Amazon.com Widgets

Should children under 16 be allowed to play sports and risk injury

Asked by: packers
  • Shit fuck nigga

    Oh nigga. Fuck that shit. Fuck nigga yeah in the hood, loll d d d d d d d s s a s e a d a d s d sis sis sis s s s s s s f f f f f f f f f f f f f

  • Shit fuck nigga

    Oh nigga. Fuck that shit. Fuck nigga yeah in the hood, loll d d d d d d d s s a s e a d a d s d sis sis sis s s s s s s f f f f f f f f f f f f f

  • They definitley should

    Kids always have a choice to play. Kids know that they are taking a risk of being injured if they play. They don't have to play if they don't want to get hurt. So obviously kids are going to get hurt playing football and any other sport, but that is their choice and their risk they don't have to do it.

  • People have dreams under 16

    Yes, people love sports and love to watch them. With kids starting to play at such a high age of 16 they wouldn't be able to reach greatness until like 25-30,which is half of their sports career. Professional players worked from when they were little to achieve their dream. Young people want to achieve theirs too so let them.

  • Up to the parents

    Parents have to take the risk of letting their child play sports and getting injured. Parents also have to take into consideration that their child could die as a result from a big hit like in football. They should be allowed because the parents should always have to sign a release form

  • Some sports are dangerous.

    Is it worth the risk? Children that do sports, especially football, have a high risk of concussion. But it's up to adults. If they don't mind their child getting hurt or possibly dying then go right ahead. Parents also have to take into consideration that their child could die as a result from a big hit like in football. So should kids under 16 play football. No.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.