Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes, freedom should be limited because there are somethings people should not do.

    Freedom to do anything without legal repercussions is a dangerous idea. Things like murder and assault should by all means be illegal and be met with a police force. Without laws people may do whatever they want if they think they can avoid the vengeance of their community. To protect people, freedom must be limited.

  • Only When Harm is Imminent

    Freedoms should only be taken from a man when his personal choices are almost certainly going to lead to the harm of an innocent person. Limiting freedoms is only acceptable if it is the lesser evil, as in needed to protect someone's well-being. Beyond that, the government or people have no right to step on liberty.

  • NO, Freedom shouldn't be limited

    People do dangerous things, but that doesn't means that they should have to be removed to its freedom., Out there are good people that fights against that and they are going to be affected too, i think and most of the people think that been removed from our freedom is a bad idea for a big reason that is our right to have freedom, freedom to do, say, and believe in what we are, think, and do.
    That is why our nation should be free to do the right thing, to become a strong and united Nation.

  • NO, Freedom shouldn't be limited

    People do dangerous things, but that doesn't means that they should have to be removed to its freedom., Out there are good people that fights against that and they are going to be affected too, i think and most of the people think that been removed from our freedom is a bad idea for a big reason that is our right to have freedom, freedom to do, say, and believe in what we are, think, and do.
    That is why our nation should be free to do the right thing, to become a strong and united Nation.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.