Amazon.com Widgets

Should Gays be Allowed to get Married by a Church?

Asked by: President_Vern
  • Of course gays should be allowed to get married in a church

    It really shouldn't matter whether you are or are not gay that you have a special privilege to get married somewhere specific. Aren't we as a world today trying to bring people together? So why shouldn't we allow gay people to get married in a church it shouldn't be different privileges for people who want to marry the same sex and those who don't

  • No to Legalised Discrimination

    If churches were exempt from having to marry anyone from the LGBT community, this would be a legalised form of discrimination. Just like restaurants were labelled as for whites or for coloured, it would be a similar situation. Also, in response to President_Vern, since the church and state are separate bodies, don't you also think that we shouldn't allow court-house marriages between heterosexual couples? There's a separation between church and state so why should, sometimes considered sacred, unions of couples be conducted in a government setting? Should religious couples not be allowed to have court-house marriages? The phrase "separation of church and state" itself does not appear in the US Constitution, either. Jefferson said it at the Supreme Court, so even if churches were not tax exempt, there wouldn't be an issue, because there's no explicit law stating that there's a genuine separation between church and state. The US Supreme Court has referenced the separation of church and state metaphor more than 25 times, though not always fully embracing the principle, saying "the metaphor itself is not a wholly accurate description of the practical aspects of the relationship that in fact exists between church and state".

  • This is iffy so I'm putting my answer on both sides.

    "Allowed" is such a confusing word. If you mean, "Should it be forced on the churches and the right of the people?": No. Definitely not. Separation of Church and State. However, if you mean, "If the Church says it's okay, should it be legal for them to marry?": Yes. Most definitely.

  • Of course they should be allowed.

    This does not mean that every church would necessarily be forced to perform gay marriages (any more than they should be forced to sing or not during church services, for example), but as far as it being allowable for gay people to be married in a church - most definitely.

    I think it's too bad that the prejudices of a relatively few people, far back in time , still has such an impact. It's taken a long time, but change has come, surprisingly fast once the movement started in earnest, in my opinion.

  • If the priest performing the ceremony is comfortable with it.

    Rights, and the protection of them, has to go both ways. LGBT people should have the right to marry whoever they want, but religious figures should also have the right to refuse to do something they don't want to.

    As long as a religious figure isn't preaching hate or homophobia, they should be able to reserve the right to politely decline performing an LGBT wedding.

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • Simple answer: YES

    The general answer is yes, gays SHOULD be allowed to get marred by a church. However, gays SHOULD NOT require a church to marry them. If a couple desires to have a church wedding, it will be their job to find a church that condones homosexuality. Because of their religious freedoms, no CHURCH should be forced to marry someone (not just homosexual) they do not want to marry. However, other wedding venues should not be allowed to deny homosexuals unless they have the same tax exemptions the church has.

  • In our government we have separation of Church and State.

    In the U.S, the Church and the Government are separate bodies. Government cannot make any law pertaining to the Church, and the a Church has no power in Government. Because of this, it is ultimately the Church's decision as to whether or not a homosexual may be married. Just today, same-sex was legalized on a federal level. Is it possible that religion could become the next target? Share you opinions below, let's get a debate fired up.

  • Its unconstitutional !

    Marriage is defined by the church between a man and a woman... Not two men or two women. Now because of the liberal agenda gay marriage is now legal. When a priest refuses to marry a gay couple he can be persecuted or hit with legal trouble. Now since the constitution allows freedom of religion, it goes against that priest's rights because it is a part of his religion not to marry a homosexual couple.

  • It is the Churches Decision

    When discussing about couples that are "Gay", most churches will obviously be against the idea of marrying a same sex couple; especially "hardcore" Christians. And, in my opinion, the church should get a say of whether or not they want to Marry a same sex couple. They should not be forced by the Government for denying the marriage of a same sex couple, just because they have a different belief than others.

  • The government can't regulate religious ceremonies

    Marriage can be preformed in one of two ways. You can either be married by a religious organization or by a governmental representative (judges, politicians, etc.) The federal government can regulate marriage laws within their own jurisdiction, but the regulation of religious facilities are not their responsibility (unless they want to establish a state religion). This also applies to different religious settings. A person can't get married in a synagogue unless one of the individuals is or plans to become a jew. Same thing for mosques and churches. And all three are against gay marriage and can refuse to do it, whether people like it or not.

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • No they should not

    Fags dont belong in churches, fags only belong six feet under. They fucking give us aids and expect a goddamn parade for their primitive and disgusting behaviour seen in animald. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ...

  • Its our choice

    It goes against their belief. Its this simple if they have the right to be gay and be married then we have the right to say no and reject marriage. I f gay people don't top being gay for society and for churches then why should churches marry gays and go against their religion for society and gays. Its that simple.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
BlackOpal97 says2015-06-27T10:04:20.677
Do you mean by or in
Forthelulz says2015-06-28T01:27:42.413
Do you mean forcing the church to marry them regardless of their wishes?
Forthelulz says2015-06-28T01:29:25.900
*Forcing the church to marry the couple regardless of the church's wishes on the matter.