Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes, I don't see why not

    The idea that children need parents of the opposite sex is bullshit. Children simply need parents that will love them and care for them, regardless of what sex or gender they are. So yes, I argue that homosexual couples should be parents just like heterosexuals. It is usually because of heterosexual "parents" that the child they had together is adopted by a homosexual couple.

  • Well, why not?

    Please, enlighten me. If single mothers or fathers can do it, so can gay couples. Why is this even a question?
    People on the "no" side of the debate have said that it is not normal for children and will 'confuse them'. There is no such thing as a 'normal' couple. And why should it confuse children? If children are okay with straight couples, why not gay/lesbian couples? Honestly, what is the difference here?

  • Yes i do think that they should be parents.

    Because it teaches the kids that being different os OK AND THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE DIFFERENT does not mean that you should be discriminated against.And they tend to be more responsible parents. Gays and lesbians are just really nice in general. And those are my reasons that being a gay or lesbian parent is OK.

  • Everyone Can Be Happy Being Parents

    If gays and lesbians want to be parents, they have the right to do so just as much as anyone else. There's no law against being a mother or father in the United States. There are many options--in vitro fertilization, surrogacy and adoption. So long as the loving couple meets the same criteria as everyone else, there is nothing wrong with homosexuals having children.

  • They Should Have The Right

    I do not believe all gay and lesbian people should be parents, just as not all heterosexuals should be parents. There can be plethora of ideals and life issues that can lead a person to either not want children or maybe not be fit to have children. That really doesn't have anything to do with their sexual orientation. So yes, homosexuals should have the right to be parents, but that doesn't mean they all should be.

  • Yes if they qualify

    A home that is qualified to give a child love and support should never be denied no matter the sexual preference of the people. There are too many kids that don't get a fair share in life to be overly picky about sexual orientation. If the parents are qualified then they should be parents.

  • Yes they can be

    As long as people are in a long term and committed relationship, they should be able to adopt children. These children would be much better off with a loving couple, even if it's a different type of family, than if they were to stay in a group home or with a foster family.

  • This is like asking if a man and a woman can have kids

    I'm going to state it now, of course they can. There's no reason why they can't unless they abuse/mistreat their kid in anyway (which, in fact, this happens in a hetero relationship??). They're literally just people who want to be happy with their partner and want to start a family as long.

  • No human being should have the RIGHT to make that call for another human being

    I believe that if a person is healthy, capable, and in their right mind there is NO REASON they should not be able to experience being a parent. Whether they decide to have a child naturally, scientifically,or through adoption. A persons sexual preference does not dictate whether or not that person is going to be a good parent or bad parent. There are heterosexual people molesting, abusing, mistreating and killing kids everyday but yet and still they are given the opportunity to do so. I feel that unless a person has shown reason that they should not and cannot be fit to raise a child, then no one should have anything to say.

  • No, it confuses children.

    No, gays and lesbians should not be parents, because it confuses children about what normal is. Gays and lesbians can do other things. They do not have to raise kids. Kids do best in traditional homes. Sometimes, homosexual parents are better than nothing, but we should legislate for the ideal, which is two-parent homes.

  • If it can't happen naturally, it shouldn't happen.

    If something can't happen naturally, it is not meant to be. It is impossible for two parents of the same sex to create a child without doing some crazy stuff like in vetro fertilization. They can not naturally create a child by having sex with each other. Therefore, they should not be allowed to parent a child as if they created it together. Why force a child into something that could never happen naturally? If there is no alternative, OK, but there is. Children should be adopted by a man and a woman.

  • If it can't happen naturally, it should not be.

    If something can't happen naturally, it is not meant to be. It is impossible for two parents of the same sex to create a child without doing some crazy stuff like in vetro fertilization. They can not naturally create a child by having sex with each other. Therefore, they should not be allowed to parent a child as if they created it together. Why force a child into something that could never happen naturally? If there is no alternative, OK, but there is. Children should be adopted by a man and a woman.

  • Why Do Children Need To Subjected To This Madness

    Children should not have to suffer and be humiliated because they have 2 fathers or 2 mothers , and no people will not accept that gays and lesbians are different and frankly neither do I, and i say that because i has been proven that homosexuality can be healed, and if this sickness can be cured than i should be, but until that time comes, homosexuals must not raise children, can you imagine the humiliation of a child who is asked to bring his father to school has to go through, what can he say:"which One?" or "I don't Have A Father, But I Do Have 2 Mothers" he would be laughing stock, I don't understand how people even think about allowing these people to adopt children.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.