were doing well, refugees in Europe have shown that they are bad for the economy, when they should be contribuing to it by getting jobs and living as Europeans, until the current ones demonstrate they can help the countries that are receiving them.
    Of course there are refugees working but stats demonstrate this is the "minority".

  • Great Britain should not take more refugees.

    If you look at what happened to Germany? Germany takes in too many refugees and they have so many more problems like terrorist attacks. Also if you take in refugees it is hard to teach them what your countries values if their from an African country or a Communist country.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.