Amazon.com Widgets
  • Horrible pieces of junk .

    Well first off the most obvious reason is that cars are really really really harmful to our world through vehicles emitting large amounts of pollutants. The earth is our home and our provider, we lived without cars before why can't we repeat that. Accidents are caused and lives are lost each year precious lives. Back before the cars invention people use to walk on the streets; imagine all that space could be put into good use. I feel like city/metropolitan area would be better off using public transport. Maybe not banning all vehicles immediately but in the distant future it would be a great decision.

  • No and never

    TRAVELLING BY CAR IS COMFORTABLE,BUT IT DAMAGE THE CYCLE OF NATURE .IF WE ARE TRAVELLING BY CARS IT WILL CAUSE SERIOUS DAMAGE TO NATURE.USING PUBLIC TRANSPORT LIKE BUS ,TRAINS ARE GOOD FOR LONG DISTANCES.CYCLING IS BEST FOR SHORT DISTANCES IT IS VERY NICE FOR OUR HEALTH AND ALSO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Use public transport and save the earth!!

  • Ban cars or else

    Ban cars because they emit things that arent healthy then people get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog, and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma. BOOOO HOO

  • We have the technology to have a pollution free world, but something must be done about it!

    We don't need cars (and taxis) ! We have electric trains, electric and hydrogen buses, bicycles, and our own legs, which don't pollute the air (assuming the electricity comes from renewable sources), to replace cars that run on unsustainable fossil fuels and produce dirty, unhealthy, toxic gases. We could also replace taxis with cycle rickshaws. Cycling also helps people keep fit and healthy.

    In a future without cars, in a rural area you could walk, cycle, or book a cycle rickshaw online to your nearest bus or regional train stop, where you would continue your onward journey by bus/regional train, then walk, cycle, or get a cycle rickshaw to your final destination, and in a urban area you could cycle/walk across the city, catch a cycle rickshaw, or get a city bus/train to wherever you are going.

    For journeys outside your local area/city, you could get to your local area/city central train station by a mode of transport listed above, catch an electric intercity train, then reach your final destination by transit mode listed above. All electricity could come from renewable sources – hydroelectric, wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, wave, biomass, ect.

    If we want to completely stop global warming and climate change then we have to get rid of everything that produces toxic emissions, everywhere.

  • Cars are a huge participant in the apocalypse

    Have you ever done research on global warming? You should 57% of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is from cars. The most likely world apocalypse is global warming. Unless we find the technology to rip gases out of our atmosphere, its not a matter of if, its a matter of when the world will end due to climate change and our atmosphere destroys our world and cooks us all alive. I'm 16 years old, if i have this much knowledge about this, than adults who say no it shouldn't be banned are just selfish and idiotic. Human nature is to not plan ahead and just live in the moment. This is because we are use to paradise and we don't think anything will happen to us because we are the dominant species and have no natural predators. Its time for us to plan ahead and think about our children. Do you want them to be cooked alive in our own world? There are so many reasons as to why cars should be banned. I guarantee you that people won't listen to me and nobody will do anything until its to late, it almost already is. Do we really need cars? Do we really need paper? THE ANSWER IS NO!

  • Cars do more harm than good to the society

    They pollute our planet all the time, destroying our beautiful planet,
    People lose their lives (one has only One life and that is it) when they have a severe accident
    They cost too much money
    Often there is only 1 person sitting in the care, so the car is not used optimally
    And there are other ways to spend your free time. Do some sports, play some music, see some friends. You can always take public transport - or a bike. Cars are not everything, are they.
    Yes, your trip might take a little longer at some points, but you are possibly saved from an accident and thus given some years of healthy life.
    Humanity could do without cars all the way to 1930.
    So why wouldn't we do without? We have got the most advanced public transport of all ages, better than in 1930. We can do it. And we should.

  • It would pretty much solve every problem

    Stopping the use of cars for personal use would save the world and have health benefits as previously mentioned. But would also increase a sense of community, stop the need to cover the land in concrete and reduce wars. I think cars would still be needed for some businesses and delivery of produce etc.But the main advantage is that the billions of dollars pumped into roads each year could be redirected to free and more public transport for everyone.

  • It does more harm than good.

    Think about it. What are the benefits of cars? Going faster and can transport heavy things. But the cost of that is:
    -Pollution
    -Traffic
    -Accidents
    -Obesity
    -It's expensive (car, gas, insurance, reparations)

    We gain much more as a society by walking and using transportations ONLY in emergency cases. If we start walking again, many countries would be healthy again, and people will have much more resistance (I have a frail body, yet I manage to walk long distances for long periods of time in summer because I've trained myself to. Most people would do better than me). Public transportation could stay for emergencies, but be more common and less expensive, and preferably be a train. Aside for public services, private companies who transport heavy stuff could use transportation, but only them. Families must not be allowed to use cars.

  • Absolutely it is polluting

    I really don't see why we need cars. They pollute the environment, and they are bad for the polar bears, who are dwindling in population at only 20~25K now.

    Please, for goodness sakes, have some common sense and be smart to saving the environment
    We have our legs, bicycles, and horses for a reason that we can use to get around and lose weight.

  • Street clutter and parking

    If you live in most residential areas in the UK you’ll understand just how difficult it is to park a car. If you are a pedestrian, you’ll know the ease by which you can walk the street when the drivers are at work in contrast to the difficulty you’ll have navigating the same streets when the cars litter every metre of road, kurb and pavement. Our quality of live would be vastly improved if there were a quarter the number of cars.

  • Cars are such a crucial part of our society taking them away will obstruct many things

    Cars are the safest, most comfortable and efficient way of transport, I need to wait for a bus or train to come, then wait for my stop, while probably standing for 30 mins, what about transport from city to city, 5+ hour drives, cars are so crucial taking them away is an obscene idea which should never be agreed to, plus have you heard of Tesla, Renault Zoe, BMW i8 and i3? These cars range from the cheapest to the most expensive and they're all electric, which is saving the environment, and most of them have advancements in safety like lane assist, stoping tailgating etc. The excuse that we should use buses is downright stupid, if we ban cars, buses will become more mainstream, they are old, low safety, high emitting vehicles which aren't comfortable to travel in which brings us back to square one when we had the same problem as you "apparently" have with cars. Trains don't reach every area in a city and what if I just wanted to visit a friends house where the bus or train does not go, what pain will that cause walk maybe 10 odd km just for that, there are more plausible options than to ban cars and i seriously think we should consider them.

  • Cars are such a crucial part of our society taking them away will obstruct many things

    Cars are the safest, most comfortable and efficient way of transport, I need to wait for a bus or train to come, then wait for my stop, while probably standing for 30 mins, what about transport from city to city, 5+ hour drives, cars are so crucial taking them away is an obscene idea which should never be agreed to, plus have you heard of Tesla, Renault Zoe, BMW i8 and i3? These cars range from the cheapest to the most expensive and they're all electric, which is saving the environment, and most of them have advancements in safety like lane assist, stoping tailgating etc. The excuse that we should use buses is downright stupid, if we ban cars, buses will become more mainstream, they are old, low safety, high emitting vehicles which aren't comfortable to travel in which brings us back to square one when we had the same problem as you "apparently" have with cars. Trains don't reach every area in a city and what if I just wanted to visit a friends house where the bus or train does not go, what pain will that cause walk maybe 10 odd km just for that, there are more plausible options than to ban cars and i seriously think we should consider them.

  • I ove them V8, v12 etc. engines!

    They are just too great! Why not, after all car lovers are dead, but we will pass it on, so that may take a long time. Also cars are practical, private,no ones going to assault you, and if you drive safely, no accidents will happen, so there Mr Environmentally Friendly Man!

  • Cars help us get around

    Have you ever heard of electric cars? Also, if they ban cars, the the united states will collapse. Cars are in america's history, for example, nascar. It's not just for america. Imagine going from one place to another that's miles apart from each other on foot. Also, you can't just fly because that's too expensive. Also, boats are too slow.

  • Don't ruin it for the rest of us.

    Electric cars exist, we can compromise and ban internal combustion for the public roads. Honestly, EVERYONE THINKS CARS ARE POLLUTING!!! It is almost like you are ignoring the hard work of people who build electric or bio fuel powered vehicles. Basically, anything that exists, has existed or ever will exist will negatively impact the environment somehow.

  • Poor reasoning against cars

    You assume cars are polluting...

    Ever heard of Tesla, they are electric and highly desirable.

    The only reason we do not use public transport is because they will never be as simple, easy to use and comfortable as a car.

    Ban internal combustion for non racing purposes if we need to, I agree that compromises must be made, but we can use electricity or ethanol. The non enthusiasts can slowly depress themselves in a stinky bus, while the rest of us car people shall use our cars.

    If you do not like something, don't ruin it for the rest of us.

  • Not until i die

    Why?? Are there any better alternatives?

    Buses are cramped in order to fit more people, meaning the spread of diseases and harmful chemicals at record pace. Privacy shall be an outdated idea. Buses are unsafe and have poor safety standards, lacking full curtain, footwell and frontal airbags. They basically do not have crumple zones, so your idea of cars causing too much death will not end with buses, as ghe amount of accidents with buses will be low, but more deadly. They are slow, wallowing and very uncomfortable. Their engine note can never match a F-Type, and they are hideous evil machines.

    Bicycles-No safety equipment, no airbags, basically just walking but while sitting down. Why would you pay money to walk while sitting down?

    Trains-Like buses, but you cannot go anywhere.

    Monorails-Like trains, except they are cool.

    Maglevs- Like monorails, but also cool.

    Walking- what next? Why would we go back to the stone age?

    I have nothing against electric cars, but not everyone can afford a tesla, which is still the cheapest DESIRABLE electric car, so wait a bit then ban the internal combustion gases.

    Use biofuel.



    See, cars are not that bad, and as for the crashes, just increase safety standards, light up the highways better and educate the public.

    I have no reason to live without the existance of the automobile.


    All hail the lords Enzo, Christian, Ettore, Ferrucio, Bruce and Henry.


    And a couple of other people

  • NO Never should they be bannned

    Im a car enthusiast so I would wanna die if I couldnt drive cars anymore. I just love the feel of the open road. And think of all theings people can do with cars such as offroadin. Road trips. Racing. And lastly even just transportation.. Yeah good luck biking your way from L.A. To San Fransisco or farther such as from state to state

  • No No No

    If cars get banned everyone is going to using public transport and bikes which make it even harder to get around unless you get more people to make more of these and their really expensive it easier for everyone just to have a car to get around It may pollute the environment and kill people but to fix that we invest in safer cars

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.