Amazon.com Widgets
  • Horrible pieces of junk .

    Well first off the most obvious reason is that cars are really really really harmful to our world through vehicles emitting large amounts of pollutants. The earth is our home and our provider, we lived without cars before why can't we repeat that. Accidents are caused and lives are lost each year precious lives. Back before the cars invention people use to walk on the streets; imagine all that space could be put into good use. I feel like city/metropolitan area would be better off using public transport. Maybe not banning all vehicles immediately but in the distant future it would be a great decision.

  • No and never

    TRAVELLING BY CAR IS COMFORTABLE,BUT IT DAMAGE THE CYCLE OF NATURE .IF WE ARE TRAVELLING BY CARS IT WILL CAUSE SERIOUS DAMAGE TO NATURE.USING PUBLIC TRANSPORT LIKE BUS ,TRAINS ARE GOOD FOR LONG DISTANCES.CYCLING IS BEST FOR SHORT DISTANCES IT IS VERY NICE FOR OUR HEALTH AND ALSO FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Use public transport and save the earth!!

  • Ban cars or else

    Ban cars because they emit things that arent healthy then people get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog, and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma because in china there is too much smog and smog rhymes with fog and also looks like fog but is bad for ur body and u can get asthma. BOOOO HOO

  • We have the technology to have a pollution free world, but something must be done about it!

    We don't need cars (and taxis) ! We have electric trains, electric and hydrogen buses, bicycles, and our own legs, which don't pollute the air (assuming the electricity comes from renewable sources), to replace cars that run on unsustainable fossil fuels and produce dirty, unhealthy, toxic gases. We could also replace taxis with cycle rickshaws. Cycling also helps people keep fit and healthy.

    In a future without cars, in a rural area you could walk, cycle, or book a cycle rickshaw online to your nearest bus or regional train stop, where you would continue your onward journey by bus/regional train, then walk, cycle, or get a cycle rickshaw to your final destination, and in a urban area you could cycle/walk across the city, catch a cycle rickshaw, or get a city bus/train to wherever you are going.

    For journeys outside your local area/city, you could get to your local area/city central train station by a mode of transport listed above, catch an electric intercity train, then reach your final destination by transit mode listed above. All electricity could come from renewable sources – hydroelectric, wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, wave, biomass, ect.

    If we want to completely stop global warming and climate change then we have to get rid of everything that produces toxic emissions, everywhere.

  • Cars are a huge participant in the apocalypse

    Have you ever done research on global warming? You should 57% of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is from cars. The most likely world apocalypse is global warming. Unless we find the technology to rip gases out of our atmosphere, its not a matter of if, its a matter of when the world will end due to climate change and our atmosphere destroys our world and cooks us all alive. I'm 16 years old, if i have this much knowledge about this, than adults who say no it shouldn't be banned are just selfish and idiotic. Human nature is to not plan ahead and just live in the moment. This is because we are use to paradise and we don't think anything will happen to us because we are the dominant species and have no natural predators. Its time for us to plan ahead and think about our children. Do you want them to be cooked alive in our own world? There are so many reasons as to why cars should be banned. I guarantee you that people won't listen to me and nobody will do anything until its to late, it almost already is. Do we really need cars? Do we really need paper? THE ANSWER IS NO!

  • Cars Are Not The #1 polluter

    Cars have come a long way since they became a part of everyday life in the world. The fact is this "global warming" thing is just an excuse by people who don't realise they are the number one CO2 source. Emmissons from a 1970's car is far worse than todays cars and old cars make up such a small percentage of the fleet of cars that are in the present day that it dosn't even matter. To sum it up, ban idiots not cars

  • It is Better without cars

    I agree with this because we think our Life will be healthier & a bit more wealthier without a car, keeping in mind the benefits of running to catch- buses & offers that taxi providers like UBER are providing nowadays. During normal circumstances I run to catch buses, under emergencies i opt for Cabs. If your question is  what if Cars never existed then I bet nothing better could have happened to metro cities than this, It would have been traffic  & pollution free that would have left our life's much more healthier & stress free.

    Life without a car would be a
    1.Life with travelling and enjoying public transports.
    2.Life in which rising of petrol prices wont bother you.
    3.Life in which you love your bike.
    4.Life with the beauty of travelling in night with bike.
    5.Would be life in which helmet is an import important thing.
    6.Life in which there is no toll tax.
    7.Life in which traffic jam wont bother you much.
    8.Life which lacks music while travelling.
    9 .Life in which you have less issues for parking place

  • It is Better without cars

    I agree with this because we think our Life will be healthier & a bit more wealthier without a car, keeping in mind the benefits of running to catch- buses & offers that taxi providers like UBER are providing nowadays. During normal circumstances I run to catch buses, under emergencies i opt for Cabs. If your question is  what if Cars never existed then I bet nothing better could have happened to metro cities than this, It would have been traffic  & pollution free that would have left our life's much more healthier & stress free.

    Life without a car would be a
    1.Life with travelling and enjoying public transports.
    2.Life in which rising of petrol prices wont bother you.
    3.Life in which you love your bike.
    4.Life with the beauty of travelling in night with bike.
    5.Would be life in which helmet is an import important thing.
    6.Life in which there is no toll tax.
    7.Life in which traffic jam wont bother you much.
    8.Life which lacks music while travelling.
    9 .Life in which you have less issues for parking place

  • Yes We Should

    I agree with this because we think our Life will be healthier & a bit more wealthier without a car, keeping in mind the benefits of running to catch- buses & offers that taxi providers like UBER are providing nowadays. During normal circumstances I run to catch buses, under emergencies i opt for Cabs. If your question is  what if Cars never existed then I bet nothing better could have happened to metro cities than this, It would have been traffic  & pollution free that would have left our life's much more healthier & stress free.

    Life without a car would be a
    1.Life with travelling and enjoying public transports.
    2.Life in which rising of petrol prices wont bother you.
    3.Life in which you love your bike.
    4.Life with the beauty of travelling in night with bike.
    5.Would be life in which helmet is an import important thing.
    6.Life in which there is no toll tax.
    7.Life in which traffic jam wont bother you much.
    8.Life which lacks music while travelling.
    Ce .Life in which you have less issues for parking place

    Now you tell me, a heathier and happier lifestyle, isn't that what you want. A world with no pollution, no obesity, this would solve your problem, this would solve the world’s problems, imagine world were you can go outside and breath the beautiful fresh air, not worrying about world pollution. Although it would isolate us from other society however it will bring your society, just remember your grandparent talking about the good old days, why were they the good old days you ask? Because it was the days where society was together, were global warming wasn’t an issue, why don’t we make that our world today,

  • Whats the point and why

    Well realy whats the point n all you ever do is use it for stuff you want and probably what other people dont want people may argue that there are tesla model x out there and they run on electricity well i would argue that they cst slot of money and bicyle cost not alot of money and doesnt need elctricty or gas

  • Cars Are Not The #1 polluter

    Cars have come a long way since they became a part of everyday life in the world. The fact is this "global warming" thing is just an excuse by people who don't realise they are the number one CO2 source. Emmissons from a 1970's car is far worse than todays cars and old cars make up such a small percentage of the fleet of cars that are in the present day that it dosn't even matter. To sum it up, ban idiots not cars

  • Why do people jump to conclusions so quickly????

    Argument 1: Cars are polluting
    Answer: Electric vehicles do not pump a bit of Co2
    Argument 2: But most electricity is produced by coal plants and the such.
    Answer: So why don't we ban tvs, lightbulbs and other major parts of modern day society that we would literally die without?
    Argument 3: So uhh, what is so bad about public transport?
    Answer: It is highly inefficient for the working class citizen who does not have much time on their hands to get on a bus, wait 10 minutes, get on it, arrive 50 minutes later due to several stops and walk to work taking another 10 minutes, instead of hopping into a car to take 30 minutes straight away.
    Argument: Too many people die from car accidents!
    Answer: Yes, due to carelessness and often low awareness about the importance of a speed limit and safety tested car. In a country like India, where speed limits are ignored and everyone goes for the car with the biggest touchscreen instead of the most airbags, problems are bound to happen. A choice could be to install an electronic limiter, as cars are so wired up that this might really not be too difficult.
    Argument: Congestion will occur!
    Answer: Then upgrade public transport so that you can get anywhere anytime without compromise! There is no need to ban cars once people realise how efficient a system of trains and buses like these are in place. A day only has 24 hours after all, none of it can be wasted in today's world.
    Answer 2: If cars do get banned, I and hundreds of thousands of other loyal car fanatics will stage a coup to remove whoever decided that banning the lifeblood of our time is a good idea.


    If horses where banned in 1810, if steam trains were banned in 1890, if sails were banned in 1772, where would our world be today? Maybe later, preferably after I die so that I do not have to live in such a disgusting world, the world will be ready to move to something else. But not yet...

  • Cars are such a crucial part of our society taking them away will obstruct many things

    Cars are the safest, most comfortable and efficient way of transport, I need to wait for a bus or train to come, then wait for my stop, while probably standing for 30 mins, what about transport from city to city, 5+ hour drives, cars are so crucial taking them away is an obscene idea which should never be agreed to, plus have you heard of Tesla, Renault Zoe, BMW i8 and i3? These cars range from the cheapest to the most expensive and they're all electric, which is saving the environment, and most of them have advancements in safety like lane assist, stoping tailgating etc. The excuse that we should use buses is downright stupid, if we ban cars, buses will become more mainstream, they are old, low safety, high emitting vehicles which aren't comfortable to travel in which brings us back to square one when we had the same problem as you "apparently" have with cars. Trains don't reach every area in a city and what if I just wanted to visit a friends house where the bus or train does not go, what pain will that cause walk maybe 10 odd km just for that, there are more plausible options than to ban cars and i seriously think we should consider them.

  • Cars are such a crucial part of our society taking them away will obstruct many things

    Cars are the safest, most comfortable and efficient way of transport, I need to wait for a bus or train to come, then wait for my stop, while probably standing for 30 mins, what about transport from city to city, 5+ hour drives, cars are so crucial taking them away is an obscene idea which should never be agreed to, plus have you heard of Tesla, Renault Zoe, BMW i8 and i3? These cars range from the cheapest to the most expensive and they're all electric, which is saving the environment, and most of them have advancements in safety like lane assist, stoping tailgating etc. The excuse that we should use buses is downright stupid, if we ban cars, buses will become more mainstream, they are old, low safety, high emitting vehicles which aren't comfortable to travel in which brings us back to square one when we had the same problem as you "apparently" have with cars. Trains don't reach every area in a city and what if I just wanted to visit a friends house where the bus or train does not go, what pain will that cause walk maybe 10 odd km just for that, there are more plausible options than to ban cars and i seriously think we should consider them.

  • I ove them V8, v12 etc. engines!

    They are just too great! Why not, after all car lovers are dead, but we will pass it on, so that may take a long time. Also cars are practical, private,no ones going to assault you, and if you drive safely, no accidents will happen, so there Mr Environmentally Friendly Man!

  • Cars help us get around

    Have you ever heard of electric cars? Also, if they ban cars, the the united states will collapse. Cars are in america's history, for example, nascar. It's not just for america. Imagine going from one place to another that's miles apart from each other on foot. Also, you can't just fly because that's too expensive. Also, boats are too slow.

  • Don't ruin it for the rest of us.

    Electric cars exist, we can compromise and ban internal combustion for the public roads. Honestly, EVERYONE THINKS CARS ARE POLLUTING!!! It is almost like you are ignoring the hard work of people who build electric or bio fuel powered vehicles. Basically, anything that exists, has existed or ever will exist will negatively impact the environment somehow.

  • Poor reasoning against cars

    You assume cars are polluting...

    Ever heard of Tesla, they are electric and highly desirable.

    The only reason we do not use public transport is because they will never be as simple, easy to use and comfortable as a car.

    Ban internal combustion for non racing purposes if we need to, I agree that compromises must be made, but we can use electricity or ethanol. The non enthusiasts can slowly depress themselves in a stinky bus, while the rest of us car people shall use our cars.

    If you do not like something, don't ruin it for the rest of us.

  • Not until i die

    Why?? Are there any better alternatives?

    Buses are cramped in order to fit more people, meaning the spread of diseases and harmful chemicals at record pace. Privacy shall be an outdated idea. Buses are unsafe and have poor safety standards, lacking full curtain, footwell and frontal airbags. They basically do not have crumple zones, so your idea of cars causing too much death will not end with buses, as ghe amount of accidents with buses will be low, but more deadly. They are slow, wallowing and very uncomfortable. Their engine note can never match a F-Type, and they are hideous evil machines.

    Bicycles-No safety equipment, no airbags, basically just walking but while sitting down. Why would you pay money to walk while sitting down?

    Trains-Like buses, but you cannot go anywhere.

    Monorails-Like trains, except they are cool.

    Maglevs- Like monorails, but also cool.

    Walking- what next? Why would we go back to the stone age?

    I have nothing against electric cars, but not everyone can afford a tesla, which is still the cheapest DESIRABLE electric car, so wait a bit then ban the internal combustion gases.

    Use biofuel.



    See, cars are not that bad, and as for the crashes, just increase safety standards, light up the highways better and educate the public.

    I have no reason to live without the existance of the automobile.


    All hail the lords Enzo, Christian, Ettore, Ferrucio, Bruce and Henry.


    And a couple of other people

  • NO Never should they be bannned

    Im a car enthusiast so I would wanna die if I couldnt drive cars anymore. I just love the feel of the open road. And think of all theings people can do with cars such as offroadin. Road trips. Racing. And lastly even just transportation.. Yeah good luck biking your way from L.A. To San Fransisco or farther such as from state to state


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.