Amazon.com Widgets

Should execution of the severely mentally ill or retarded be legal?

Asked by: Equality2447
  • Why would you do that?

    Before you do this, consider the fact that just because the are different than us, doesn't mean that they are worse or lower than us. After all, your parents gave you a chance didn't they? So give them one. Killing someone who is mentally handicapt is murder. They are living, breathing people just like YOU and just like me. So like i said, give them a chance.

  • These people are dangerous, if you had a appliance that was as potentially wouldn't you rid yourself of the danger?

    These people are potentially or have no life quality, for example with the shooting of new town conecticut were perpetrated by a man of severe mental compromise. If we had executed the new town shooter earlier he would not of usurped the life's of 28 children and several adults. People like him could of been stopped before they reached a boiling point. I'm a former nurse for those of extreme mental retardation and I did not feel this way until I worked with said severe mental retardates but many of my patients were imcampapble of basic motor activity and Layed on a mat miserable, plus there family's were heavily burden and twice a miserable paying the medical bills and caring for a person that was not capable of loving them back. These are not the easy decisions but they are the decisions that must be made to prevent future new town shooting and to liberate those of severe mental retardation from their earthly perils.

  • Because they're a drag

    Like the elderly they are nothing more than a drag on expenses, time, and efforts, at least the elderly actually have contributed something to society. They peoples poor genetic code should not be used as a gateway for "special treatment" or a way to gain sympathy. It is in our nature to improve and move forward, so why should we allow those with mental retardations the option to have a life for however long it may be?

  • When Population Control is Needed

    I realize there were many human beings that were mentally ill that made significant discoveries e.G Stephen Hawking. That is why there should be some test to show if a person could learn to the extent of contributing to society more than just giving love for people that care for them. If we think logically, the people that cross the line are just a burden on society. If we think emotionally, the people deserve to live because they can love. I side with logical thinking mainly because just being able to love and absolutely nothing else does not mean the person has absolute immunity from execution.
    If our society comes to the point where we need to start population control who is going to be the first to go? Third world countries, a different race, or the mentally ill. Today execution would not be legalized, but in the future when it becomes necessary people will be forced to see the logical side through. Some still might ask what if it never gets legalized even if its necessary? To that I would tell them that once it becomes a sense of survival between the mentally ill and the voter, humans (since we are rationalizing beings) will choose the side of logic. Because emotion will change from love to survival at the time of necessary population control. When that happens I'm sure the law will be passed.

  • They are Worthless?

    All humans are worthless, but the mentally incapable are even more so. The sinful, degenerate waste of the planet should be wiped clean.
    Just pulling your leg, what kind of sociopath would you have to be, to believe that they deserve to be euthanized? Do you euthanize your pets because they're not as smart? What good do pets provide to society as a whole? They provide the same value s mentally ill individuals, they love, the support, they learn and there's people who care about them. You cannot in good concience kill these innocent people! This doesn't just affect the target, or affects the people who love them, it would deviate them! How can you possibly justify this vile concensus?! I hope everyone who voted yes sincerely learns the fully of their ways and comes to reason and light. I'll be praying for you all.

  • They have no point in existence.

    They are against God's image. God never wanted imperfections. They also will never give back to society. They are a waste of our time, money, and education. Some people might say it would be more humane to leave them be and they are harmless, but these kinds of people are almost always the gunman at the school shooting, or the murderer of anyone. These people have no sense of right and wrong, so they will do anything, and you guys are saying we should just let them do that? Disgusting.

  • The retarded are an annoyance!

    The Special Education Department is robbing a large portion of schools' funding and said funding should have gone to extracurricular classes and to improve teachers' salaries! All my childhood, I was forced to sit next to them on a tiny bus smelling like a foul stench, at a classroom with the same foul stench, not to mention they drool, hang their mouths open, make unnecessarily excessively repetitive noises, and wanders off when not under adult supervision! I blame those who thought that the retarded should get more attention like Eunice Kennedy Shriver, founder of the Special Olympics. Who would want to see them play sports? So freakin' cringeworthy! Their attention span is shorter than a dirty mutt living in a junkyard! Kill All Retards I say, it's not like they can defend themselves since they can't speak in complete sentences or use even 1% of their peanut-sized brain!

  • There are Millons perhaps Billions of people with Mental insufficiency and its weighing down our society

    I have been working with people with disabilities for 5 years. Many of the people i have worked with have severe behavioural issues as well as hurt people. I know they don't understand what they are doing, but our world wont be able to support more people very soon. We dont have enough resources to be supporting people who are don't have any quality of life,

  • Yes yes yes

    Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes
    yes yes yes

  • We should terminate them.

    They are just a waste of our resources and they do nothing helpful to our society. Nowadays, we cant have freeloaders who do no work and get extra attention. It would be better for our society if we removed those genes completely. We would save on many resources that could be used elsewhere

  • Very nasty type of thinking

    Well, equality2447, what if the execution panel decided that the cut off point defining mental retardation is one point above your IQ? Or, let's say your mental illness all of a sudden fits in the "unfit" category. Maybe all adult males under five feet five inches in height would be considered severely handicapped. I'm sure there would be some displeased folks out there.

  • No I don't think so

    The mentally I'll often commit crimes with no knowledge at all that they are doing the wrong thing. There is no malice in their killings, they need treatment for their disease not death.

    Those who are mentally retarded do not have the full mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong.

  • Who would be the judge?

    Being mentally ill or retarded is not a crime. Why should they have to die at all? Because they might need help? That would be incredibly selfish. We are all human beings and deserving of respect. And who would decide who would be executed or not? Someone could claim anyone was too mentally ill to be alive just to get rid of that person. They could find a doctor(s) who could be paid off to say anything. I am extremely saddened to see the rate was 50% on both sides.

  • It is not fair to take away someone's right to life because they have a low IQ.

    We have advanced as a society to the point where we can now recognize prejudice as wrong. However, it seems that we can not yet always recognize prejudice when it appears.

    Any decent deonotological system of ethics will require human beings to care for those with disabilities. To not do so is barbaric and inhumane and flies in the face of nearly every system of morality known to man.

  • Not every mentally ill person, No mentally retarded people

    There's obviously going to be a few mentally unstable people out there that are dangerous. Does that nessecarily mean that all of them are dangerous? No. The most harm a mentally ill person can do to you is - Wait, never mind, mentally ill people can't harm you.

    TL;DR: , Unless you want to be a Rick Perry, it shouldn't be allowed.

  • They are Worthless?

    All humans are worthless, but the mentally incapable are even more so. The sinful, degenerate waste of the planet should be wiped clean.
    Just pulling your leg, what kind of sociopath would you have to be, to believe that they deserve to be euthanized? Do you euthanize your pets because they're not as smart? What good do pets provide to society as a whole? They provide the same value s mentally ill individuals, they love, the support, they learn and there's people who care about them. You cannot in good concience kill these innocent people! This doesn't just affect the target, or affects the people who love them, it would deviate them! How can you possibly justify this vile concensus?! I hope everyone who voted yes sincerely learns the fully of their ways and comes to reason and light. I'll be praying for you all.

  • What type of person would do that!

    I was in a special education class in 5th grade cause i had light autism and a short attention span, in seventh grade i was in a gym class and i was a partner with a special needs kid, Just because they have autism or ill does not mean we kill them

  • Mentally ill people don't deserve any kind of bad behaviour for them, especially execution. In any case

    We shouldn't kill leople who don't make a difference beetween good and bad. Those people deserve a mental institution not death. Even though it's cheaper, it's not right and it's not humane. And almost any serial murderer had a mental illnes. For example: Ted Bundy, Aileen Wuornos, many minors etc etc...

  • No, Why would you execute someone who isn't even aware that they'll be executed?!

    Yes, They struggle in life and Yes it would put them out of their misery, but think about it. Would you want to be executed for something that you weren't aware of doing wrong? Would you want to be executed because you couldn't understand the wrongs of your situation? Why execute them? We are ALL human beings! So what if they are mentally challenged! I've seen plenty of mentally challenged make it through life whether they are aware of it or not! Let them live. Give them a chance like we are given every day.

    It's truly disgusting that you would agree to this. What would you really gain in this world for executing someone who's not able to properly function? It's not their fault they were born like that! Imagine if that was your brother, sister, cousin, best friend. Would you want them executed for a mistake?

  • Completely Unconstitutional to execute those who do not understand the reality of their punishment.

    Mentally ill people do not always understand what they are doing wrong and some do not understand what they are being told even during trials. The Supreme Court held in Atkins v. Virginia that individuals with intellectual disabilities cannot be executed because they are categorically less culpable than other criminals. If a defendant was insane at the time of the crime, he or she can be found not guilty by reason of insanity. There have been several different cases where diagnosed schizophrenic people have been executed, even though they do not understand or show understanding of the trial or punishment.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.