Amazon.com Widgets
  • Horrible pieces of junk .

    Well first off the most obvious reason is that cars are really really really harmful to our world through vehicles emitting large amounts of pollutants. The earth is our home and our provider, we lived without cars before why can't we repeat that. Accidents are caused and lives are lost each year precious lives. Back before the cars invention people use to walk on the streets; imagine all that space could be put into good use. I feel like city/metropolitan area would be better off using public transport. Maybe not banning all vehicles immediately but in the distant future it would be a great decision.

  • No and never

    TRAVELLING BY CAR IS COMFORTABLE,BUT IT DAMAGE THE CYCLE OF NATURE .IF WE ARE TRAVELLING BY CARS IT WILL CAUSE SERIOUS DAMAGE TO NATURE.USING PUBLIC TRANSPORT LIKE BUS ,TRAINS ARE GOOD FOR LONG DISTANCES.CYCLING IS BEST FOR SHORT DISTANCES IT IS VERY NICE FOR OUR HEALTH AND ALSO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Use public transport and save the earth!!

  • Ban cars or else

    Ban cars because they emit things that arent healthy then people get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog, and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma. BOOOO HOO

  • We have the technology to have a pollution free world, but something must be done about it!

    We don't need cars (and taxis) ! We have electric trains, electric and hydrogen buses, bicycles, and our own legs, which don't pollute the air (assuming the electricity comes from renewable sources), to replace cars that run on unsustainable fossil fuels and produce dirty, unhealthy, toxic gases. We could also replace taxis with cycle rickshaws. Cycling also helps people keep fit and healthy.

    In a future without cars, in a rural area you could walk, cycle, or book a cycle rickshaw online to your nearest bus or regional train stop, where you would continue your onward journey by bus/regional train, then walk, cycle, or get a cycle rickshaw to your final destination, and in a urban area you could cycle/walk across the city, catch a cycle rickshaw, or get a city bus/train to wherever you are going.

    For journeys outside your local area/city, you could get to your local area/city central train station by a mode of transport listed above, catch an electric intercity train, then reach your final destination by transit mode listed above. All electricity could come from renewable sources – hydroelectric, wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, wave, biomass, ect.

    If we want to completely stop global warming and climate change then we have to get rid of everything that produces toxic emissions, everywhere.

  • Cars are a huge participant in the apocalypse

    Have you ever done research on global warming? You should 57% of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is from cars. The most likely world apocalypse is global warming. Unless we find the technology to rip gases out of our atmosphere, its not a matter of if, its a matter of when the world will end due to climate change and our atmosphere destroys our world and cooks us all alive. I'm 16 years old, if i have this much knowledge about this, than adults who say no it shouldn't be banned are just selfish and idiotic. Human nature is to not plan ahead and just live in the moment. This is because we are use to paradise and we don't think anything will happen to us because we are the dominant species and have no natural predators. Its time for us to plan ahead and think about our children. Do you want them to be cooked alive in our own world? There are so many reasons as to why cars should be banned. I guarantee you that people won't listen to me and nobody will do anything until its to late, it almost already is. Do we really need cars? Do we really need paper? THE ANSWER IS NO!

  • Yes and No

    We should ban cars because they are making cities suffer from serious air and noise pollution and endless traffic jams because of these cars. I also say no because we need it to travel when we are going somewhere really far. So i say we should have cars but only use it when we need it not when we want it if that makes sense.

  • Health . .

    If you exercise 5 times a day for 30 minutes you could live longer by 3.4 years. If you exercise for 10 minutes you could live longer by 1.8 . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . / . . .

  • Unsafe and polluting

    Cars kill over a million people every year, and injure many more. They produce air pollution which harms the planet. Even electric cars produce air pollution indirectly - energy used to charge the batteries comes mostly from coal power plants. Production of car batteries on its own produces massive amounts of pollution. Switching from a functional non electric car to a new electric car produces more pollution than continuing to use the non electric car. Cars also generate noise and space pollution, their infrastructure (roads, car parks etc.) take up over 50% of the area of cities. Cars themself are space and throughput inefficient, needing around twice the space that pedestrians or cyclist would need. Cars (as opposed to walking or cycling) contribute to obesity levels in the population, decreasing the overall health in the population and increasing the amount of resources needed for healthcare. The average commute distance in Europe is 18 kilometres, and takes 30 minutes by car. The same distance can be covered in 40 minutes on a bicycle. The small increase in transport time is minimal considering all the benefits.

  • Pollution for the roads

    Most of the cities in Britain are becoming way too polluted, and no one is getting as much exercise as they should have. By at least changing your car to electric or to go walking somewhere instead of using the car, we could make a massive difference to the air in this country, and we would probably all live a longer and healthier life.

  • 1.3million people die every year

    This is the number of people that die from cars every year directly but whats the point of having practical cars or as a hobby if the earth is polluted and destroyed! There are way more alternatives like walking, public transport, cycling and more. Don't be lazy and never get a car

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • Cars are the bet so we can get to places we need to get to.

    So if you need to get to work or some job inerview so that is why car are able to get to places we need or really need to get to so we do not need to walk and tack a very long and hard time to some weir importamt.

  • No, We Should Keep Cars

    Cars are very convenient tools that we need in every day life, without them I don't even know how we would get around. Sure we could use public transportation, but there aren't enough buses to carry 7 billion people. And if you think the solution is to build more buses, think again. We would just be better off in the first place with cars. Secondly, there aren't many bus stops so we will still have to take a bus and then walk a long way. What if the place you want to go to doesn't have a bus stop near it? If we ban cars the world will end.

    Posted by: JLi
  • They are the primary use of transportation in many countries

    About 1.3 million people dies a year on averge in the us but if you chop that down into days than about hundreds of people die each day and thats not a very safe amount you are way way way way more likely to die in a car accident than win the mega millions

  • They are the primary use of transportation in many countries

    About 1.3 million people dies a year on averge in the us but if you chop that down into days than about hundreds of people die each day and thats not a very safe amount you are way way way way more likely to die in a car accident than win the mega millions

  • They are the primary use of transportation in many countries

    About 1.3 million people dies a year on averge in the us but if you chop that down into days than about hundreds of people die each day and thats not a very safe amount you are way way way way more likely to die in a car accident than win the mega millions


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.