Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes i think so

    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.
    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.
    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.
    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.

  • Yes she should be

    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.

  • Yes she should be

    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.

  • Yes she should be

    Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government. Because it is illegal to do. There is security issue for using local servers that contain data from the government.

  • The problem is the content

    Yes, it seems the investigation into Clinton's email use should have resulted in charges against her. Her use of a private email server for confidential emails shows gross negligence and seems to fit the perimeters that FBI director Comey set out in his speech announcing the end of the investigation.

  • Yes, Clinton should have been charged for using a private email server.

    Even though the FBI could not find sufficient evidence to charge Hillary Clinton for using a private email server, she most likely did break some laws. Therefore, Clinton should be charged for using the serve while secretary of state. Other government officials have been prosecuted for mishandling classified information in a similar format to Clinton and her aides. Clinton is not above the law, and should face charges for her crimes.

  • She did not purposefully break the law

    Clinton probably made an error in judgement by using a private server, but I don't feel that it is punishable by law. She felt that her information was secure, and didn't act in any intentional way to break any laws. This is something that had been done previously without being addressed, so I imagine she and her aides felt that is was perfectly acceptable.

  • No, Clinton should not have been charged with using a private email server.

    Since this topic has been ruled on by a judge who has determined that she should not be criminally charged, then in my opinion there was not sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. The judge determined that criminal charges were not warranted for Clinton's use of the server and I would have to agree with the ruling.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.